Sherri: The only other thing that I think should be added is the word "currently" before the word "approved."? My thoughts behind that are that we have had prior logos that were removed, i.e., the Millenium logo, and I'm not sure if there were any others.? However, if we want each site to be "current" and logos changed when, for whatever reason, they are removed, then I believe it would be necessary to add the word "current" to "approved."? I think that helps in circumventing a future issue before it arises.? The state of Colorado ran into that issue when a logo was requested by the designer to be removed a few months ago.? Consequently, each and every CC had to remove that logo and install a new logo.? If something happens in the future, for USGW, that could be averted.? Granted, at the moment, the current logos are probably "given" to the USGW (I don't know the history of all of the logos as some otheres may), however, should another logo be removed, we need to know that we have the ability to have that altered without an uprising in the future.? Just my 2 cents. Denise SEMA CC Rep SC New Jersey -----Original Message----- From: Sherri <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Sun, Oct 11, 2009 7:46 am Subject: [STATE-COORD] Back to the Subject at Hand We've drifted away from the original question that started this discussion. Can we focus back on the subject that started this discussion, please? I realize that there are widely differing opinions on the subject of the Election Committee procedures - the AB has on the agenda to take a good look at them, and make revisions. We need to finish the discussion on the two items that started this string so that the AB can finish them and move on to the next items. We're really trying to catch up and clear the agenda so we're not constantly carrying agenda items over from one month to the next to the next... <g> Is there any more discussion on the clarification of two specific items in the CC guidelines document - specifying that the logo on the sites must be one of the member-approved logos and clarifying the title of the document to indicate that this applies to ALL project sites? Sherri Bradley National Coordinator USGenWeb Project Information about the USGenWeb Project at http://usgenweb.org Advisory Board Agenda http://usgenweb.org/agenda2.php ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message
Great idea, Denise. Sherri -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of [email protected] Sent: Sunday, October 11, 2009 8:35 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [STATE-COORD] Back to the Subject at Hand Sherri: The only other thing that I think should be added is the word "currently" before the word "approved."? My thoughts behind that are that we have had prior logos that were removed, i.e., the Millenium logo, and I'm not sure if there were any others.? However, if we want each site to be "current" and logos changed when, for whatever reason, they are removed, then I believe it would be necessary to add the word "current" to "approved."? I think that helps in circumventing a future issue before it arises.? The state of Colorado ran into that issue when a logo was requested by the designer to be removed a few months ago.? Consequently, each and every CC had to remove that logo and install a new logo.? If something happens in the future, for USGW, that could be averted.? Granted, at the moment, the current logos are probably "given" to the USGW (I don't know the history of all of the logos as some otheres may), however, should another logo be removed, we need to know that we have the ability to have that altered without an uprising in the future.? Just my 2 cents. Denise SEMA CC Rep SC New Jersey -----Original Message----- From: Sherri <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Sun, Oct 11, 2009 7:46 am Subject: [STATE-COORD] Back to the Subject at Hand We've drifted away from the original question that started this discussion. Can we focus back on the subject that started this discussion, please? I realize that there are widely differing opinions on the subject of the Election Committee procedures - the AB has on the agenda to take a good look at them, and make revisions. We need to finish the discussion on the two items that started this string so that the AB can finish them and move on to the next items. We're really trying to catch up and clear the agenda so we're not constantly carrying agenda items over from one month to the next to the next... <g> Is there any more discussion on the clarification of two specific items in the CC guidelines document - specifying that the logo on the sites must be one of the member-approved logos and clarifying the title of the document to indicate that this applies to ALL project sites? Sherri Bradley National Coordinator USGenWeb Project Information about the USGenWeb Project at http://usgenweb.org Advisory Board Agenda http://usgenweb.org/agenda2.php ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message
I can live with this, but in the end will it be a part of the bylaws or just a CC guideline, which in the end does not have the same effect? jan ----- Original Message ----- From: <[email protected]> > Sherri: > > The only other thing that I think should be added is the word "currently" > before the word "approved."? > > My thoughts behind that are that we have had prior logos that were > removed, i.e., the Millenium logo, and I'm not sure if there were any > others.? However, if we want each site to be "current" and logos changed > when, for whatever reason, they are removed, then I believe it would be > necessary to add the word "current" to "approved."? I think that helps in > circumventing a future issue before it arises.? > > The state of Colorado ran into that issue when a logo was requested by the > designer to be removed a few months ago.? Consequently, each and every CC > had to remove that logo and install a new logo.? If something happens in > the future, for USGW, that could be averted.? Granted, at the moment, the > current logos are probably "given" to the USGW (I don't know the history > of all of the logos as some otheres may), however, should another logo be > removed, we need to know that we have the ability to have that altered > without an uprising in the future.? > > Just my 2 cents. > > > Denise > SEMA CC Rep > SC New Jersey > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Sherri <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Sent: Sun, Oct 11, 2009 7:46 am > Subject: [STATE-COORD] Back to the Subject at Hand > > > > > > > > > > > We've drifted away from the original question that started this > discussion. > Can we focus back on the subject that started this discussion, please? I > realize that there are widely differing opinions on the subject of the > Election Committee procedures - the AB has on the agenda to take a good > look > at them, and make revisions. We need to finish the discussion on the two > items that started this string so that the AB can finish them and move on > to > the next items. We're really trying to catch up and clear the agenda so > we're not constantly carrying agenda items over from one month to the next > to the next... <g> > > Is there any more discussion on the clarification of two specific items in > the CC guidelines document - specifying that the logo on the sites must be > one of the member-approved logos and clarifying the title of the document > to > indicate that this applies to ALL project sites? > > > Sherri Bradley > National Coordinator > USGenWeb Project > Information about the USGenWeb Project at http://usgenweb.org > Advisory Board Agenda http://usgenweb.org/agenda2.php > > > > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > [email protected] > with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body > of > the message > > > > > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the > quotes in the subject and the body of the message -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 8.5.421 / Virus Database: 270.14.9/2427 - Release Date: 10/10/09 06:39:00