In a message dated 10/10/2009 6:49:30 PM Eastern Daylight Time, [email protected] writes: If specific logos are not mandated how can anyone be displaying the "wrong" one? Why would it not make sense that it needs to be an "approved" logo? Do people think they can just make one up and use it because they feel like it? Why would we have logos displayed on a National page for use by the coordinators if they weren't the "approved" logos? I mean, that just seems like common sense, especially if you are aligned with a large project like UGW. Denise NJ State Coordiantor

We have coordinators who have been with the project since the beginning or shortly thereafter. I'm sure other projects do too. They may be using a logo from the early days. It was certainly approved then. I wasn't suggesting they made one up. Why would we have logos displayed on a National page for use by the > coordinators if they weren't the "approved" logos? > "Approved" and "required" are not the same word nor do they mean the same thing. Cheryl