It's an excellent suggestion, Vivian. Sherri -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Michael and Vivian Saffold Sent: Saturday, October 10, 2009 6:20 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [STATE-COORD] Fw: [ABChat] Next Agenda Items I don't think anyone would object to the word "approved" being added. By the way, I had one suggestion from a county coordinator: Build a simple chart with one column for required elements and another for suggested. Vivian Price Saffold State Coordinator The GAGenWeb Project At 05:53 PM 10/10/2009, you wrote: >Cheryl, > >Neither the bylaw or the CC guidelines specify that you must use one of the >APPROVED logos. Both just refer to 'logo'. I think it was understood by >most when the logos were selected by the membership that the one used on our >sites should be one of those, but there are some that do not use one of the >logos and they still expect their sites to be recognized as USGenWeb sites >and they expect to be able to vote in our elections. > >The object of this discussion was/is to clarify that one of the >member-approved logos must be used on all project sites for them to be >recognized as such. > >To give some perspective to the history of why these items were added to the >agenda, I was one of the AB members that was aiding the Election Committee >in July to try to get the status of all of the unverified voters updated to >verified so those members would be eligible to vote in the election held >this past July. There were over 45 sites that had no USGenWeb Project logo >at all and another 15 or so that weren't using one of the approved logos. >There were also about half a dozen that didn't have the coordinator's name >and/or contact info on the sites. > >Sherri Bradley >National Coordinator >USGenWeb Project >Information about the USGenWeb Project at http://usgenweb.org >Advisory Board Agenda http://usgenweb.org/agenda2.php > > >-----Original Message----- >From: [email protected] >[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Cheryl Rothwell >Sent: Saturday, October 10, 2009 5:21 PM >To: [email protected] >Subject: Re: [STATE-COORD] Fw: [ABChat] Next Agenda Items > >Am I to understand that at the moment there is not a requirement that we use >one of those logos? Or is it just that the requirement is often ignored? >Just a clarification question. > > > > > >------------------------------- >To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to >[email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without >the quotes in the subject and the body of the message ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message