Katherine, I agree. Still, we don't need to be too concerned about the national guidelines if we have our own because the AB has always looked to the states' by-laws in most issues if a conflict arises. I do think I will write and let the AB know that the 2 weeks will probably not sit well. If our CCs think it is too much, you know that the feeling is probably the same national wide. Nola ----- Original Message ----- From: "Katherine Benbow" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Saturday, October 10, 2009 12:23 PM Subject: Re: [STATE-COORD] The bylaw rule does exist > Speaking for myself and a number of CC's in NCGenWeb, we would be opposed > to > the time period of two weeks mentioned below. A month would be a more > reasonable time period, particularly if the site in question is a larger > one. Or try three weeks instead, if a month sounds too long. As some > others have pointed out within our own project, what is someone is ill or > on > a two-week vacation when they are notified? > > Katherine Benbow > ASC, NCGenWeb > > > > > On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 11:54 AM, W. David Samuelsen > <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Article VI Section 5 >> ... Coordinators of *any websites* found to be in non-compliance shall >> be notified of such and shall be given a period of two (2) weeks in >> which to bring their website into compliance.... >> >> So this meant Town and/or Local Projects are subjected to this rule >> about the logos. There is no loophole for the TC/LPCs to get away with >> it. And it isn't vague about Town/Local since it says *any websites*. >> >> David Samuelsen >> >> ------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to >> [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the >> quotes in the subject and the body of the message >> > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the > quotes in the subject and the body of the message > > __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus > signature database 4495 (20091010) __________ > > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. > > http://www.eset.com > > > __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 4495 (20091010) __________ The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. http://www.eset.com