There are many states that do not have their own sets of bylaws. There are people in the USGenWeb Project that seems to make it a career to either take over, destroy or see how much havoc they can create to the USGenWeb Project. There are a few SCs who will not take action against those who misuse the USGenWeb Project logo. The reasons: 1. There is no bylaw prohibiting it. 2. Fear of violating a persons freed to express themselves as they see fit. 3. They do not care what the CCs do. Now if you state rules say where to put the logos, then I fail to see what could be objected to. The state rules are applied first. The bylaws will only cover those that are not protected. Les Cheryl Rothwell wrote: > No, I'm not reading it to say something different. I'm wondering why we need > it, particularly since it distresses some members. Our state rules say where > to put the logos. Why do we need US to tell us? I'm thinking unnecessary. > > On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 5:34 PM, Lesley L Shockey > <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Cheryl, are you reading the proposed bylaw change to say something >> other than this? >> >> Les >> >> Cheryl Rothwell wrote: >> >>> It seems logical to me that the USGenWeb logo should only link to the >> main >>> USGenWeb page and the state logo should only link to the main state page. >>> Who thinks otherwise? >>> >>> Cheryl Rothwell >>> ASC, ILGenWeb > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message >

Thanks Les, I could not have said it better. Jeff Kemp SEMA CC Rep ----- Original Message ----- From: "Lesley L Shockey" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, January 15, 2010 6:06 PM Subject: Re: [STATE-COORD] Proposed Bylaws Amendment > There are many states that do not have their own sets of bylaws. > > There are people in the USGenWeb Project that seems to make it a > career to either take over, destroy or see how much havoc they can > create to the USGenWeb Project. > > There are a few SCs who will not take action against those who misuse > the USGenWeb Project logo. > The reasons: > 1. There is no bylaw prohibiting it. > 2. Fear of violating a persons freed to express themselves as they see > fit. > 3. They do not care what the CCs do. > > Now if you state rules say where to put the logos, then I fail to see > what could be objected to. The state rules are applied first. The > bylaws will only cover those that are not protected. > > Les > > Cheryl Rothwell wrote: >> No, I'm not reading it to say something different. I'm wondering why we >> need >> it, particularly since it distresses some members. Our state rules say >> where >> to put the logos. Why do we need US to tell us? I'm thinking unnecessary. >> >> On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 5:34 PM, Lesley L Shockey >> <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> Cheryl, are you reading the proposed bylaw change to say something >>> other than this? >>> >>> Les >>> >>> Cheryl Rothwell wrote: >>> >>>> It seems logical to me that the USGenWeb logo should only link to the >>> main >>>> USGenWeb page and the state logo should only link to the main state >>>> page. >>>> Who thinks otherwise? >>>> >>>> Cheryl Rothwell >>>> ASC, ILGenWeb >> >> ------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to >> [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the >> quotes in the subject and the body of the message >> > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the > quotes in the subject and the body of the message >

I don't understand why people object to half the stuff they do but they do. You may fail to see it but that doesn't stop them from objecting and therefore voting no. Could someone give me an example of a USGenWeb logo being linked to something terrible?