If Arkansas has counties available they sure aren't advertising any on the web site. On 08/08/2012 05:04 PM, Betsy wrote: > So sorry to hear your state is dead or dying. Arkansas and Texas are > both going strong. We do have a few openings most of the time, but > we are still getting volunteers. Arkansas has more at the moment > because a volunteer is retiring who had 7 counties. She will be > missed as she has done a great job! However, other volunteers are > already stepping up to take over her counties. > > I fought against having a FB page for my county and another volunteer > set one up. Was I ever wrong! We have a lot of followers and lots > of posts. It generates lots of referrals to the website, too. > > I personally have information on my counties that is NOT on > familysearch or ancestry and will never be there. There is still a > need for USGenWeb and it is not dead, especially where the people > care about keeping it alive. > > Betsy > > At 04:37 PM 8/8/2012, you wrote: >> I have posted to county mail lists and the State mail lists numerous times. >> While this has always been a good source to advertise, it has not been >> lucrative. I think that basically except for the BIG lists, they are near >> dead. Most people now use the message boards. This morning I used our FB >> page and so far haven't received a response. People really are not >> interested in doing sites now that we have familysearch.org, Ancestry, >> Seekingmichigan. Sorry to say, but I believe that the projects have been >> let go for to long and they are a dying breed. Essentially, I think we are >> just waiting for the last one to turn out the lights. So sad, but so true. >> >> Jan >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Pat Asher >> Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2012 3:48 PM >> To: state-coord@rootsweb.com >> Subject: Re: [STATE-COORD] Texas Counties Available >> >> At 03:14 PM 8/8/2012, Shirley Cullum wrote: >>> The TXGenWeb Project has several counties available for adoption and is >>> looking for volunteers to maintain them. Please pass this on to your state >>> mail lists. >> Shirley, >> >> I know Arkansas is also looking for volunteers. I wonder if posting >> to the Rootsweb mailing lists for the specific counties might be a >> way to enlist new (and enthusiastic) volunteers for the >> organization. I know it would take some extra effort on the part of >> the SC. They would have to subscribe to the specific county lists in >> order to post -- but it might be one way to generate new members for >> the USGW as those who have done excellent work for years start to >> scale back, or think about retiring. >> >> >> Pat Asher >> SWSC CC Rep -- A veteran is someone who, at one point in their life, wrote a blank check made payable to ‘The United States of America’ for any amount, up to and including their life. _ _... ..._ _ _._ ._ ..... ._.. ... .._

I totally agree, Betsy. While we do have more North Carolina Counties up for adoption than we would like, all of them are covered by our Regional Coordinators and none of those are neglected, and all members of our Board willing help out one another when it is needed. Everyone steps up to the plate to contribute records where necessary, and I don't see any lack in enthusiasm for the Project from anyone. Deloris Williams -------------------------------------------------- From: "Betsy" <betsyamills@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2012 5:04 PM To: <state-coord@rootsweb.com> Subject: Re: [STATE-COORD] Texas Counties Available > So sorry to hear your state is dead or dying. Arkansas and Texas are > both going strong. We do have a few openings most of the time, but > we are still getting volunteers. Arkansas has more at the moment > because a volunteer is retiring who had 7 counties. She will be > missed as she has done a great job! However, other volunteers are > already stepping up to take over her counties. > > I fought against having a FB page for my county and another volunteer > set one up. Was I ever wrong! We have a lot of followers and lots > of posts. It generates lots of referrals to the website, too. > > I personally have information on my counties that is NOT on > familysearch or ancestry and will never be there. There is still a > need for USGenWeb and it is not dead, especially where the people > care about keeping it alive. > > Betsy >

Maybe some of the State or County Projects are dead, but I don't think that is the case for all of us. Some of my Counties are very active, not always on the Mailing Lists, although some are, but just by the the amount of activity on some of the sites themselves shows me there are a lot of visitors. And I don't know about everyone else, but I stay pretty busy getting personal inquiries from those that visit the sites that I administer or help out on. I don't see our Projects going down or ready to turn out the lights. Deloris Williams NCGenWeb- Asst. State Coordinator #1 http://www.ncgenweb.us/ County Coordinator for: Franklin - http://www.ncgenweb.us/franklin/ Granville- http://www.ncgenweb.us/ncgranville/ Halifax- http://www.ncgenweb.us/halifax/ Vance- http://www.ncgenweb.us/vance/ -------------------------------------------------- From: "Jana Cortez" <janacortez@charter.net> Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2012 4:37 PM To: <state-coord@rootsweb.com> Subject: Re: [STATE-COORD] Texas Counties Available > I have posted to county mail lists and the State mail lists numerous > times. > While this has always been a good source to advertise, it has not been > lucrative. I think that basically except for the BIG lists, they are near > dead. Most people now use the message boards. This morning I used our FB > page and so far haven't received a response. People really are not > interested in doing sites now that we have familysearch.org, Ancestry, > Seekingmichigan. Sorry to say, but I believe that the projects have been > let go for to long and they are a dying breed. Essentially, I think we > are > just waiting for the last one to turn out the lights. So sad, but so > true. > > Jan > >

Most of those counties only became available yesterday and before they are put up for adoption they need to be gotten ready and that can take a few days. Gayle -----Original Message----- From: state-coord-bounces@rootsweb.com [mailto:state-coord-bounces@rootsweb.com] On Behalf Of Billie Walsh Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2012 4:27 PM To: state-coord@rootsweb.com Subject: Re: [STATE-COORD] Texas Counties Available If Arkansas has counties available they sure aren't advertising any on the web site. On 08/08/2012 05:04 PM, Betsy wrote: > So sorry to hear your state is dead or dying. Arkansas and Texas are > both going strong. We do have a few openings most of the time, but we > are still getting volunteers. Arkansas has more at the moment because > a volunteer is retiring who had 7 counties. She will be missed as she > has done a great job! However, other volunteers are already stepping > up to take over her counties. > > I fought against having a FB page for my county and another volunteer > set one up. Was I ever wrong! We have a lot of followers and lots of > posts. It generates lots of referrals to the website, too. > > I personally have information on my counties that is NOT on > familysearch or ancestry and will never be there. There is still a > need for USGenWeb and it is not dead, especially where the people care > about keeping it alive. > > Betsy > > At 04:37 PM 8/8/2012, you wrote: >> I have posted to county mail lists and the State mail lists numerous times. >> While this has always been a good source to advertise, it has not >> been lucrative. I think that basically except for the BIG lists, >> they are near dead. Most people now use the message boards. This >> morning I used our FB page and so far haven't received a response. >> People really are not interested in doing sites now that we have >> familysearch.org, Ancestry, Seekingmichigan. Sorry to say, but I believe that the projects have been >> let go for to long and they are a dying breed. Essentially, I think we are >> just waiting for the last one to turn out the lights. So sad, but so true. >> >> Jan >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Pat Asher >> Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2012 3:48 PM >> To: state-coord@rootsweb.com >> Subject: Re: [STATE-COORD] Texas Counties Available >> >> At 03:14 PM 8/8/2012, Shirley Cullum wrote: >>> The TXGenWeb Project has several counties available for adoption and >>> is looking for volunteers to maintain them. Please pass this on to >>> your state mail lists. >> Shirley, >> >> I know Arkansas is also looking for volunteers. I wonder if posting >> to the Rootsweb mailing lists for the specific counties might be a >> way to enlist new (and enthusiastic) volunteers for the organization. >> I know it would take some extra effort on the part of the SC. They >> would have to subscribe to the specific county lists in order to post >> -- but it might be one way to generate new members for the USGW as >> those who have done excellent work for years start to scale back, or >> think about retiring. >> >> >> Pat Asher >> SWSC CC Rep -- A veteran is someone who, at one point in their life, wrote a blank check made payable to 'The United States of America' for any amount, up to and including their life. _ _... ..._ _ _._ ._ ..... ._.. ... .._ ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to STATE-COORD-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

I have posted to county mail lists and the State mail lists numerous times. While this has always been a good source to advertise, it has not been lucrative. I think that basically except for the BIG lists, they are near dead. Most people now use the message boards. This morning I used our FB page and so far haven't received a response. People really are not interested in doing sites now that we have familysearch.org, Ancestry, Seekingmichigan. Sorry to say, but I believe that the projects have been let go for to long and they are a dying breed. Essentially, I think we are just waiting for the last one to turn out the lights. So sad, but so true. Jan -----Original Message----- From: Pat Asher Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2012 3:48 PM To: state-coord@rootsweb.com Subject: Re: [STATE-COORD] Texas Counties Available At 03:14 PM 8/8/2012, Shirley Cullum wrote: >The TXGenWeb Project has several counties available for adoption and is >looking for volunteers to maintain them. Please pass this on to your state >mail lists. Shirley, I know Arkansas is also looking for volunteers. I wonder if posting to the Rootsweb mailing lists for the specific counties might be a way to enlist new (and enthusiastic) volunteers for the organization. I know it would take some extra effort on the part of the SC. They would have to subscribe to the specific county lists in order to post -- but it might be one way to generate new members for the USGW as those who have done excellent work for years start to scale back, or think about retiring. Pat Asher SWSC CC Rep ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to STATE-COORD-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

So sorry to hear your state is dead or dying. Arkansas and Texas are both going strong. We do have a few openings most of the time, but we are still getting volunteers. Arkansas has more at the moment because a volunteer is retiring who had 7 counties. She will be missed as she has done a great job! However, other volunteers are already stepping up to take over her counties. I fought against having a FB page for my county and another volunteer set one up. Was I ever wrong! We have a lot of followers and lots of posts. It generates lots of referrals to the website, too. I personally have information on my counties that is NOT on familysearch or ancestry and will never be there. There is still a need for USGenWeb and it is not dead, especially where the people care about keeping it alive. Betsy At 04:37 PM 8/8/2012, you wrote: >I have posted to county mail lists and the State mail lists numerous times. >While this has always been a good source to advertise, it has not been >lucrative. I think that basically except for the BIG lists, they are near >dead. Most people now use the message boards. This morning I used our FB >page and so far haven't received a response. People really are not >interested in doing sites now that we have familysearch.org, Ancestry, >Seekingmichigan. Sorry to say, but I believe that the projects have been >let go for to long and they are a dying breed. Essentially, I think we are >just waiting for the last one to turn out the lights. So sad, but so true. > >Jan > > >-----Original Message----- >From: Pat Asher >Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2012 3:48 PM >To: state-coord@rootsweb.com >Subject: Re: [STATE-COORD] Texas Counties Available > >At 03:14 PM 8/8/2012, Shirley Cullum wrote: > >The TXGenWeb Project has several counties available for adoption and is > >looking for volunteers to maintain them. Please pass this on to your state > >mail lists. > >Shirley, > >I know Arkansas is also looking for volunteers. I wonder if posting >to the Rootsweb mailing lists for the specific counties might be a >way to enlist new (and enthusiastic) volunteers for the >organization. I know it would take some extra effort on the part of >the SC. They would have to subscribe to the specific county lists in >order to post -- but it might be one way to generate new members for >the USGW as those who have done excellent work for years start to >scale back, or think about retiring. > > >Pat Asher >SWSC CC Rep > > >------------------------------- >To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to >STATE-COORD-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the >quotes in the subject and the body of the message > > >------------------------------- >To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to >STATE-COORD-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without >the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

Hi Pat, Carla Clifton is in charge of the TX Orphan Counties and has joined all the mail lists and made a plea for volunteers. Shirley On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 2:48 PM, Pat Asher <swsc.ccrep@att.net> wrote: > At 03:14 PM 8/8/2012, Shirley Cullum wrote: > >The TXGenWeb Project has several counties available for adoption and is > >looking for volunteers to maintain them. Please pass this on to your state > >mail lists. > > Shirley, > > I know Arkansas is also looking for volunteers. I wonder if posting > to the Rootsweb mailing lists for the specific counties might be a > way to enlist new (and enthusiastic) volunteers for the > organization. I know it would take some extra effort on the part of > the SC. They would have to subscribe to the specific county lists in > order to post -- but it might be one way to generate new members for > the USGW as those who have done excellent work for years start to > scale back, or think about retiring. > > > Pat Asher > SWSC CC Rep > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > STATE-COORD-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the > quotes in the subject and the body of the message >

At 03:14 PM 8/8/2012, Shirley Cullum wrote: >The TXGenWeb Project has several counties available for adoption and is >looking for volunteers to maintain them. Please pass this on to your state >mail lists. Shirley, I know Arkansas is also looking for volunteers. I wonder if posting to the Rootsweb mailing lists for the specific counties might be a way to enlist new (and enthusiastic) volunteers for the organization. I know it would take some extra effort on the part of the SC. They would have to subscribe to the specific county lists in order to post -- but it might be one way to generate new members for the USGW as those who have done excellent work for years start to scale back, or think about retiring. Pat Asher SWSC CC Rep

The TXGenWeb Project has several counties available for adoption and is looking for volunteers to maintain them. Please pass this on to your state mail lists. Thanks, Shirley Cullum SC TXGenWeb

I agree. I think everyone is enjoying the peace, working on genealogy and avoiding any politics. As long as the issues don't affect them, they are content [satisfied]. Is that wrong? Not in my book! Betsy At 05:58 PM 8/4/2012, you wrote: >That's an interesting commentary. Maybe they just aren't as >dissatisfied as one might like to think. I believe that is the other >side of the coin. Denise

That's an interesting commentary. Maybe they just aren't as dissatisfied as one might like to think. I believe that is the other side of the coin. Denise On Aug 4, 2012, at 5:05 PM, Billie Walsh <bilwalsh@swbell.net> wrote: > I want to thank those that voted for me. > > Congratulations to the losers and condolences to the winners. > > I find it very sad that only 9% of the membership bothered to vote. > Pretty good statement on how people feel about the political side of > things around here. 91percent of the members don't give > a.............well..........you know what they don't give. Gotta wonder > why the group even bothers to hold elections. Nobody really cares about > the outcome. At least 91% don't care. > > > -- > A veteran is someone who, at one point in their life, wrote a blank > check made payable to ‘The United States of America’ for any amount, up > to and including their life. > > > _ _... ..._ _ > _._ ._ ..... ._.. ... .._ > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to STATE-COORD-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

Good observation, Denise. On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 2:58 PM , Denise Wells wrote: > That's an interesting commentary. Maybe they just aren't as > dissatisfied as one might like to think. I believe that is the other > side of the coin. > Denise > > > > On Aug 4, 2012, at 5:05 PM, Billie Walsh <bilwalsh@swbell.net> wrote: > >> I want to thank those that voted for me. >> >> Congratulations to the losers and condolences to the winners. >> >> I find it very sad that only 9% of the membership bothered to vote. >> Pretty good statement on how people feel about the political side of >> things around here. 91percent of the members don't give >> a.............well..........you know what they don't give. Gotta >> wonder why the group even bothers to hold elections. Nobody really >> cares about the outcome. At least 91% don't care. >> >> >> -- >> A veteran is someone who, at one point in their life, wrote a blank >> check made payable to ‘The United States of America’ for any amount, >> up to and including their life. >> >> >> _ _... ..._ _ >> _._ ._ ..... ._.. ... .._ >> >> ------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to >> STATE-COORD-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without >> the quotes in the subject and the body of the message > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > STATE-COORD-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without > the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

I want to thank those that voted for me. Congratulations to the losers and condolences to the winners. I find it very sad that only 9% of the membership bothered to vote. Pretty good statement on how people feel about the political side of things around here. 91percent of the members don't give a.............well..........you know what they don't give. Gotta wonder why the group even bothers to hold elections. Nobody really cares about the outcome. At least 91% don't care. -- A veteran is someone who, at one point in their life, wrote a blank check made payable to ‘The United States of America’ for any amount, up to and including their life. _ _... ..._ _ _._ ._ ..... ._.. ... .._

Congrats to everyone! And to those who voted for us, thank you! Denise Wells SEMA CC Rep On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 8:06 PM, Sherri Bradley <kyvitals@windstream.net>wrote: > *********** PLEASE FORWARD TO ALL USGENWEB PROJECT LISTS AND MEMBERS > ******************** > > Congratulations to all! I look forwards to working with all of you in the > coming year. > > Sherri Bradley > National Coordinator > USGenWeb Project > Information about the USGenWeb Project at http://usgenweb.org > Advisory Board Agenda http://usgenweb.org/agenda2.shtml > > ======================== > > From: Christina Palmer [mailto:usgwelections@gmail.com] > Sent: Friday, August 03, 2012 7:54 PM > To: kyvitals@windstream.net; usgenwebnc@windstream.net > Subject: USGenWeb Project Election Results > > The USGW Election Committee would like to thank all of the candidates for > articipating in the election process. > > Eligible Voters overall: 1370 > # of voting members: 152 (11.09 %) > Members Requesting Passwords: 188 (13.72%) > > National Coordinator: > Sherri Bradley 114 (80.28 %) > Billie Erin Walsh 28 (19.72 %) > > The EC declares Sherri Bradley the winner. > > NENC SC: > Nancy Janyszeski 7 (100 %) > > The EC declares Nancy Janyszeski the winner. > > NENC CC: > Alice Allen 37 (100 %) > > The EC declares Alice Allen the winner. > > SEMA CC: > Denise Wells 61 (100 %) > > The EC declares Denise Wells the winner. > > SEMA SC: > Les Shockey 17 (100 %) > > The EC declares Les Shockey the winner. > > SWSC SC: > Larry Flesher 10 (100 %) > > The EC declares Larry Flesher the winner. > > SWSC CC: > Pat Asher 31 (64.58 %) > Clarissa Loyd 17 (35.42 %) > > The EC declares Pat Asher the winner. > > NWPL CC: > Ann Geoghegan 33 (76.74 %) > Don Kelly 10 (23.26 %) > > The EC declares Ann Geoghegan the winner. > > > Thank you, > Christina Palmer > USGW Election Committee > > > > > USGenWeb Advisory Board Agenda: http://usgenweb.org/agenda2.shtml > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > BOARD-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes > in the subject and the body of the message > -- Denise Wells SEMA CC Rep

Yes, congratulations and job well done! Thanks to all who worked so hard to make the election possible. Maureen Mead SC CTGenWeb: ctgenweb.org CC Fairfield Co. CT: ctgenweb.org/county/cofairfield mmeadpond@aol.com meadponddesign@gmail.com -----Original Message----- From: Deloris Williams <del_williams@comcast.net> To: state-coord <state-coord@rootsweb.com>; usgenweb-discuss <usgenweb-discuss@rootsweb.com> Sent: Sat, Aug 4, 2012 10:20 am Subject: Re: [STATE-COORD] FW: USGenWeb Project Election Results Congratulations to all of those who have been elected in this years election! Deloris Williams NCGenWeb- ASC#1 -------------------------------------------------- From: "Sherri Bradley" <kyvitals@windstream.net> Sent: Friday, August 03, 2012 7:06 PM To: <board@rootsweb.com>; <usgenweb-all@rootsweb.com>; <state-coord@rootsweb.com>; <usgenweb-discuss@rootsweb.com> Subject: [STATE-COORD] FW: USGenWeb Project Election Results > *********** PLEASE FORWARD TO ALL USGENWEB PROJECT LISTS AND MEMBERS > ******************** > > Congratulations to all! I look forwards to working with all of you in the > coming year. > > Sherri Bradley > National Coordinator > USGenWeb Project > Information about the USGenWeb Project at http://usgenweb.org > Advisory Board Agenda http://usgenweb.org/agenda2.shtml > > ======================== > > From: Christina Palmer [mailto:usgwelections@gmail.com] > Sent: Friday, August 03, 2012 7:54 PM > To: kyvitals@windstream.net; usgenwebnc@windstream.net > Subject: USGenWeb Project Election Results > > The USGW Election Committee would like to thank all of the candidates for > articipating in the election process. > > Eligible Voters overall: 1370 > # of voting members: 152 (11.09 %) > Members Requesting Passwords: 188 (13.72%) > > National Coordinator: > Sherri Bradley 114 (80.28 %) > Billie Erin Walsh 28 (19.72 %) > > The EC declares Sherri Bradley the winner. > > NENC SC: > Nancy Janyszeski 7 (100 %) > > The EC declares Nancy Janyszeski the winner. > > NENC CC: > Alice Allen 37 (100 %) > > The EC declares Alice Allen the winner. > > SEMA CC: > Denise Wells 61 (100 %) > > The EC declares Denise Wells the winner. > > SEMA SC: > Les Shockey 17 (100 %) > > The EC declares Les Shockey the winner. > > SWSC SC: > Larry Flesher 10 (100 %) > > The EC declares Larry Flesher the winner. > > SWSC CC: > Pat Asher 31 (64.58 %) > Clarissa Loyd 17 (35.42 %) > > The EC declares Pat Asher the winner. > > NWPL CC: > Ann Geoghegan 33 (76.74 %) > Don Kelly 10 (23.26 %) > > The EC declares Ann Geoghegan the winner. > > > Thank you, > Christina Palmer > USGW Election Committee > > > > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > STATE-COORD-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the > quotes in the subject and the body of the message ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to STATE-COORD-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

Congratulations to all of those who have been elected in this years election! Deloris Williams NCGenWeb- ASC#1 -------------------------------------------------- From: "Sherri Bradley" <kyvitals@windstream.net> Sent: Friday, August 03, 2012 7:06 PM To: <board@rootsweb.com>; <usgenweb-all@rootsweb.com>; <state-coord@rootsweb.com>; <usgenweb-discuss@rootsweb.com> Subject: [STATE-COORD] FW: USGenWeb Project Election Results > *********** PLEASE FORWARD TO ALL USGENWEB PROJECT LISTS AND MEMBERS > ******************** > > Congratulations to all! I look forwards to working with all of you in the > coming year. > > Sherri Bradley > National Coordinator > USGenWeb Project > Information about the USGenWeb Project at http://usgenweb.org > Advisory Board Agenda http://usgenweb.org/agenda2.shtml > > ======================== > > From: Christina Palmer [mailto:usgwelections@gmail.com] > Sent: Friday, August 03, 2012 7:54 PM > To: kyvitals@windstream.net; usgenwebnc@windstream.net > Subject: USGenWeb Project Election Results > > The USGW Election Committee would like to thank all of the candidates for > articipating in the election process. > > Eligible Voters overall: 1370 > # of voting members: 152 (11.09 %) > Members Requesting Passwords: 188 (13.72%) > > National Coordinator: > Sherri Bradley 114 (80.28 %) > Billie Erin Walsh 28 (19.72 %) > > The EC declares Sherri Bradley the winner. > > NENC SC: > Nancy Janyszeski 7 (100 %) > > The EC declares Nancy Janyszeski the winner. > > NENC CC: > Alice Allen 37 (100 %) > > The EC declares Alice Allen the winner. > > SEMA CC: > Denise Wells 61 (100 %) > > The EC declares Denise Wells the winner. > > SEMA SC: > Les Shockey 17 (100 %) > > The EC declares Les Shockey the winner. > > SWSC SC: > Larry Flesher 10 (100 %) > > The EC declares Larry Flesher the winner. > > SWSC CC: > Pat Asher 31 (64.58 %) > Clarissa Loyd 17 (35.42 %) > > The EC declares Pat Asher the winner. > > NWPL CC: > Ann Geoghegan 33 (76.74 %) > Don Kelly 10 (23.26 %) > > The EC declares Ann Geoghegan the winner. > > > Thank you, > Christina Palmer > USGW Election Committee > > > > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > STATE-COORD-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the > quotes in the subject and the body of the message

Thanks to all that did take the time to vote in this year's election. Les Shockey On 8/3/2012 8:06 PM, Sherri Bradley wrote: > > SEMA SC: > Les Shockey 17 (100 %) > > The EC declares Les Shockey the winner.

Congratulations Everybody! Katy Hestand http://shop.groovingrannylive.com/ Put Some Classy Junk in Your Trunk! Shop 24/7 from your Couch or your Bed! Stay comfortably out of the Weather! On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 9:03 PM, Mary Ann Lubinsky <maryannlubinsky@yahoo.com > wrote: > Congratulations, all! > > > Mary Ann Lubinsky > > > > ________________________________ > From: Sherri Bradley <kyvitals@windstream.net> > To: board@rootsweb.com; usgenweb-all@rootsweb.com; > state-coord@rootsweb.com; usgenweb-discuss@rootsweb.com > Sent: Friday, August 3, 2012 8:06 PM > Subject: [STATE-COORD] FW: USGenWeb Project Election Results > > *********** PLEASE FORWARD TO ALL USGENWEB PROJECT LISTS AND MEMBERS > ******************** > > Congratulations to all! I look forwards to working with all of you in the > coming year. > > Sherri Bradley > National Coordinator > USGenWeb Project > Information about the USGenWeb Project at http://usgenweb.org > Advisory Board Agenda http://usgenweb.org/agenda2.shtml > > ======================== > > From: Christina Palmer [mailto:usgwelections@gmail.com] > Sent: Friday, August 03, 2012 7:54 PM > To: kyvitals@windstream.net; usgenwebnc@windstream.net > Subject: USGenWeb Project Election Results > > The USGW Election Committee would like to thank all of the candidates for > articipating in the election process. > > Eligible Voters overall: 1370 > # of voting members: 152 (11.09 %) > Members Requesting Passwords: 188 (13.72%) > > National Coordinator: > Sherri Bradley 114 (80.28 %) > Billie Erin Walsh 28 (19.72 %) > > The EC declares Sherri Bradley the winner. > > NENC SC: > Nancy Janyszeski 7 (100 %) > > The EC declares Nancy Janyszeski the winner. > > NENC CC: > Alice Allen 37 (100 %) > > The EC declares Alice Allen the winner. > > SEMA CC: > Denise Wells 61 (100 %) > > The EC declares Denise Wells the winner. > > SEMA SC: > Les Shockey 17 (100 %) > > The EC declares Les Shockey the winner. > > SWSC SC: > Larry Flesher 10 (100 %) > > The EC declares Larry Flesher the winner. > > SWSC CC: > Pat Asher 31 (64.58 %) > Clarissa Loyd 17 (35.42 %) > > The EC declares Pat Asher the winner. > > NWPL CC: > Ann Geoghegan 33 (76.74 %) > Don Kelly 10 (23.26 %) > > The EC declares Ann Geoghegan the winner. > > > Thank you, > Christina Palmer > USGW Election Committee > > > > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > STATE-COORD-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the > quotes in the subject and the body of the message > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > STATE-COORD-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the > quotes in the subject and the body of the message >

*********** PLEASE FORWARD TO ALL USGENWEB PROJECT LISTS AND MEMBERS ******************** Congratulations to all! I look forwards to working with all of you in the coming year. Sherri Bradley National Coordinator USGenWeb Project Information about the USGenWeb Project at http://usgenweb.org Advisory Board Agenda http://usgenweb.org/agenda2.shtml ======================== From: Christina Palmer [mailto:usgwelections@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, August 03, 2012 7:54 PM To: kyvitals@windstream.net; usgenwebnc@windstream.net Subject: USGenWeb Project Election Results The USGW Election Committee would like to thank all of the candidates for articipating in the election process.   Eligible Voters overall: 1370 # of voting members: 152 (11.09 %) Members Requesting Passwords: 188 (13.72%) National Coordinator: Sherri Bradley 114 (80.28 %) Billie Erin Walsh 28 (19.72 %)   The EC declares Sherri Bradley the winner.   NENC SC: Nancy Janyszeski 7 (100 %)   The EC declares Nancy Janyszeski the winner.     NENC CC: Alice Allen 37 (100 %)   The EC declares Alice Allen the winner.   SEMA CC: Denise Wells  61 (100 %)   The EC declares Denise Wells the winner.   SEMA SC: Les Shockey  17 (100 %)   The EC declares Les Shockey the winner.     SWSC SC: Larry Flesher 10 (100 %)   The EC declares Larry Flesher the winner.   SWSC CC: Pat Asher 31 (64.58 %) Clarissa Loyd  17 (35.42 %)   The EC declares Pat Asher the winner.   NWPL CC: Ann Geoghegan 33 (76.74 %) Don Kelly 10 (23.26 %)   The EC declares Ann Geoghegan the winner.     Thank you,  Christina Palmer  USGW Election Committee

Congratulations, all!   Mary Ann Lubinsky ________________________________ From: Sherri Bradley <kyvitals@windstream.net> To: board@rootsweb.com; usgenweb-all@rootsweb.com; state-coord@rootsweb.com; usgenweb-discuss@rootsweb.com Sent: Friday, August 3, 2012 8:06 PM Subject: [STATE-COORD] FW: USGenWeb Project Election Results *********** PLEASE FORWARD TO ALL USGENWEB PROJECT LISTS AND MEMBERS ******************** Congratulations to all!  I look forwards to working with all of you in the coming year. Sherri Bradley National Coordinator USGenWeb Project Information about the USGenWeb Project at http://usgenweb.org Advisory Board Agenda http://usgenweb.org/agenda2.shtml ======================== From: Christina Palmer [mailto:usgwelections@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, August 03, 2012 7:54 PM To: kyvitals@windstream.net; usgenwebnc@windstream.net Subject: USGenWeb Project Election Results The USGW Election Committee would like to thank all of the candidates for articipating in the election process.   Eligible Voters overall: 1370 # of voting members: 152 (11.09 %) Members Requesting Passwords: 188 (13.72%) National Coordinator: Sherri Bradley 114 (80.28 %) Billie Erin Walsh 28 (19.72 %)   The EC declares Sherri Bradley the winner.   NENC SC: Nancy Janyszeski 7 (100 %)   The EC declares Nancy Janyszeski the winner.     NENC CC: Alice Allen 37 (100 %)   The EC declares Alice Allen the winner.   SEMA CC: Denise Wells  61 (100 %)   The EC declares Denise Wells the winner.   SEMA SC: Les Shockey  17 (100 %)   The EC declares Les Shockey the winner.     SWSC SC: Larry Flesher 10 (100 %)   The EC declares Larry Flesher the winner.   SWSC CC: Pat Asher 31 (64.58 %) Clarissa Loyd  17 (35.42 %)   The EC declares Pat Asher the winner.   NWPL CC: Ann Geoghegan 33 (76.74 %) Don Kelly 10 (23.26 %)   The EC declares Ann Geoghegan the winner.     Thank you,  Christina Palmer  USGW Election Committee ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to STATE-COORD-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message