I don't think so. It's such a common name (in the Heighway line). He married Sarah (Thomas??), but Susan/Sarah? I think this is them in 1861, as the names match children in other census records, although I don't know who E (female) is/was: 1861 Census - 54 Cosley Street, Bilston, Staffordshire [1] In 1861, our Thomas (45) and Sarah (45) "Highway" were living at 54 Cosley Street in Bilston, Borough of Wolverhampton, Ecclesiastical Parish of St. Lukes. With them are children Mary A. (21), Thomas (9), E. (daughter, 7), Abraham (2), and Elijah (4 mo.). Thomas was a contractor for house work, and both Thomas and daughter E. were in school. There is no occupation given for either Sarah or eldest daughter Mary A. This record indicates that Thomas was b. Coalport; and wife Sarah and daughter Mary A. in Broseley, Shropshire, while the younger children Thomas, E., Abraham, and Elijah were all born in Bilston, Staffs. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- [1] 1861 Census - England, Staffordshire, Registration District of Woverhampton, Parish and Sub-Registration District of Bilston, St. Luke's Parish, ED-18, Piece 2007, Folio 73, p. 40. Ancestry Reference: Class: RG9; Piece: 2007; Folio: 73; Page: 40; GSU roll: 542902. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Lin Lamberg" <linlamberg@btinternet.com> To: <staffordshire@rootsweb.com> Sent: Friday, January 13, 2012 1:09 AM Subject: Re: [STAFFORDSHIRE] Darkhorse Chapel, Coseley -- HEIGHWAY burial, 1899 > Is this your Thomas Marilyn? > > 1861 Southalls Lane Parish of St James Dudley:- > > THOMAS HEIGHWAY Head Married 28yrs SUSAN HEIGHWAY > Wife Married 30yrs > ****************************** > ATTENTION TO ALL:- When replying please remove the details that do not > apply to your mail and change the SUBJECT LINE for best useage of ARCHIVED > MATERIALS. > ------------------------------- > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > STAFFORDSHIRE-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the > quotes in the subject and the body of the message