Thanks Ruth, I realise now that we have probably been confusing Registration Districts with County Boundaries. Its obviously a village myth. However Ancestry does have Repton under Staffordshire on the 1911 census. Perhaps they made the same misatke! Thanks again, Andy ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ruth J" <ruthgenda@btinternet.com> To: <staffordshire@rootsweb.com> Sent: Saturday, January 26, 2013 9:10 AM Subject: [STAFFORDSHIRE] Repton in Staffordshire > Hi Andy > > Genuki holds your answers. > > See here for Repton's history of the parish > http://www.genuki.org.uk/big/eng/DBY/Repton/index.html > > Note particularly its physical situation - 'REPTON is a parish, in the > hundred of Repton and Gresley: the village, which is seven miles S.S.E. > from Derby and four and a half N.E. from Burton-upon-Trent ... ' There's > your clue. > > See here for dates and area changes: > http://www.ukbmd.org.uk/genuki/reg/districts/burton%20upon%20trent.html > and http://www.ukbmd.org.uk/genuki/reg/districts/repton.html > > Good luck > Ruth > ****************************** > ATTENTION TO ALL:- When replying please remove the details that do not > apply to your mail and change the SUBJECT LINE for best useage of ARCHIVED > MATERIALS. > ****************************** > PLEASE keep your Anti-Virus and Anti-Malware software up to date. BEWARE > of messages making it onto the List with a single URL. NEVER follow the > link. It's usually from an infected source! > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > STAFFORDSHIRE-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the > quotes in the subject and the body of the message

Adrian Said So - if it says Spinster or Bachelor, then we can take it as true. If it doesn't say anything, then I DON'T believe we can assume them to be Spinster or Bachelor. I totally disagree with this. I have seen people listed as spinster or bachelor and have been previously married. Condition at marriage is at the end of the day whatever you want to tell them. The only part of a marriage cert that can be taken as true are the names of those marrying and the vicars name Rob

Hello list, If a marriage took place in Staffordshire ( I'm looking particularly at Waterfall) in the mid 18th Century was there an absolute requirement to note whether the parties were ever married previously? If they were not recorded as "widow" or "widower" can you be confident that this was a first marriage? I have an Ellen Street married at Waterfall to John Bould in 1763 and I have a William Street buried in Waterfall in 1761 leaving a widow called Ellen Street. Her later recorded burial would have made her 33 years old at the time of her marriage to John Bould. If she was a spinster at her wedding then I need to look elsewhere for Ellen Street. Helen

Peter, I wish that I could provide a summary - but I'm no expert in civil administration either. Wikipedia gives a fairly comprehensive account of the formation of both ancient and modern Civil Parishes in England here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civil_parishes_in_England Boundary changes occur for any number of reasons but they will always be political. The bottom line, I would suggest, is that it's all to do with the size of the population in the areas at the time and the distribution of available monies to service their needs - whether its roads, education, health, poor relief, etc. Hence the need for censuses. And accurate civil registration. Huge administrative changes took place in the 19thC in England because of population movement (Industrial Revolution) and boundary change was occurring all over the shop. >From these Repton and Burton-on-Trent records on Genuki it seems that minor boundary changes occurred in 1880 and quite a few more in 1937. Genuki has: << 1.3.1880 a) Lost three detached parts of the parish of Repton, including the Scaddaws, Southward, and Ticknall Village (which became part of the parish of Ticknall on 1.3.1880) to Ashby de la Zouch registration district. Population transferred 140 in 1881. b) Lost another detached part of the parish of Repton, including Daniel Hayes Farm (which became part of the parish of Smisby on 1.3.1880) to Ashby de la Zouch registration district. Population transferred 5 in 1881. 1.1.1937 (i) Lost the parishes of Ash, Barton Blount, Bearwardcote, Bretby, Burnaston, Caldwell, Castle Gresley, Catton, Church Broughton, Church Gresley, Coton in the Elms, Dalbury Lees, Drakelow, Egginton, Etwall, Findern, Foremark, Foston & Scropton, Hatton, Hilton, Hoon, Ingleby, Linton, Lullington, Marston on Dove, Mickleover, Newton Solney, Osleston & Thurvaston, Radbourne, Repton, Rosliston, Stanton & Newhall, Sutton on the Hill, Swadlincote, Trusley, Twyford & Stenson, Walton upon Trent, and Willington, to Repton registration district. Population transferred 38441 in 1931. 1.1.1937 (created) Gained the parishes of Ash, Barton Blount, Bearwardcote, Bretby, Burnaston, Caldwell, Castle Gresley, Catton, Church Broughton, Church Gresley, Coton in the Elms, Dalbury Lees, Drakelow, Egginton, Etwall, Findern, Foremark, Foston & Scropton, Hatton, Hilton, Hoon, Ingleby, Linton, Lullington, Marston on Dove, Mickleover, Newton Solney, Osleston & Thurvaston, Radbourne, Repton, Rosliston, Stanton & Newhall, Sutton on the Hill, Swadlincote, Trusley, Twyford & Stenson, Walton upon Trent, and Willington, from Burton upon Trent registration district. Population transferred 38441 in 1931. >> These movements appear contradictory but are complicated by the fact that while some ground within a parish is gained, and other ground is lost, the original parish names will still be used - but not always. People don't like new names on the whole - try talking to Yorkshire folk about Humberside and Rutland/Leicestershire folk about unitary authorities! The reasons for the changes will be found in the minutes of council meetings and (possibly) newspaper reports. (Long days' journey into night!) Don't know whether this is any help at all, Peter. But someone else might have a better answer. Andy, if you're reading this, you could always contact Repton Parish Council directly and ask which authority was answerable to Repton in whatever period your interested in, but do be very specific with dates and parishes. They just might give you a full history with reasons. Again, good luck. If you have success let us know. Ruth

Andy, Wikipedia says Derbyshire. The Hugh Wallis site has IGI batches from 1578 onwards under Derbyshire. And Ancestry says Derbyshire. What records do you have that might suggest Staffordshire? Admittedly, it's close to Staffordshire so they could have done a bit of border hopping for BDM or weekly shopping. Peter

Hi Andy Genuki holds your answers. See here for Repton's history of the parish http://www.genuki.org.uk/big/eng/DBY/Repton/index.html Note particularly its physical situation - 'REPTON is a parish, in the hundred of Repton and Gresley: the village, which is seven miles S.S.E. from Derby and four and a half N.E. from Burton-upon-Trent ... ' There's your clue. See here for dates and area changes: http://www.ukbmd.org.uk/genuki/reg/districts/burton%20upon%20trent.html and http://www.ukbmd.org.uk/genuki/reg/districts/repton.html Good luck Ruth

I think people need to remember that GRO districts are completely different to county boundaries. A lot of the South Derbyshire villages register birth marriage and deaths at Burton upon Trent yet none have ever been in Staffs. Burton upon Trent is far closer to these villages than Derby itself is so that will be why the town was chosen to be where people registered Rob -----Original Message----- From: Ruth J <ruthgenda@btinternet.com> To: staffordshire <staffordshire@rootsweb.com> Sent: Sat, Jan 26, 2013 12:12 pm Subject: Re: [STAFFORDSHIRE] Repton in Staffordshire Peter, I wish that I could provide a summary - but I'm no expert in civil administration either. Wikipedia gives a fairly comprehensive account of the formation of both ancient and modern Civil Parishes in England here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civil_parishes_in_England Boundary changes occur for any number of reasons but they will always be political. The bottom line, I would suggest, is that it's all to do with the size of the population in the areas at the time and the distribution of available monies to service their needs - whether its roads, education, health, poor relief, etc. Hence the need for censuses. And accurate civil registration. Huge administrative changes took place in the 19thC in England because of population movement (Industrial Revolution) and boundary change was occurring all over the shop. >From these Repton and Burton-on-Trent records on Genuki it seems that minor boundary changes occurred in 1880 and quite a few more in 1937. Genuki has: << 1.3.1880 a) Lost three detached parts of the parish of Repton, including the Scaddaws, Southward, and Ticknall Village (which became part of the parish of Ticknall on 1.3.1880) to Ashby de la Zouch registration district. Population transferred 140 in 1881. b) Lost another detached part of the parish of Repton, including Daniel Hayes Farm (which became part of the parish of Smisby on 1.3.1880) to Ashby de la Zouch registration district. Population transferred 5 in 1881. 1.1.1937 (i) Lost the parishes of Ash, Barton Blount, Bearwardcote, Bretby, Burnaston, Caldwell, Castle Gresley, Catton, Church Broughton, Church Gresley, Coton in the Elms, Dalbury Lees, Drakelow, Egginton, Etwall, Findern, Foremark, Foston & Scropton, Hatton, Hilton, Hoon, Ingleby, Linton, Lullington, Marston on Dove, Mickleover, Newton Solney, Osleston & Thurvaston, Radbourne, Repton, Rosliston, Stanton & Newhall, Sutton on the Hill, Swadlincote, Trusley, Twyford & Stenson, Walton upon Trent, and Willington, to Repton registration district. Population transferred 38441 in 1931. 1.1.1937 (created) Gained the parishes of Ash, Barton Blount, Bearwardcote, Bretby, Burnaston, Caldwell, Castle Gresley, Catton, Church Broughton, Church Gresley, Coton in the Elms, Dalbury Lees, Drakelow, Egginton, Etwall, Findern, Foremark, Foston & Scropton, Hatton, Hilton, Hoon, Ingleby, Linton, Lullington, Marston on Dove, Mickleover, Newton Solney, Osleston & Thurvaston, Radbourne, Repton, Rosliston, Stanton & Newhall, Sutton on the Hill, Swadlincote, Trusley, Twyford & Stenson, Walton upon Trent, and Willington, from Burton upon Trent registration district. Population transferred 38441 in 1931. >> These movements appear contradictory but are complicated by the fact that while some ground within a parish is gained, and other ground is lost, the original parish names will still be used - but not always. People don't like new names on the whole - try talking to Yorkshire folk about Humberside and Rutland/Leicestershire folk about unitary authorities! The reasons for the changes will be found in the minutes of council meetings and (possibly) newspaper reports. (Long days' journey into night!) Don't know whether this is any help at all, Peter. But someone else might have a better answer. Andy, if you're reading this, you could always contact Repton Parish Council directly and ask which authority was answerable to Repton in whatever period your interested in, but do be very specific with dates and parishes. They just might give you a full history with reasons. Again, good luck. If you have success let us know. Ruth ****************************** ATTENTION TO ALL:- When replying please remove the details that do not apply to your mail and change the SUBJECT LINE for best useage of ARCHIVED MATERIALS. ****************************** PLEASE keep your Anti-Virus and Anti-Malware software up to date. BEWARE of messages making it onto the List with a single URL. NEVER follow the link. It's usually from an infected source! ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to STAFFORDSHIRE-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

Hi It has always been Derbyshire as far as I am aware. I lived in Tutbury for a number of years and Repton was always Derbyshire back in 1965! Sent from my iPad On 26 Jan 2013, at 00:03, "austens" <austens@talktalk.net> wrote: > Hi all, does anyone know when Repton was in Staffordshire please? Its Derbyshire now and I think ancestry files it there for all the censes. > > Andy > ****************************** > ATTENTION TO ALL:- When replying please remove the details that do not apply to your mail and change the SUBJECT LINE for best useage of ARCHIVED MATERIALS. > ****************************** > PLEASE keep your Anti-Virus and Anti-Malware software up to date. BEWARE of messages making it onto the List with a single URL. NEVER follow the link. It's usually from an infected source! > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to STAFFORDSHIRE-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

Hi all, does anyone know when Repton was in Staffordshire please? Its Derbyshire now and I think ancestry files it there for all the censes. Andy

As far as I know Repton was never staffs ------Original Message------ From: austens Sender: staffordshire-bounces@rootsweb.com To: staffordshire@rootsweb.com ReplyTo: staffordshire@rootsweb.com Subject: [STAFFORDSHIRE] Repton in Staffordshire? Sent: 26 Jan 2013 00:03 Hi all, does anyone know when Repton was in Staffordshire please? Its Derbyshire now and I think ancestry files it there for all the censes. Andy ****************************** ATTENTION TO ALL:- When replying please remove the details that do not apply to your mail and change the SUBJECT LINE for best useage of ARCHIVED MATERIALS. ****************************** PLEASE keep your Anti-Virus and Anti-Malware software up to date. BEWARE of messages making it onto the List with a single URL. NEVER follow the link. It's usually from an infected source! ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to STAFFORDSHIRE-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message Sent from my BlackBerry® wireless device

Cliff, I had a quick look. It should all be there. They married in 1829 in Kingswinford. But remember, Family Search is transcribed indexes. If somebody on the list has access to original Parish Registers or you can order films via your nearest LDS centre you might get extra data like father's name or witnesses. You need to extract maximum clues for each and every source and try for original records. Peter

Clifford, Reading between the lines they married about 1825 and left England about 1844. You really need some specific town in Staffordshire. I have a few suggestions. Marriage and births of Elizabeth , James and Thomas should be in Church Records on Family Search. After 1837, you'll find births in Civil Registrations on FreeBMD. They will also be in 1841 census. While 1841 doesn't show exact birthplace is will show if in or outside county. You may also find relatives living with them or nearby. From 1841 you will get an idea of age and birthplace of Sarah which might enable you to finr her birth on Family Search. Peter

Leslie, Right now I have no idea where in Ireland Thomas was born.  I just received his information yesterday.  Hopefully I'll be able to figure out something, but already I am seeing a fly in the ointment that another cousin sent to me about Thomas' line, but that has to do with finding a possible second wife (or first of 2 - dunno yet).  Yes, we are making progress, even if it is a wee bit slow - I've been at this since 1979.  I do know that at least one of his descendants has had his Y-DNA tested, and they are part of the Johnstons of Sir Adam Group.  One of these has his Johnston in Co. Fermanagh, Co. Leitrim and then lost track of him in Co. Cavan before he then went to Australia.  His Y-DNA is a very close match to mine indicating a possible Most Recent Common Ancestor possibly in the mid-1700s.  We got onto this Thomas via another descendant in the U.S. by the looks of it - I still need to sort all of this out :-0  On top of this one of the Australian cousins has a sister of his gggrandfather, and she went to Rawdon rather than to Australia with her siblings.  We are getting very close to pulling this group together by the looks of it. In addition, we have contacted a documented member of the Poldean line in France and another in Germany.  What makes this helpful is that the French Johnston's ancestors went from Scotland to Ireland first and then on to France.  I need to get this family's information on their Ireland kin together and post it too.  The noted Irish architect Francis Johnston came from this line. My gggrandfather, Robert "Red Robin" Johnston was born in Kilrea, Londonderry Co., Ireland, 1808.  His brother, Francis, was born in England in 1805, but I don't know where.  Many of our Johnston kin in Ireland left with the 2 Methodist emmigrations to Upper Canada in 1822 and 1832. If you have a male Johnston alive today I would strongly urge you to have him get his Y-DNA tested by FTDNA, ASAP.  The 67-markers test is the one to get although the more expensive 111-markers test is coming into its own now as more people buy this upgrade.  Several of us have tested for 111 markers, but the 67 will give us a great start.  We have been able to make some valuable connections with this tool with well over 50 of us connected via it.  We have a group here on Yahoo: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/JohnstonsOfSirAdam/ I hasten to add that as we have family information posted here that one must provide proof of a connection to this famly.  We do this so that we have certain degree of privacy.  What works for us is a Y-DNA test showing kinship, a known kinship to a current member, or a paper trail going back to the Johnstons of Poldean or a son of Sir Adam Johnston. Yes, the male line of Clan Johnston/e did not die out - the current chief's father just used that as an argument to get the titles for his family on the distaff side - the Hope family.  It worked ;-) Good hunting, Cliff. ________________________________ From: Leslie Prpich <beyond@islandnet.com> To: staffordshire@rootsweb.com Sent: Thu, January 24, 2013 7:22:55 PM Subject: Re: [STAFFORDSHIRE] JOHNSTON, Thomas Hi Clifford, Do you know where in Ireland Thomas came from? My ancestor Charles JOHNS(T)ON was born circa 1793 in Ireland and emigrated to Staffordshire. He married Ann MOUNTFORD at Newcastle-under-Lyme, Staffordshire in 1835. One census has him from county Cavan and another from Leitrim. I have nothing else to go on, and I've hoped for years that he emigrated with a relative and I'd be able to trace him that way. Ever hopeful, Leslie in Canada On 2013-01-24, at 11:54 AM, Cliff. Johnston wrote: > Seeking information on: > > Thomas JOHNSTON, b. 1801, IRELAND, > m. 1829, Staffordshire, ENGLAND, Sarah SHAW. > > Children: > 1. Elizabeth, b. 1828, ENGLAND, d. 1846, Rawdon, Que., > 2. James, b. 1831, ENGLAND, d. 1846, Rawdon, Que., > 3. Thomas, b. 1833, ENGLAND, > 4. Ann, b. 1839, ENGLAND, > 5. Rebecca, b. 1841, ENGLAND, > 6. Sarah, b. 1846, Rawdon, Que., and > 7. Jane, b. 1848, Rawdon, Que. > > > Any and all help will be greatly appreciated. > > Thank you. > > Clifford Johnston > ****************************** > ATTENTION TO ALL:- When replying please remove the details that do not apply to >your mail and change the SUBJECT LINE for best useage of ARCHIVED MATERIALS. > ****************************** > PLEASE keep your Anti-Virus and Anti-Malware software up to date. BEWARE of >messages making it onto the List with a single URL. NEVER follow the link. It's >usually from an infected source! > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to >STAFFORDSHIRE-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the >quotes in the subject and the body of the message > ****************************** ATTENTION TO ALL:- When replying please remove the details that do not apply to your mail and change the SUBJECT LINE for best useage of ARCHIVED MATERIALS. ****************************** PLEASE keep your Anti-Virus and Anti-Malware software up to date. BEWARE of messages making it onto the List with a single URL. NEVER follow the link. It's usually from an infected source! ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to STAFFORDSHIRE-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

Hi Clifford, Do you know where in Ireland Thomas came from? My ancestor Charles JOHNS(T)ON was born circa 1793 in Ireland and emigrated to Staffordshire. He married Ann MOUNTFORD at Newcastle-under-Lyme, Staffordshire in 1835. One census has him from county Cavan and another from Leitrim. I have nothing else to go on, and I've hoped for years that he emigrated with a relative and I'd be able to trace him that way. Ever hopeful, Leslie in Canada On 2013-01-24, at 11:54 AM, Cliff. Johnston wrote: > Seeking information on: > > Thomas JOHNSTON, b. 1801, IRELAND, > m. 1829, Staffordshire, ENGLAND, Sarah SHAW. > > Children: > 1. Elizabeth, b. 1828, ENGLAND, d. 1846, Rawdon, Que., > 2. James, b. 1831, ENGLAND, d. 1846, Rawdon, Que., > 3. Thomas, b. 1833, ENGLAND, > 4. Ann, b. 1839, ENGLAND, > 5. Rebecca, b. 1841, ENGLAND, > 6. Sarah, b. 1846, Rawdon, Que., and > 7. Jane, b. 1848, Rawdon, Que. > > > Any and all help will be greatly appreciated. > > Thank you. > > Clifford Johnston > ****************************** > ATTENTION TO ALL:- When replying please remove the details that do not apply to your mail and change the SUBJECT LINE for best useage of ARCHIVED MATERIALS. > ****************************** > PLEASE keep your Anti-Virus and Anti-Malware software up to date. BEWARE of messages making it onto the List with a single URL. NEVER follow the link. It's usually from an infected source! > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to STAFFORDSHIRE-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message >

Peter, Thank you for your excellent advice.  I'll get on this tonight :-) Cliff. ________________________________ From: Peter R Booth <pbo08596@bigpond.net.au> To: staffordshire@rootsweb.com Sent: Thu, January 24, 2013 4:55:35 PM Subject: Re: [STAFFORDSHIRE] JOHNSTON, Thomas Clifford,     Reading between the lines they married about 1825 and left England about 1844.     You really need some specific town in Staffordshire. I have a few suggestions.     Marriage and births of Elizabeth , James and Thomas should be in Church Records on Family Search.     After 1837, you'll find births in Civil Registrations on FreeBMD.     They will also be in 1841 census. While 1841 doesn't show exact birthplace is will show if in or outside county. You may also find relatives living with them or nearby.     From 1841 you will get an idea of age and birthplace of Sarah which might enable you to finr her birth on Family Search.     Peter ****************************** ATTENTION TO ALL:- When replying please remove the details that do not apply to your mail and change the SUBJECT LINE for best useage of ARCHIVED MATERIALS. ****************************** PLEASE keep your Anti-Virus and Anti-Malware software up to date. BEWARE of messages making it onto the List with a single URL. NEVER follow the link. It's usually from an infected source! ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to STAFFORDSHIRE-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

Gillian, Thank you.  Our family has fought with bureaucrats throughout the centuries over the spelling of our surname.  It was actually Johnstone from 1724 or so onward.  Most have settled on Johnston by now. Cliff. ________________________________ From: Gillian Hawkins <ghawkins@shaw.ca> To: STAFFORDSHIRE@rootsweb.com Sent: Thu, January 24, 2013 4:48:10 PM Subject: Re: [STAFFORDSHIRE] JOHNSTON, Thomas Hi Clifford, 1851 Census Quebec Canada with the spelling JOHNSON:- Leinster County Canada-East (Quebec) Sub-district St PATRICE de Rawdon Thomas JOHNSON age 50 born 1801 Ireland Son Thomas age 18 Daughter  Ann age age 12 Daughter Rebecca age 10 Daughter Jane age 3 Couldn't find wife Sarah, son James or daughters Sarah (b.1846) and Elizabeth HTH Regards Gill in Canada ****************************** ATTENTION TO ALL:- When replying please remove the details that do not apply to your mail and change the SUBJECT LINE for best useage of ARCHIVED MATERIALS. ****************************** PLEASE keep your Anti-Virus and Anti-Malware software up to date. BEWARE of messages making it onto the List with a single URL. NEVER follow the link. It's usually from an infected source! ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to STAFFORDSHIRE-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

Hi Clifford, 1851 Census Quebec Canada with the spelling JOHNSON:- Leinster County Canada-East (Quebec) Sub-district St PATRICE de Rawdon Thomas JOHNSON age 50 born 1801 Ireland Son Thomas age 18 Daughter Ann age age 12 Daughter Rebecca age 10 Daughter Jane age 3 Couldn't find wife Sarah, son James or daughters Sarah (b.1846) and Elizabeth HTH Regards Gill in Canada

Seeking information on: Thomas JOHNSTON, b. 1801, IRELAND, m. 1829, Staffordshire, ENGLAND, Sarah SHAW. Children: 1. Elizabeth, b. 1828, ENGLAND, d. 1846, Rawdon, Que., 2. James, b. 1831, ENGLAND, d. 1846, Rawdon, Que., 3. Thomas, b. 1833, ENGLAND, 4. Ann, b. 1839, ENGLAND, 5. Rebecca, b. 1841, ENGLAND, 6. Sarah, b. 1846, Rawdon, Que., and 7. Jane, b. 1848, Rawdon, Que. Any and all help will be greatly appreciated. Thank you. Clifford Johnston

Thank you, Lin, That helps to clarify the picture and up pop those same names again. Helen ----- Original Message ----- From: "Lin Lamberg" <linlamberg@btinternet.com> To: <staffordshire@rootsweb.com> Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2013 6:04 AM Subject: Re: [STAFFORDSHIRE] No Baptisms found > Helen there is a Removal Order held at the Archives dated 20. 3. 1767 for > a Thomas Bould, Wife Ann and children Esther, Joseph, Ann, Joyce, Thomas > and William from Leek and Lowe to Bradnop. > > HTH Linda. > ****************************** > ATTENTION TO ALL:- When replying please remove the details that do not > apply to your mail and change the SUBJECT LINE for best useage of ARCHIVED > MATERIALS. > ****************************** > PLEASE keep your Anti-Virus and Anti-Malware software up to date. BEWARE > of messages making it onto the List with a single URL. NEVER follow the > link. It's usually from an infected source! > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > STAFFORDSHIRE-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the > quotes in the subject and the body of the message

Helen there is a Removal Order held at the Archives dated 20. 3. 1767 for a Thomas Bould, Wife Ann and children Esther, Joseph, Ann, Joyce, Thomas and William from Leek and Lowe to Bradnop. HTH Linda.