Jeanne & others who set me straight! Thanks you. This is indeed Surrey. When I have a look at other families on surrounding pages, there are a number there plainly enumerated as born in Frimley, Surrey, despite Ancestry having indexed them as Kent! Not quite as bizarre as indexing Middlesex as Mexico though! Cheers Graham Sydney -----Original Message----- From: Jeanne Bunting UK [mailto:firgrove@compuserve.com] Sent: Friday, 6 May 2005 5:43 AM To: SOG-UK-L@rootsweb.com Subject: [SoG] Ash, Kent The districts you refer to are most certainly in Surrey. If you scroll down the 1861 search page you can look at the individual counties and within those counties are listed the parishes. Once you have selected a parish you can view the "Enumerator's Walk". Try it for the District where you found your people. Sadly, Ancestry were in too much of a hurry to get the census on line that they omitted to check little details like which parish is in which county - many are wrong. And it isn't there in its entirety in spite of what it says on their web site - they have admitted that there are omissions. See: http://archiver.rootsweb.com/th/read/GOONS/2005-05/1115208304 Jeanne Bunting This email has been scanned for viruses by NetBenefit using Sophos anti-virus technology