Peter Here is the reply I received from my cousin regarding the 1861 Census: "It was at the Family Records Centre in London where I read in the street index that part of one side of Dean St was missing. The thick books of London Street indexes on shelves just outside where the film drawers are kept, near where you pick up the dummy film box. I remember getting the film out anyway and it stopped on Dean Street at a house very close to the one I was looking for (i.e. 19, I have a vague recollection that the last house before the break was 16, but cannot be sure & of course the note book is eluding me.) " Sheila Murray Ayr, UK Peter B Park wrote: >Sheila, > >>From where is the district missing? > >Peter Park, >Walton on Thames, Surrey, UK. > > >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Sheila Murray" <SheilaMurray@mtcharlesayr.fsnet.co.uk> >To: <SOG-UK-L@rootsweb.com> >Sent: Friday, February 18, 2005 7:02 PM >Subject: Re: [SoG] 1861 Census > > > > >>Great - I've found an entry from a district which was posted as missing >>elsewhere! >> >>Sheila Murray >> >>Jeanne Bunting UK wrote: >> >> >> >>>David, >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>>Have just noticed a news release from the 15 Feb on the >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>><http://www.1837online.com/> www.1837online.com homepage. >>> >>>Transcriptions and original census images for the 1861 census are being >>> >>> >put > > >>>online now starting with London, Middlesex, Surrey and Kent. < >>> >>>I wondered how long it would be before someone noticed!! It has been >>> >>> >there > > >>>since midnight on Monday!! <g> >>> >>>Jeanne Bunting >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> > > > > > >