RootsWeb.com Mailing Lists
Total: 1/1
    1. Re: [SHIVER] RE: Book Copies
    2. please add daniel Ward at dmward@juno.com thanks. On Fri, 25 Feb 2000 08:38:41 -0600 "Shirley Turner Shiver" <shirleyt@bellsouth.net> writes: > John: > > I have some pages from the D.E. Cain book...I've been scanning them > to send > to interested SHIVER/PRESTWOOD researchers. Also included are the > pages on > the PELHAM family with connections to our branch of the SHIVERs via > a > marriage between Elmedia SHIVER and Perry Allen JONES, a PELHAM > descendant. > > Since I sent the message to the list, I realized that we cannot > attach files > to list messages, so, I'm sending them via e-mail. As I previously > noted, I > hope that I'm not stepping on any toes by doing this. Since I made > the > copies around 20 years ago the original book has "walked" from the > library, > so I cannot recopy crooked pages, get a copy of the frontispiece, > etc. I > tried every way I knew to copy the scanned text to an e-mail without > doing > it via an attachment, but could not, and settled on sending > individual > e-mails. If any of you computer geniuses out there know how I can do > this, > send instructions! I use Internet Explorer. > > I have the following people on my send list: Mary K, Jim S, Dan W, > P.J., > Nancy S, Jill S, Laura H, Carol S, Mary F, Ronnie, and Kenny. If > you, or > anyone else, want copies, please let me know, and I'll add your > e-mail to my > list. > > People interested in the Cain book must realize that it contains > some > erroneous information - however, there are lots of tidbits that will > furnish > clues for further research. Mr. Cain did a great service, and I, > for one, > applaud him. He got all his data the hard way - without the > internet! > > Shirley > > -----Original Message----- > From: JohnArden@aol.com <JohnArden@aol.com> > To: SHIVER-L@rootsweb.com <SHIVER-L@rootsweb.com> > Date: February 25, 2000 07:24 AM > Subject: Re: [SHIVER] RE: Book Copies > > > >It looks like I've missed a message. What kind of book are we > talking > about? > > > > >

    02/25/2000 09:20:36