I am having trouble getting the 'Washington baptisms' to open on the frontis database. Other parishes behave OK, just Washington refuses to open. Does anyone else have the same problem? Cordelia Hull 14526

When you open, some show sources in blue. They appear to have been transcribed. Others in black so probably nothing to see. The listing (March 2014) at http://www.sfhg.org.uk/Sussex%20Baptism%20Index_%20Coverage%20by%20Parish.pdf does not include Washington. Maybe that's the answer. Alan 1350 Cordelia Hull via wrote on 06/11/2014 09:43: > I am having trouble getting the 'Washington baptisms' to open on the > frontis database. Other parishes behave OK, just Washington refuses to > open. > > Does anyone else have the same problem? > > Cordelia Hull > 14526 > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to SFHG-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message >

Please see my two postings dated 10 Sep 2014 concerning the relationship between SFHG and PRTS and how indexes arrive on the Frontis sites. Since those postings, Fittleworth has been published as SXW-185 and by my count that leaves the following nine parishes outstanding: Bury, Littlehampton, Lyminster, Kingston Gorse, Southwick, Slaugham, Thakeham, Washington and West Chiltington. You will notice that Washington is in that list and so you will have to wait a little longer before it appears. However, on a more positive note, I hope to be visiting WSRO on Saturday, weather permitting, and I am happy to look up a single item in the Washington registers for you, if that would be helpful. If you would like me to do that, please let me have the details by 16.00 GMT Friday so that I can put them on my file. Best wishes, Marion Woolgar Bognor Regis, West Sussex SFHG Member No: 3323