I know that some of you are members of the Hampshire list, so can somebody explain the reason for this to me, the original Email was called Return which you will receive shortly ----- Original Message ----- From: <hampshire-bounces@rootsweb.com> To: <austengenealogy@iprimus.com.au> Sent: Saturday, June 21, 2008 11:55 PM Subject: Your message to mailing list HAMPSHIRE rejected > Your message sent to the HAMPSHIRE mailing list has been reviewed and > will not be posted for the following reason: > > Please alter the subject line to surnames as this would show up in the > archives on a search. Thanks > > To contact the HAMPSHIRE list administrator, please send an email to > hampshire-admin@rootsweb.com. > > Sincerely > > HAMPSHIRE list administrator > hampshire-admin@rootsweb.com
Hi Joe There are three Hampshire lists that I know of. [HAM] (Hampshire list, linked to Hampshire Genealogical Society), [ENG-HANTS], and [HAMPSHIRE-LIFE]. I subscribe to all three. The last two don't seem to be linked to societies, but are hosted by rootsweb, and are very friendly and helpful, though fairly quiet at times. [HAM] has proved difficult for me, too, with several bounces when I started with them. The list administrator was quite particular about how long messages were, what was in them, and what links I put in to try to help others. I was not, for example, allowed to link to the ancestry pages on my website because the website also contained commercial information. However, I have exchanged some useful information with some of the friendly and helpful subscribers. All the best Tony 9967 PS I haven't copied this to EOLFHS, because last time I did that, my message was rejected !? On 21/06/2008, Joe Austen <austengenealogy@iprimus.com.au> wrote: > I know that some of you are members of the Hampshire list, so can somebody > explain the reason for this to me, the original Email was called Return > which you will receive shortly
I am looking for any information regarding George SARGENT and Caroline BAKER both born around 1810 in NORTHIAM. Sarah Kirkpatrick 12719
William Gurr Born C 1829 in Lmberhurst married Annie Elizabeth Noakes of Lamberhurst in the 4th Qtr 1884. Their son Lewis Godfrey Gurr married Dagmar L Crump in the 3Rd Qtr of 1922. I am seeking their descendants. Michael Lucas SFHG 12279
Family historians who missed the sell-out presentation at West Sussex Record Office in Chichester early in June will have another chance to attend the Next Steps in Family History session when it is repeated on Wednesday evening 2 July. The Record Office is hosting a series of family history evenings, each on particular themes, and this one looks at military and probate records and also demonstrates how to preserve old family papers. Tickets cost £5 each and must be booked in advance. For further details or to book tickets, telephone (01243) 753602 or E-mail records.office@westsussex.gov.uk . Best wishes Marion Woolgar Bognor Regis, West Sussex SFHG NO: 3323
On Wed, 18 Jun 2008 15:28:22 -0700 (PDT) Christine Jackson <jackson_cf@yahoo.com> wrote: Hello Christine, > Thank you, Brad, for that clarification - most helpful. You're welcome. It surprises me, sometimes, that people aren't aware the GRO versions do not have original signatures. > Does anyone know what would have happened to the original registers? > Were they disposed of locally - i.e. to local museums, county records > offices, etc.? As they're required to be available for the production of copy certificates, the Register Office has to keep them. Disposal, of any sort, isn't allowed. -- Regards _ / ) "The blindingly obvious is / _)rad never immediately apparent" Is she really going out with him? New Rose - The Damned
Christine: As I understand it, the original registers (for register office events) should still be with the register office concerned though some register offices have closed or merged which means they should be with the current register office covering the area. Any register office should be able to advise you. For parish registers, most are now in county record offices. If your local library has a copy of Phillimores Atlas and Guide to Parish Registers that will give you a list, county by county, of which parish registers exist and where they are archived. Later registers not listed should presumably still be at the parish church. Regards John Cain 10370
this is the hassle of 3 email addresses when you are not on the ball ----- Original Message ----- From: Joe Austen To: SFHG-L@rootsweb.com Cc: EOLFHS-MEMBERS-L@rootsweb.com Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2008 10:32 PM Subject: Re missing cert GQ To the many members of both Societies, that have offered assistance in the last few days, you have my thanks and appreciation, unfortunately I have been very sick since I sent the last email, and was unable to concentrate on anything for long enough to respond to your` many replies (I got a chill on Sunday. I have managed to decipher a lot of the certificate, and the fact that she was born in Calcutta Place in what appears to be Bromley. I`ve also changed my opinion of who filled out the form and I now think that the Registrar did the lot including the fathers signature, but the mothers maiden name remains a mystery I have deciphered enough that I think that the last 3 letters are probably aim, the beginning of the name looks like a capital U but on a 45 degree angle to the right with a little squiggle to the left at the base, which is probably part of the letter. I would scan it and send it off to volunteers but I haven`t yet worked out how to install my new scanner. The old scanner worked fine until I went to England last year. when I came home the computer installed a whole heap of updates and presto the scanner dont work XP strikes again. so I went out and bought a Canon MX300 and it has 2 installation CDs. Regards Joe Austen in OZ
I'd guess so. Also in the SMI in an adjacent parish are Place: Horsted Keynes, West Sussex, Date: 22 Jan 1711/2: Subject: Stephen SAWYER, of West Hoathly Spouse: Elizabeth GATLAND, dau of Walter GATLAND and Place: Horsted Keynes, West Sussex, Date: 22 Jan 1711/2: Subject: Stephen SAWYER, Rotherfield Spouse: Elizabeth GARLAND, Cuckfield (GATLAND) Maybe the NBI (or the Tombstones/Burials database) have information in Steven Sawyer. Alan > I have an entry for 31st August 1731 in West Hoathley:- > > John Faulkoner married Elizabeth Sawyer. > Mr Mrs. > > Does the Mrs under Elizabeth Sawyer imply that Sawyer was > her surname from a previous marriage rather than her > maiden name?. > > With many thanks. > > Robin
I have an entry for 31st August 1731 in West Hoathley:- John Faulkoner married Elizabeth Sawyer. Mr Mrs. Does the Mrs under Elizabeth Sawyer imply that Sawyer was her surname from a previous marriage rather than her maiden name?. With many thanks. Robin
Sue, I have checked the Horsham baptismal records of John Scutt, the son of John Scutt of Horsham and Elizabeth Bax of Capel, whom I thought might be the parents of your John born in 1802, but their son John was born in 1786, and there does not appear to have been a John Scutt born in Horsham c. 1800, though there were other Scutts living there at the time. Sorry - I thought I had found the right parents, but it does not seem to be so! All good wishes, Sue Djabri ----- Original Message ----- From: "sue at chb" <jennifer.ellingworth@unicombox.co.uk> To: <SFHG-L@rootsweb.com> Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2008 1:02 PM Subject: [SFHG] Fw: John Scutt > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: sue at chb > To: sfhg-request@rootsweb.com > Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2008 3:48 PM > Subject: John Scutt > > > I am trying to trace the parents of John Scutt born about 1802 probably > Sussex died 1848 aged 47 - Horsham,Sussex. John married Sarah Penfold in > 1825 in Horsham. > 1841 census the family were in Capel , Surrey. > I am hoping to attach John to his correct parents as there appears to be a > number of choices at this time. > regards Sue E > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > SFHG-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes > in the subject and the body of the message >
Thank you, Brad, for that clarification - most helpful. Does anyone know what would have happened to the original registers? Were they disposed of locally - i.e. to local museums, county records offices, etc.? Christine Jackson SFHG 397 --- On Wed, 6/18/08, Brad Rogers <brad@fineby.me.uk> wrote: From: Brad Rogers <brad@fineby.me.uk> Subject: Re: [SFHG] Fw: Re missing cert GQ To: "Sussex FHG" <sfhg@rootsweb.com> Received: Wednesday, June 18, 2008, 9:35 AM On Wed, 18 Jun 2008 22:34:45 +1000 "Joe Austen" <austengenealogy@iprimus.com.au> wrote: Hello Joe, > opinion of who filled out the form and I now think that the Registrar > did the lot including the fathers signature, but Since you got the cert from the GRO, all you'll see is the clerk's writing. It is, after all, a transcription of papers sent to the GRO from the regional Register Office. Which themselves, are transcriptions of the original registers. -- Regards _ / ) "The blindingly obvious is / _)rad never immediately apparent" If Adolf Hitler flew in today, they'd send a limousine anyway (White Man) In Hammersmith Palais ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to SFHG-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message __________________________________________________________________ Looking for the perfect gift? Give the gift of Flickr! http://www.flickr.com/gift/
On Wed, 18 Jun 2008 22:34:45 +1000 "Joe Austen" <austengenealogy@iprimus.com.au> wrote: Hello Joe, > opinion of who filled out the form and I now think that the Registrar > did the lot including the fathers signature, but Since you got the cert from the GRO, all you'll see is the clerk's writing. It is, after all, a transcription of papers sent to the GRO from the regional Register Office. Which themselves, are transcriptions of the original registers. -- Regards _ / ) "The blindingly obvious is / _)rad never immediately apparent" If Adolf Hitler flew in today, they'd send a limousine anyway (White Man) In Hammersmith Palais
Joe, I suggest you email the relevant Register Office enclosing a scanned copy of the certificate, asking them if they could view the original entry and tell you what the maiden name as the GRO copy is not legible. I recently did this to find out an informants name to a death as the GRO copy was unreadable. Having politely explained the problem, and able to give them the date and place within the district, they then very quickly replied with the name. Stephen Steere Orpington, Kent.
Help please. Edward Noakes born c 1775 died c 1850 was I believe a farmer in Hastings area. He married Mary Harman at All Saints Church, Hastings on 22nd December 1800. His son,also Edward went to farm in Lamberhurst at the time of his marriage in 1823, (? married in Lamberhurst/). I'd like to know more of the Noakes in Hastings and why the move of Edward to Lamberhurst. All advice will be acknowledged. Michael SFHS No 12279
----- Original Message ----- From: sue at chb To: sfhg-request@rootsweb.com Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2008 3:48 PM Subject: John Scutt I am trying to trace the parents of John Scutt born about 1802 probably Sussex died 1848 aged 47 - Horsham,Sussex. John married Sarah Penfold in 1825 in Horsham. 1841 census the family were in Capel , Surrey. I am hoping to attach John to his correct parents as there appears to be a number of choices at this time. regards Sue E
Peter The Sussex People Index has a reference to a James Punnet marrying Ann Cooper but gives her father as George, husbandman of Heathfield area, East Sussex. Will of George Cooper dated 23 January 1746/7 proved 30 November 1749 (Lewes A58 109). It's not in the SFHG Wills Depository as we only have a note of it. The notes say: son in law Jas Punnett, grandson James Punnett, granddaughter Mary Punnett (son and daughter of Jas Punnett and wife Susannah). That's probably made it worse. Judy Excell ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jackie Rowntree" <jackie.rowntree@becksidemill.fsnet.co.uk> To: "'Peter Killow'" <peterL@killow305.fsnet.co.uk>; <SFHG-L@rootsweb.com> Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2008 11:45 AM Subject: Re: [SFHG] Help with PUNNETTs, please > Peter > The SMI has the following > Extract from the Sussex Marriage Index: > Place: Heathfield, East Sussex, Date: 24 Sep 1747: > Subject: James PUNNET > Spouse: Mary COOPER, (B) > > Extract from the Sussex Marriage Index: > Place: Heathfield, East Sussex, Date: 29 Sep 1747: > Subject: James PUNNET > Spouse: Elizabeth COOPER > > Extract from the Sussex Marriage Index: > Place: Heathfield, East Sussex, Date: 11 Sep 1738: > Subject: James PUNNET, carpenter Heathfield > Spouse: Ann COOPER, dau of H.COOPER > > Which is not a lot of help > > Maybe someone has the Heathfield P Rs > > Jackie 10751 > >
Peter The SMI has the following Extract from the Sussex Marriage Index: Place: Heathfield, East Sussex, Date: 24 Sep 1747: Subject: James PUNNET Spouse: Mary COOPER, (B) Extract from the Sussex Marriage Index: Place: Heathfield, East Sussex, Date: 29 Sep 1747: Subject: James PUNNET Spouse: Elizabeth COOPER Extract from the Sussex Marriage Index: Place: Heathfield, East Sussex, Date: 11 Sep 1738: Subject: James PUNNET, carpenter Heathfield Spouse: Ann COOPER, dau of H.COOPER Which is not a lot of help Maybe someone has the Heathfield P Rs Jackie 10751 -----Original Message----- From: sfhg-bounces@rootsweb.com [mailto:sfhg-bounces@rootsweb.com] On Behalf Of Peter Killow Sent: 17 June 2008 22:13 To: SFHG-L@rootsweb.com Subject: [SFHG] Help with PUNNETTs, please I am trying to sort out the marriage(s) of James PUNNET of Heathfield. Could SKS please find out any marriages of JAMES PUNNET(T) and Elizabeth COOPER or Mary COOPER between 1747 and 1750 in Heathfield. This may help me to identify the mother of James's sixth child. TIA Peter Killow ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to SFHG-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message
I am trying to sort out the marriage(s) of James PUNNET of Heathfield. Could SKS please find out any marriages of JAMES PUNNET(T) and Elizabeth COOPER or Mary COOPER between 1747 and 1750 in Heathfield. This may help me to identify the mother of James's sixth child. TIA Peter Killow
Hi Brian, I had a similar problem with my 'Ultimate Family Tree' which is no longer supported - I was unable to load it onto my new PC with Windows XP. In desperation I punched in brief details of my problem on Google which produced loads of websites. Among them was a free download of a patch (No.23 in my case) which was precisely suited to my needs. Once downloaded, it enabled my PC to accept my obsolete family history programme. I think it likely that many programmes that worked on XP won't work on Vista but it is likely that patches have been created to provide a compatible interface. All the Best Mike Bishop ======================================== Message Received: Jun 17 2008, 01:26 PM From: BandBFenner@aol.com To: sfhg-l@rootsweb.com Cc: Subject: [SFHG] Storing Family Records I have stored my family records on Sierra Easy Family tree which works ok with Windows XP. As my computer has now given up working, I have had to change to a computer with Vista as the programme. I am unable to us the disc on this machine. Can anybody come up with suggestions on which one to use. The sierra disc is great as you have a family member on each page and you can store a great deal of info. As help would be appreciated Regards Brian Fenner ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to SFHG-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message