RootsWeb.com Mailing Lists
Previous Page      Next Page
Total: 7060/10000
    1. Re: [SFHG] FW: PARKS daughters
    2. Rachel Howe
    3. Thank you! On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 10:50 AM, Deborah Montgomerie <ifm@whidbey.net>wrote: > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Deborah Montgomerie [mailto:ifm@whidbey.net] > Sent: Sunday, August 03, 2008 9:20 PM > To: 'Rachel Howe' > Subject: RE: [SFHG] PARKS daughters > Importance: High > > Hi Emily, on the free site www.familysearch.org Sarah is shown with a > record of her marriage to George. This is called an ancestral file and a > person named Zina Johnston of 208 Wapitt Cresent, Fort McMurra, Alberta, > Canada T9H 4M8 has put the info on there. I would write to her and give > her > the same information you have supplied here and maybe she can give you more > info. > > Good Luck, > Debbie > > -----Original Message----- > From: sfhg-bounces@rootsweb.com [mailto:sfhg-bounces@rootsweb.com] On > Behalf > Of Rachel Howe > Sent: Sunday, August 03, 2008 5:19 PM > To: SFHG SxFamHXGrp; Debbie Shipcott > Subject: [SFHG] PARKS daughters > > Hi, > My name is Emily. I am 12. My mom, Rachel, is a member of your > group. She said we should email you. I am interested in learning more > about Mary, Matilda, Charolotte and Sarah PARKS. Sarah is my great, great, > great, great grandmother. Her sisters (Mary, Matilda, and Charlotte) are > my > GGGGG aunts. This is what I know: Their parents are John PARKS born in > Hailsham and Matilda WOOD born 1 Feb 1807 in West Grinstead. They were > married 15 Nov 1825 in Hailsham. They had 10 children, all born in > Hailsham. 4 girls and 6 boys. Right now I want to learn about the girls. > I know the most about Sarah (christened 22 Apr 1827) but this is what I > know > about her sisters: Charlotte was christened 25 Dec 1830 and married John > LEE and they were the witnesses at Sarah's wedding (she married George > HENDERSON in Hailsham 10 Mar 1849 and had 10 children too (born in > Hailsham and in Seaford)). Matilda was christened 11 Jul 1841 and Mary was > christened 14 Jun 1846. I have just begun to research these people and I > know my mom can help me, too. I like looking at the census records and I > need to start doing that. We don't have Ancestry any more but my mom says > that there are more and more things becoming available on the internet so I > think I can find out more about them. If any of you have any information I > would love to hear from you. > > Thank you, > Emily > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > SFHG-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes > in > the subject and the body of the message > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > SFHG-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes > in the subject and the body of the message >

    08/05/2008 03:31:41
    1. Re: [SFHG] Parish Records
    2. Joe, IHGS have some, for example at http://www.ihgs.ac.uk/shop/index.php/Books/transcripts/Phillimore. Another source is http://www.prtsoc.org.uk/ and you might try http://www.parishregister.co.uk/ and http://www.parishregister.co.uk/search_for_parreg.php. Otherwise I would check the local family history society site, there are tabs for areas near the top of http://www.ffhs.org.uk/members2/contacting.php, or just try google. Alan 1350 Joe Austen wrote: > I seek to buy a specific set of PRs on Microfiche (not of Sussex) does anyone know where I could order these from. Regards Joe Austen 9934 in OZ > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to SFHG-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message > > > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com > Version: 8.0.138 / Virus Database: 270.5.12/1592 - Release Date: 8/5/2008 6:03 AM > > >

    08/05/2008 12:48:42
    1. Re: [SFHG] Parish Records
    2. Christine Jackson
    3. Joe, You might start with the GenFair site (Federation of Family History Societies) - http://www.genfair.co.uk/ - and click on Parish Records. I haven't used them but it looks like a good starting point. Christine Jackson SFHG 397 --- On Tue, 8/5/08, Joe Austen <austengenealogy@iprimus.com.au> wrote: From: Joe Austen <austengenealogy@iprimus.com.au> Subject: [SFHG] Parish Records To: SFHG-L@rootsweb.com Received: Tuesday, August 5, 2008, 8:08 AM I seek to buy a specific set of PRs on Microfiche (not of Sussex) does anyone know where I could order these from. Regards Joe Austen 9934 in OZ ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to SFHG-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message __________________________________________________________________ Get a sneak peak at messages with a handy reading pane with All new Yahoo! Mail: http://ca.promos.yahoo.com/newmail/overview2/

    08/05/2008 03:58:42
    1. [SFHG] FIELD - a family tragedy in Chichester
    2. PMR
    3. Hello Listers I've been checking some family files and something has just 'hit' me. Edward FIELD my 4xgreat-uncle died on 9th January 1786 and his little daughter Elizabeth, aged 4years 6 months, died the next day, 10th January 1786. Both were buried in the cemetery now known, I understand, as St Mary's Whyke Road and then as St Mary's Rumboldswyke. A second child, Edward, was buried a few weeks later, on 21st February 1786. I'd never looked at them both together like I did when re-checking some burial/MI information sent ages ago by a kind Lister called Katherine. If you see this, Katherine, I'd love to make contact again. I can't remember your surname! You said you had MIs for the whole of Chichester. It looks at first glance to be a tragic accident, but Edward left a Will dated 2nd Dec 1785, which seems to indicate that both he and Elizabeth had contracted some dire illness. In his Will he mentions, as is usual "... all such children as I may have living ..." but there was a phrase that was new to me - "... if but one such child then to such only child ...". At the time of making his Will, Edward and his wife Lucy (née PARVIN) had four children, aged 12, 8, 4 and 2. This phrase seems to indicate that he anticipated not only his own death but that of several of his children. As I mentioned above, 2 of them did succumb; were the others ill as well? It seem that the illness was something which only death would relieve, and apparently very infectious. Yet Edward was quite lucid and 'of sound memory' early in December when he made quite a length Will. In his Will he mentions 'my friend Joseph ROBINS ...'. Joseph was married to Edward's sister Mary, J&M being my 3 x ggps. Does anyone know if there was a particular illness prevalent in Chichester in the lates 1780s please? I have no other known Chichester rellies who died in 1786. Joseph ROBINS also died young, but not till 1793 (aged 39). Any others interested in these FIELDs or ROBINSes would be most welcome correspondents. Many thanks Pam Beaudesert, Queensland, Australia

    08/04/2008 07:49:25
    1. [SFHG] FW: PARKS daughters
    2. Deborah Montgomerie
    3. -----Original Message----- From: Deborah Montgomerie [mailto:ifm@whidbey.net] Sent: Sunday, August 03, 2008 9:20 PM To: 'Rachel Howe' Subject: RE: [SFHG] PARKS daughters Importance: High Hi Emily, on the free site www.familysearch.org Sarah is shown with a record of her marriage to George. This is called an ancestral file and a person named Zina Johnston of 208 Wapitt Cresent, Fort McMurra, Alberta, Canada T9H 4M8 has put the info on there. I would write to her and give her the same information you have supplied here and maybe she can give you more info. Good Luck, Debbie -----Original Message----- From: sfhg-bounces@rootsweb.com [mailto:sfhg-bounces@rootsweb.com] On Behalf Of Rachel Howe Sent: Sunday, August 03, 2008 5:19 PM To: SFHG SxFamHXGrp; Debbie Shipcott Subject: [SFHG] PARKS daughters Hi, My name is Emily. I am 12. My mom, Rachel, is a member of your group. She said we should email you. I am interested in learning more about Mary, Matilda, Charolotte and Sarah PARKS. Sarah is my great, great, great, great grandmother. Her sisters (Mary, Matilda, and Charlotte) are my GGGGG aunts. This is what I know: Their parents are John PARKS born in Hailsham and Matilda WOOD born 1 Feb 1807 in West Grinstead. They were married 15 Nov 1825 in Hailsham. They had 10 children, all born in Hailsham. 4 girls and 6 boys. Right now I want to learn about the girls. I know the most about Sarah (christened 22 Apr 1827) but this is what I know about her sisters: Charlotte was christened 25 Dec 1830 and married John LEE and they were the witnesses at Sarah's wedding (she married George HENDERSON in Hailsham 10 Mar 1849 and had 10 children too (born in Hailsham and in Seaford)). Matilda was christened 11 Jul 1841 and Mary was christened 14 Jun 1846. I have just begun to research these people and I know my mom can help me, too. I like looking at the census records and I need to start doing that. We don't have Ancestry any more but my mom says that there are more and more things becoming available on the internet so I think I can find out more about them. If any of you have any information I would love to hear from you. Thank you, Emily ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to SFHG-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

    08/04/2008 03:50:20
    1. Re: [SFHG] Arthur Sisley
    2. John Cain
    3. John: I have not seen any replies yet on list to your July 31 plea for help. My reply will not help much. Neither Arthur Sisley nor Lucille Robb appear on any of the 1901 UK censuses shown on Ancestry. The birth registers for England and Wales between 1901 and 1915 list no births for either of them, nor do the marriage registers list a marriage between them. It is as though they never existed - certainly in England and Wales - though Robb is also a common Scots name so she may have been born in Scotland. One thought - if he was a stretcher bearer in WW1 could Arthur have come over with Australian/New Zealand/South African/American/Canadian troops and settled in England after the war? Another possibility - did they in fact marry. Lucille may have been deserted by her husband and divorce was difficult to obtain in those days, especially for catholics. They may just have been common law husband and wife? Sorry not to have been any real help but it may give you some idea of where to look. Have you tried checking electoral registers for the address at which son Anthony was born. Regards. John Cain 10370.

    08/04/2008 03:44:26
    1. Re: [SFHG] FIELD - a family tragedy in Chichester
    2. k morris
    3. Hi Pam   As you say, illness and early death were everyday events at that time, so I should not place too much significance on the wording of the will; it is pretty standard for a will of that date.   Kathleen --- On Mon, 8/4/08, PMR <cliveden@acenet.net.au> wrote: From: PMR <cliveden@acenet.net.au> Subject: [SFHG] FIELD - a family tragedy in Chichester To: "SSX-PLUS Mailing List" <SUSSEX-PLUS-L@rootsweb.com>, "SFHG Mailing List" <sfhg@rootsweb.com> Date: Monday, August 4, 2008, 4:49 AM Hello Listers I've been checking some family files and something has just 'hit' me. Edward FIELD my 4xgreat-uncle died on 9th January 1786 and his little daughter Elizabeth, aged 4years 6 months, died the next day, 10th January 1786. Both were buried in the cemetery now known, I understand, as St Mary's Whyke Road and then as St Mary's Rumboldswyke. A second child, Edward, was buried a few weeks later, on 21st February 1786. I'd never looked at them both together like I did when re-checking some burial/MI information sent ages ago by a kind Lister called Katherine. If you see this, Katherine, I'd love to make contact again. I can't remember your surname! You said you had MIs for the whole of Chichester. It looks at first glance to be a tragic accident, but Edward left a Will dated 2nd Dec 1785, which seems to indicate that both he and Elizabeth had contracted some dire illness. In his Will he mentions, as is usual "... all such children as I may have living ..." but there was a phrase that was new to me - "... if but one such child then to such only child ...". At the time of making his Will, Edward and his wife Lucy (née PARVIN) had four children, aged 12, 8, 4 and 2. This phrase seems to indicate that he anticipated not only his own death but that of several of his children. As I mentioned above, 2 of them did succumb; were the others ill as well? It seem that the illness was something which only death would relieve, and apparently very infectious. Yet Edward was quite lucid and 'of sound memory' early in December when he made quite a length Will. In his Will he mentions 'my friend Joseph ROBINS ...'. Joseph was married to Edward's sister Mary, J&M being my 3 x ggps. Does anyone know if there was a particular illness prevalent in Chichester in the lates 1780s please? I have no other known Chichester rellies who died in 1786. Joseph ROBINS also died young, but not till 1793 (aged 39). Any others interested in these FIELDs or ROBINSes would be most welcome correspondents. Many thanks Pam Beaudesert, Queensland, Australia ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to SFHG-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

    08/04/2008 02:39:41
    1. [SFHG] PARKS daughters
    2. Rachel Howe
    3. Hi, My name is Emily. I am 12. My mom, Rachel, is a member of your group. She said we should email you. I am interested in learning more about Mary, Matilda, Charolotte and Sarah PARKS. Sarah is my great, great, great, great grandmother. Her sisters (Mary, Matilda, and Charlotte) are my GGGGG aunts. This is what I know: Their parents are John PARKS born in Hailsham and Matilda WOOD born 1 Feb 1807 in West Grinstead. They were married 15 Nov 1825 in Hailsham. They had 10 children, all born in Hailsham. 4 girls and 6 boys. Right now I want to learn about the girls. I know the most about Sarah (christened 22 Apr 1827) but this is what I know about her sisters: Charlotte was christened 25 Dec 1830 and married John LEE and they were the witnesses at Sarah's wedding (she married George HENDERSON in Hailsham 10 Mar 1849 and had 10 children too (born in Hailsham and in Seaford)). Matilda was christened 11 Jul 1841 and Mary was christened 14 Jun 1846. I have just begun to research these people and I know my mom can help me, too. I like looking at the census records and I need to start doing that. We don't have Ancestry any more but my mom says that there are more and more things becoming available on the internet so I think I can find out more about them. If any of you have any information I would love to hear from you. Thank you, Emily

    08/03/2008 12:19:06
    1. Re: [SFHG] Jacques
    2. What a good sight..thanks Stephen, the families around Midhurst and Petersfield look promising for my Jacques/Jaques connections. Judith Jacques 12602 on 1/8/08 7:07 PM, Stephen Selby at stephen.selby@virgin.net wrote: > Have a look at FreeBMD.( http://www.freebmd.org.uk ) They show a William > Jacques born in the September quarter 1890 ref Midhurst 2b 389. > > Steve > > -----Original Message----- > From: sfhg-bounces@rootsweb.com [mailto:sfhg-bounces@rootsweb.com] On Behalf > Of judy@wilddoghill.com.au > Sent: 01 August 2008 01:58 > To: SFHG@rootsweb.com > Subject: [SFHG] Jacques > > > Hello List members > > This is long shot, but would someone be able to find a birth or any details > for a WILLIAM JACQUES born July 28 1890. His Australian War Records say that > he was born in Sussex England and his father's name was GEORGE. Also in the > 'Sussex Strays' Census 1891 is a Martha Jacques aged 17. Camberley HAM p358. > The Parish is shown as West Lavington. > > Any information may help to find the birth place/family of my gggrandfather, > John Jacques b c1812. > > Thank you > Judith Jacques > 12602 > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > SFHG-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in > the subject and the body of the message > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

    08/02/2008 04:10:15
    1. Re: [SFHG] Jacques
    2. Thank you for this info Eileen, it all helps in my search for family 'Jacques'... the areas in which they lived... Judith 12602 > Hi there, all I can find is: 1881 census > > William Jacques aged 8 months. Born Rogate, West Sussex > Parents George born Greatham (? Graffham) 1862 and Elizabeth born Rogate > 1863. > > And a John Jacques born 1813 Fernhurst > > There are a couple of family trees on ancestry called Jacques family tree > but I could not find the correct dates for you on those. > > I hope this helps > > Eileen Turrell > 12765 > ----- Original Message ----- > From: <judy@wilddoghill.com.au> > To: <SFHG@rootsweb.com> > Sent: Friday, August 01, 2008 1:58 AM > Subject: [SFHG] Jacques > > >> Hello List members >> >> This is long shot, but would someone be able to find a birth or any >> details >> for a WILLIAM JACQUES born July 28 1890. His Australian War Records say >> that >> he was born in Sussex England and his father's name was GEORGE. >> Also in the 'Sussex Strays' Census 1891 is a Martha Jacques aged 17. >> Camberley HAM p358. >> The Parish is shown as West Lavington. >> >> Any information may help to find the birth place/family of my >> gggrandfather, >> John Jacques b c1812. >> >> Thank you >> Judith Jacques >> 12602 >> >> ------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to >> SFHG-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes >> in the subject and the body of the message >> >

    08/02/2008 02:57:23
    1. Re: [SFHG] Jacques
    2. Thanks so much Mark, I'll take a while to digest all your helpful info. and, everything helps!...certainly will follow up on the Australian War records for William. The 'long shot' was a William Jacques, born in Sussex in 1890, living in Australia, not far from my grandfather William James b 1887. Slim chance that my John Jacques b1812, may be connected to this Sussex family somehow. I have had help before through SFHG list regarding my gggrandfather John Jacques, (c1812) who was sentenced to Transportation to Australia (Tasmania) Sussex Quarter Session Records, in 1835. The records give his profession as Papermaker, Alverstoke (Hants)/ Brighton, but his Tasmanian records state 'gentleman's Servant' sentenced for wearing 'stolen wearing apparel'. Oh dear, Lacy undies? A helpful 'Lister' suggested he had lived in both Alverstoke and Brighton in Sussex. He was on the 'Leviathan' Hulk, Portsmouth Harbour, before being transported to Tasmania. Another helpful member has offered to look at his Records in Lewes, which could get me closer to his birth place. John Jacques' subsequent Tasmanian family were boatmen and Lighthouse keepers, strong attachments to the sea for generations, this continues... John called himself James after his marriage and died in Hobart in 1860. One of his sons was William and another John. Returning to John's profession (s) Papermaker, I read somewhere that there were Paper Mills in them Sussex Hills...any thoughts on that? I have always been led to believe our 'Jacques' were Hugenot's. On we go and thanks! Judith Jacques 12602

    08/01/2008 09:50:17
    1. [SFHG] Sussex 'strays' marrying in Surrey - pre-1837
    2. The website has two new .pdf files using information provided by West Surrey FHS. One is of 1700+ grooms and the other of 800+ brides, in each case from Sussex parishes but marrying in Surrey. Alan

    08/01/2008 07:42:21
    1. Re: [SFHG] SFHG Digest, Vol 3, Issue 216
    2. lizstilwell
    3. I've done a bit of googling on various sites to try and determine a bit more about this postcard. Firstly the date of the postcard: well it would have either been Edward VIIs reign (1902-1910) or George Vs (1910-1936). Maybe Eileen would be kind enough to have a look at the following site which would narrow down the date. www.edinphoto.org.uk/0_PC_0/0_post_card_history_-_stamps_postage_rates_uk_1890s-1952.htm Secondly the address: - there were indeed residential addresses in Tanfield Court, Inner Temple, however the Blitz destroyed a lot of these buildings and few were rebuilt. But the stamp suggests a pre WWII date so the address would have still been there then. I would also suggest that the sender's address was Crouch End, HORNSEY - which is in Middlesex and at that time in the London Borough of Hornsey but now in the London Borough of Harringay. Thirdly although the sender of the postcard hasn't signed it with his his full name I would think that because he used his initials SgG (probably Goodfellow) they were indeed blood brothers. If there was a clearer indication of the date it would be worth trying to locate these people in Post Office Directories of the time. If you have no takers, Eileen, it could well be worth posting this on the London list. best wishes Liz >> > > Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 06:51:44 +0100 >> > > From: "Eileen Austin" <e.austin@virgin.net> >> > > Subject: [SFHG] Mr C GOODFELLOW >> > > To: "SFHG SURNAME LIST" <SFHG-L@rootsweb.com> >> > > Message-ID: <004601c8f208$5982bea0$0100a8c0@newpc> >> > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" >> > > >> > > I have a photograph of three people, an elderly lady seated, >> with a lady >> > > and gent standing behind, taken in a garden. >> > > >> > > It is in the form of a postcard which was addressed to Mr C >> Goodfellow, >> 4 >> > > Tanfield Court, Inner Temple. >> > > >> > > Message reads Dear brother, Thanks for the letter. Shall be very >> pleased >> > > to come over on Friday evening , about 6.00pm. Love ?? SgG. >> > > >> > > His address given as Crouch End, Stamp is franked Hornsea. I >> cannot read >> > > the date but the Kings Head is facing to the left and it is a >> Green Half >> > > Penny stamp. >> > > >> > > Anyone wanting it send me an address and I will put it in the >> post. >> > > >> > > Regards >> > > >> > > Eileen Turrell 12765 >

    08/01/2008 07:15:35
    1. [SFHG] Jacques
    2. Hello List members This is long shot, but would someone be able to find a birth or any details for a WILLIAM JACQUES born July 28 1890. His Australian War Records say that he was born in Sussex England and his father's name was GEORGE. Also in the 'Sussex Strays' Census 1891 is a Martha Jacques aged 17. Camberley HAM p358. The Parish is shown as West Lavington. Any information may help to find the birth place/family of my gggrandfather, John Jacques b c1812. Thank you Judith Jacques 12602

    08/01/2008 04:58:18
    1. Re: [SFHG] SFHG Digest, Vol 3, Issue 216
    2. Chris Page
    3. The Inner Temple is one of the four Inns of Court that all Barristers and Judges in the UK have to belong to (I am a member of Inner Temple). The Inns have nothing to do with freemasonary and we do not refer to each other as brothers, although they may have done when Eileen's postcard was written. On the other hand, is it possible that the writer of the postcard was sending it to their brother (sibling) at Inner Temple? Chris On 1 Aug 2008 at 8:06, Claire Wickens wrote: > ...and the Inner Temple is one of the London Inns of Court. (They > do have > an online database of admissions, but I'm not sure what dates it > covers.) > > Claire > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Bridget Meads" <bridgetmeads@btinternet.com> > To: "CAROL BURGESS" <carol.burgess@btinternet.com>; > <sfhg@rootsweb.com> > Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2008 10:45 PM > Subject: Re: [SFHG] SFHG Digest, Vol 3, Issue 216 > > > > Fair thought Carol, but I Imagine a Freemason would have concluded > with > > 'fraternally' rather than 'love' .... > > > > Bridget 10773 > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "CAROL BURGESS" <carol.burgess@btinternet.com> > > To: <sfhg@rootsweb.com> > > Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2008 9:39 PM > > Subject: Re: [SFHG] SFHG Digest, Vol 3, Issue 216 > > > > > > > Dear Eileen > > > Could the sender have been writing to a fellow Freemason, ie > 'brother', > > > 'Inner Temple'? > > > > > > Regards > > > Carol 11557 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > > > > > Message: 2 > > > Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 06:51:44 +0100 > > > From: "Eileen Austin" <e.austin@virgin.net> > > > Subject: [SFHG] Mr C GOODFELLOW > > > To: "SFHG SURNAME LIST" <SFHG-L@rootsweb.com> > > > Message-ID: <004601c8f208$5982bea0$0100a8c0@newpc> > > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > > > > > I have a photograph of three people, an elderly lady seated, > with a lady > > > and gent standing behind, taken in a garden. > > > > > > It is in the form of a postcard which was addressed to Mr C > Goodfellow, > 4 > > > Tanfield Court, Inner Temple. > > > > > > Message reads Dear brother, Thanks for the letter. Shall be very > pleased > > > to come over on Friday evening , about 6.00pm. Love ?? SgG. > > > > > > His address given as Crouch End, Stamp is franked Hornsea. I > cannot read > > > the date but the Kings Head is facing to the left and it is a > Green Half > > > Penny stamp. > > > > > > Anyone wanting it send me an address and I will put it in the > post. > > > > > > Regards > > > > > > Eileen Turrell 12765 > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > > > > > ------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > > > SFHG-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without > the quotes > > > in the subject and the body of the message > > > > > > ------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > SFHG-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the > quotes in > the subject and the body of the message > > > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > SFHG-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the > quotes in the subject and the body of the message >

    08/01/2008 02:15:19
    1. Re: [SFHG] SFHG Digest, Vol 3, Issue 216
    2. Claire Wickens
    3. ...and the Inner Temple is one of the London Inns of Court. (They do have an online database of admissions, but I'm not sure what dates it covers.) Claire ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bridget Meads" <bridgetmeads@btinternet.com> To: "CAROL BURGESS" <carol.burgess@btinternet.com>; <sfhg@rootsweb.com> Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2008 10:45 PM Subject: Re: [SFHG] SFHG Digest, Vol 3, Issue 216 > Fair thought Carol, but I Imagine a Freemason would have concluded with > 'fraternally' rather than 'love' .... > > Bridget 10773 > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "CAROL BURGESS" <carol.burgess@btinternet.com> > To: <sfhg@rootsweb.com> > Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2008 9:39 PM > Subject: Re: [SFHG] SFHG Digest, Vol 3, Issue 216 > > > > Dear Eileen > > Could the sender have been writing to a fellow Freemason, ie 'brother', > > 'Inner Temple'? > > > > Regards > > Carol 11557 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > > > Message: 2 > > Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 06:51:44 +0100 > > From: "Eileen Austin" <e.austin@virgin.net> > > Subject: [SFHG] Mr C GOODFELLOW > > To: "SFHG SURNAME LIST" <SFHG-L@rootsweb.com> > > Message-ID: <004601c8f208$5982bea0$0100a8c0@newpc> > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > > > I have a photograph of three people, an elderly lady seated, with a lady > > and gent standing behind, taken in a garden. > > > > It is in the form of a postcard which was addressed to Mr C Goodfellow, 4 > > Tanfield Court, Inner Temple. > > > > Message reads Dear brother, Thanks for the letter. Shall be very pleased > > to come over on Friday evening , about 6.00pm. Love ?? SgG. > > > > His address given as Crouch End, Stamp is franked Hornsea. I cannot read > > the date but the Kings Head is facing to the left and it is a Green Half > > Penny stamp. > > > > Anyone wanting it send me an address and I will put it in the post. > > > > Regards > > > > Eileen Turrell 12765 > > > > ------------------------------ > > > > ------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > > SFHG-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes > > in the subject and the body of the message > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to SFHG-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message >

    08/01/2008 02:06:31
    1. Re: [SFHG] Fwd: Customs and Traditions of the Royal Navy
    2. Thanks to all for their efforts to forward Mike's message. I don't know what the problem was. Unfortunately the book I am looking for is not the one suggested by Mike or Jim. I must have the wrong title in my head. I will keep looking and hopefully come across it. Best wishes to all on the list from a very hot Spain. Alan 10469 From: Warwick & Eleanor Dilley Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2008 12:30 AM To: alaninspain@msn.com Subject: Fwd: [SFHG] Customs and Traditions of the Royal Navy Alan, You may get this several times as Mike has requested someone forward it to you as he couldn't get through. Regards, Eleanor. Begin forwarded message: From: Mike Strong <mikestrong@waitrose.com> Date: 31 July 2008 07:10:54 GMT+10:00 To: "<alaninspain@msn.com>" <alaninspain@msn.com> Cc: SFHG SxFamHXGrp <SFHG-L@rootsweb.com> Subject: [SFHG] Customs and Traditions of the Royal Navy Dear Alan, I think that the book you want is Commander A.B.Campbell's "CUSTOMS AND TRADITIONS OF THE ROYAL NAVY With Chapters on the Royal Marines, the Women's Royal Naval Service, Naval Decorations and Medals." Published by Gale & Polden Limited, Aldershot, 1956. I've shown the full title exactly as it appears on the title page but the dust- jacket has only the short title shown in capitals. I do sympathise with your loss, having myself lost several books in that way and had others spoiled. Nowadays I don't let my books out of the house. MikeS. On 30 Jul 2008, at 18:45, <alaninspain@msn.com> <alaninspain@msn.com> wrote: As so much of our past is connected to the sea, I wonder if anyone can help me to locate a book. I believe it's title is "Traditions And Customs of the Royal Navy". I lent my copy to someone and it was not returned. Alan. ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to SFHG-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

    07/31/2008 05:54:10
    1. Re: [SFHG] Jacques
    2. Mark Milton
    3. Judith, Looking at the Records Search on the Australian National Archives, it lists a William Jacques who was born on July 28 1890 in Portsmouth, England. The next of kin was listed as L Jacques. The date range listed in 1939-1948 (i.e WWII records). These records have not yet been accessed and hence have not yet been scanned. However, you can order them I think. The records that you have looked at are his WWI records. which are scanned in. Looking at them it states that he was born in Rogate, Sussex and his father (George Jacques) lived in Liss, Hants. It appears that William Jacques died 7.8.74, age 84. There is a birth registered for a William Jacques registered in July Q 1890 in Midhurst district (2b, 389) In the 1901 census his family is mistranscribed as Jaynes. Class: /RG13/; Piece: /1092/; Folio: /70/; Page: /24 Crocker Hall, Cooper's Lane, Liss, Hants George Jacques; Head; age 39; Domestic Gardener; b Grantham, Hants Elizabeth Jacques; Wife; age; age 38; b Rogate, Susses Ada Jacques; Daughter; age 14; b Rogate, Sussex William Jacques; Son; age 10; b Rogate, Sussex George was the son of Edmond Jacques (b abt 1824 in Liss) and Jane (b abt 1826 in Rogate) Edmund Jacques was the son of Ann Jacques. He had a sister Caroline Jacques There is a John Jacques who was born in about 1812 and died in 1898 in Chichester District In 1891, he is listed as being born in Furneux, Surrey. He is living in the household of William Jacques (b //abt 1852 in Liss) In 1881, he is listed as being born in Fernhurst, Sussex. He is living in the household of Edmund and Jane Jacques. He is listed as a lodger. In 1871, he is listed as being born in Fernhurst, Sussex and is married to Sarah with a 15 year old son, Henry In 1861, he is listed as being born in Liss. he is married to Sarah In 1851, he is listed as being born in Farnhurst, Surrey. He is married to Sarah. He is mistranscribed as John Jeeves. In 1841, he is listed as being born in Hants. He is married to Sarah There is a John Jacques who was christened in Farnhurst, Sussex (Son of John and Ann) // I would guess that John Jacques (b 1812) is the brother of Edmund Jacques who belongs to the direct line of the William Jacques that inspired this enquiry. Liss and Rogate are less than 4 miles apart. Fernhurst is 8-9 miles from Rogate and Liss. I hope that this was helpful (and correct!) Regards Mark Milton / judy@wilddoghill.com.au wrote: > Hello List members > > This is long shot, but would someone be able to find a birth or any details > for a WILLIAM JACQUES born July 28 1890. His Australian War Records say that > he was born in Sussex England and his father's name was GEORGE. > Also in the 'Sussex Strays' Census 1891 is a Martha Jacques aged 17. > Camberley HAM p358. > The Parish is shown as West Lavington. > > Any information may help to find the birth place/family of my gggrandfather, > John Jacques b c1812. > > Thank you > Judith Jacques > 12602 > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to SFHG-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message > >

    07/31/2008 05:33:43
    1. Re: [SFHG] SFHG Digest, Vol 3, Issue 216
    2. Bridget Meads
    3. Fair thought Carol, but I Imagine a Freemason would have concluded with 'fraternally' rather than 'love' .... Bridget 10773 ----- Original Message ----- From: "CAROL BURGESS" <carol.burgess@btinternet.com> To: <sfhg@rootsweb.com> Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2008 9:39 PM Subject: Re: [SFHG] SFHG Digest, Vol 3, Issue 216 > Dear Eileen > Could the sender have been writing to a fellow Freemason, ie 'brother', > 'Inner Temple'? > > Regards > Carol 11557 > > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 06:51:44 +0100 > From: "Eileen Austin" <e.austin@virgin.net> > Subject: [SFHG] Mr C GOODFELLOW > To: "SFHG SURNAME LIST" <SFHG-L@rootsweb.com> > Message-ID: <004601c8f208$5982bea0$0100a8c0@newpc> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > I have a photograph of three people, an elderly lady seated, with a lady > and gent standing behind, taken in a garden. > > It is in the form of a postcard which was addressed to Mr C Goodfellow, 4 > Tanfield Court, Inner Temple. > > Message reads Dear brother, Thanks for the letter. Shall be very pleased > to come over on Friday evening , about 6.00pm. Love ?? SgG. > > His address given as Crouch End, Stamp is franked Hornsea. I cannot read > the date but the Kings Head is facing to the left and it is a Green Half > Penny stamp. > > Anyone wanting it send me an address and I will put it in the post. > > Regards > > Eileen Turrell 12765 > > ------------------------------ > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > SFHG-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes > in the subject and the body of the message

    07/31/2008 04:45:48
    1. Re: [SFHG] SFHG Digest, Vol 3, Issue 216
    2. CAROL BURGESS
    3. Dear Eileen Could the sender have been writing to a fellow Freemason, ie 'brother', 'Inner Temple'? Regards Carol 11557 ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 06:51:44 +0100 From: "Eileen Austin" <e.austin@virgin.net> Subject: [SFHG] Mr C GOODFELLOW To: "SFHG SURNAME LIST" <SFHG-L@rootsweb.com> Message-ID: <004601c8f208$5982bea0$0100a8c0@newpc> Content-Type: text/plain;    charset="iso-8859-1" I have a photograph of three people, an elderly lady seated, with a lady and gent standing behind, taken in a garden. It is in the form of a postcard which was addressed to Mr C Goodfellow, 4 Tanfield Court, Inner Temple. Message reads Dear brother, Thanks for the letter. Shall be very pleased to come over on Friday evening , about 6.00pm. Love ?? SgG. His address given as Crouch End, Stamp is franked Hornsea.  I cannot read the date but the Kings Head is facing to the left and it is a Green Half Penny stamp. Anyone wanting it send me an address and I will put it in the post. Regards Eileen Turrell 12765 ------------------------------

    07/31/2008 02:39:33