What if the info was on separate pages, Y-DNA results on one and page with lines and links on another. I know that would not be ideal but would keep it from being so much work to redo. The example Vicki sent is along the lines of what I was thinking as to grouping. As for me, I´m no expert as to doing web pages and I find the FTDNA setup hard to work with. It seems very crude or otherwise I don´t know how to use it. _____ Fra: marie sellers hollinger [mailto:mari@netins.net] Sendt: 4. juni 2009 04:02 Til: 'Linda Peacock'; SELLERS@rootsweb. com Emne: RE: Sellers Y-DNA site LINDA, thanks for any suggestions. FT sends our chart results by proven haplo's. We have diff haplo's #'s that match these proven matches, so grouped together as proven, not just by haplo #'s. They are coming out with a new chart foremat, don't know how good/diff it will be. I would like to have a #/link to family groups. Each person needs to send their chart, so we can follow it and several/most have done this. We canNot link anyone till Proven. Just the proven test matches to those families. Kinda like now, but a Link to that group family. Then I need to manually post these names and charts to that link. I have been thinking of this, just need time to experiment. AND each time we have new results, they send me a new chart, which would NOT have our old links in it. SO, redo each, everytime?? I may be able to work around this, by just extracting the one or two new results and try pasting them into the old excel sheet, which has our links to group pages. But, sometimes, they upgrade haplo's and I may not catch if I didn't repost complete chart. Must study more, but, I would like a link to family groups that match. Been thinking, but, not doing on it. Thanks for suggestions. Welcomed. marie, iowa -----Original Message----- From: Linda Peacock [mailto:lindapeacock@vip.cybercity.dk] Sent: Wednesday, June 03, 2009 10:48 AM To: mari@netins.net Subject: Sellers Y-DNA site Marie, I´ve just been looking at the site to see which families are represented and have a suggestion. I think it would be good to group the members by haplogroups and if possible, within the haplogroups by family groups, from most distant common ancestor. The Ross site is an example of what I´m thinking of, though not sure how the administrator did that. I´ve tried grouping our Bonham site and it´s not easy. Just a suggestion. Yours, Linda