>From: <achatac@bellsouth.net> >To: "diane roscoe" <fraggle.roscoe@hotmail.co.uk> >Subject: Re: [WIG LIST] 1684 parish census >Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 18:14:44 -0500 > >My observation is that husband is listed first, then wife, who usually is >listed with her maiden name. Children will follow in order of birth, oldest >to youngest, and then any other people living there. On the 1684 census >that seems to be the pattern. >Also, on that census children over 10 years old were listed. Those under 10 >were not listed. If anyone out there differs with this, please let us know. >Carolyn Achata > > > > From: "diane roscoe" <fraggle.roscoe@hotmail.co.uk> > > Date: 2007/02/26 Mon PM 04:59:54 EST > > To: SCT-WIGTOWNSHIRE@rootsweb.com > > Subject: [WIG LIST] 1684 parish census > > > > hello, > > Could anyone tell me if realtionships can be inferred from the order of >the > > people listed in the parish roll, or if they were listed in order of > > seniority. I have made certain assumptions from the order in the past, >but I > > am wondering if there are any 'rules' I should know about. > > Diane > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > > Get Hotmail, News, Sport and Entertainment from MSN on your mobile. > > http://www.msn.txt4content.com/ > > > > > > ------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to >SCT-WIGTOWNSHIRE-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without >the quotes in the subject and the body of the message > > > _________________________________________________________________ Exclusive Ed Byrne daily comedy clips on MSN Video http://specials.uk.msn.com/edbyrne/