Note: The Rootsweb Mailing Lists will be shut down on April 6, 2023. (More info)
RootsWeb.com Mailing Lists
Total: 1/1
    1. Re: [SUT] Spicey Posh
    2. Iain Sutherland
    3. I think the further we keep away from the residents of Beckingham Palace the better who knows one day it might be "What The Butler Read on E. Mails" ouch we could all be exposed! Iain ----- Original Message ----- From: John McKay <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 9:38 AM Subject: RE: [SUT] Spicey Posh > Points well made Fraser. I think the legal difference is that our's is an > acronym of a group of words and as Christine notes, we are not taking any > liberties or association to Posh Spice. > Not sure about Sara's point though. Writing a timid letter is fraught with > danger, better to leave it alone completely me thinks. > Sara's idea however did raise a point - I wonder, not being right into Posh > (of the little letter variety) and the Spice Girls about her origins - does > she have her roots in Sutherland perchance? > The reason for the question is related to us potentially securing a high > profile patron - something which always has considerable promotional and > profile advantages to a group such as ours. Not that Posh Spice has any > appeal to me at all, but one does reflect on the potential benefits a Patron > might bring to us. > Perhaps something the Committee might consider at some stage. > Just a thought. > John McKay > Australia > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Monday, 11 November 2002 12:12 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [SUT] Spicey Posh > > > As can be seen by going to www.theposh.com Peterborough FC are into POSH in > a > big way, and would appear to have the upper hand with regard to copyright > registration. The trouble is that whoever wins might be just that much more > touchy about others using " their " trademark and this may even impact on > ourselves, despite the fact that we might be very small beer in a national > sense. > Would P.O.S.H. count as a different trademark to POSH? > This would seem to be getting into murky water--I'm almost sorry I brought > it > up in the first place!! > > Fraser MacKenzie > > Sutherland. > > > ==== SCT-SUTHERLAND Mailing List ==== > Please visit our NEW POSH web site at > www.sutherlandheritage.com > > ============================== > To join Ancestry.com and access our 1.2 billion online genealogy records, go > to: > http://www.ancestry.com/rd/redir.asp?targetid=571&sourceid=1237 > > > > ==== SCT-SUTHERLAND Mailing List ==== > Our Member's Interest's site > http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.com/~suthlist/index.htm > > ============================== > To join Ancestry.com and access our 1.2 billion online genealogy records, go to: > http://www.ancestry.com/rd/redir.asp?targetid=571&sourceid=1237 > >

    11/13/2002 11:46:40