Hi This is a bit confusing!! If Martin is the father of Owen you would expect him to be listed first. It could be adjacent houses (other rellies?) It could also be a mistranscribing of the census line in one case. But if Martin should be line 13 who is missing? Name, Age, Parish, District, Book, Page, Line Martin Mahon, 50, Greenock, 436, 40, 3, 18 Owen Mahon, 18, Greenock, 436, 40, 3, 15 There is also John Mahon, 26, Greenock, 444, 126, 6, 14 I have probably added to the puzzle, sorry! Mike John, 26, Line 19 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- FIGHT BACK AGAINST SPAM! Download Spam Inspector, the Award Winning Anti-Spam Filter http://mail.giantcompany.com ----- Original Message ----- From: <Gene7mac@aol.com> To: <SCT-RENFREW-L@rootsweb.com> Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2003 2:51 PM Subject: [Renfrew] 1851 Census for Greenock > Hi Mike > Could you look up Martin Mahon and his family especially son Owen. Is Martin > still married? Does Owen have any siblings? They could be in Greenock as Owen > was married there in 1852. > Thank you again for your offer > Gene > > > ==== SCT-RENFREW Mailing List ==== > ********************************************************************** > The Renfrewshire Query board is at > http://cgi.rootsweb.com/~genbbs/genbbs.cgi/Scotland/Renfrew > >