I re-registered to have a say. After all, it was me that was being attacked I could hardly believe the half-truths and poisonous garbage that I saw in print The "voluminous" info was a simple request to Rootsweb, asking about their rules. All that was included was a link to one post. I have no desire to see anyone expelled. That was downright fabrication. The simple fact is that this list is run in a dictatorial fashion - why ?? Bob Murray's response hit on quite a few truths. That was my meaning when I referred to 'the current state of affairs'. I have been contacted by Rootsweb who replied < I have discussed with her the need to allow for the discussion of other web sites that are related to the list's topic and expect compliance on that part > What this means is that a lister can mention ANY website in relation to their research Ida/Ian If you spent as much time working on your website/list as you do attacking me, then your site/list would be second to none. You have to drop the jealousy or whatever it is, that has created this situation Limited lister support was given to admin, one of whom only months ago was saying "why doesn't MF offer me some help with my brick wall ?", or words to that effect. MF spent a whole day researching said family and made three posts to the list. No reply. Never again L**** Intelligent listers will use both Mullgenealogy AND Mullfamilies Michael

Whatever happened to "live and let live? Michael was dissatisfied with the original Mull site, and after trying to improve it without success, he did something about it, and should be congratulated for the time and effort expended. Any contact I have had has been courteous, correct and swift. The original site is a great resounce, but it has its faults. There is room for another site and noone should be asking people to take sides, decrying the other, or asking for expulsions. Jim Morison ----- Original Message ----- From: "MF" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, July 29, 2011 9:52 PM Subject: [SCT-ISLEOFMULL] PLEASE READ >I re-registered to have a say. After all, it was me that was being attacked > > I could hardly believe the half-truths and poisonous garbage that I saw in > print > > The "voluminous" info was a simple request to Rootsweb, asking about their > rules. All that was included was a link to one post. > > I have no desire to see anyone expelled. That was downright fabrication. > > The simple fact is that this list is run in a dictatorial fashion - why ?? > > Bob Murray's response hit on quite a few truths. That was my meaning when > I referred to 'the current state of affairs'. > > I have been contacted by Rootsweb who replied > > < I have discussed with her the need to allow for the discussion of other > web sites that are related to the list's topic and expect compliance on > that part > > > What this means is that a lister can mention ANY website in relation to > their research > > Ida/Ian > > If you spent as much time working on your website/list as you do attacking > me, then your site/list would be second to none. > > You have to drop the jealousy or whatever it is, that has created this > situation > > Limited lister support was given to admin, one of whom only months ago was > saying "why doesn't MF offer me some help with my brick wall ?", or words > to that effect. > > MF spent a whole day researching said family and made three posts to the > list. No reply. Never again L**** > > Intelligent listers will use both Mullgenealogy AND Mullfamilies > > > > Michael > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without > the quotes in the subject and the body of the message