Probate Court Pickens County December 5, 1896 Sarah E. Martin, J. T. Youngblood, as Administrators, etal Against Lucy H. Spearman, etal, Defendants To J. B. Newbery, Probate Judge and C. E. Robinson, attorney for the plaintiffs in the above mentioned case: Take notice that the defendants appeal from the judgement of the Probate Court, herein, on the following grounds, to wit:- Because the court erred in holding, in his judgement in said case dated 9th November 1896, that the personal property of the intestates was not sufficient to pay his debts, and that the personal property of the deceased was not subject to his debts. Because the court erred in holding that it was necessary to sell the real estate of the intestates in aid of assets. Because the court erred in holding that the defense failed to prove that there was personal property belonging to the estate of the intestates. Because the court erred in ordering the lands, described in said decree, to be sold in aid of assets, and in directing the administrators of the proceeds of such sale. Because the said judgement of the Probate judge is contrary to the evidence in said case there appearing no reason in said evidence for an order for the sale of the real estate. Dec. 5, 1896 Morgan & Blassingame Defendants Attorneys