To: Grant Muckart Here is what we have on Fielding Scantland, Scandland, Scantling. ( scantling is an old English unit of measure) This was prepared by a first cousin more than 20 years ago after onsite research in Washington, D.D. and Virginia. "Book T, page 378 of the Culpeper County Records notes the following entry: "Washington from Trustees to Fielding Scandland, June 16, 1798."" "From the COMPENDIUM OF AMERICAN GENEALOGY, Volume VII. FIELDING SCANTLING came from Scotland to Virginia, His son James W. Scantling (1804-1888) married Mary Yeager. James and Mary's daughter, Caroline Elizabeth (1829-1888, in 1849 married Dr. James Augustus (1826-1911). Dr. Augustus was a physician and surgeon and resided in Chattanooga, Tennessee and Ainsworth, Nebraska." " The 1810 Federal Census of Virginia, page 114, notes that Fielding Scantling resided in Culpeper County, Virginia and was head of household and that he and his wife were over forty-five. They had two boys under age 10, two boys from ten to sixteen and two boys sixteen to twenty-six. Ther was one girl between sixteen and twenty-six." "The 1820 Federal Census of Virginia, page 157 notes that Fielding Scantling was a resident of Shenandoah County, Strawsbury Township, Virginia. There were no Scantlings or Scantlands as Head of household in Culpeper County in 1820" I just got started in Family History research last summer. Have found that Dr. James Augustus (above) should be Dr. James Augustus Kenaston per FIRST FAMILIES OF AMERICA, page 257, under Kenaston, Thomas Corwin. It also says that Mary Yeager (1802-1868) married James W. Scanland (1804-1888) of Washington, VA in 1827 at Woodstock, VA. My source for this page and page 699 in next paragraph is Genealogy.com Family Archive Image. On page 699, under Kenaston, Hampton Ray Jr. it says that Dr. James Augustus Kenaston married in 1849 to Caroline Elizabeth Scanland (1829-1888), daughter of James W and Mary Yeager. James W son of Fielding, "Scot. to Va." There is one Rootsweb.com site (39815) that refers to Fielding Scanland but the emphasis is on the Kenaston family. There is another one (23791) that seems to be confused. The Scantland/Hollingsworth/Manning/Lamb site is material that I uploaded. WFT Vol41 Tree 1079 has Fielding Scanland and is primarily about the Kenaston family. Thank you very much for your help and consideration. Don Scantland Ohio