In reply to Al and Cathy: Phillip Lupo's Caroline is also shown in his household in 1860, just by her initial "C" age 37. So I agree with Cathy that she was not the wife of James Price, but it may be that both were named after an older Lupo family member named Caroline? Good eye, Al. I haven't talked to Lou Pero in a long time, and haven't seen any current chart she might have worked on. But Lou did some fine, in-depth research on the Lupos in the primary records, especially in Robeson. I have never found any real clue as to the identity of Phillip Lupo of Marion County. But I finally found one document in the court records or something similar (can't find it right now), where he AND William Lupo both signed, or were both at an estate sale, or something like that. Nothing showing a relationship, but certainly showing that they weren't strangers to each other, though they lived miles apart from each other. Phillip seemed to be just a little younger than William, but not young enough to have been William's son. It's been difficult for me to avoid speculating that they might have been brothers. Oh, we do LOVE to theorize with little to no evidence available, don't we? Honey, I can theorize with the best of them. And I just love it. My pet peeve is when that theorizing is presented on a chart, with no clarifying data, no notes, no nothing to indicate that it is anything but the butt naked truth. Years ago, I was looking through the printed census records, just browsing around, you know. And all of a sudden it jumped out at me that Luke Johnson had a wife named Appy. And this Appy was just about the same estimated age as the youngest daughter of old Barrett Barfield. And in the same general neighborhood. And I had been wondering what became of Barrett's Appy - who she married, if perhaps Sellers was wrong, and she got married here, or did she really move to Georgia with her father? Now, I wondered, could she have married Luke Johnson? A short time later, I worked up a family group sheet for old Barrett. And beside his daughter Appy, just so I wouldn't forget about it, I put, in parentheses, with three big question marks, (Luke Johnson???). But no further evidence was ever found for a marriage like this. In fact, a correspondent sent some evidence to me that Luke Johnson had probably married someone totally different. My theory was shot down, but I forgot to remove that little note from my family group sheet. Sure enough, several years later I sent it off to someone who asked me about the Barfield family, never even stopping to think about that reference to (Luke Johnson???) that was still on my fgs. Well, now you can go to nearly any Barfield chart on the web, and you will find little old Appy Barfield shown there married to Luke Johnson. No question marks. No parentheses. Apparently those got in someone's way, so they removed them. And dozens of people are still busy, propagating the gospel that Appy Barfield married Luke Johnson. And every time I see that chart for Barrett Barfield's family online, I know it is my own (cause no one else in the world would have had any reason to put together Luke Johnson and Appy Barfield in the Lake View area). And it has been butchered. You can readily see how much confidence that gives me in uncited online charts, and the quality of the data they contain. The only happy thing about the whole incident is that my name and address have been removed from the thing, so I suffer no embarrassment from it. (Until now, when I've decided to confess, that is.) Not sure how I got here from Lupo. Just rambling.... Jo Church Dickerson