Count me in Donna ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bil Brasington" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, July 04, 2000 4:15 PM Subject: RE: [SCLANCAS] 1850 Census > I will add you to lust of interested people, if you like. If I get enough > people interested, we will decide the course. The one thing I have in mind > is a tool that a researcher can use to resolve 1850 questions. If you have > seen the Kershaw County 1850 espanded census, you will know my aims. > I have a Tabitha (Betty)PIERCE married to John MOTLEY/MOTLOW about 1781 in > Kershaw County. > > Don't see any Pierce in 1850 census. > > Bil > > From: "D J Peirce" <[email protected]> > Reply-To: [email protected] > To: [email protected] > Subject: RE: [SCLANCAS] 1850 Census > Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2000 16:54:12 -0400 > > This sounds very interesting, I'd like to examine it further...I find so > little about my families in Lancaster--but they were indeed there, as I have > found just enough to let me know that's where they lived. > Please explain a little more about it. It does sound super! > Doris > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Sue Brooks [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Tuesday, July 04, 2000 7:41 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [SCLANCAS] 1850 Census > > > > Bill, > > I, too, would like to see the expanded 1850 census also and would be glad to > contribute anything documented that I have. For a while I've wished there > were a place to connect up Lancaster Co. (AND Chesterfield information) > > You've mentioned the expanded Kershaw - where do you either access it or > purchase a copy? > > > Bil Brasington <[email protected]> wrote: > I threw out the idea to see if there is enough interest to persue. > Everytime I use the Kershaw Expanded 1850 I am so pleased with it as opposed > to when I check out the 1850 Lancaster. > > I would be looking to expand the 1850 with more data, full names, women's > maiden names, actual dates, etc. Any computer format with some indication > of its source. A lot can be derived by use of the 1860 census and cemetery > records but what I don't want is unattributed guesses. I have had too many > people say they got the "fact" from LDS or Family Tree Maker CD, which is > like saying I heard it from a neighbor. > > GEDCOM, Rich Text File, whatever. I can get the data into a format. I will > find a home for it on the net. > > Interested? > > Bil > > > From: "Lyn Brudnicki" > Reply-To: [email protected] > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [SCLANCAS] 1850 Census > Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2000 18:28:35 -0500 > > Bill...do you want only families/connections of those appearing on the 1850 > census? I'd love to see this project happen! > Evelyn > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Bil Brasington" > To: > Sent: Monday, July 03, 2000 12:33 PM > Subject: [SCLANCAS] 1850 Census > > > > As all of us who have tried to work with the 1850, frustration is the > > keyword. Kershaw County has published a great Expanded 1850 Census. > > > > Any interest in joining with me to do like wise? > > > > I see it is a huge GEDCOM, starting with the census and expanding full > names > > and adding dates and locations, marriage data, and military service. A > > general research tool to be shared. I assume we can find an online home > for > > it. > (snipped) > > > > ________________________________________________________________________ > Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com > > > > --------------------------------- > Do You Yahoo!? > Kick off your party with Yahoo! Invites. > > > > ________________________________________________________________________ > Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com >