If you are trying to enlarge a thumb nail picture to get a useable picture, the answer is probably no. There are just not enough pixels available in a thumb to create anything much larger. Your program may try to interpolate the missing pixels, but I don't think you will be happy with the results. Ron >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Nick Ashby" >> >Is there any way I can enlarge thumb nail pictures to s decent size > > > >

I use Paint Shop Pro to print multiple pictures without captions on a single page and FTM 10 scrapbooks to print multiple pictures with selected details in captions. Current project in FTM has about 200 images for a single individual sorted by date. Do you want to share larger thumbnail pictures or use them for reference? There are some specialized thumnail programs but I've never found a use for them in addition to genealogy and scanning software products used daily. Windows XP also has a number of image options that reduce the need for thumbnail products. Elizabeth in Canada ----- Original Message ----- From: "Nick Ashby" > >Is there any way I can enlarge thumb nail pictures to s decent size

--=======1396561E======= Content-Type: text/plain; x-avg-checked=avg-ok-37A49E3; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Frank, At 19:09 16/12/02 -0300, you wrote: >One reason: if you write to an address with the word "request" in it, it= =20 >means that it goes to a human for action. Someone is either not reading=20 >these requests from people wanting to unsubscribe, or is unaware that=20 >he/she has to take action to unsubscribe those people. > >Frank That's not so. If you write to [email protected] it goes to a= =20 computer. This also happens with other list servers I have been on. That'= s=20 why when you subscribe or unsubscribe you must not add please, thank you,= =20 signatures etc - for it goes to a computer, not a human. Cheers, Cathy=20 --=======1396561E=======--

>Is there any way I can enlarge thumb nail pictures to s decent size > Nick Ashby Eastcote Middx. > > > >. >

I usually put "TEST - IGNORE" in the subject line. This means that other listers can delete the message without opening it - and are thus spared from reading that they should have ignored it! Frank On Monday, December 16, 2002, at 06:35 pm, Ronald Whitney wrote: > I would like to apologize to Ambrose and anyone else on the mailing list > that I annoyed or offended. > > By way of explanation: The old e-mail address I had AND the address I > was > sent when I subscribed a couple of days ago were incorrect. Hence my > messages did not appear on the list or in my E-mail. The test was the > only > way I could think of to find out if a different address would work. As > it > turned out, the correct address worked to get my messages to the > list. I > get the messages that other people write to the list in my inbox, but > not > my own. I find this a little strange, but I can live with it. > > I appreciate that Ambrose wrote to me directly. I am only replying to > the > entire list because he said I was annoying everyone. If this is so, I > apologize to all of you. > > Ron > > Return-Path: <[email protected]> > From: [email protected] > Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2002 14:13:11 EST > Subject: Re: [SP] Test #3 > To: [email protected] > > This is not the place for testing. Messages like this cannot be > ignored. > Please find some other means of testing and desist from annoying > everyone.. > > Ambrose > > > -- > El mensaje recibido, fue analizado por el Servicio de Antivirus de > Alternativa > Gratis y se encuentra libre de virus y contenidos peligrosos. > > Frank John Frank Nowikowski Buenos Aires, Argentina [email protected]

On Monday, December 16, 2002, at 02:43 pm, Ann Winder wrote: > I agree...they put us at first under "technology", now under > "miscellaneous". I have no control over that... but a Whole Lot of > people > have found the list, so I guess it's OK. Yes, but once on,they can't get off. The unsubscribe procedure doesn't work. One reason: if you write to an address with the word "request" in it, it means that it goes to a human for action. Someone is either not reading these requests from people wanting to unsubscribe, or is unaware that he/she has to take action to unsubscribe those people. Frank John Frank Nowikowski Buenos Aires, Argentina [email protected]

I agree it is hard to find. I am happy that you were able to solve your problem. You didn't annoy or offend me. I need help sometimes too. Rose ----- Original Message ----- From: "Joyce Ragels" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, December 16, 2002 5:16 PM Subject: Re: [SP] Apology > R > > You did not annoy everyone. Glad you seem to have it resolved now. > > J > > Ronald Whitney wrote: > > I would like to apologize to Ambrose and anyone else on the mailing list > > that I annoyed or offended. > > > > By way of explanation: The old e-mail address I had AND the address I was > > sent when I subscribed a couple of days ago were incorrect. Hence my > > messages did not appear on the list or in my E-mail. The test was the only > > way I could think of to find out if a different address would work. As it > > turned out, the correct address worked to get my messages to the list. I > > get the messages that other people write to the list in my inbox, but not > > my own. I find this a little strange, but I can live with it. > > > > I appreciate that Ambrose wrote to me directly. I am only replying to the > > entire list because he said I was annoying everyone. If this is so, I > > apologize to all of you. > > > > Ron > > > > Return-Path: <[email protected]> > > From: [email protected] > > Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2002 14:13:11 EST > > Subject: Re: [SP] Test #3 > > To: [email protected] > > > > This is not the place for testing. Messages like this cannot be ignored. > > Please find some other means of testing and desist from annoying everyone.. > > > > Ambrose > > > > > > > -- > Joyce Ragels > Tucson Arizona USA > > Never drive faster than your guardian angel can fly. > - Unknown > > >

Elizabeth, What a good idea, I'm glad you talked about this. It will be my first project with the (hopefully) new digital Christmas camera. Thanks. Babs in Las Vegas On Mon, 16 Dec 2002 09:26:48 -0700 "E.Rodier" <[email protected]> writes: > > Many small, handmade Christmas tree ornaments were scanned for an > earlier > project before purchase of a digital camera with a closeup feature. > ________________________________________________________________ Sign Up for Juno Platinum Internet Access Today Only $9.95 per month! Visit www.juno.com

I would like to apologize to Ambrose and anyone else on the mailing list that I annoyed or offended. By way of explanation: The old e-mail address I had AND the address I was sent when I subscribed a couple of days ago were incorrect. Hence my messages did not appear on the list or in my E-mail. The test was the only way I could think of to find out if a different address would work. As it turned out, the correct address worked to get my messages to the list. I get the messages that other people write to the list in my inbox, but not my own. I find this a little strange, but I can live with it. I appreciate that Ambrose wrote to me directly. I am only replying to the entire list because he said I was annoying everyone. If this is so, I apologize to all of you. Ron Return-Path: <[email protected]> From: [email protected] Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2002 14:13:11 EST Subject: Re: [SP] Test #3 To: [email protected] This is not the place for testing. Messages like this cannot be ignored. Please find some other means of testing and desist from annoying everyone.. Ambrose

R You did not annoy everyone. Glad you seem to have it resolved now. J Ronald Whitney wrote: > I would like to apologize to Ambrose and anyone else on the mailing list > that I annoyed or offended. > > By way of explanation: The old e-mail address I had AND the address I was > sent when I subscribed a couple of days ago were incorrect. Hence my > messages did not appear on the list or in my E-mail. The test was the only > way I could think of to find out if a different address would work. As it > turned out, the correct address worked to get my messages to the list. I > get the messages that other people write to the list in my inbox, but not > my own. I find this a little strange, but I can live with it. > > I appreciate that Ambrose wrote to me directly. I am only replying to the > entire list because he said I was annoying everyone. If this is so, I > apologize to all of you. > > Ron > > Return-Path: <[email protected]> > From: [email protected] > Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2002 14:13:11 EST > Subject: Re: [SP] Test #3 > To: [email protected] > > This is not the place for testing. Messages like this cannot be ignored. > Please find some other means of testing and desist from annoying everyone.. > > Ambrose > > -- Joyce Ragels Tucson Arizona USA Never drive faster than your guardian angel can fly. - Unknown

I agree...they put us at first under "technology", now under "miscellaneous". I have no control over that... but a Whole Lot of people have found the list, so I guess it's OK. Ann ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ronald Whitney" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, December 16, 2002 9:49 AM Subject: [SP] Seasons Greetings > Hello all! > > I have been reviewing the archives and decided to subscribe again until I > get too busy and have to unsubscribe again. > > One thing - I had a heck of a time trying to find the mailing list on > RootsWeb so I could subscribe. Finally had to do a google to find you. > Seems like it should be easier to find a mailing list from the RootsWeb > home page. Of course, it may have been staring me in the face and I just > missed it. > > I noticed a lengthy discussion in the archives about using Iomega ZIP and > JAZ disks to archive images. I don't want to revisit the arguments pro and > con, but I would like to relate the following to those who use them. > > Within the last couple of days I pulled out a ZIP disk to recover an image > that I needed. While trying to open the folder I found images that > wouldn't open because of bad data. I ran the Zip and Jaz testing system > developed by Steve Gibson http:/grc.com and found that I had some bad > sections that couldn't be read. So, I transferred all of the images that > could be saved to my hard drive and reformatted the Zip disk. Then it > tested OK. I had the lost images on other backups (I never rely on just > one) so I didn't lose anything. Point is, we need to test our Iomega disks > every so often. > > If you are not familiar with the Zip test, it is called Trouble in > Paradise, TIP.2.1 and can be found at the above URL. The beauty of it is > when it finds errors on a disk it moves the data to a good sector and saves > it. And it's free. Of course, that only works if the data isn't so far > gone that it can't be read. > > Happy ending - I tested the rest of my archived disks and they were all OK. > > Ron > > >

I have just been reminded that earlier, the address for this list was scanners-photos-L/[email protected] The "tech" part has been removed, so if your postings aren't getting through, please to change your address book. None of us got any warning on that one. Ann

Just testing. Please ignore. Ron

Hello all! I have been reviewing the archives and decided to subscribe again until I get too busy and have to unsubscribe again. One thing - I had a heck of a time trying to find the mailing list on RootsWeb so I could subscribe. Finally had to do a google to find you. Seems like it should be easier to find a mailing list from the RootsWeb home page. Of course, it may have been staring me in the face and I just missed it. I noticed a lengthy discussion in the archives about using Iomega ZIP and JAZ disks to archive images. I don't want to revisit the arguments pro and con, but I would like to relate the following to those who use them. Within the last couple of days I pulled out a ZIP disk to recover an image that I needed. While trying to open the folder I found images that wouldn't open because of bad data. I ran the Zip and Jaz testing system developed by Steve Gibson http:/grc.com and found that I had some bad sections that couldn't be read. So, I transferred all of the images that could be saved to my hard drive and reformatted the Zip disk. Then it tested OK. I had the lost images on other backups (I never rely on just one) so I didn't lose anything. Point is, we need to test our Iomega disks every so often. If you are not familiar with the Zip test, it is called Trouble in Paradise, TIP.2.1 and can be found at the above URL. The beauty of it is when it finds errors on a disk it moves the data to a good sector and saves it. And it's free. Of course, that only works if the data isn't so far gone that it can't be read. Happy ending - I tested the rest of my archived disks and they were all OK. Ron

This is just another test. Please ignore. Ron

Not all shopping here but the mail volume has dropped off in most of my lists. Scanning items to share with friends and relatives in holiday mail. Planning to scan one of grandpa's stone mason tools with his name imprinted in the metal. Many small, handmade Christmas tree ornaments were scanned for an earlier project before purchase of a digital camera with a closeup feature. Need to shop for a credit card size holder with neck strap to carry a tiny new digital camera 2.25" x 3.5" and thin. Pocket vest is okay for meetings and library visits but too bulky for holding a small baby. Elizabeth ----- Original Message ----- From: "Rose Deal" > I think everyone is out Christmas Shopping.

I think everyone is out Christmas Shopping. Rose Subject: [SP] testing > There seems to be some question about whether this suddenly silent list is > working...so please ignore this, it is just a test! Ann > > >

There seems to be some question about whether this suddenly silent list is working...so please ignore this, it is just a test! Ann

Thanks Mary I'll give it a try. HP say they will not be updating the drivers for this scanner. Talk about contrived obsolescence Bob KIRK Dukinfield Cheshire Interests Are: KIRK (Crewe & Manchester) DAWSON (Manchester) ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mary Fowler Leek" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Sunday, December 08, 2002 7:22 PM Subject: Re: [SP] HP SCanjet 4s and Windows XP > Hi Bob, > > I just discovered a good place to find answers to questions regarding the various HP scanners. > > I can't help you directly but there may be some assistance on this HP scanner forum: > > http://bizforums.itrc.hp.com/cm/CategoryHome/1,,418,00.html > > > Mary > [email protected] > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Bob Kirk" <[email protected]> > To: <[email protected]> > Sent: Sunday, December 08, 2002 10:22 AM > Subject: [SP] HP SCanjet 4s and Windows XP > > > : Has anyone any experience of making the HP SCanjet 4s work under Windows > : XP. > : > : > : Bob KIRK > : Dukinfield > : Cheshire > : > : Interests Are: > : KIRK (Crewe & Manchester) > : DAWSON (Manchester) > : > : >

Has anyone any experience of making the HP SCanjet 4s work under Windows XP. Bob KIRK Dukinfield Cheshire Interests Are: KIRK (Crewe & Manchester) DAWSON (Manchester)