I use two cameras, one of which is a Canon G5. I chose it because it has a tiltable LCD screen that is very clear, even in bright sunlight. The NGS's online newsletter had a series of articles comparing different camera models and their comparative strengths and weaknesses specifically for genealogy uses. At one point in that series, the author provided a downloadable spreadsheet that you could adapt to fit your own personal preferences. Here are links to the August issue--poke around and find earlier/later issues: To view the HTML version of UpFront visit: http://www.NGSgenealogy.org/UpFront/080104/web To view the PDF version of UpFront visit: http://www.NGSgenealogy.org/UpFront/080104/080104.pdf

--- Carolyn Rodosta <[email protected]> wrote: > Outside of this web page, where do you suggest I go on the internet > for information? > There's certainly lots of information on the 'net. But I would suggest that you browse a library or bookstore for a good beginner's guide to digital photography. There are so many finer points of digital cameras and software that are easier to absorb from well-organized book, than a web page. Then you can search Google for specifics. Like searching for "[your camera model] review" for other users' comments. Kraig __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new resources site! http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/resources/

I would recommend you get a camera with macro mode. You can take closer pictures that are VERY clear with this feature. Some even use this feature to take photos of printed material at libraries. Not all libraries allow this. If you take your pictures at the highest resolution your camera can handle, you will have clearer pictures. The downside of that is the higher the resolution the more space they take which means you'll have to make sure you have either a laptop for downloads or extra disks, memory sticks, whatever it is your camera requires. If you are going to be away from a computer for an extended stay and you run out of space, you can now go to stores and download your camera onto a CD. Lots of options out there. BTW, the macro feature works great on flowers and crafts too. :) J Carolyn Rodosta wrote: > Is there an address for archives of previous messages? I'm afraid what I ask may be quite elementary for most of you. > > Here's the scenario: > > 1. I am buying my first digital camera and am a point & shoot level photographer. I am tending towards a Canon that is small enough for my purse but not so small that I can't see the picture on the screen. (I'm in my 60's). > > 2. While on vacation in May I want to use this camera to photograph tombstones, points of interest, and people. > > 3. My computer knowledge is minimal. > > Outside of this web page, where do you suggest I go on the internet for information? > > Care > > > ==== SCANNERS-PHOTOS Mailing List ==== > To subscribe or unsubscribe send a message to [email protected] or [email protected] with the single word SUBSCRIBE or UNSUBSCRIBE in the body of the message. > > ============================== > Jumpstart your genealogy with OneWorldTree. Search not only for > ancestors, but entire generations. Learn more: > http://www.ancestry.com/s13972/rd.ashx > > > -- Joyce Ragels Be who you are and say what you feel, because those who mind don't matter and those who matter don't mind. - Dr. Seuss

--- Carolyn Rodosta <[email protected]> wrote: > Is there an address for archives of previous messages? At the bottom of this page there are links to search or browse the archives: http://lists.rootsweb.com/index/other/Technical/SCANNERS-PHOTOS.html One recommendation I will add for digital cameras is to find one that uses ordinary RECHARGABLE AA batteries. Some cameras use special batteries that are hard to find, and expensive. Digital cameras go through batteries FAST; you'll want to get a few spares and a charger. Digital cameras are nice! There's one difference, though, between my digital camera and my film camera that's been hard to adjust to. Digital cameras have a quite noticable lag from when you press the shutter release until it captures the picture; with a film camera it's instantaneous. Not a big deal if your subject isn't moving (grave markers), but a lot of my pictures of children are their backs! If action is important, be sure to try it out when you're looking for cameras. The last time I was shopping for a camera, the Sony cameras were supposed to have the shortest time delay, but they were still unacceptable for fast action, in my opinion. Kraig __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com

Hello, I am 60 and just received my first digital camera. My needs were similar and I can't say enough about my Sony Cybershot, DSC-T1. No affiliation at all. It is very small. The macro mode is wonderful and the viewing screen is 2 inches wide by 1 1/2 inches tall. They have come down $100 since November and I was at a convention yesterday and saw one other but 10 people came up to me to ask me what my camera was because it fits in the palm of my hand. It is 3 1/4 x 2 1/4 approximately and 3/4 inch thick. I love it and am so happy with it. When you zoom, it doesn't telescope. It does it internally. It is an Optical Zoom 3x. The macro mode is what you want for close up, for sure and that's all I took yesterday. I can get 6 inches from what I am shooting and it is clear. Check it out. Sally -----Original Message----- From: Joyce Ragels [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Sunday, March 13, 2005 9:51 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [SP] Cemetery Photography I would recommend you get a camera with macro mode. You can take closer pictures that are VERY clear with this feature. Some even use this feature to take photos of printed material at libraries. Not all libraries allow this. If you take your pictures at the highest resolution your camera can handle, you will have clearer pictures. The downside of that is the higher the resolution the more space they take which means you'll have to make sure you have either a laptop for downloads or extra disks, memory sticks, whatever it is your camera requires. If you are going to be away from a computer for an extended stay and you run out of space, you can now go to stores and download your camera onto a CD. Lots of options out there. BTW, the macro feature works great on flowers and crafts too. :) J Carolyn Rodosta wrote: > Is there an address for archives of previous messages? I'm afraid what I ask may be quite elementary for most of you. > > Here's the scenario: > > 1. I am buying my first digital camera and am a point & shoot level photographer. I am tending towards a Canon that is small enough for my purse but not so small that I can't see the picture on the screen. (I'm in my 60's). > > 2. While on vacation in May I want to use this camera to photograph tombstones, points of interest, and people. > > 3. My computer knowledge is minimal. > > Outside of this web page, where do you suggest I go on the internet for information? > > Care > > > ==== SCANNERS-PHOTOS Mailing List ==== > To subscribe or unsubscribe send a message to [email protected] or [email protected] with the single word SUBSCRIBE or UNSUBSCRIBE in the body of the message. > > ============================== > Jumpstart your genealogy with OneWorldTree. Search not only for > ancestors, but entire generations. Learn more: > http://www.ancestry.com/s13972/rd.ashx > > > -- Joyce Ragels Be who you are and say what you feel, because those who mind don't matter and those who matter don't mind. - Dr. Seuss ==== SCANNERS-PHOTOS Mailing List ==== To subscribe or unsubscribe send a message to [email protected] or [email protected] with the single word SUBSCRIBE or UNSUBSCRIBE in the body of the message. ============================== Search the US Census Collection. Over 140 million records added in the last 12 months. Largest online collection in the world. Learn more: http://www.ancestry.com/s13965/rd.ashx

Is there an address for archives of previous messages? I'm afraid what I ask may be quite elementary for most of you. Here's the scenario: 1. I am buying my first digital camera and am a point & shoot level photographer. I am tending towards a Canon that is small enough for my purse but not so small that I can't see the picture on the screen. (I'm in my 60's). 2. While on vacation in May I want to use this camera to photograph tombstones, points of interest, and people. 3. My computer knowledge is minimal. Outside of this web page, where do you suggest I go on the internet for information? Care

I haven't tried this but couldn 't you project the slide onto a screen and then use a digital camera without a macro focus to copy a slide? Charlie Newfield The Villages, FL ----- Original Message ----- From: "Kraig Jones" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Saturday, March 12, 2005 12:09 PM Subject: Re: [SP] RE: SCANNERS-PHOTOS-D Digest V05 #7 : : --- David Hug <[email protected]> wrote: : > Kraig, would you please tell us how to copy a color slide with a : > digital : > camera? I can't imagine how it would be done. : > : > Dave : : Dave & all, : : You can find a detailed description of what I did in the archives: : : http://archiver.rootsweb.com/th/read/SCANNERS-PHOTOS/2005-03/1110159900 : : Briefly, I put the slide on a backlit slide sorter/viewer, set up the : camera on a tripod and aimed it down toward the slide on a desk, and : snapped digital pictures. You should have a camera with "macro focus" : feature, and optically zoom in to the slide. : : As I said, I got results at least as good as I could get with a : flat-bed scanner with slide attachment, though probably not as good as : with an expensive dedicated slide/film scanner. (We turned it into an : excuse to get a digital camera ;-) ) : : Hope this helps. Any questions, please don't hesitate to ask. : : Kraig : : : __________________________________________________ : Do You Yahoo!? : Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around : http://mail.yahoo.com : : : ==== SCANNERS-PHOTOS Mailing List ==== : To subscribe or unsubscribe send a message to [email protected] or [email protected] with the single word SUBSCRIBE or UNSUBSCRIBE in the body of the message. : : ============================== : Search Family and Local Histories for stories about your family and the : areas they lived. Over 85 million names added in the last 12 months. : Learn more: http://www.ancestry.com/s13966/rd.ashx : : :

Charlie, In a word, No! Think about it. Projecting an image on a surface (any surface) does not produce a high resolution image. The effect is identical to taking a digital image and Zooming to 300 or 400 magnification (or greater), except the little dots are round instead of square. The normal viewing distance for a projected slide is greater than 12 feet so the resolution is unimportant -- same as billboards along the highway. Taking a photograph of that will look about as good as it would if you walked up to the screen and view it from a foot away.. One of the things one has to recognize is that a scanner is nothing more than a digital camera with a fixed focus lens. To match the output of a scanner, a camera has to have the same resolution (ppi) and the same candlepower from the light source. (Granted a program like Photoshop can compensate for that somewhat, but...) For that reason, Kraig's solution is not the perfect answer... if you are trying to capture the quality in the image on a piece of film. The light source is just not strong enough. On the other hand, that quality level is not always required... or necessary. So for general run-of-the-mill work, it is perfect. Besides, the price can't be beat. Ron -----Original Message----- From: Charles Newfield [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Saturday, March 12, 2005 5:31 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [SP] RE: SCANNERS-PHOTOS-D Digest V05 #7 I haven't tried this but couldn 't you project the slide onto a screen and then use a digital camera without a macro focus to copy a slide? Charlie Newfield The Villages, FL <Snip>

--- Charles Newfield <[email protected]> wrote: > I haven't tried this but couldn 't you project the slide onto a > screen and > then use a digital camera without a macro focus to copy a slide? > > Charlie Newfield Yes, in fact my brother has used this method, with acceptable results he said. I don't own a slide projector, so... Kraig __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com

I have a Visoneer 9020 that has developed an oily film on the underside of the scanning glass. It now affects my color scans with a white background...I get a pink background in the scan. In attempting to take the unit apart to gain access to the underside of the scanning glass I seem to have run out of options. I have removed all the screws on the bottom of the unit and have still not been able to separate the bottom and top halves without making a conscious effort to break the plastic case. Has anyone run into this problem? Any ideas? Bill

We've been using PaperPort, upgrading since we got it installed in our first scanner. Haven't changed because we worried about losing the ability to work with photos scanned in PP's proprietary format .max. Now we're using PP 8 and have the ability to scan in .tif (with a lot of the manipulating options are greyed out), an improvement. So we've been reluctant users to this point. Now we really need to do some .pdf scanning of documents, etc., and have seen many negative user comments about PP 9 & 10. Looks like people who were very happy with PP 9 are very disappointed in PP 10 because of its slowness and having been largely rewritten. And others say that both PP 9 & 10 are absolutely incompatible with XP Pro (which we're using). So we're wondering if anyone on the list has any advice or suggestions about an alternative program, and whether the .max photos will be able to make the jump. ~ Elsa in Allegany County, Maryland

--- David Hug <[email protected]> wrote: > Kraig, would you please tell us how to copy a color slide with a > digital > camera? I can't imagine how it would be done. > > Dave Dave & all, You can find a detailed description of what I did in the archives: http://archiver.rootsweb.com/th/read/SCANNERS-PHOTOS/2005-03/1110159900 Briefly, I put the slide on a backlit slide sorter/viewer, set up the camera on a tripod and aimed it down toward the slide on a desk, and snapped digital pictures. You should have a camera with "macro focus" feature, and optically zoom in to the slide. As I said, I got results at least as good as I could get with a flat-bed scanner with slide attachment, though probably not as good as with an expensive dedicated slide/film scanner. (We turned it into an excuse to get a digital camera ;-) ) Hope this helps. Any questions, please don't hesitate to ask. Kraig __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com

Dave, Imagine if you held the Slide (color or no) between a very bright light (like the Sun, for instance) and your camera... simply focus and shoot. Now imagine that you could design something tube-shaped that fit between your camera lens and the Slide (to block superfluous light). Furthermore, this device would be just the exact length to hold the Slide the correct distance from the camera so that the image would just fill the frame. You could even hand-hold such a device, since the slide and the camera would always move in the same direction. Imagine that. Ron -----Original Message----- From: David Hug [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, March 11, 2005 7:36 PM To: [email protected] Subject: [SP] RE: SCANNERS-PHOTOS-D Digest V05 #7 Kraig, would you please tell us how to copy a color slide with a digital camera? I can't imagine how it would be done. Dave

Kraig, would you please tell us how to copy a color slide with a digital camera? I can't imagine how it would be done. Dave > [Original Message] > From: <[email protected]> > To: <[email protected]> > Date: 3/7/2005 3:00:00 AM > Subject: SCANNERS-PHOTOS-D Digest V05 #7 > > Internal Virus Database is out-of-date. > Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. > Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 266.5.1 - Release Date: 2/27/2005

Your are exactly right. > Jake, > > A "reader" being the faster method of file transfer is generally the case. > However, it has more to do with the difference in the transfer speeds > between USB v1.1 and v2.0. The camera and your "reader" are each nothing > more than an external drive -- as far as your computer is concerned. > > For what its worth, I, too, remove the disk from the camera to transfer > the > files. This is because my drive is always attached to the computer and I > don't have to go through the hassle of stringing a cable to connect the > camera. > > One caution with using a "reader" to transfer the files: Make sure that > you > use the camera to format the disk afterwards. Do not format the disk with > your computer. Most (but not all) cameras are very finicky about this. > > Ron > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2005 7:08 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: RE: [SP] Re: Scanner Reinstalling Problems > > I think you may be right about the hub. However, I never attach my camera > directly to any outlet. I remove the storage card and insert it into a > reader . . . it is much, much faster to download. > > Jake > <Snip> > > > ==== SCANNERS-PHOTOS Mailing List ==== > To subscribe or unsubscribe send a message to > [email protected] or > [email protected] with the single word SUBSCRIBE or > UNSUBSCRIBE in the body of the message. > > ============================== > View and search Historical Newspapers. Read about your ancestors, find > marriage announcements and more. Learn more: > http://www.ancestry.com/s13969/rd.ashx > >

Jake, A "reader" being the faster method of file transfer is generally the case. However, it has more to do with the difference in the transfer speeds between USB v1.1 and v2.0. The camera and your "reader" are each nothing more than an external drive -- as far as your computer is concerned. For what its worth, I, too, remove the disk from the camera to transfer the files. This is because my drive is always attached to the computer and I don't have to go through the hassle of stringing a cable to connect the camera. One caution with using a "reader" to transfer the files: Make sure that you use the camera to format the disk afterwards. Do not format the disk with your computer. Most (but not all) cameras are very finicky about this. Ron -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2005 7:08 PM To: [email protected] Subject: RE: [SP] Re: Scanner Reinstalling Problems I think you may be right about the hub. However, I never attach my camera directly to any outlet. I remove the storage card and insert it into a reader . . . it is much, much faster to download. Jake <Snip>

Hi I have been sent, by e-mail a number of digital photos of wills and conveyacing instruments which are sonewhat lengthy and quite difficult to read. What would be the best way to be able ro read them and perhaps print them onto hard copy. With thanks Garry

At 08:08 PM 3/10/2005, you wrote: >I think you may be right about the hub. However, I never attach my camera >directly to any outlet. I remove the storage card and insert it into a >reader . . . it is much, much faster to download. I have a reader built in to my R300 Epson Printer and find that much easier. I was having trouble using my carmera plugged into the USB. It used to work then it quit. I had installed a USB 2 hub and it worked a couple of times. I think my camera got too outdated - it is a Kodak DC240 and a 3.5 mp. Takes great pictures. My 2 cents......................

I think you may be right about the hub. However, I never attach my camera directly to any outlet. I remove the storage card and insert it into a reader . . . it is much, much faster to download. Jake > Hi Ron, > I'm not sure you are right. > I was reading my camera manual last night and it says: > Use the interface cable to attach the camera directly to a USB port on the > computer, not through a USB hub. The connection may not operate correctly > through a USB hub. > > I've found this with a friend's external CD writer. It worked when > attached > directly to the computer but not when attached to the hub she had. Other > devices like scanner worked perfectly through the hub. > > I can't recall where but I've also recently read that if a device wasn't > being recognised properly on one USB port, using another often caused it > to > be recognised. > > Just my experience and reading. I don't understand why. > > Cathy > > At 04:26 9/03/2005, Ronald Boyd wrote: > >>Donna, >> >>There must be something else in the mix. >> >>The USB ports on the front of a computer are simply a hub - an unpowered >> one >>at that -- connected to the USB Card by a cable similar to the one that >> you >>have connected to your printer. Granted the signal starts out powered (as >>are the other 2/4 (external) ports on the Card) but that power is lost as >>soon as it is connected to the hub. (These ports are actually designed to >> be >>used with low/no power consuming devices like a mouse or a keyboard.) >> >>Therefore, if you are lucky enough to have a device that works on an >>unpowered USB port, it should work even better (or, at least, no worse) >> from >>a powered outlet... either at the rear of the computer or at a separate >>powered hub. >> >>Ron > > > ==== SCANNERS-PHOTOS Mailing List ==== > To subscribe or unsubscribe send a message to > [email protected] or > [email protected] with the single word SUBSCRIBE or > UNSUBSCRIBE in the body of the message. > > ============================== > Search Family and Local Histories for stories about your family and the > areas they lived. Over 85 million names added in the last 12 months. > Learn more: http://www.ancestry.com/s13966/rd.ashx > >

This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=____1110496814295_5OE0r?rqgo Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Garry, what do you mean by "difficult to read?" If I had more specifics I might be able to make some suggestions. Are the images color or are they just 2 tone b&w? Suggest posting them to your website and giving us the URL so we can view them. I tend to agree with Kraig's response except when it comes to printing. He's correct when he says there are only so many pixels in a photo. If the resolution of the photo is too low, zooming in (cropping) and blowing up a small piece of the image will just make it worse because you'll bring each individual pixel "closer", and you'll get choppy edges. When nice folks send me photos that they have scanned at a low resolution, I kindly ask them to rescan at 300dpi and at least a 5x7 size. I've got 2 'middle of the road" color printers that can do one heck of a good job on photos, whether they are of people or documents, anywhere in size from 4x6 to 8x10, as long as the digital image is in the 300dpi range, the size of the image is adequate, and the type of paper is correct for photo printing. If the total size of the image is only 1 megapixel or less, there is little you can do with it as far as printing, especially when it needs resizing. Again I agree with Kraig that printing your own photos is probably more expensive overall but you have more control over the output in my opinion. Dennis > > From: [email protected] > Date: 2005/03/10 Thu PM 03:00:00 CST > To: [email protected] > Subject: SCANNERS-PHOTOS-D Digest V05 #10 > > ------=____1110496814295_5OE0r?rqgo Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Type: multipart/digest; boundary=----------------------------; name="reply" Content-Disposition: inline; filename="reply" LS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tDQoNCkNvbnRlbnQtVHlwZTogdGV4dC9w bGFpbg0KDQpTQ0FOTkVSUy1QSE9UT1MtRCBEaWdlc3QJCQkJVm9sdW1lIDA1IDogSXNzdWUg MTANCg0KVG9kYXkncyBUb3BpY3M6DQogICMxIERpZ2l0YWwgcGhvdG9zICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICBbIkdhcnJ5IEYgQmVsbCIgPGdhenphQHdvb3NoLmNvLm56Pl0NCiAgIzIg UmU6IFtTUF0gRGlnaXRhbCBwaG90b3MgICAgICAgICAgICAgIFtLcmFpZyBKb25lcyA8a3Jh aWdqb25lczIwMDBAeWFob28uXQ0KDQpBZG1pbmlzdHJpdmlhOg0KVG8gdW5zdWJzY3JpYmUg ZnJvbSBTQ0FOTkVSUy1QSE9UT1MtRCwgc2VuZCBhIG1lc3NhZ2UgdG8NCg0KICAgICAgICBT Q0FOTkVSUy1QSE9UT1MtRC1yZXF1ZXN0QHRlY2gucm9vdHN3ZWIuY29tDQoNCnRoYXQgY29u dGFpbnMgaW4gdGhlIGJvZHkgb2YgdGhlIG1lc3NhZ2UgdGhlIGNvbW1hbmQNCg0KICAgICAg ICB1bnN1YnNjcmliZQ0KDQphbmQgbm8gb3RoZXIgdGV4dC4gIE5vIHN1YmplY3QgbGluZSBp cyBuZWNlc3NhcnksIGJ1dCBpZiB5b3VyIHNvZnR3YXJlDQpyZXF1aXJlcyBvbmUsIGp1c3Qg dXNlIHVuc3Vic2NyaWJlIGluIHRoZSBzdWJqZWN0LCB0b28uDQoNClRvIGNvbnRhY3QgdGhl IFNDQU5ORVJTLVBIT1RPUy1EIGxpc3QgYWRtaW5pc3RyYXRvciwgc2VuZCBtYWlsIHRvDQpT Q0FOTkVSUy1QSE9UT1MtYWRtaW5AdGVjaC5yb290c3dlYi5jb20uDQoNCl9fX19fX19fX19f X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fXw0KLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tDQoN ClgtTWVzc2FnZTogIzENCkRhdGU6IFRodSwgMTAgTWFyIDIwMDUgMjE6MjA6NTIgKzEzMDAN CkZyb206ICJHYXJyeSBGIEJlbGwiIDxnYXp6YUB3b29zaC5jby5uej4NClRvOiBTQ0FOTkVS Uy1QSE9UT1MtTEByb290c3dlYi5jb20NCk1lc3NhZ2UtSUQ6IDwwMGQzMDFjNTI1NGEkOTMw ZDA5YzAkYzZkNzRhY2FAb2VtZDFubDcxaWJ3OGs+DQpTdWJqZWN0OiBEaWdpdGFsIHBob3Rv cw0KQ29udGVudC1UeXBlOiB0ZXh0L3BsYWluOw0KCWZvcm1hdD1mbG93ZWQ7DQoJY2hhcnNl dD0iaXNvLTg4NTktMSI7DQoJcmVwbHktdHlwZT1yZXNwb25zZQ0KQ29udGVudC1UcmFuc2Zl ci1FbmNvZGluZzogN2JpdA0KDQpIaQ0KDQpJIGhhdmUgYmVlbiBzZW50LCBieSBlLW1haWwg YSBudW1iZXIgb2YgZGlnaXRhbCBwaG90b3Mgb2Ygd2lsbHMgYW5kIA0KY29udmV5YWNpbmcg aW5zdHJ1bWVudHMgd2hpY2ggYXJlIHNvbmV3aGF0IGxlbmd0aHkgYW5kIHF1aXRlIGRpZmZp Y3VsdCB0byANCnJlYWQuICAgV2hhdCB3b3VsZCBiZSB0aGUgYmVzdCB3YXkgdG8gYmUgYWJs ZSBybyByZWFkIHRoZW0gYW5kIHBlcmhhcHMgcHJpbnQgDQp0aGVtIG9udG8gaGFyZCBjb3B5 Lg0KDQpXaXRoIHRoYW5rcw0KR2FycnkgDQoNCl9fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f X19fXw0KLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tDQoNClgtTWVzc2FnZTogIzIN CkRhdGU6IFRodSwgMTAgTWFyIDIwMDUgMDY6NDU6MzEgLTA4MDAgKFBTVCkNCkZyb206IEty YWlnIEpvbmVzIDxrcmFpZ2pvbmVzMjAwMEB5YWhvby5jb20+DQpUbzogU0NBTk5FUlMtUEhP VE9TLUxAcm9vdHN3ZWIuY29tDQpNZXNzYWdlLUlEOiA8MjAwNTAzMTAxNDQ1MzEuNjU5ODYu cW1haWxAd2ViNjA1MDUubWFpbC55YWhvby5jb20+DQpTdWJqZWN0OiBSZTogW1NQXSBEaWdp dGFsIHBob3Rvcw0KQ29udGVudC1UeXBlOiB0ZXh0L3BsYWluOyBjaGFyc2V0PXVzLWFzY2lp DQoNCi0tLSBHYXJyeSBGIEJlbGwgPGdhenphQHdvb3NoLmNvLm56PiB3cm90ZToNCj4gSGkN Cj4gDQo+IEkgaGF2ZSBiZWVuIHNlbnQsIGJ5IGUtbWFpbCBhIG51bWJlciBvZiBkaWdpdGFs IHBob3RvcyBvZiB3aWxscyBhbmQgDQo+IGNvbnZleWFjaW5nIGluc3RydW1lbnRzIHdoaWNo IGFyZSBzb25ld2hhdCBsZW5ndGh5IGFuZCBxdWl0ZQ0KPiBkaWZmaWN1bHQgdG8gDQo+IHJl YWQuICAgV2hhdCB3b3VsZCBiZSB0aGUgYmVzdCB3YXkgdG8gYmUgYWJsZSBybyByZWFkIHRo ZW0gYW5kDQo+IHBlcmhhcHMgcHJpbnQgDQo+IHRoZW0gb250byBoYXJkIGNvcHkuDQo+IA0K DQpHYXJyeSwNCldoYXQgZm9ybWF0IGFyZSB5b3VyIHBob3RvcyBpbj8gIEpQRUcgKC5qcGcg ZmlsZSk/ICBBbmQgd2hhdCByZXNvbHV0aW9uDQoob3IgIm1lZ2FwaXhlbHMiIG9mIHRoZSBj YW1lcmEgdGhleSB3ZXJlIHRha2VuIHdpdGg/ICBUaGVyZSBpcyBvbmx5IHNvDQptdWNoIGlu Zm9ybWF0aW9uIGluIHRoZSBkaWdpdGFsIHBpY3R1cmUsIHNvIGlmIHRoZXkncmUgaGFyZCB0 byByZWFkDQpub3csIHRoZXJlIG1heSBiZSBhIGxpbWl0IHRvIHdoYXQgeW91IGNhbiBkby4N Cg0KV2hhdCBzb2Z0d2FyZSBhcmUgeW91IHVzaW5nIHRvIHZpZXcgYW5kIHByaW50IHRoZSBw aG90b3M/ICBJcmZhbnZpZXcNCih3d3cuaXJmYW52aWV3LmNvbSkgaXMgYSBGUkVFIGdyYXBo aWMgd2lld2VyIHByb2dyYW0gZm9yIFdpbmRvd3MuICBJdCdzDQplYXN5IHRvIHVzZSwgYW5k IGhhcyBhIHByZXR0eSBnb29kIHNldCBvZiBmZWF0dXJlcy4gIE9yIHRoZXJlJ3MNClBob3Rv c2hvcCAob3IgYSAibGltaXRlZCIgUGhvdG9zaG9wIEVsZW1lbnRzIG9yIExFKSwgb3IgUGFp bnRTaG9wIFByby4NCg0KV2l0aCBhbnkgb2YgdGhlc2UgcHJvZ3JhbXMsIHlvdSBjb3VsZCB6 b29tIGluIG9uIGFyZWFzIG9mIHlvdXIgd2lsbHMNCmV0YywgdG8gbWFrZSBpdCBlYXNpZXIg dG8gcmVhZC4gIFlvdSBjb3VsZCBhbHNvIHRyeSBhZGp1c3RpbmcgY29udHJhc3QsDQpjb2xv cnMsIG9yIHVzaW5nICJzaGFycG5lc3MiIGZpbHRlcnMgdG8gYnJpbmcgb3V0IG1vcmUgZGV0 YWlsLiAgWW91DQp3b3VsZCB1c2UgYW55IG9mIHRoZXNlIHByb2dyYW1zIHRvIGRvIHRoZSBw cmludGluZywgdG9vLiAgQnV0IHVubGVzcw0KeW91IGhhdmUgYSByZWFsbHkgZ29vZCBwcmlu dGVyLCB5b3UgbWF5IG5vdCBnZXQgcmVhZGFibGUgY29waWVzLiAgWW91DQpjb3VsZCB0cnkg c2VsZWN0aW5nIGEgc21hbGxlciBhcmVhIG9mIGludGVyZXN0IGluIHlvdXIgcGhvdG8gYW5k DQpibG93aW5nIGl0IHVwIHRvIGEgcHJpbnRlciBwYWdlIHNpemUuDQoNCkFuIGFsdGVybmF0 aXZlLCBpZiBsaWtlIG1lIHlvdSBkb24ndCBoYXZlIGEgcGhvdG8gcHJpbnRlciwgaXMgdG8g c2VuZA0KZGlnaXRhbCBmaWxlcyB0byBhIHBob3RvIHNob3AgZm9yIHByaW50aW5nLiAgTW9z dCAib25lIGhvdXIiIHBob3RvDQpwbGFjZXMgY2FuIGRvIGRpZ2l0YWwgcHJpbnRzOyB0aGV5 J3JlIGJldHRlciB0aGFuIHlvdSBjYW4gZG8gd2l0aCBhDQpob21lICBwcmludGVyLCBhbmQg cHJvYmFibHkgY29zdCBsZXNzLiAgDQoNCktyYWlnDQoNCg0KDQoJCQ0KX19fX19fX19fX19f X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fXyANCkRvIHlvdSBZYWhvbyE/IA0KWWFob28hIFNtYWxs IEJ1c2luZXNzIC0gVHJ5IG91ciBuZXcgcmVzb3VyY2VzIHNpdGUhDQpodHRwOi8vc21hbGxi dXNpbmVzcy55YWhvby5jb20vcmVzb3VyY2VzLyANCg0KLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0t LS0tLS0tLS0tLS0NCkVuZCBvZiBTQ0FOTkVSUy1QSE9UT1MtRCBEaWdlc3QgVjA1IElzc3Vl ICMxMA0KKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqDQo= -------------------------------- ------=____1110496814295_5OE0r?rqgo--