RootsWeb.com Mailing Lists
Previous Page      Next Page
Total: 7100/10000
    1. Re: [SC-OPD] Old Pendleton Database cd revision available
    2. Mary Tinkler
    3. Please post a mailing address & the price again for those of us with Macs who will need to order a cd by mail. Thanks, Mary Tinkler >There will be a revision of the Old Pendleton District SC Database cd in >September. >All open requests will be filled at that time. > >This is a project of the OPD Chapter of the SCGS. Additions are made >continually. >Downloads are updated monthly. The cd is currently revised about twice a >year, >dependent upon demand. > >OPD consisted of the three westernmost counties of SC, so was adjacent to a >dozen modern >SC, NC and GA counties. Map of the surrounding area showing modern >counties in all 3 states: >http://jrshelby.com/opdcd/opd.jpg > >For an excellent map of the district when it *was* a district see the >SCROOTS 1820 Mills Atlas map at >http://scroots.org/1825pendleton2.html >or for a larger, clearer but slower loading version: >http://scroots.org/1825pendleton3.html > >As of August, the database contained 275,000 names (ancestors, residents, >descendents) and 93,000 >marriages, and almost all of these are cousins somehow. > >For more info about the downloadable database, OPDC/SCGS, and the cd, see >http://jrshelby.com/opdcd/ >Note: this is a new address. > > >==== SC-OLD-PENDLETON-DIST Mailing List ==== >Join RootsWeb WorldConnect Program >For details on how to submit your GEDCOM >Visit http://www.rootsweb.com >Scroll down to Other Tools/Resources

    08/31/2000 08:59:51
    1. Re: [SC-OPD] Re Mt. PISGAH Baptist Church Cemetery
    2. Kim Wilson
    3. Hi Kay, This is possibly your Miles H. Smith. My notes on the Simeon Smith family come from: 1850 Anderson Co. SC, Eastern Sub-Division, p. 299 #868: Simion Smith, farmer, $700 Alexander, et al. p. 174: WILL OF SIMION SMITH--pp. 528-31. Descendants of Simeon Smith 1 Simeon Smith 1787 - 1875 .. +Amy McAlister 1791 - 1876 ......... 2 Edward Smith ......... 2 Margaret E. Smith ............. +Martin ......... 2 Miles H. Smith ......... 2 Joshua Smith 1821 - ......... 2 Lucinda Smith 1824 - ............. +McElreath ......... 2 Elizabeth Caroline Smith 1830 - 1906 ............. +John Newton Wyatt 1838 - 1914 .................... 3 Charles Newton Wyatt 1863 - 1916 ........................ +Addis Pickens 1872 - 1943 .................... 3 J. Kirby Wyatt 1866 - 1868 .................... 3 Edward Franklin Wyatt 1868 - 1956 ........................ +Amanda Margaret Cox 1870 - 1957 .................... 3 William Redmond Wyatt 1870 - 1923 ........................ +Laura Addie Daniel 1868 - 1912 .................... *2nd Wife of William Redmond Wyatt: ........................ +Nancy Jane Babb 1874 - 1962 Yours, Kim > >I'm trying to locate any hint of my Forsyth Co. GA Smiths -- They came from >Pendleton/Anderson District and I tend to reach for any possibility. The >current lead is Mt. Pisgah Cemetery for their ancestors and/or the Mullinax >and Hopes and a Mary Montgomery md to another John Smith (and their >ancestors). > >1-- Miles Hampton Smith (1813-1896) Pendleton,Anderson County,SC > sp-Mary Louise Smith (1825-1903) ,,Georgia > d/o John Smith & Mary Montgomery > 2-- William E. Smith (1848-1914) ,,Georgia > sp-Sarah E. Baldwin (1853-1916) > 2-- John E. C. Smith (1849-1911) Cuba,Forsyth County,Georgia > 2-- James Monroe Smith [I] (1851-1930) Of Forsyth County,Georgia > sp-Mary Hannah Hope (1847-1888) ,,Georgia > sp-Molly Dempsey (1862-1921) ,,Georgia > 2-- Margaret Jane Mahala Smith (1853-1903) ,,Georgia > sp-George W. Tallant (1851-1917) > 2-- Judson Smith (1854-1927) ,,Georgia > sp-Vada MNU (1874-1948) > 2-- Aney E. Smith (1858-1900) ,,Georgia > 2-- Nancy Elizabeth Smith [I] (1860-1929) ,,Georgia > sp-FNU Thomas ( -1896) > 2-- Jasper Newton Smith (1861-1924) ,,Georgia > sp-Margaret Mahulda Bramblett (1867-1926) ,Forsyth County,Georgia >

    08/31/2000 05:48:26
    1. Re: [SC-OPD] Re: Program v. Program
    2. Wallace Neal
    3. Re Ftw. I have really had aproblem with it, even with the upgrades. Evertime I download a program, it goes directly into my Family Tree Maker that I have my personal data on. I would like to read it before it messes everthing else up. I have 2 weeks to undo this mess before a reunion. Any ideas E.Neal bjatkinson@juno.com wrote: > FTM may be their marketing favorite but the best program is FO. That's > why I threw out all other programs. It makes a better book, etc. and will > hold endless numbers of names. My regular file is over 80000 and when I > downloaded the OldPend GEDcom it didnt even flinch! > > On Thu, 31 Aug 2000 08:34:38 EDT MCBB1@aol.com writes: > > My one and only two cents worth. I have both FTM and Family Origins. > > FO is > > a newer version than the FTM. The only way I can prevent FTM from > > defaulting > > a downloaded GED file, is to open it through the FO. Being > > persnickety, I > > recall that the same company owns both programs, but that the FTM is > > their #1 > > marketing favorite. Hmmmmmm! > > > > Mike Cobb > > > > > > ==== SC-OLD-PENDLETON-DIST Mailing List ==== > > Remember the Subject line > > and amend it to reflect > > what's in your message. > > > > ==== SC-OLD-PENDLETON-DIST Mailing List ==== > Genealogy Resources on the Web > http://www.genhomepage.com/northamerican.html

    08/31/2000 04:59:25
    1. Re: [SC-OPD] Re: Program v. Program
    2. In a message dated 08/31/2000 8:36:05 AM Eastern Daylight Time, MCBB1@aol.com writes: << owns both programs, but that the FTM is their #1 marketing favorite. Hmmmmmm! >> More precisely they had the marketing rights to Family Origins, the copyright is still with the programmer, Formal Soft. FTM is their property. Best Regards, Herman G <A HREF="http://www.geocities.com/BourbonStreet/Delta/8155/">Old Pendleton Home Page</A> [Downloads, Family Line Web Pages, CD ROM Databases and much more]

    08/31/2000 03:20:52
    1. [SC-OPD] Re: Program v. Program
    2. My one and only two cents worth. I have both FTM and Family Origins. FO is a newer version than the FTM. The only way I can prevent FTM from defaulting a downloaded GED file, is to open it through the FO. Being persnickety, I recall that the same company owns both programs, but that the FTM is their #1 marketing favorite. Hmmmmmm! Mike Cobb

    08/31/2000 02:34:38
    1. RE: [SC-OPD] Re: Program v. Program
    2. Nancy Custer
    3. Maybe I'm not understanding your question but if I give the new file a different name, it never interferes with my master FTM file which is called "masterfile" . I have dozens of different data files that people have sent me and the OPD file and find no conflict. I haven't downloaded the OPD file in a while so I have not had to deal with the size problem. Nancy -----Original Message----- From: Wallace Neal [mailto:wneal2@bellsouth.net] Sent: Thursday, August 31, 2000 7:59 AM To: SC-OLD-PENDLETON-DIST-L@rootsweb.com Subject: Re: [SC-OPD] Re: Program v. Program Re Ftw. I have really had aproblem with it, even with the upgrades. Evertime I download a program, it goes directly into my Family Tree Maker that I have my personal data on. I would like to read it before it messes everthing else up. I have 2 weeks to undo this mess before a reunion. Any ideas E.Neal bjatkinson@juno.com wrote: > FTM may be their marketing favorite but the best program is FO. That's > why I threw out all other programs. It makes a better book, etc. and will > hold endless numbers of names. My regular file is over 80000 and when I > downloaded the OldPend GEDcom it didnt even flinch! > > On Thu, 31 Aug 2000 08:34:38 EDT MCBB1@aol.com writes: > > My one and only two cents worth. I have both FTM and Family Origins. > > FO is > > a newer version than the FTM. The only way I can prevent FTM from > > defaulting > > a downloaded GED file, is to open it through the FO. Being > > persnickety, I > > recall that the same company owns both programs, but that the FTM is > > their #1 > > marketing favorite. Hmmmmmm! > > > > Mike Cobb > > > > > > ==== SC-OLD-PENDLETON-DIST Mailing List ==== > > Remember the Subject line > > and amend it to reflect > > what's in your message. > > > > ==== SC-OLD-PENDLETON-DIST Mailing List ==== > Genealogy Resources on the Web > http://www.genhomepage.com/northamerican.html ==== SC-OLD-PENDLETON-DIST Mailing List ==== Harmony is the objective of this list. We are all adults, so please respect us by talking with the list admin before making suggestions on methods of posting or conduct. Thank you -- donna -- list admin -- dbrand@itexas.net

    08/31/2000 02:22:58
    1. Re: [SC-OPD] Re: Program v. Program
    2. FTM may be their marketing favorite but the best program is FO. That's why I threw out all other programs. It makes a better book, etc. and will hold endless numbers of names. My regular file is over 80000 and when I downloaded the OldPend GEDcom it didnt even flinch! On Thu, 31 Aug 2000 08:34:38 EDT MCBB1@aol.com writes: > My one and only two cents worth. I have both FTM and Family Origins. > FO is > a newer version than the FTM. The only way I can prevent FTM from > defaulting > a downloaded GED file, is to open it through the FO. Being > persnickety, I > recall that the same company owns both programs, but that the FTM is > their #1 > marketing favorite. Hmmmmmm! > > Mike Cobb > > > ==== SC-OLD-PENDLETON-DIST Mailing List ==== > Remember the Subject line > and amend it to reflect > what's in your message. >

    08/31/2000 01:52:45
    1. Re: [SC-OPD] Re: What pgms can import OPD d/b?
    2. I went to Family Origins from FTM and it handled that large file without a hitch. What you have with FTM is a version that is limited in what it can handle. If you upgrade or change to another program you should be able to gedcom the file from the old program and import to the new and then uninstall the old one altogether. On Wed, 30 Aug 2000 14:40:53 -0500 Jim Allen <jall@watervalley.net> writes: > ***For John Robertson*** > John, I've read all this with great interest, and I fully understand > the > problem with FTM. If I did not have so much time invested in FTM I > would > go back to Brother's Keeper. Alas, the story of my life. I have BK > and > PAF on my computer. Here is my problem: when I attempt to open the > > downloaded info my FTM opens and of course will/can not handle the > amount > of info. I suspect somewhere along the line, maybe in version 5 of > FTM, I > selected it to be the default genealogy program on my computer. I > attempted to go back to version 5 and change the default, however, > the > program prevents this. I have checked version 6 and there is no > place to > make this choice as V6 builds on V5. Suggestions please? How can > I prevent FTM from opening as default genealogy program. any help > from > **anyone** will be greatly appreciated. I there is no other course > I guess > I'll go back to BK or maybe give PAF a try. My question about PAF: > does > LDS have a built in section that will allow them to enter my > computer and > collect the genealogy info? Many thanks for any help or > suggestion. Sincerely Jim Allen. (Searching: ALLEN, BOYD, > COCKERHAM, > HILDRETH, HOLLINGSWORTH, PRATT, PALMER, ROBERDS. > > > > At 07:17 AM 8/29/00 -0400, you wrote: > > > >>My apologies for not being more clear. I was referring > specifically to the > >>downloadable file, not the CD. > >> > > > > >My experience (I've done all this numerous times) with the > *downloadable > >gedcom* is that it can be imported into practically *any* major > Windows > >genealogy program (except that it can *only* be imported into FTM > by using > >WinNT or Win2000), requiring from about an hour for Brothers Keeper > to > >about 10 hours for Legacy, with typical import times of 2 to 3 > hours. It > >is quicker by half to get it into Legacy by first importing it into > PAF > >4.0, then loading the PAF database into Legacy. > > > >This is exactly the process followed in making the cd. The gedcom > is > >downloaded exactly as any of you would do it (maybe a bit faster!). > Then, > >one at a time, this downloaded gedcom is imported into all the > various > >programs. For many, using the cd is like hiring a neighbor boy to > mow > >your lawn: you could do it yourself but prefer paying someone to do > the > >time-consuming work for you (but likely at a lower rate/hour than > for > >lawn-mowing!). For others, the cd is the only way they can succeed > in > >accessing the data (e.g., FTM users not caring to bite the bullet > and buy > >pricey Win2000 when they have no other need for it, or others > simply > >overwhelmed by the process.). > > > >Currently, it seems that at least 75% of those interested in the > OPD d/b, > >use FTM and are faced with the choice of (1) getting the cd, OR (2) > > >switching to another program such as free PAF 4.0 (for this > purpose, if no > >other). It is quite possible in PAF to split off a database > containing > >those of interest to you, and exporting a gedcom of a size (less > than > >200,000 or so persons) which *could* be imported into FTM in > >Win95/98. But some would still prefer getting an occasional cd to > the > >commotion of doing all this. > > > >So, at least for now, both methods are still available. > > > >Mac users aren't so fortunate. The only way they can currently get > their > >hands on the gedcom is the re-assembled unzipped version of it > included on > >the cd. And then, for some inexplicable reason, the import seems > to be > >about 10 times slower. > > > >I hope this makes all this clear to everyone. > > > >John Robertson > > > > > > > > > >==== SC-OLD-PENDLETON-DIST Mailing List ==== > >Want to search for a surname in RootsWeb archives > >http://searches.rootsweb.com/cgi-bin/listsearch.pl > > > ==== SC-OLD-PENDLETON-DIST Mailing List ==== > Here's the web site for The South Carolina Genealogical Society > concerning Old Pendleton District information to be downloaded > <AHREF="http://www.geocities.com/bourbonstreet/delta/8155/site2.html"> > OPD Download</A> > http://www.geocities.com/bourbonstreet/delta/8155 >

    08/30/2000 10:31:41
    1. Re: [SC-OPD] Re: What pgms can import OPD d/b?
    2. Jim Allen
    3. ***For John Robertson*** John, I've read all this with great interest, and I fully understand the problem with FTM. If I did not have so much time invested in FTM I would go back to Brother's Keeper. Alas, the story of my life. I have BK and PAF on my computer. Here is my problem: when I attempt to open the downloaded info my FTM opens and of course will/can not handle the amount of info. I suspect somewhere along the line, maybe in version 5 of FTM, I selected it to be the default genealogy program on my computer. I attempted to go back to version 5 and change the default, however, the program prevents this. I have checked version 6 and there is no place to make this choice as V6 builds on V5. Suggestions please? How can I prevent FTM from opening as default genealogy program. any help from **anyone** will be greatly appreciated. I there is no other course I guess I'll go back to BK or maybe give PAF a try. My question about PAF: does LDS have a built in section that will allow them to enter my computer and collect the genealogy info? Many thanks for any help or suggestion. Sincerely Jim Allen. (Searching: ALLEN, BOYD, COCKERHAM, HILDRETH, HOLLINGSWORTH, PRATT, PALMER, ROBERDS. At 07:17 AM 8/29/00 -0400, you wrote: >>My apologies for not being more clear. I was referring specifically to the >>downloadable file, not the CD. >> > > >My experience (I've done all this numerous times) with the *downloadable >gedcom* is that it can be imported into practically *any* major Windows >genealogy program (except that it can *only* be imported into FTM by using >WinNT or Win2000), requiring from about an hour for Brothers Keeper to >about 10 hours for Legacy, with typical import times of 2 to 3 hours. It >is quicker by half to get it into Legacy by first importing it into PAF >4.0, then loading the PAF database into Legacy. > >This is exactly the process followed in making the cd. The gedcom is >downloaded exactly as any of you would do it (maybe a bit faster!). Then, >one at a time, this downloaded gedcom is imported into all the various >programs. For many, using the cd is like hiring a neighbor boy to mow >your lawn: you could do it yourself but prefer paying someone to do the >time-consuming work for you (but likely at a lower rate/hour than for >lawn-mowing!). For others, the cd is the only way they can succeed in >accessing the data (e.g., FTM users not caring to bite the bullet and buy >pricey Win2000 when they have no other need for it, or others simply >overwhelmed by the process.). > >Currently, it seems that at least 75% of those interested in the OPD d/b, >use FTM and are faced with the choice of (1) getting the cd, OR (2) >switching to another program such as free PAF 4.0 (for this purpose, if no >other). It is quite possible in PAF to split off a database containing >those of interest to you, and exporting a gedcom of a size (less than >200,000 or so persons) which *could* be imported into FTM in >Win95/98. But some would still prefer getting an occasional cd to the >commotion of doing all this. > >So, at least for now, both methods are still available. > >Mac users aren't so fortunate. The only way they can currently get their >hands on the gedcom is the re-assembled unzipped version of it included on >the cd. And then, for some inexplicable reason, the import seems to be >about 10 times slower. > >I hope this makes all this clear to everyone. > >John Robertson > > > > >==== SC-OLD-PENDLETON-DIST Mailing List ==== >Want to search for a surname in RootsWeb archives >http://searches.rootsweb.com/cgi-bin/listsearch.pl

    08/30/2000 08:40:53
    1. Re: [SC-OPD] Fw: http://www.bibliofind.com/
    2. A word of caution...these are fantastic sources but you may want to take the time to look at the documents yourself. I found an abstract of some important deeds were very incomplete and inaccurate. One very important one said that this ancestor sold 400 acres...the real deed said that he sold 100 of 400 acres and told specifically where the deed was filed, which was tremendous help. Also showed that there was no clear title to the land as the son was selling his part before the estate was settled and before his mother died. The date of the sale also helped me pinpoint where he was and when he moved from Union Co to Abbeville Co. On Tue, 29 Aug 2000 19:52:36 -0700 "Shirley Davis Warren" <swarren2@prodigy.net> writes: > > > Search Results > > > > > > > > Pauline Young: ABSTRACTS OF OLD NINETY-SIX AND ABBEVILLE > DISTRICT, SOUTH > > CAROLINA, WILLS AND BONDS ; This is probably the most important > book on > the > > up-country of South Carolina. It contains more than 3,500 > abstracts of > > wills, bonds and administrations between 1774 and 1860 and more > than > 30,000 > > names of persons mentioned in these records. Old Ninety-Six and > Abbeville > > districts are the present-day counties of Abbeville, Anderson, > Cherokee, > > Edgefield, Greenwood, Greenville, Laurens, Newberry, Pickens, > Oconee, > > Saluda, Spartanburg, and Union. Old 96 District bordered Georgia > on its > > western boundary and was the ancestral home of many early Georgia > settlers. > > (1950) 1996, index, 677 pp South Carolina Abbeville 4016SH > Offered for > > sale by Willow Bend Books at US$50.00 > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- - > -- > > ---- > > > > > > Young, Pauline: Abstracts of Wills and Bonds Old Ninety Six and > Abbeville > > District, South Carolina ; Greenville, S.C.: Southern Historical > Press, > 1992 > > reprint of the 1978 ed.,as new/SC 16, Genealogy South Carolina > (UR#:5877) > > Offered for sale by Maris Books at US$50.00 > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- - > -- > > ---- > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- - > -- > > --- > > > > > > Pauline Young: A GENEALOGICAL COLLECTION OF SOUTH CAROLINA WILLS > AND > > RECORDS, Volume 1 ; Contains more than 460 legal records with some > 3000 > > names of early South Carolina settlers named in the Districts of > Edgefield, > > Laurens, Pendleton, Pickens, Spartanburg, and York, ans such > records as: > > Wills, deeds, estate administration, slave papers, petitions, > inquest, and > > equity records. (1955), 1994, index, 266 pp South Carolina General > Reference > > 8607SH Offered for sale by Willow Bend Books at US$35.00 > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- - > -- > > ---- > > > > > > Young, Pauline: Abstracts of Wills and Bonds Old Ninety Six and > Abbeville > > District, South Carolina ; Greenville, S.C.: Southern Historical > Press, > 1992 > > reprint of the 1978 ed.,as new/SC 16, Genealogy South Carolina > (UR#:8365) > > Offered for sale by Maris Books at US$50.00 > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- - > -- > > ---- > > > > > > Pauline Young: A GENEALOGICAL COLLECTION OF SOUTH CAROLINA WILLS > AND > > RECORDS, Volume 2 ; Covers a spectrum of abstracts of wills and > estates of > > Abbeville, Pickens and Anderson counties; real estates books and > sales > > (division among heirs); citizenship papers of Pickens County; and > other > > selected records of Pauline Young's genealogical collection. 1984, > index, > > 328 pp South Carolina General Reference 8608SH Offered for sale > by > Willow > > Bend Books at US$28.50 > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- - > -- > > ---- > > > > > > Willie Pauline Young: Abstracts of Old Ninety-Six and Abbeville > District > > Wills and Bonds (as on File in the Abbeville, South Carolina, > Courthouse) > ; > > Georgia Genealogical Reprints (1969 Reprint of the 1950 edition), > Hardcover > > in VG condition (light edge wear). 638 pages of genealogical > information. > > [2.2 lbs], Genealogy State of South Carolina Genealogy > (UR#:10717) > > Offered for sale by Charles Berry, Bookseller at US$45.00 > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- - > -- > > ---- > > > > > > Young, Pauline: Abstracts of Wills and Bonds Old Ninety Six and > Abbeville > > District, South Carolina ; Greenville, S.C.: Southern Historical > Press, > 1992 > > reprint of the 1978 ed.,as new/SC 16, Genealogy South Carolina > (UR#:7881) > > Offered for sale by Maris Books at US$50.00 > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- - > -- > > ---- > > > > > > > > > > > > Willie Pauline Young: Abstracts of Old Ninety-Six and Abbeville > District > > Wills and Bonds ; Southern Historical Press, Liberty, South > Carolina, 2nd > > printing, 1977. Blue cloth brds, no D.J. Very clean, no flaws. > Great > > genealogical resource. 582 pgs w/ 85 pg index to names. VG+. > Genealogy. > > UR#000179 Offered for sale by Bank Street Books at US$50.00 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If the book you are looking for is not yet in Bibliofind, or if > you would > > like to be notified when other books with the same word(s) enter > Bibliofind, > > please post a want below. > > > > Your Personal Want List > > > > Author: > > Title: > > Any other word(s): > > Your Email Address: > > > > > > Non-subscribers may post up to ten titles on their Personal Want > Lists. > > Bibliofind subscribers may post unlimited wants. > > > > Click here for more information about wants. > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- - > -- > > ---- > > Copyright 1999 exchange.com Home . About . Legal . Help > > > > > > > > > ==== SC-OLD-PENDLETON-DIST Mailing List ==== > Harmony is the objective of this list. We are all adults, so please > respect us by talking with the list admin before making suggestions > on methods of posting or conduct. > Thank you -- donna -- list admin -- dbrand@itexas.net >

    08/29/2000 09:40:48
    1. RE: [SC-OPD] Check out RootsWeb: Genealogy Mailing Lists: USA/SC
    2. Eldon Wade
    3. I just did it two days ago and it worked fine. Are you sure you got the name right? The first time I tried I left out the DIST and it won't work without that in. Eldon -----Original Message----- From: DSHopmann@aol.com [mailto:DSHopmann@aol.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2000 10:35 AM To: SC-OLD-PENDLETON-DIST-L@rootsweb.com Subject: [SC-OPD] Check out RootsWeb: Genealogy Mailing Lists: USA/SC <A HREF="http://lists.rootsweb.com/index/usa/SC/">Click here: RootsWeb: Genealogy Mailing Lists: USA/SC</A> Hello, I am trying to search the archived messages of this list through Rootsweb. When I keyed in the name of this list, it came back that it does not exist. This list is not listed as one of Rootsweb's mailing list. The only list that came close was....... OPD-CD Help! Diane H. ==== SC-OLD-PENDLETON-DIST Mailing List ==== Join RootsWeb WorldConnect Program For details on how to submit your GEDCOM Visit http://www.rootsweb.com Scroll down to Other Tools/Resources

    08/29/2000 02:43:55
    1. [SC-OPD] Fw: http://www.bibliofind.com/
    2. Shirley Davis Warren
    3. > Search Results > > > > Pauline Young: ABSTRACTS OF OLD NINETY-SIX AND ABBEVILLE DISTRICT, SOUTH > CAROLINA, WILLS AND BONDS ; This is probably the most important book on the > up-country of South Carolina. It contains more than 3,500 abstracts of > wills, bonds and administrations between 1774 and 1860 and more than 30,000 > names of persons mentioned in these records. Old Ninety-Six and Abbeville > districts are the present-day counties of Abbeville, Anderson, Cherokee, > Edgefield, Greenwood, Greenville, Laurens, Newberry, Pickens, Oconee, > Saluda, Spartanburg, and Union. Old 96 District bordered Georgia on its > western boundary and was the ancestral home of many early Georgia settlers. > (1950) 1996, index, 677 pp South Carolina Abbeville 4016SH Offered for > sale by Willow Bend Books at US$50.00 > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- > ---- > > > Young, Pauline: Abstracts of Wills and Bonds Old Ninety Six and Abbeville > District, South Carolina ; Greenville, S.C.: Southern Historical Press, 1992 > reprint of the 1978 ed.,as new/SC 16, Genealogy South Carolina (UR#:5877) > Offered for sale by Maris Books at US$50.00 > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- > ---- > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- > --- > > > Pauline Young: A GENEALOGICAL COLLECTION OF SOUTH CAROLINA WILLS AND > RECORDS, Volume 1 ; Contains more than 460 legal records with some 3000 > names of early South Carolina settlers named in the Districts of Edgefield, > Laurens, Pendleton, Pickens, Spartanburg, and York, ans such records as: > Wills, deeds, estate administration, slave papers, petitions, inquest, and > equity records. (1955), 1994, index, 266 pp South Carolina General Reference > 8607SH Offered for sale by Willow Bend Books at US$35.00 > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- > ---- > > > Young, Pauline: Abstracts of Wills and Bonds Old Ninety Six and Abbeville > District, South Carolina ; Greenville, S.C.: Southern Historical Press, 1992 > reprint of the 1978 ed.,as new/SC 16, Genealogy South Carolina (UR#:8365) > Offered for sale by Maris Books at US$50.00 > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- > ---- > > > Pauline Young: A GENEALOGICAL COLLECTION OF SOUTH CAROLINA WILLS AND > RECORDS, Volume 2 ; Covers a spectrum of abstracts of wills and estates of > Abbeville, Pickens and Anderson counties; real estates books and sales > (division among heirs); citizenship papers of Pickens County; and other > selected records of Pauline Young's genealogical collection. 1984, index, > 328 pp South Carolina General Reference 8608SH Offered for sale by Willow > Bend Books at US$28.50 > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- > ---- > > > Willie Pauline Young: Abstracts of Old Ninety-Six and Abbeville District > Wills and Bonds (as on File in the Abbeville, South Carolina, Courthouse) ; > Georgia Genealogical Reprints (1969 Reprint of the 1950 edition), Hardcover > in VG condition (light edge wear). 638 pages of genealogical information. > [2.2 lbs], Genealogy State of South Carolina Genealogy (UR#:10717) > Offered for sale by Charles Berry, Bookseller at US$45.00 > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- > ---- > > > Young, Pauline: Abstracts of Wills and Bonds Old Ninety Six and Abbeville > District, South Carolina ; Greenville, S.C.: Southern Historical Press, 1992 > reprint of the 1978 ed.,as new/SC 16, Genealogy South Carolina (UR#:7881) > Offered for sale by Maris Books at US$50.00 > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- > ---- > > > > > > Willie Pauline Young: Abstracts of Old Ninety-Six and Abbeville District > Wills and Bonds ; Southern Historical Press, Liberty, South Carolina, 2nd > printing, 1977. Blue cloth brds, no D.J. Very clean, no flaws. Great > genealogical resource. 582 pgs w/ 85 pg index to names. VG+. Genealogy. > UR#000179 Offered for sale by Bank Street Books at US$50.00 > > > > > > > > > > If the book you are looking for is not yet in Bibliofind, or if you would > like to be notified when other books with the same word(s) enter Bibliofind, > please post a want below. > > Your Personal Want List > > Author: > Title: > Any other word(s): > Your Email Address: > > > Non-subscribers may post up to ten titles on their Personal Want Lists. > Bibliofind subscribers may post unlimited wants. > > Click here for more information about wants. > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- > ---- > Copyright 1999 exchange.com Home . About . Legal . Help > > >

    08/29/2000 01:52:36
    1. [SC-OPD] Re:Newbie
    2. David L. Ray
    3. Hi folks, I'm new to this list and would like to know if anyone is researching or has any info on SUGG or SUGGS? I am particularly interested in those who moved to West Tennessee or Kentucky. All my info is at http://worldconnect.rootsweb.com/~dray11 I have 10726 individuals, last updated Aug. 7, 2000. Thanks, Dave Ray dray@tds.net

    08/29/2000 07:47:02
    1. [SC-OPD] Re:
    2. Hello All, I am new to this list and would like to connect with anyone who has information on McGEE or CHAPMAN. I am specifically looking for information on Solomon McGee, born abt 1780 in VA. His son George Washington McGEE was born 1812 in SC. It's possible Solomon married Elizabeth CHAPMAN, daughter of Joseph Chapman, but I have no proof of this yet. I have lots of information on Solomon's descendents to share. The 1810 Census of Pendleton district of South Carolina, page 145 lists Solomon McGee. 2 males under 10, a male 26-45, 2 females 16-26 and one female 26-45. Just two lines above them is a listing for Joseph Chapman, 1 male under 10, 1 male over 45, 1 female 10-16 and 1 female over 45. I believe this could be Solomon's wife's parents. There is no longer a Solomon listed in Chesterfield Co where there was one listed in 1800. Would appreciate any contacts. Olive Lee >From Oklahoma "The Heartland"

    08/29/2000 06:26:21
    1. [SC-OPD] Archived messages..
    2. Found the answer. The archived messages can be reached by clicking on the Anderson link, then it leads to a link for the archived messages of SC-OLD-PENDLETON-DIST Diane H.

    08/29/2000 04:38:21
    1. [SC-OPD] Check out RootsWeb: Genealogy Mailing Lists: USA/SC
    2. <A HREF="http://lists.rootsweb.com/index/usa/SC/">Click here: RootsWeb: Genealogy Mailing Lists: USA/SC</A> Hello, I am trying to search the archived messages of this list through Rootsweb. When I keyed in the name of this list, it came back that it does not exist. This list is not listed as one of Rootsweb's mailing list. The only list that came close was....... OPD-CD Help! Diane H.

    08/29/2000 04:35:12
    1. Re: [SC-OPD] How to clean up those messages
    2. David L. Ray
    3. Here's a great way to clean up messages. After you copy the text, open Wordpad. Paste the text into it, then click edit, replace. In the "Find What" box that comes up type >. In the "Replace With" box, don't type anything. Click "Replace All" and it will remove all those >>>>. Then you can either save the Wordpad file and send it as an attachment or simply copy the new clean text and paste it into the new email to send out. This technique also works in other text editors. Hope this helps, Dave ----- Original Message ----- From: "Donna" <dbrand@itexas.net> To: <SC-OLD-PENDLETON-DIST-L@rootsweb.com> Sent: Monday, August 28, 2000 11:57 PM Subject: [SC-OPD] How to clean up those messages : The message below came in when I ask the group to clean up the messages that were forwarded from somewhere else. When a message is forwarded the MIME usually is forwarded too. Bill replied with a challenge I think was appropriate for this list too. We have a lot of new comers. : : ------------------------------------------ : OK, Bill, you're on : : Place the arrow of your mouse at the place where you want to begin copying : or cutting text. : : Depress and hold down the left mouse button. While holding down the mouse : button drag it across the test. This will "highlight" the text. Now : release the left mouse button. Place the arrow of your mouse "on" the : highlighted text. Click the right mouse button. A box will appear. Click : on "copy" or "cut" : : Copy if you want to create a new message, or cut to clean up a message being : forwarded. : : Now if you want that information to be somewhere else in a document, place : the mouse arrow where you want the text to be placed. Click the right mouse : button. Click on "paste" : : It will take some practice to learn how to control these things. Just don't : give up. : : <Smile> Now no one has an excuse to forward a messy message. : : : donna : http://www.angelfire.com/tx4/donnasdigs : : : ----- Original Message ----- : From: <WHB925@aol.com> : To: <dbrand@itexas.net> : Cc: <VAROOTS-L@rootsweb.com> : Sent: Monday, August 28, 2000 10:36 PM : Subject: Re: [VAROOTS] Please clean up your posts : : : Donna: : Why dont' you give the list instructions on how to copy and paste. It took : me : a long time to learn. : I mentioned copy and paste to my niece and she said : she only knew how to do it with scissors and a pot of paste. : Bill Bowen : : : : ==== SC-OLD-PENDLETON-DIST Mailing List ==== : Join RootsWeb WorldConnect Program : For details on how to submit your GEDCOM : Visit http://www.rootsweb.com : Scroll down to Other Tools/Resources :

    08/29/2000 02:58:03
    1. Re: [SC-OPD] How to clean up those messages
    2. If you want to forward a message intact to someone and want to get rid of those >>>>>on the left side? Open a Word document. Then go to the message and use Ctrl A to highlight the entire thing. Move back to the blank Word document and hit Ctrl V to paste it there. Next use Ctrl H which drops down a window with a long field to type into. In that field put one " > " only (that means just type >) then hit the letter A for replace all. It will take all those little >'s out! Next use Ctrl A and highlight the entire text, go to your email message area and do a Ctrl V and you have a clean copy. It sounds complicated but once you do it you will find it a breeze to do. Betty

    08/29/2000 02:01:50
    1. Re: [SC-OPD] How to clean up those messages
    2. <Smile> Now no one has an excuse to forward a messy message. Donna, I found that the mouse was hard to do for the cut and paste because it is hard to control where it goes. There is a way that my DH taught me that I like very much. It might be helpful to those who are new at mouse control. first, put your curser at the beginning of the text you want to copy, then hold down the shift button and use the arrow key that is on the right hand side of you key board and arrow to the end of the text, or use the down arrow if there is a lot of it. This lets you stop where you want on the highlighting. Then you let go of those keys and hold down the Ctrl key and hit the letter C. This copies the text you have highlighted. Go to the place where you want this text copied to and put your cursor there. Then hold down the Ctrl key and hit the letter V. It will paste the text right there. Works easier for me, might for some others too. Betty

    08/29/2000 01:56:23
    1. [SC-OPD] Re: What pgms can import OPD d/b?
    2. John Robertson
    3. > >My apologies for not being more clear. I was referring specifically to the >downloadable file, not the CD. > > My experience (I've done all this numerous times) with the *downloadable gedcom* is that it can be imported into practically *any* major Windows genealogy program (except that it can *only* be imported into FTM by using WinNT or Win2000), requiring from about an hour for Brothers Keeper to about 10 hours for Legacy, with typical import times of 2 to 3 hours. It is quicker by half to get it into Legacy by first importing it into PAF 4.0, then loading the PAF database into Legacy. This is exactly the process followed in making the cd. The gedcom is downloaded exactly as any of you would do it (maybe a bit faster!). Then, one at a time, this downloaded gedcom is imported into all the various programs. For many, using the cd is like hiring a neighbor boy to mow your lawn: you could do it yourself but prefer paying someone to do the time-consuming work for you (but likely at a lower rate/hour than for lawn-mowing!). For others, the cd is the only way they can succeed in accessing the data (e.g., FTM users not caring to bite the bullet and buy pricey Win2000 when they have no other need for it, or others simply overwhelmed by the process.). Currently, it seems that at least 75% of those interested in the OPD d/b, use FTM and are faced with the choice of (1) getting the cd, OR (2) switching to another program such as free PAF 4.0 (for this purpose, if no other). It is quite possible in PAF to split off a database containing those of interest to you, and exporting a gedcom of a size (less than 200,000 or so persons) which *could* be imported into FTM in Win95/98. But some would still prefer getting an occasional cd to the commotion of doing all this. So, at least for now, both methods are still available. Mac users aren't so fortunate. The only way they can currently get their hands on the gedcom is the re-assembled unzipped version of it included on the cd. And then, for some inexplicable reason, the import seems to be about 10 times slower. I hope this makes all this clear to everyone. John Robertson

    08/29/2000 01:17:16