Susan, I looked in my very small Quaker book of VA and didn't see the GILLIAMS, but am pretty sure they were Quakers. They wouldn't be in my book if they were in a different MM anyway. One reason I mention this is because so many families of Surry Co, VA are in my book: HUNNICUTS- BAILEYS-JORDANS, etc. Best of luck, Audrey ----- Original Message ----- From: "Susan Rosine" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, September 26, 2008 7:14 AM Subject: Re: [SC-BUSHRIVERQUAKERS] GILLIAM > > I've added the GILLIAM name to the Quaker project. I had the name Hinshaw > already, but will add the Henshaw spelling. > > https://www.familytreedna.com/public/britishquakers > > Susan > >> Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2008 17:28:28 -0700 >> From: "Audrey E Pool" >> Subject: Re: [SC-BUSHRIVERQUAKERS] GILLIAMS >> >> The GILLIAMS were from Surry Co, VA. "Hinchy" GILLIAM is really >> Henshaw/Hinshaw GILLIAM. Most researchers are familiar with the Hinshaw >> Quaker genealogy. You may know this already - just passing along a bit of >> information. Audrey >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Kathleen Summers" >> To: >> Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2008 4:20 PM >> Subject: Re: [SC-BUSHRIVERQUAKERS] Keren Happuch >> >> >>> Ah! Thank you. This is all very interesting. I have, of course, found >>> many different spellings and originally I thought that >>> Happuch/Hoppoch/Coppock was a surname but then found it attached to >>> other >>> surnames also so I began to wonder "Who was this Karen Happuch." Good to >>> know the story and the correct spelling. It might just help me track >>> down >>> my Newberry families of Thomas/Justis/Gilliam. One family was supposed >>> to >>> be Quaker but it might be that Gilliam was a second wife so there is a >>> mystery as to where the Quaker actually came in. >>> >>> Thanks for taking the time to answer my question. >>> >>> Kathy > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' > without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message > >