RootsWeb.com Mailing Lists
Total: 1/1
    1. RE: [SACKETT-L] 1703 New York colonial census for NYC
    2. Chris Sackett
    3. Wendy, I am unable to get through to the second of these URLs either directly or through the site accessed by the first URL (although I was able to access Richard's will abstract via this page). The "ftp:" address prefix looks strange for a website??? Roy Crego seems quite sure that the 1703 census shows two sons and the number of negro slaves is different too. If I read Roy's message correctly he found the census data in O'Callaghan's Documentary History of the State of NY (1849) p.614. I've tried to find this online but without success. How did you get through to the 1703 census page? Would you know if O'Callaghan is available online anywhere? Best... Chris > -----Original Message----- > From: Wendy Sacket [mailto:wsacket@mail.ccc.cccd.edu] > Sent: 14 November 2003 17:26 > To: SACKETT-L@rootsweb.com > Subject: [SACKETT-L] 1703 New York colonial census for NYC > > > After seeing the previous postings, especially Nancy's comment, I did a > little digging with Google myself. I didn't get any hits for a census in > 1708 (maybe I just couldn't find the transcription online) but I > did locate > the transcription for 1703 using the following URL > > http://www.rootsweb.com/~nycoloni/offsite.html#chu > > which had a link to > > ftp://ftp.rootsweb.com/pub/usgenweb/ny/newyork/census/1703/1703-nyc.txt > > The information in the USGenWeb archive was as follows: > Census Year 1703 > State New York > County New York > > District: New York City; East Ward > Page# 397 > [NOTE: I moved the categories to a vertical format for ease of typing and > reading] > > > Masters of Familys Richd Sackett > Males 16-60 1 > Females 1 > Male children 2 > Female children 0 > Male Negro 0 > Female Negro 0 > Male Negro children 1 > Female Negro children 0 > All above 60 0 > > > This would correspond to a household of Capt. Richard, his wife > Margery, two > sons, no daughters, no adult slaves, one slave child (a male), > and no adults > over the age of 60.

    11/14/2003 04:49:34