RootsWeb.com Mailing Lists
Previous Page      Next Page
Total: 40/125
    1. Re: [ROSE-DNA] FTDNA Sale
    2. Diana Gale Matthiesen
    3. Hello Jackie, The sale prices on the "New Kits" are not available to existing members. The only tests available to you on this sale would be these upgrades: > Upgrades..........,,..........Group Price.....SALE PRICE > 67 to 111 Markers..................$129...........$109 > mtHVR1 to Mega (FMS)...............$269...........$209 > mtHVR2 to Mega (FMS)...............$239...........$199 "FMS" stands for "Full Mitochondrial Sequence," but that would only be available to you if you had already tested one or both of the mtDNA HyperVariable Regions (HVR1 or HVR1+HVR2). I presume you haven't taken either of the mtHVR tests, so the only test available to you, if you want to take advantage of this sale, is the upgrade to 111 markers. Sorry, Diana > -----Original Message----- > From: rose-dna-bounces@rootsweb.com [mailto:rose-dna- > bounces@rootsweb.com] On Behalf Of Jackie Madden > Sent: Sunday, July 15, 2012 12:50 AM > To: rose-dna@rootsweb.com > Subject: Re: [ROSE-DNA] FTDNA Sale > > Diana, > I am a member and have done the 67 marker test. I would like to do > the > Maternal test but don't know what it's called or how much it costs. > Can you > please advise me so I can get the test. Thank you, Jackie Rose > Madden > > -----Original Message----- > From: rose-dna-bounces@rootsweb.com [mailto:rose-dna- > bounces@rootsweb.com] > On Behalf Of Diana Gale Matthiesen > Sent: Monday, July 09, 2012 10:55 AM > To: ROSE-DNA@rootsweb.com > Subject: [ROSE-DNA] FTDNA Sale > > FamilyTreeDNA is again offering it's "Sizzling Summer Sale" prices. > If you've been considering getting tested or upgrading your existing > tests, now's the time to do it because these discounts are > substantial > - and temporary. > > New Kits.........................Group Price.....SALE PRICE > Y-DNA-12..............................$ 99...........$ 59 > Y-DNA-37..............................$149...........$129 > Y-DNA-67..............................$239...........$199 > Family Finder.........................$289...........$199 > mtDNA Full Sequence (FMS).............$299...........$219 > Family Finder + Y-DNA-37..............$438...........$328 > Family Finder + mtDNAPlus (HVR1+2)....$438...........$328 > Comprehensive (FF + FMS + Y-DNA-67)...$797...........$617 > SuperDNA (FMS + Y-DNA-67).............$518...........$438 > > If you are already a project member of the project, the following > upgrades are on sale. > > Upgrades..........,,..........Group Price.....SALE PRICE > 12 to 37 Markers...................$109...........$ 70 > 25 to 37 Markers...................$ 59...........$ 35 > 25 to 67 Markers...................$159...........$114 > 37 to 67 Markers...................$109...........$ 79 > 37 to 111 Markers..................$220...........$188 > 67 to 111 Markers..................$129...........$109 > mtHVR1 to Mega (FMS)...............$269...........$209 > mtHVR2 to Mega (FMS)...............$239...........$199 > > To place an upgrade order, first click the orange "Order Upgrade" > button at the upper right, then choose the orange, "Current Special > Offers," button on the next page. Only the tests you are eligible > for > will show up (i.e., if you've already taken a test, it won't show up > as available, on either the standard price list or sale price list). > > All orders must be placed and paid for my 11:59 p.m., Sunday, July > 15th, 2012, to receive the sale prices. > > If you have questions or need assistance, please don't hesitate to > contact me. > > Diana

    07/14/2012 09:20:36
    1. Re: [ROSE-DNA] FTDNA Sale
    2. Jackie Madden
    3. Diana, I am a member and have done the 67 marker test. I would like to do the Maternal test but don't know what it's called or how much it costs. Can you please advise me so I can get the test. Thank you, Jackie Rose Madden -----Original Message----- From: rose-dna-bounces@rootsweb.com [mailto:rose-dna-bounces@rootsweb.com] On Behalf Of Diana Gale Matthiesen Sent: Monday, July 09, 2012 10:55 AM To: ROSE-DNA@rootsweb.com Subject: [ROSE-DNA] FTDNA Sale FamilyTreeDNA is again offering it's "Sizzling Summer Sale" prices. If you've been considering getting tested or upgrading your existing tests, now's the time to do it because these discounts are substantial - and temporary. New Kits.........................Group Price.....SALE PRICE Y-DNA-12..............................$ 99...........$ 59 Y-DNA-37..............................$149...........$129 Y-DNA-67..............................$239...........$199 Family Finder.........................$289...........$199 mtDNA Full Sequence (FMS).............$299...........$219 Family Finder + Y-DNA-37..............$438...........$328 Family Finder + mtDNAPlus (HVR1+2)....$438...........$328 Comprehensive (FF + FMS + Y-DNA-67)...$797...........$617 SuperDNA (FMS + Y-DNA-67).............$518...........$438 If you are already a project member of the project, the following upgrades are on sale. Upgrades..........,,..........Group Price.....SALE PRICE 12 to 37 Markers...................$109...........$ 70 25 to 37 Markers...................$ 59...........$ 35 25 to 67 Markers...................$159...........$114 37 to 67 Markers...................$109...........$ 79 37 to 111 Markers..................$220...........$188 67 to 111 Markers..................$129...........$109 mtHVR1 to Mega (FMS)...............$269...........$209 mtHVR2 to Mega (FMS)...............$239...........$199 To place an upgrade order, first click the orange "Order Upgrade" button at the upper right, then choose the orange, "Current Special Offers," button on the next page. Only the tests you are eligible for will show up (i.e., if you've already taken a test, it won't show up as available, on either the standard price list or sale price list). All orders must be placed and paid for my 11:59 p.m., Sunday, July 15th, 2011, to receive the sale prices. If you have questions or need assistance, please don't hesitate to contact me. Diana ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to ROSE-DNA-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

    07/14/2012 03:49:41
    1. Re: [ROSE-DNA] FTDNA Sale
    2. Diana Gale Matthiesen
    3. Oh good grief. I was re-using text from last year's Summer Sale, and I neglected to change the year. It obviously should be 2012. Sorry. Diana > From: Diana Gale Matthiesen > Sent: Monday, July 09, 2012 1:52 PM > <snip> > > All orders must be placed and paid for my 11:59 p.m., Sunday, July > 15th, 2011, to receive the sale prices. > <snip>

    07/10/2012 06:39:22
    1. [ROSE-DNA] FTDNA Sale
    2. Diana Gale Matthiesen
    3. FamilyTreeDNA is again offering it's "Sizzling Summer Sale" prices. If you've been considering getting tested or upgrading your existing tests, now's the time to do it because these discounts are substantial - and temporary. New Kits.........................Group Price.....SALE PRICE Y-DNA-12..............................$ 99...........$ 59 Y-DNA-37..............................$149...........$129 Y-DNA-67..............................$239...........$199 Family Finder.........................$289...........$199 mtDNA Full Sequence (FMS).............$299...........$219 Family Finder + Y-DNA-37..............$438...........$328 Family Finder + mtDNAPlus (HVR1+2)....$438...........$328 Comprehensive (FF + FMS + Y-DNA-67)...$797...........$617 SuperDNA (FMS + Y-DNA-67).............$518...........$438 If you are already a project member of the project, the following upgrades are on sale. Upgrades..........,,..........Group Price.....SALE PRICE 12 to 37 Markers...................$109...........$ 70 25 to 37 Markers...................$ 59...........$ 35 25 to 67 Markers...................$159...........$114 37 to 67 Markers...................$109...........$ 79 37 to 111 Markers..................$220...........$188 67 to 111 Markers..................$129...........$109 mtHVR1 to Mega (FMS)...............$269...........$209 mtHVR2 to Mega (FMS)...............$239...........$199 To place an upgrade order, first click the orange "Order Upgrade" button at the upper right, then choose the orange, "Current Special Offers," button on the next page. Only the tests you are eligible for will show up (i.e., if you've already taken a test, it won't show up as available, on either the standard price list or sale price list). All orders must be placed and paid for my 11:59 p.m., Sunday, July 15th, 2011, to receive the sale prices. If you have questions or need assistance, please don't hesitate to contact me. Diana

    07/09/2012 07:55:07
    1. [ROSE-DNA] FSB: Fathers-Sons-Brothers
    2. Diana Gale Matthiesen
    3. Hello List, A new Y-DNA project has opened at FamilyTreeDNA, called "Fathers-Sons-Brothers": http://www.familytreedna.com/public/Father-Son-Brother/ It's intention is to consolidate all father-son and brother-brother pairs Y-DNA tested at FTDNA. These pairs are extremely valuable for estimating the frequency of mutations. The project has only just opened, today, so the admins are still in the process of building the web site, but it's not too early to join. To do so, please click the "Join Projects" link at the upper left on your member page, then choose "F" under "Surname Projects," then scroll down and click "Fathers,Sons,Brothers." I have joined my father and his brother (MATTHIESEN 67/67), plus two first cousins who are brothers (STRAUB 110/111). If you are part of such a pair, I encourage you and your other half to please join the project. All haplogroups are welcome, and you don't have to have tested the same number of markers. Diana

    05/13/2012 12:15:34
    1. Re: [ROSE-DNA] RFA no longer controls ROSE DNA Project
    2. KNR
    3. Don Marty's kit number is 202115. Kathy -----Original Message----- From: rose-dna-bounces@rootsweb.com [mailto:rose-dna-bounces@rootsweb.com] On Behalf Of Don Rose Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2012 2:07 PM To: rose-dna@rootsweb.com Subject: Re: [ROSE-DNA] RFA no longer controls ROSE DNA Project Kathy, Mason died in the final days of the Civil War. His only son was only 3 years old. Any ROSE family info was not passed on. A paper in his Civil War pension file says he was born in Ohio. 1860 census record says New York. I don't know the county. What is your husband's DNA Kit number? Mine is 5348 Don On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 10:46 AM, KNR <knmrose@roadrunner.com> wrote: > Don > > Thanks for the information. Where in NY was Mason from? You don't > happen to have any Willaims from the Chemung County area hanging > around in your tree? > :) > > Thanks for the info. > > Kathy > > -----Original Message----- > From: rose-dna-bounces@rootsweb.com > [mailto:rose-dna-bounces@rootsweb.com] > On Behalf Of Don Rose > Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2012 1:33 PM > To: rose-dna@rootsweb.com > Subject: Re: [ROSE-DNA] RFA no longer controls ROSE DNA Project > > *Hi Kathy~ > > I am in a similar situation. My DNA results connected me to Aldert ROSE. > However, I was lucky in that I had a mutation in my code. This > mutation was traced to Aldert's gg grandson, Johannes ROOSA bn 1742 > (ROSE DNA Group T1). > So all of Johannes' male descendants, including me, have this > mutation. I was thrilled when I discovered this because I thought > that it would be a piece of cake in finding the connection between > Johannes and my gg gf, Mason ROSE bn ca. 1828 in NY or OH. Such has > not been the case. It was around the time of this mutation that my > line changed the name to ROSE. I have been knocking myself out for > almost ten years with no success. > > I have used Aldert as my most distant ancestor simply because I want > searchers to know that I am of ROOSA as they search the ROSE DNA charts. > > Don Rose > http://wc.rootsweb.ancestry.com/cgi-bin/igm.cgi?op=PED&db=darose47&id= > I1 > * > On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 6:40 AM, KNR <knmrose@roadrunner.com> wrote: > > > I have a question on the earliest paternal ancestor that should be > > entered. > > Should it be the one that you have definitely traced or the one that > > has come back through the DNA testing. For instance, the last direct > > ancestor that I can trace for my husband is James Montgomery Rose > > who was born in Elmira, NY in 1851 and died, I believe, in 1906. I > > think that his father's name was William. From the DNA, my husband > > is a > descendent of Aldert Roosa. > > This means that James' father's last name may have been Roosa or > > Rosa rather than Rose. I have not been able to yet find the links > > between the two. > > Which should I enter in the table? > > > > Thanks > > Kathy > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: rose-dna-bounces@rootsweb.com > > [mailto:rose-dna-bounces@rootsweb.com] > > On Behalf Of Diana Gale Matthiesen > > Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2012 9:06 AM > > To: ROSE-DNA@rootsweb.com > > Subject: [ROSE-DNA] RFA no longer controls ROSE DNA Project > > > > Hello List, > > > > As many of you will have heard, the Rose Family Association is no > > longer running the ROSE DNA Project at FTDNA: > > http://www.familytreedna.com/public/rose/ > > > > I find this a welcome change in that the new admins have elected to > > turn on the public display of test results: > > http://www.familytreedna.com/public/rose/default.aspx?section=yresul > > ts > > > > > > New test results will now appear automatically, as soon as they are > > returned, and all 111 markers will be shown. > > > > As you can see in the above results table, many individuals have not > > entered their earliest Paternal Ancestor. DNA test results without > > even an earliest ancestor are of minimal use, so I urge all of you > > who haven't entered that information to please do so. Space in the > > text field is limited, so the preferred form is, for example: > > > > John C. ROSE (1805-1860) SCT > VA > MO > > > > Diana > > > > > > ------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > > ROSE-DNA-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without > > the quotes in the subject and the body of the message > > > > > > > > ------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > > ROSE-DNA-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without > > the quotes in the subject and the body of the message > > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > ROSE-DNA-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the > quotes in the subject and the body of the message > > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > ROSE-DNA-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the > quotes in the subject and the body of the message > ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to ROSE-DNA-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

    05/10/2012 06:16:11
    1. Re: [ROSE-DNA] RFA no longer controls ROSE DNA Project
    2. KNR
    3. Don Thanks for the information. Where in NY was Mason from? You don't happen to have any Willaims from the Chemung County area hanging around in your tree? :) Thanks for the info. Kathy -----Original Message----- From: rose-dna-bounces@rootsweb.com [mailto:rose-dna-bounces@rootsweb.com] On Behalf Of Don Rose Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2012 1:33 PM To: rose-dna@rootsweb.com Subject: Re: [ROSE-DNA] RFA no longer controls ROSE DNA Project *Hi Kathy~ I am in a similar situation. My DNA results connected me to Aldert ROSE. However, I was lucky in that I had a mutation in my code. This mutation was traced to Aldert's gg grandson, Johannes ROOSA bn 1742 (ROSE DNA Group T1). So all of Johannes' male descendants, including me, have this mutation. I was thrilled when I discovered this because I thought that it would be a piece of cake in finding the connection between Johannes and my gg gf, Mason ROSE bn ca. 1828 in NY or OH. Such has not been the case. It was around the time of this mutation that my line changed the name to ROSE. I have been knocking myself out for almost ten years with no success. I have used Aldert as my most distant ancestor simply because I want searchers to know that I am of ROOSA as they search the ROSE DNA charts. Don Rose http://wc.rootsweb.ancestry.com/cgi-bin/igm.cgi?op=PED&db=darose47&id=I1 * On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 6:40 AM, KNR <knmrose@roadrunner.com> wrote: > I have a question on the earliest paternal ancestor that should be > entered. > Should it be the one that you have definitely traced or the one that > has come back through the DNA testing. For instance, the last direct > ancestor that I can trace for my husband is James Montgomery Rose who > was born in Elmira, NY in 1851 and died, I believe, in 1906. I think > that his father's name was William. From the DNA, my husband is a descendent of Aldert Roosa. > This means that James' father's last name may have been Roosa or Rosa > rather than Rose. I have not been able to yet find the links between > the two. > Which should I enter in the table? > > Thanks > Kathy > > -----Original Message----- > From: rose-dna-bounces@rootsweb.com > [mailto:rose-dna-bounces@rootsweb.com] > On Behalf Of Diana Gale Matthiesen > Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2012 9:06 AM > To: ROSE-DNA@rootsweb.com > Subject: [ROSE-DNA] RFA no longer controls ROSE DNA Project > > Hello List, > > As many of you will have heard, the Rose Family Association is no > longer running the ROSE DNA Project at FTDNA: > http://www.familytreedna.com/public/rose/ > > I find this a welcome change in that the new admins have elected to > turn on the public display of test results: > http://www.familytreedna.com/public/rose/default.aspx?section=yresults > > > New test results will now appear automatically, as soon as they are > returned, and all 111 markers will be shown. > > As you can see in the above results table, many individuals have not > entered their earliest Paternal Ancestor. DNA test results without > even an earliest ancestor are of minimal use, so I urge all of you who > haven't entered that information to please do so. Space in the text > field is limited, so the preferred form is, for example: > > John C. ROSE (1805-1860) SCT > VA > MO > > Diana > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > ROSE-DNA-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the > quotes in the subject and the body of the message > > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > ROSE-DNA-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the > quotes in the subject and the body of the message > ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to ROSE-DNA-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

    05/10/2012 07:46:24
    1. Re: [ROSE-DNA] RFA no longer controls ROSE DNA Project
    2. Don Rose
    3. Kathy, Mason died in the final days of the Civil War. His only son was only 3 years old. Any ROSE family info was not passed on. A paper in his Civil War pension file says he was born in Ohio. 1860 census record says New York. I don't know the county. What is your husband's DNA Kit number? Mine is 5348 Don On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 10:46 AM, KNR <knmrose@roadrunner.com> wrote: > Don > > Thanks for the information. Where in NY was Mason from? You don't happen > to > have any Willaims from the Chemung County area hanging around in your tree? > :) > > Thanks for the info. > > Kathy > > -----Original Message----- > From: rose-dna-bounces@rootsweb.com [mailto:rose-dna-bounces@rootsweb.com] > On Behalf Of Don Rose > Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2012 1:33 PM > To: rose-dna@rootsweb.com > Subject: Re: [ROSE-DNA] RFA no longer controls ROSE DNA Project > > *Hi Kathy~ > > I am in a similar situation. My DNA results connected me to Aldert ROSE. > However, I was lucky in that I had a mutation in my code. This mutation > was > traced to Aldert's gg grandson, Johannes ROOSA bn 1742 (ROSE DNA Group T1). > So all of Johannes' male descendants, including me, have this mutation. I > was thrilled when I discovered this because I thought that it would be a > piece of cake in finding the connection between Johannes and my gg gf, > Mason > ROSE bn ca. 1828 in NY or OH. Such has not been the case. It was around > the time of this mutation that my line changed the name to ROSE. I have > been knocking myself out for almost ten years with no success. > > I have used Aldert as my most distant ancestor simply because I want > searchers to know that I am of ROOSA as they search the ROSE DNA charts. > > Don Rose > http://wc.rootsweb.ancestry.com/cgi-bin/igm.cgi?op=PED&db=darose47&id=I1 > * > On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 6:40 AM, KNR <knmrose@roadrunner.com> wrote: > > > I have a question on the earliest paternal ancestor that should be > > entered. > > Should it be the one that you have definitely traced or the one that > > has come back through the DNA testing. For instance, the last direct > > ancestor that I can trace for my husband is James Montgomery Rose who > > was born in Elmira, NY in 1851 and died, I believe, in 1906. I think > > that his father's name was William. From the DNA, my husband is a > descendent of Aldert Roosa. > > This means that James' father's last name may have been Roosa or Rosa > > rather than Rose. I have not been able to yet find the links between > > the two. > > Which should I enter in the table? > > > > Thanks > > Kathy > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: rose-dna-bounces@rootsweb.com > > [mailto:rose-dna-bounces@rootsweb.com] > > On Behalf Of Diana Gale Matthiesen > > Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2012 9:06 AM > > To: ROSE-DNA@rootsweb.com > > Subject: [ROSE-DNA] RFA no longer controls ROSE DNA Project > > > > Hello List, > > > > As many of you will have heard, the Rose Family Association is no > > longer running the ROSE DNA Project at FTDNA: > > http://www.familytreedna.com/public/rose/ > > > > I find this a welcome change in that the new admins have elected to > > turn on the public display of test results: > > http://www.familytreedna.com/public/rose/default.aspx?section=yresults > > > > > > New test results will now appear automatically, as soon as they are > > returned, and all 111 markers will be shown. > > > > As you can see in the above results table, many individuals have not > > entered their earliest Paternal Ancestor. DNA test results without > > even an earliest ancestor are of minimal use, so I urge all of you who > > haven't entered that information to please do so. Space in the text > > field is limited, so the preferred form is, for example: > > > > John C. ROSE (1805-1860) SCT > VA > MO > > > > Diana > > > > > > ------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > > ROSE-DNA-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the > > quotes in the subject and the body of the message > > > > > > > > ------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > > ROSE-DNA-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the > > quotes in the subject and the body of the message > > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > ROSE-DNA-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the > quotes > in the subject and the body of the message > > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > ROSE-DNA-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the > quotes in the subject and the body of the message >

    05/10/2012 05:06:59
    1. Re: [ROSE-DNA] RFA no longer controls ROSE DNA Project
    2. Diana Gale Matthiesen
    3. Hello Kathy, It's better to enter just what you know, for certain, so I would give James Montgomery ROSE as the earliest ancestor. I haven't yet checked the subgrouping on the ROSE DNA results page, but presumable he will be subgrouped with the other descendants of Aldert ROOSA, so that tells people where his DNA matches are. Diana > -----Original Message----- > From: rose-dna-bounces@rootsweb.com [mailto:rose-dna- > bounces@rootsweb.com] On Behalf Of KNR > Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2012 9:41 AM > To: rose-dna@rootsweb.com > Subject: Re: [ROSE-DNA] RFA no longer controls ROSE DNA Project > > I have a question on the earliest paternal ancestor that should be > entered. > Should it be the one that you have definitely traced or the one that > has > come back through the DNA testing. For instance, the last direct > ancestor > that I can trace for my husband is James Montgomery Rose who was > born in > Elmira, NY in 1851 and died, I believe, in 1906. I think that his > father's > name was William. From the DNA, my husband is a descendent of Aldert > Roosa. > This means that James' father's last name may have been Roosa or > Rosa rather > than Rose. I have not been able to yet find the links between the > two. > Which should I enter in the table? > > Thanks > Kathy > > -----Original Message----- > From: rose-dna-bounces@rootsweb.com [mailto:rose-dna- > bounces@rootsweb.com] > On Behalf Of Diana Gale Matthiesen > Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2012 9:06 AM > To: ROSE-DNA@rootsweb.com > Subject: [ROSE-DNA] RFA no longer controls ROSE DNA Project > > Hello List, > > As many of you will have heard, the Rose Family Association is no > longer > running the ROSE DNA Project at FTDNA: > http://www.familytreedna.com/public/rose/ > > I find this a welcome change in that the new admins have elected to > turn on > the public display of test results: > http://www.familytreedna.com/public/rose/default.aspx?section=yresul > ts > > > New test results will now appear automatically, as soon as they are > returned, and all 111 markers will be shown. > > As you can see in the above results table, many individuals have not > entered > their earliest Paternal Ancestor. DNA test results without even an > earliest > ancestor are of minimal use, so I urge all of you who haven't > entered that > information to please do so. Space in the text field is limited, so > the > preferred form is, for example: > > John C. ROSE (1805-1860) SCT > VA > MO > > Diana > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > ROSE-DNA-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without > the quotes > in the subject and the body of the message > > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to ROSE-DNA- > request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes > in the subject and the body of the message

    05/10/2012 04:46:58
    1. Re: [ROSE-DNA] RFA no longer controls ROSE DNA Project
    2. Don Rose
    3. *Hi Kathy~ I am in a similar situation. My DNA results connected me to Aldert ROSE. However, I was lucky in that I had a mutation in my code. This mutation was traced to Aldert's gg grandson, Johannes ROOSA bn 1742 (ROSE DNA Group T1). So all of Johannes' male descendants, including me, have this mutation. I was thrilled when I discovered this because I thought that it would be a piece of cake in finding the connection between Johannes and my gg gf, Mason ROSE bn ca. 1828 in NY or OH. Such has not been the case. It was around the time of this mutation that my line changed the name to ROSE. I have been knocking myself out for almost ten years with no success. I have used Aldert as my most distant ancestor simply because I want searchers to know that I am of ROOSA as they search the ROSE DNA charts. Don Rose http://wc.rootsweb.ancestry.com/cgi-bin/igm.cgi?op=PED&db=darose47&id=I1 * On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 6:40 AM, KNR <knmrose@roadrunner.com> wrote: > I have a question on the earliest paternal ancestor that should be > entered. > Should it be the one that you have definitely traced or the one that has > come back through the DNA testing. For instance, the last direct ancestor > that I can trace for my husband is James Montgomery Rose who was born in > Elmira, NY in 1851 and died, I believe, in 1906. I think that his father's > name was William. From the DNA, my husband is a descendent of Aldert Roosa. > This means that James' father's last name may have been Roosa or Rosa > rather > than Rose. I have not been able to yet find the links between the two. > Which should I enter in the table? > > Thanks > Kathy > > -----Original Message----- > From: rose-dna-bounces@rootsweb.com [mailto:rose-dna-bounces@rootsweb.com] > On Behalf Of Diana Gale Matthiesen > Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2012 9:06 AM > To: ROSE-DNA@rootsweb.com > Subject: [ROSE-DNA] RFA no longer controls ROSE DNA Project > > Hello List, > > As many of you will have heard, the Rose Family Association is no longer > running the ROSE DNA Project at FTDNA: > http://www.familytreedna.com/public/rose/ > > I find this a welcome change in that the new admins have elected to turn on > the public display of test results: > http://www.familytreedna.com/public/rose/default.aspx?section=yresults > > > New test results will now appear automatically, as soon as they are > returned, and all 111 markers will be shown. > > As you can see in the above results table, many individuals have not > entered > their earliest Paternal Ancestor. DNA test results without even an > earliest > ancestor are of minimal use, so I urge all of you who haven't entered that > information to please do so. Space in the text field is limited, so the > preferred form is, for example: > > John C. ROSE (1805-1860) SCT > VA > MO > > Diana > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > ROSE-DNA-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the > quotes > in the subject and the body of the message > > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > ROSE-DNA-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the > quotes in the subject and the body of the message >

    05/10/2012 04:32:45
    1. Re: [ROSE-DNA] RFA no longer controls ROSE DNA Project
    2. KNR
    3. I have a question on the earliest paternal ancestor that should be entered. Should it be the one that you have definitely traced or the one that has come back through the DNA testing. For instance, the last direct ancestor that I can trace for my husband is James Montgomery Rose who was born in Elmira, NY in 1851 and died, I believe, in 1906. I think that his father's name was William. From the DNA, my husband is a descendent of Aldert Roosa. This means that James' father's last name may have been Roosa or Rosa rather than Rose. I have not been able to yet find the links between the two. Which should I enter in the table? Thanks Kathy -----Original Message----- From: rose-dna-bounces@rootsweb.com [mailto:rose-dna-bounces@rootsweb.com] On Behalf Of Diana Gale Matthiesen Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2012 9:06 AM To: ROSE-DNA@rootsweb.com Subject: [ROSE-DNA] RFA no longer controls ROSE DNA Project Hello List, As many of you will have heard, the Rose Family Association is no longer running the ROSE DNA Project at FTDNA: http://www.familytreedna.com/public/rose/ I find this a welcome change in that the new admins have elected to turn on the public display of test results: http://www.familytreedna.com/public/rose/default.aspx?section=yresults New test results will now appear automatically, as soon as they are returned, and all 111 markers will be shown. As you can see in the above results table, many individuals have not entered their earliest Paternal Ancestor. DNA test results without even an earliest ancestor are of minimal use, so I urge all of you who haven't entered that information to please do so. Space in the text field is limited, so the preferred form is, for example: John C. ROSE (1805-1860) SCT > VA > MO Diana ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to ROSE-DNA-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

    05/10/2012 03:40:44
    1. [ROSE-DNA] RFA no longer controls ROSE DNA Project
    2. Diana Gale Matthiesen
    3. Hello List, As many of you will have heard, the Rose Family Association is no longer running the ROSE DNA Project at FTDNA: http://www.familytreedna.com/public/rose/ I find this a welcome change in that the new admins have elected to turn on the public display of test results: http://www.familytreedna.com/public/rose/default.aspx?section=yresults New test results will now appear automatically, as soon as they are returned, and all 111 markers will be shown. As you can see in the above results table, many individuals have not entered their earliest Paternal Ancestor. DNA test results without even an earliest ancestor are of minimal use, so I urge all of you who haven't entered that information to please do so. Space in the text field is limited, so the preferred form is, for example: John C. ROSE (1805-1860) SCT > VA > MO Diana

    05/10/2012 03:05:48
    1. [ROSE-DNA] FTDNA extends sale to January 7th
    2. Diana Gale Matthiesen
    3. Hello List, FTDNA has extended their sale to January 7th: http://www.familytreedna.com/products.aspx It's not too late to take advantage of these huge discounts. Diana

    01/02/2012 05:10:18
    1. [ROSE-DNA] ROSE R1b Group G L513?
    2. Diana Gale Matthiesen
    3. Have any of you who are Haplogroup R1b Group G from the RFA Rose DNA project been deep SNP tested? Were you L513+? Have any of you tested 111 markers? If so, please share your results, so I can add them to the Group G table: http://dgmweb.net/DNA/Rose/Rose-results-R1b-G.html Diana

    08/27/2011 02:11:33
    1. [ROSE-DNA] #167308, desc/o John ROSE of King George Co VA, upgrades to 111 markers
    2. Diana Gale Matthiesen
    3. Member #167308, a descendant of John ROSE (1706- ) of Stafford [now King George] Co., VA, has upgraded his testing from 67 to 111 markers: http://dgmweb.net/DNA/Rose/Rose-results-R1b-L.html#data The markers in Panel 5 (Markers 68-111) are turning out to be more variable than the ones in Panel 4 (Markers 38-67), which is welcome. This variability is especially welcome in this family because it's modal haplotype is nearly a match with the R1b modal haplotype at 25 markers - which is what led to some early grouping errors in the Rose DNA project. Testing to 37 markers cleared up most of those. The goal now is to find "branching markers," that is, mutations downstream of our common ancestor that distinguish different family lines. A good example of success in this quest is in my CORBIN project, where two forks in the family tree are congruent with the appearance of a new mutation (please scroll to the right to see the branches highlighted): http://dgmweb.net/DNA/Corbin/CorbinDNA-results-HgI1.html#AS2 The more markers we test, the more likely we are to find such identifying markers. Diana

    08/25/2011 04:36:20
    1. [ROSE-DNA] #5601, desc/o John ROSE of King George Co VA, upgrades to 67 markers
    2. Diana Gale Matthiesen
    3. A testing upgrade from 37 markers to 67 has returned for #5601, a descendant of John ROSE (1706- ) of King George Co., VA: http://dgmweb.net/DNA/Rose/Rose-results-R1b-L.html He is a 67/67 match with #167308, his 3rd cousin (once removed) and a 66/67 match with #2993, his 3rd cousin. We have some missing data in the table. Two people have been test to 67 markers, but have not shared their results, at least not with me. Three have not shared their entire lineage, and two have tested only 25 markers. Please help your fellow researchers by upgrading your testing, sharing your results, and sharing your lineage. Diana

    08/25/2011 04:21:24
    1. Re: [ROSE-DNA] expiration of Introductory price on 68-111 upgrade
    2. Diana Gale Matthiesen
    3. I guess the IT guys weren't awake at midnight Friday night to change the price because the Introductory price was still available at 7 am Saturday morning. But it's not available, now (Saturday afternoon). A check of the price list shows the price is now 129, not 101. Diana > -----Original Message----- > From: rose-dna-bounces@rootsweb.com [mailto:rose-dna- > bounces@rootsweb.com] On Behalf Of Diana Gale Matthiesen > Sent: Saturday, April 16, 2011 7:52 AM > To: rose-dna@rootsweb.com > Subject: Re: [ROSE-DNA] expiration of Introductory price on 68-111 > upgrade > > Hello List, > > Well, I still haven't heard from FTDNA, but it's 7 a.m. (ET) > Saturday > morning, and the Introductory price on the 67-111 upgrade is still > on > the Product list, so the rumor must be correct: the price didn't > expire at midnight. I don't know how much longer it will be in > effect, but I hope long enough for more project members to take > advantage of it. > > Diana

    04/16/2011 10:38:33
    1. Re: [ROSE-DNA] expiration of Introductory price on 68-111 upgrade
    2. Diana Gale Matthiesen
    3. Hello List, Well, I still haven't heard from FTDNA, but it's 7 a.m. (ET) Saturday morning, and the Introductory price on the 67-111 upgrade is still on the Product list, so the rumor must be correct: the price didn't expire at midnight. I don't know how much longer it will be in effect, but I hope long enough for more project members to take advantage of it. Diana > -----Original Message----- > From: rose-dna-bounces@rootsweb.com [mailto:rose-dna- > bounces@rootsweb.com] On Behalf Of Diana Gale Matthiesen > Sent: Friday, April 15, 2011 9:10 PM > To: ROSE-DNA@rootsweb.com > Subject: [ROSE-DNA] expiration of Introductory price on 68-111 > upgrade > > Hello List, > > I hate to pass on rumors, but I haven't had a response from FTDNA, > yet. > > Someone on the GENEALOGY-DNA mailing list said she telephoned FTDNA, > and they told her that only the "Facebook" specials will expire > tonight at midnight (CT). The Introductory price for the 68-111 > upgrade will continue until further notice. Let's hope that is the > case, so more members can take advantage of the savings. > > I'll let you know when I hear back from FTDNA. > > Diana

    04/16/2011 01:52:29
    1. [ROSE-DNA] expiration of Introductory price on 68-111 upgrade
    2. Diana Gale Matthiesen
    3. Hello List, I hate to pass on rumors, but I haven't had a response from FTDNA, yet. Someone on the GENEALOGY-DNA mailing list said she telephoned FTDNA, and they told her that only the "Facebook" specials will expire tonight at midnight (CT). The Introductory price for the 68-111 upgrade will continue until further notice. Let's hope that is the case, so more members can take advantage of the savings. I'll let you know when I hear back from FTDNA. Diana

    04/15/2011 03:09:53
    1. [ROSE-DNA] FTDNA sale ends Friday, midnight (CT)
    2. Diana Gale Matthiesen
    3. Hello List, FTDNA has just announced a sale on its Facebook page. I must admit, I have strongly resisted getting a Facebook account, so I got this notice second hand. I suppose I will be forced to join Facebook, eventually, but I will go down kicking and screaming when I do. The sale is only going to last through midnight, tomorrow night (central time), that is Friday, April 15th. These are the prices -- and here we find out the final price on the 67-111 upgrade and when the current introductory price (of $101) will expire: ================================================================== New customers: Y-DNA12.. $59 Y-DNA37.. $129 mtDNA... $59 Family Finder. $199 Family Finder + Y-DNA12. $258 Family Finder + mtDNA.. $258 Family Finder + mtFullSequence + Y-DNA67 . $657 Upgrades: Y-DNA12 add-on . $59 Y-DNA12 to 37.. $69 Y-DNA37 to 67.. $79 Y-DNA12 to 67.. $148 mtDNA add-on .. $59 mtFull Sequence upgrade . $199 Family Finder add-on . $199 To take advantage of these promotional prices use the coupon code: DNADAY2011 The coupon code will expire on Friday at midnight (CST). Please note, the Y-DNA67 to 111 upgrade will remain at the introductory rate of $101 (no coupon necessary) until the end of this promotion. The price will be $129 going forward. ===================================================================== Results for those who ordered the 67-111 upgrade as soon as it was available are starting to return. The consensus seems to be that it's a useful mix of fast and slow moving markers. Seven members of a Haplogroup I1-AS5 family in my STRAUB project have ordered the upgrade, and results are trickling in (scroll to the right). http://dgmweb.net/DNA/Straub/StraubDNA-results-HgI1-AS5.html#data We're already getting some variation on three of the markers, so I'm encouraged we may pick up another useful branch marker (or two or three). If you have any intention of upgrading your markers, now is a good time to do it. Diana http://dgmweb.net/DNA/Rose/OpenRoseDNA.html

    04/14/2011 03:35:37