In a message dated 28/08/2007 18:23:26 GMT Standard Time, [email protected] writes: << Is there a reason why you are sticking with RootsWeb other than the fact that it is free (for now)? For all the work you are going to put into this, would it be worth it just to move your site to a provider that won't put banners on your webpages? Yes, you might have to pay $100/year for such a site, but with all the hoops you are jumping thru, it might be worth it. >> Thanks for the comment. The best reason I can think of is that Rootsweb is/was once free service to genealogists. My site is a free service the genealogists researching their roots in SW Scotland. As a sort of a Millennium Project I set myself the goal of photographing every Kirk and taking a sample sets of photographs from every Graveyard in Dumfries and Galloway. My photos are copyright free to any family historian produce a not-for-profit family history book or website. (Although I may never finish it, I'm still working on it.) I could switch to another host I use. _www.freeola.com_ (http://www.freeola.com) is a 'free' UK hosts who offer unlimited webspace. (i.e free in the sense that they get a cut of the telephone bill when used for dial-up access.) I didn't quite appreciate that the frames layout created problems for users. Since posting my intial message that message has come across very clearly. I thought the provision of a side navigation bars was user-friendly enough for anyone My site covering a walking holiday on the Scottish Island of RUM _http://www.sypittdfs.freeola.com/Walks/Rum/index.htm_ (http://www.sypittdfs.freeola.com/Walks/Rum/index.htm) is an example of what I mean. So in short -- I'm STICKING with Rootsweb for now, but I'm certainly not STUCK there. Regards, Sandy