FreeFind says that its free version has no page limit - only a sit elimit 32 MB. http://www.freefind.com/plans.html Jacques On 5/11/2007 8:35 PM, Judy Florian wrote: > The older the site, the higher chance it is set to 1500 pages. Newer sites > (2 of mine are almost 2 yrs old) are set at 250 pages (bummer). It's over > $200 a year to upgrade (bummer). I can't afford that for a hobby. > Judy > > > On 5/11/07, Karima <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Judy, >> >> I use PICO for my Vermont Gateway site and the limit for it is 1500. I >> just >> went to their web site to check. I have had it on my site for quite >> sometime and I don't know if they have limited the pages 250 since I >> signed >> up, but mine, as I said is limited at 1500. >> >> ~Karima >> > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message > -- Jacques L'Heureux, Columbia, Maryland Personal website: http://Jacques.happyOnes.com/ Family website: http://www.happyOnes.com/ Genealogy website: http://Genealogy.happyOnes.com/ Franco-American website: http://www.FrancoAmericanConnection.com/ ColumbiaMD website: http://www.ColumbiaMD.org/ Columbia Networking Group: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ColumbiaMD/ --

one of the probelems with google and rootsweb is that it only searches one or two layers deep http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.com/~monfamilies/ does well in web searches and it is a very flat file structure made by Mike John using Frontpage Hugh W On 11/05/07, Judy Florian <[email protected]> wrote: > I'd like info from other webmasters about which on-site search engines are > 1. easiest to place the code > 2. index most or all a website > 3. allow the site to be over 250 pgs for FREE > > My 3 webs are growing and Freefind and pico are not getting all my pages. > One site is limited to 250 pgs on one engine. Collectively, I have probably > 1000 to 1500 pages within 3 cross- linked sites. > > Is google search a better option? > > Is it easy to set up? > > Do I need lists of pages (or folders) to set it up? > > I need to find a solution soon. But I can't afford a couple hundred dollars > a year for a larger search account. > > Judy > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message > -- a wonderful artist in Denmark http://www.ingerlisekristoffersen.dk/ Beta blogger http://snaps4.blogspot.com/ photographs and walks old blogger GENEALOGE http://hughw36.blogspot.com/ MAIN BLOG

The older the site, the higher chance it is set to 1500 pages. Newer sites (2 of mine are almost 2 yrs old) are set at 250 pages (bummer). It's over $200 a year to upgrade (bummer). I can't afford that for a hobby. Judy On 5/11/07, Karima <[email protected]> wrote: > > Judy, > > I use PICO for my Vermont Gateway site and the limit for it is 1500. I > just > went to their web site to check. I have had it on my site for quite > sometime and I don't know if they have limited the pages 250 since I > signed > up, but mine, as I said is limited at 1500. > > ~Karima

Judy, I use PICO for my Vermont Gateway site and the limit for it is 1500. I just went to their web site to check. I have had it on my site for quite sometime and I don't know if they have limited the pages 250 since I signed up, but mine, as I said is limited at 1500. ~Karima ----- Original Message ----- From: "Judy Florian" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>; <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, May 11, 2007 12:51 PM Subject: [ROOTSWEB-HELP] Search Engines > I'd like info from other webmasters about which on-site search engines are > 1. easiest to place the code > 2. index most or all a website > 3. allow the site to be over 250 pgs for FREE > > My 3 webs are growing and Freefind and pico are not getting all my pages. > One site is limited to 250 pgs on one engine. Collectively, I have > probably > 1000 to 1500 pages within 3 cross- linked sites. > > Is google search a better option? > > Is it easy to set up? > > Do I need lists of pages (or folders) to set it up? > > I need to find a solution soon. But I can't afford a couple hundred > dollars > a year for a larger search account. > > Judy >

Pat, If I use the code shown on page 1 below, besides changing the 'askdavetaylor' part, do I need to do anything else? Specifically, do I still need to 'register' at Google for their free search? Or, would it work without going through their registration thing? Sorry if I'm asking a dumb question but after spending all day looking at urls for problems, I feel quite confused. Judy On 5/11/07, Patricia Geary <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Judy, I played around with the code on this page > http://www.askdavetaylor.com/how_can_i_add_a_google_search_box_to_my_web_site.html > > I have not used Google search before but this is what it turns out like > http://www.houseofoak.com/search-hoo.htm > > The only change I made to his code was the url of the site and the code > for checked since I use XHTML doctype. It only took a couple of minutes to > do and publish. It may give you some ideas. It may also depend on how much > of the site has been indexed by Google. No single site I have is as large as > yours. I use a variety of free search engines and one I bought that goes > with frontpage but it will not work on the rootsweb servers. > > pat > > pat > > ------------------------------ > Pat Geary, Microsoft MVP - FrontPage > We discuss FrontPage and Expression Web > http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.com/~gearyfamily/frontpage/ > http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.com/~gearyfamily/expression-web/ > > Genealogy Web Design Tips and Tutorials > http://www.genealogy-web-creations.com/ > http://www.blog.family-genealogy-online.com/ > >

At 03:51 PM 5/11/2007, Judy Florian wrote: >I'd like info from other webmasters about which on-site search engines are >1. easiest to place the code >2. index most or all a website >3. allow the site to be over 250 pgs for FREE > >My 3 webs are growing and Freefind and pico are not getting all my pages. >One site is limited to 250 pgs on one engine. Collectively, I have probably >1000 to 1500 pages within 3 cross- linked sites. > >Is google search a better option? > >Is it easy to set up? > >Do I need lists of pages (or folders) to set it up? Judy, I played around with the code on this page http://www.askdavetaylor.com/how_can_i_add_a_google_search_box_to_my_web_site.html I have not used Google search before but this is what it turns out like http://www.houseofoak.com/search-hoo.htm The only change I made to his code was the url of the site and the code for checked since I use XHTML doctype. It only took a couple of minutes to do and publish. It may give you some ideas. It may also depend on how much of the site has been indexed by Google. No single site I have is as large as yours. I use a variety of free search engines and one I bought that goes with frontpage but it will not work on the rootsweb servers. pat pat

I'd like info from other webmasters about which on-site search engines are 1. easiest to place the code 2. index most or all a website 3. allow the site to be over 250 pgs for FREE My 3 webs are growing and Freefind and pico are not getting all my pages. One site is limited to 250 pgs on one engine. Collectively, I have probably 1000 to 1500 pages within 3 cross- linked sites. Is google search a better option? Is it easy to set up? Do I need lists of pages (or folders) to set it up? I need to find a solution soon. But I can't afford a couple hundred dollars a year for a larger search account. Judy

Sylvia, So the ideas I gave were no help? Have you tried uninstalling FP and reinstalling? Granted re-install WILL mean that FP 200 will believe you have an entire new web and it reloads it ALL --again. I just did this the past week on 3 large webs... But reinstall might help unfunk the web settings. I don't think size is the issue. I have 3 webs: 53.2MB 73.3 MB 137MB The ONLY other time when the web stops loading, but still loads other pages in the background, is when I have a forbidden file type inside the web::: zip, files with characters except - or _, and spaces. Also, did you try uploading with a different ftp program one time, or load one time through Fileman. I swear FP2000 has gremlins who get very confuzzled sometimes. All it takes is tricking FP into thinking all is well again. The issue is figuring out which problem (ex. file types), or trick to use. Take a day and look at every file name you have, and every file extension. Look with an eye as though the web is totally new to you. You might find a forbidden file type you missed. Judy On 4/28/07, Sylvia Hasenkopf <[email protected]> wrote: > I hope someone can help me. I have tried working with the Rootsweb > Helpdesk and they have no idea what is wrong. > > I have been using Frontpage 2000 since 1999 to manage the website on > Rootsweb. Admitedly it is a big website - abt 31megs. > > All of a sudden, in February of this year I began having trouble with the > upload process. I am able to process the updates - they do appear on the > web, just fine. The problem is that Frontpage advises me that "the server > has unexpectedly stopped the connection" just as the web updates are > processing. What happens is that although the material shows up online, it > does not clear from the Frontpage memory, so when I need to uplaod again, I > am uploading all those updates again, plus any new ones. I've done this > three times, thinking things would sort themselves out, however the number > of updates in the memory is getting way too huge. > In an effort to resolve this I have done the following: > > Disabled my Firewall > Adjusted the cookies so that I authorize each and every one > Ran Defrag > Ran Disk cleanup > Tried to upload with another ISP - does the same thing > In Frontpage - chose Apache Server and disabled active server pages, > ensured enabled with MS Frontpage server extentions is unchecked > Tried to reset my computer to a date prior to February and can't because I > haven't changed anything since the beginning of January and my last > successful update > Made a copy of My Web and tried to upload that - same problem, even > without all the updates to upload. It stops at the processing web updates > Disabled my virus software while I tried to upload the changes > > Anyone out there have any ideas? > > Sylvia

At 07:56 AM 4/28/2007, you wrote: >I hope someone can help me. I have tried working with the Rootsweb >Helpdesk and they have no idea what is wrong. > >I have been using Frontpage 2000 since 1999 to manage the website on >Rootsweb. Admitedly it is a big website - abt 31megs. ============ Did you try the earlier suggestions that were made to your last post? You can also try running FP Cleaner http://www.95isalive.com/fixes/fpclean.htm It quite often clears up problems? What changes have you made to your computer setup since you were last able to publish correctly? pat ---------- Pat Geary, Microsoft MVP - FrontPage We discuss FrontPage and Expression Web http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.com/~gearyfamily/frontpage/ http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.com/~gearyfamily/expression-web/ Genealogy Web Design Tips and Tutorials http://www.genealogy-web-creations.com/ http://www.blog.family-genealogy-online.com/

I hope someone can help me. I have tried working with the Rootsweb Helpdesk and they have no idea what is wrong. I have been using Frontpage 2000 since 1999 to manage the website on Rootsweb. Admitedly it is a big website - abt 31megs. All of a sudden, in February of this year I began having trouble with the upload process. I am able to process the updates - they do appear on the web, just fine. The problem is that Frontpage advises me that "the server has unexpectedly stopped the connection" just as the web updates are processing. What happens is that although the material shows up online, it does not clear from the Frontpage memory, so when I need to uplaod again, I am uploading all those updates again, plus any new ones. I've done this three times, thinking things would sort themselves out, however the number of updates in the memory is getting way too huge. In an effort to resolve this I have done the following: Disabled my Firewall Adjusted the cookies so that I authorize each and every one Ran Defrag Ran Disk cleanup Tried to upload with another ISP - does the same thing In Frontpage - chose Apache Server and disabled active server pages, ensured enabled with MS Frontpage server extentions is unchecked Tried to reset my computer to a date prior to February and can't because I haven't changed anything since the beginning of January and my last successful update Made a copy of My Web and tried to upload that - same problem, even without all the updates to upload. It stops at the processing web updates Disabled my virus software while I tried to upload the changes Anyone out there have any ideas? Sylvia

Pat makes some really good points that I'd like to underline. The secret is in knowing the program you use and what features create code that is not compliant. -- You're totally right and I just never had the patience to work with a program enough to get to know it's ins and outs to the extent that I could do this. A template you download from the Internet whether free or paid is only as good as the person who originally wrote it. -- Definitely a good caveat. Templates aren't the best option for everyone. You have to be able to look at the code and tell if it's going to work or not. Some templates are made, as you mentioned above, using features of a program that create non-compliant code. Style sheets are not funky. -- I didn't mean funky in a bad way. It's just different enough from straight HTML that it can be tricky. I use them on quite a few of my pages and they can save a LOT of time and they can also make your file size smaller depending on the amount of formatting. Learn html http://www.w3schools.com/html/default.asp Learn xhtml http://www.w3schools.com/xhtml/default.asp Learn css http://www.w3schools.com/css/default.asp -- I meant to link to this site in my last post and forgot. W3 Schools is an excellent site. It's not going to give you a totally complete education on these languages, but there is no better reference that I have found for learning the basics and for referring back to when I can't remember a tag or format. But it's all personal preference. I don't think anyone here is trying to suggest that one way is "better" than the other. We're just comparing notes on the methods we like to use and why. Those who have found editors they're happy with can disregard these messages, those who aren't happy with their editors and are interested in trying something different can give it a shot. __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com

silly people just view source and you are straight in notepad there are better specialist raw code editors Text Wrangler for example on the mac but for big pages that load quickly you cannot beat handwritten code (say a thousand lines long list of names) even if the tags are old fashioned according to w3 Hugh W On 4/26/07, Dale H. Cook <[email protected]> wrote: > At 03:20 PM 4/26/2007, Jacques L'Heureux wrote: > > >It would be like writing your own PostScript code for a printer instead > >of letting Word generate it for you. It has been done in the past but no > >one in his right mind would do it now. > > The point is that I can write more efficient code than Frontpage, > Dreamweaver and their ilk, just as I have a much better grammar > checker between my ears than any included in a word processor. I've > been writing in a variety of programming languages for 40 years, > which is probably longer than most of the HTML publishing tools > programmers have been alive. > > My last word. > > Dale H. Cook, Member, NEHGS and MA Society of Mayflower Descendants; > Plymouth Co. MA Coordinator for the USGenWeb Project > http://members.cox.net/plymouthcolony/index.shtml > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message > -- a wonderful artist in Denmark http://www.ingerlisekristoffersen.dk/ Beta blogger http://snaps4.blogspot.com/ photographs and walks old blogger GENEALOGE http://hughw36.blogspot.com/ MAIN BLOG

At 03:20 PM 4/26/2007, Jacques L'Heureux wrote: >It would be like writing your own PostScript code for a printer instead >of letting Word generate it for you. It has been done in the past but no >one in his right mind would do it now. The point is that I can write more efficient code than Frontpage, Dreamweaver and their ilk, just as I have a much better grammar checker between my ears than any included in a word processor. I've been writing in a variety of programming languages for 40 years, which is probably longer than most of the HTML publishing tools programmers have been alive. My last word. Dale H. Cook, Member, NEHGS and MA Society of Mayflower Descendants; Plymouth Co. MA Coordinator for the USGenWeb Project http://members.cox.net/plymouthcolony/index.shtml

It would be like writing your own PostScript code for a printer instead of letting Word generate it for you. It has been done in the past but no one in his right mind would do it now. My last word. Jacques On 4/26/2007 12:37 PM, Dale H. Cook wrote: > At 11:31 AM 4/26/2007, Jacques L'Heureux wrote: > > >> This is like going back to pencil and paper. >> > > There are things that you can do with pencil and paper that you > cannot easily do with a computer. > > FrontPage, Dreamweaver and their ilk have their place, but those with > extensive computer programming experience (I have 40 years) often > prefer to write HTML code by hand for fine control and exactly the > desired results. As I said upstream, though, that requires the site > designer to learn and understand HTML, which is essentially a type of > programming language, and doing so is not to everyone's taste or inclination. > > Dale H. Cook, Member, NEHGS and MA Society of Mayflower Descendants; > Plymouth Co. MA Coordinator for the USGenWeb Project > http://members.cox.net/plymouthcolony/index.shtml > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message > -- Jacques L'Heureux, Columbia, Maryland Personal website: http://Jacques.happyOnes.com/ Family website: http://www.happyOnes.com/ Genealogy website: http://Genealogy.happyOnes.com/ Franco-American website: http://www.FrancoAmericanConnection.com/ -- -- Jacques L'Heureux, Columbia, Maryland Personal website: http://Jacques.happyOnes.com/ Family website: http://www.happyOnes.com/ Genealogy website: http://Genealogy.happyOnes.com/ Franco-American website: http://www.FrancoAmericanConnection.com/ ColumbiaMD website: http://www.ColumbiaMD.org/ Columbia Networking Group: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ColumbiaMD/ --

At 11:31 AM 4/26/2007, Jacques L'Heureux wrote: >This is like going back to pencil and paper. There are things that you can do with pencil and paper that you cannot easily do with a computer. FrontPage, Dreamweaver and their ilk have their place, but those with extensive computer programming experience (I have 40 years) often prefer to write HTML code by hand for fine control and exactly the desired results. As I said upstream, though, that requires the site designer to learn and understand HTML, which is essentially a type of programming language, and doing so is not to everyone's taste or inclination. Dale H. Cook, Member, NEHGS and MA Society of Mayflower Descendants; Plymouth Co. MA Coordinator for the USGenWeb Project http://members.cox.net/plymouthcolony/index.shtml

At 09:36 AM 4/25/2007, you wrote: >I hate to admit this... but I do straight HTML using >Notepad. This is NOT directed at anyone in particular. Just another soapbox message. Straight HTML is just as easy to do working in code view of an editor. IF you know the ins and outs of using your particular editor you can create clean, compliant code. The secret is in knowing the program you use and what features create code that is not compliant. The same is true of notepad or NoteTab for that matter. If you know how to write html code and if you know what code is VALID and compliant you can create clean code. If you add tags willy nilly the code you write will be just as "crappy" as any html editor. >I started my site using a design template I found >online and then just moved the content into it. This >isn't going to be a good idea for everyone and it >probably takes more time than using an editor, but for >me I like to have that control over the site. A template you download from the Internet whether free or paid is only as good as the person who originally wrote it. I've seen plenty of PAID templates that did not validate to start and have worked with people to clean them up. >Doing straight HTML, you know how it will display >because there's no funky style sheets or XML or other >strange things that some editors put in that don't >work as expected in all browsers. Style sheets are not funky. They separate the way your content is presented from the content itself and are the way of the future. The style sheet loads once and works on every page it is attached to. The styles within your page - all those font tags and color tags and on and on have to load with each and every page they are included on. >Plus, then you can >upload one file at a time through an FTP server (which >is a biggie for me because I like to upload while I'm >working on stuff in case something goes wrong and it >starts displaying funny I can find out what's causing >it a lot quicker). I can publish one file at a time or the whole shebang using my editor, it is my choice. You can ONLY find out what is causing display errors or funny looks by knowing what the code should be and how the browser is going to interpret it. What everyone thinks looks terrific in IE may totally fall apart when viewed in Firefox and Opera. And don't discount those browsers. If you want people to view your site, make sure they can see it no matter which browser they use or at what resolution they view your site. Validating your code will go a long way towards correcting display errors. I certainly do not discount NotePad, Note Tab or any plain text editor, I do use them. If you are going to use a WYSIWYG editor, then LEARN how to use the program correctly, learn what features cause problems and if you choose to use a plain text editor, take the time to learn how to write valid code. Learn html http://www.w3schools.com/html/default.asp Learn xhtml http://www.w3schools.com/xhtml/default.asp Learn css http://www.w3schools.com/css/default.asp I'll get off my soap box now. pat ---------- Pat Geary, Microsoft MVP - FrontPage We discuss FrontPage and Expression Web http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.com/~gearyfamily/frontpage/ http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.com/~gearyfamily/expression-web/ Genealogy Web Design Tips and Tutorials http://www.genealogy-web-creations.com/ http://www.blog.family-genealogy-online.com/

This is like going back to pencil and paper. Jacques On 4/26/2007 9:33 AM, Lena C. wrote: > Another thing I should add on using Notepad is that > you can open files created in Notepad in an editor. > Some editors add enough "junk code" that you can't > easily edit the pages in Notepad (which is also part > of the reason why they have larger file sizes), but a > file created in Notepad can easily be opened and > modified in an editor, which gives you a bit more > flexibility. > > Notepad is also standard equipment on any computer, > which means you can edit your page in Notepad no > matter where you are. > > Thanks John and Dale, I'm glad to know I'm not the > only old fashioned CC out there :) > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > http://mail.yahoo.com > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message > -- Jacques L'Heureux, Columbia, Maryland Personal website: http://Jacques.happyOnes.com/ Family website: http://www.happyOnes.com/ Genealogy website: http://genealogy.happyOnes.com/ Franco-American website: http://www.FrancoAmericanConnection.com/ ColumbiaMD website: http://www.ColumbiaMD.org/ Columbia Networking Group: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ColumbiaMD/ Translation website: http://world.altavista.com/ --

Another thing I should add on using Notepad is that you can open files created in Notepad in an editor. Some editors add enough "junk code" that you can't easily edit the pages in Notepad (which is also part of the reason why they have larger file sizes), but a file created in Notepad can easily be opened and modified in an editor, which gives you a bit more flexibility. Notepad is also standard equipment on any computer, which means you can edit your page in Notepad no matter where you are. Thanks John and Dale, I'm glad to know I'm not the only old fashioned CC out there :) __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com

At 12:56 PM 4/25/2007, John Slaughter wrote: >There is nothing wrong with doing your HTML in Notepad. Dale Cook >and I both do it. One slight correction to John's post - I don't use Notepad, I use a computer programmer's editor called Vedit, which has many features such as macros and syntax highlighting that make the work easier. John is correct about the principle - Vedit is an editor, not an HTML creation program. As with Notepad, the user must have a thorough knowledge of HTML. John's comments about simplicity of the code, file size, and the ability to edit or modify the code are quite correct, and very important to me as well. Dale H. Cook, Member, NEHGS and MA Society of Mayflower Descendants; Plymouth Co. MA Coordinator for the USGenWeb Project http://members.cox.net/plymouthcolony/index.shtml

There is nothing wrong with doing your HTML in Notepad. Dale Cook and I both do it. I'm CC for 2 counties and several towns. I also have one of the largest vital records projects outside of the pay sites. Being able to hand edit all of this gives me the abilty to go in and fix a problem much faster than people using automated systems. I know every bit of code in all of my thousands of files. However, there is another side to keeping things simple. People with older browsers don't have a problem because this is nice straight forward HTML. There is no problem checking whether or not Rootsweb's servers will allow what we are doing. I'd dearly love to be using some XML or ASP so I could build a more effiecient database for the vital records. As it is, I do it in HTML and everyone wins. Another thing is the dramatic savings in file size which translates into faster page display and lower bandwidth used. I consider this important on two levels. First, the majority of people still have dial-up connections. Second, Rootsweb graciously grants us all this free space. They may be supported by Ancestry.com, but it still costs money for the internet connectivity. The more use there is, the higher the cost. Okay, I'm off the soapbox. :-) John Slaughter In loving memory of our son, Brennan. 11/10/88-5/31/01. http://john-slaughter.rootsweb.com/Brennan.html MA-Bay-Colony list moderator USGenWeb County Coordinator Essex County, MA - http://www.rootsweb.com/~maessex Middlesex County, MA - http://www.rootsweb.com/~mamiddle USGenWeb Town Coordinator Ipswich, Essex, MA - http://www.rootsweb.com/~macipswi >From: "Lena C." <[email protected]> >Reply-To: [email protected] >To: [email protected] >Subject: [ROOTSWEB-HELP] Web editors and uploading files >Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 06:36:39 -0700 (PDT) > >I hate to admit this... but I do straight HTML using >Notepad. > >I started my site using a design template I found >online and then just moved the content into it. This >isn't going to be a good idea for everyone and it >probably takes more time than using an editor, but for >me I like to have that control over the site. > >Doing straight HTML, you know how it will display >because there's no funky style sheets or XML or other >strange things that some editors put in that don't >work as expected in all browsers. Plus, then you can >upload one file at a time through an FTP server (which >is a biggie for me because I like to upload while I'm >working on stuff in case something goes wrong and it >starts displaying funny I can find out what's causing >it a lot quicker). > >Of course this is really only a good idea for people >who almost strictly update content, it's not the best >idea for doing redesigns. It's also not a good idea >for people who aren't pretty comfortable messing with >the HTML or people who like to add non-HTML components >to their sites. > >So I can't really offer suggestions on editors, but >for those wanting to do minor updates and upload them >quickly, I recommend Notepad and FileZilla. > >__________________________________________________ >Do You Yahoo!? >Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around >http://mail.yahoo.com > >------------------------------- >To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to >[email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the >quotes in the subject and the body of the message _________________________________________________________________ MSN is giving away a trip to Vegas to see Elton John.  Enter to win today. http://msnconcertcontest.com?icid-nceltontagline