On 11/20/2012 7:16 AM, Jesse Davis wrote: > I am on RM5 and I tried this with a person whose narrative report is 1870 pages and the descendant report was fine with all included. > I am on WIN7 with 500G hard drive. > Jess Davis > > I'm, also on Win 7. Am now testing on RM6, but the problem was first noticed back in August while still on RM 5. Programs are on a 120 GB SSD and data on a pair of 1 TB Drives in RAID 0 configuration. I posted the rest of the computer config in reply to another question in this thread. I Don't know how many pages it would be if the report could be generated, but also posted the number of individuals in the 7 generation list that seems to cause the error (10215). A 6 generation list (5889 individuals) has no error, so it seems the problem is somewhere between 6,000 and 10,000. If you or anyone else really wants to see this effect "in person" contact me off-list and I'll gladly send you either the GEDCOM or a copy of the RM database (RM6) that I'm now using. charlieh@wt.net or crhoffpauir@gmail.com -- Charlie Hoffpauir

The file I mentioned has 19641 names. JD From: Charlie Hoffpauir Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2012 10:13 AM To: rootsmagic-users@rootsweb.com Subject: Re: [RMagic] RootsMagic 6 Released - but still has a minor problem On 11/20/2012 7:16 AM, Jesse Davis wrote: > I am on RM5 and I tried this with a person whose narrative report is 1870 pages and the descendant report was fine with all included. > I am on WIN7 with 500G hard drive. > Jess Davis > > I'm, also on Win 7. Am now testing on RM6, but the problem was first noticed back in August while still on RM 5. Programs are on a 120 GB SSD and data on a pair of 1 TB Drives in RAID 0 configuration. I posted the rest of the computer config in reply to another question in this thread. I Don't know how many pages it would be if the report could be generated, but also posted the number of individuals in the 7 generation list that seems to cause the error (10215). A 6 generation list (5889 individuals) has no error, so it seems the problem is somewhere between 6,000 and 10,000. If you or anyone else really wants to see this effect "in person" contact me off-list and I'll gladly send you either the GEDCOM or a copy of the RM database (RM6) that I'm now using. charlieh@wt.net or crhoffpauir@gmail.com --

I wonder if it's an array problem. Just speculating, I have no idea how the Descendant view is generated. But it is clearly a bug, given that you can duplicate it via GEDCOM transfer. Tom On 2012-11-20, at 10:13 AM, Charlie Hoffpauir <crhoffpauir@gmail.com> wrote: > On 11/20/2012 7:16 AM, Jesse Davis wrote: >> I am on RM5 and I tried this with a person whose narrative report is 1870 pages and the descendant report was fine with all included. >> I am on WIN7 with 500G hard drive. >> Jess Davis > I'm, also on Win 7. Am now testing on RM6, but the problem was first > noticed back in August while still on RM 5. > Programs are on a 120 GB SSD and data on a pair of 1 TB Drives in RAID 0 > configuration. I posted the rest of the computer config in reply to > another question in this thread. I Don't know how many pages it would be > if the report could be generated, but also posted the number of > individuals in the 7 generation list that seems to cause the error > (10215). A 6 generation list (5889 individuals) has no error, so it > seems the problem is somewhere between 6,000 and 10,000. > > If you or anyone else really wants to see this effect "in person" > contact me off-list and I'll gladly send you either the GEDCOM or a copy > of the RM database (RM6) that I'm now using. > > charlieh@wt.net or crhoffpauir@gmail.com > -- > Charlie Hoffpauir > > > =================================== > RM list Archives: http://archiver.rootsweb.com/th/index/ROOTSMAGIC-USERS/ > http://archiver.rootsweb.com/cgi-bin/search?path=ROOTSMAGIC-USERS > WISH LIST: http://www.rootsmagic.com/forums/ BLOG: http://blog.rootsmagic.com/ > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to ROOTSMAGIC-USERS-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

On 11/20/2012 11:06 AM, Tom Holden wrote: > I wonder if it's an array problem. Just speculating, I have no idea how the Descendant view is generated. But it is clearly a bug, given that you can duplicate it via GEDCOM transfer. > > Tom > > Yes. Not to wish problems on anyone else, but I kind of wish someone else was able to duplicate the problem. If my data set is the only one that has the problem, I doubt that it will ever be looked into by the debuggers. And even though I doubt I'd use the Descendant list very much, it bothers me that I have to restart RM whenever I do try to use it.

If you simply want someone to confirm that your data causes the problem on somebody else's computer, send me the sufficient subset. Tom On 2012-11-20, at 1:37 PM, Charlie Hoffpauir <crhoffpauir@gmail.com> wrote: > On 11/20/2012 11:06 AM, Tom Holden wrote: >> I wonder if it's an array problem. Just speculating, I have no idea how the Descendant view is generated. But it is clearly a bug, given that you can duplicate it via GEDCOM transfer. >> >> Tom > Yes. Not to wish problems on anyone else, but I kind of wish someone > else was able to duplicate the problem. If my data set is the only one > that has the problem, I doubt that it will ever be looked into by the > debuggers. And even though I doubt I'd use the Descendant list very > much, it bothers me that I have to restart RM whenever I do try to use it. >