On 1/23/2015 1:45 AM, Lynne Roberts via wrote: > Thank you for that thorough and understandable comparison of the three > styles available for web pages - I have wondered about that ever since I > loaded my RM7 update. I use the pre-RM6 for my web site - and I use both > the family group sheets/pedigree style and the descendent narrative along > with added articles and pictures. And I have a commercially hosted url (I > Page). My concern is that now that RM seems to be migrating to their own > web space, that down the line they will stop supporting this static HTML > style. That would be fatal to me and others like me who use it and would > force us to find another software program. > > Lynne Lynne, I doubt that RM will ever eliminate that feature, but even it they did, one doesn't really need the Pre-RM6 web page creation to generate a web page if you like the Static page type. RM can generate everything that goes into the web page by existing reports. I've never used the Pre-RM6 page generation, but I've had a Static page up on Rootsweb since the days of Family Origins (It's the third link in my sig, below) and it's still the page most visited by people looking for Hoffpauir information. -- Charlie Hoffpauir http://my.rootsmagic.com/CRHoffpauir/ http://sites.rootsmagic.com/CharlieHoffpauir/ http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.com/~charlieh/ http://www.familytreedna.com/group-join.aspx?Group=Hoffpauir