There is no philosophical or methodological reason to do this. Make one residence fact and one occupation fact, use a range for the dates, and attached all the sources to the consolidated facts. On 3/15/2015 4:54 PM, Robert and Torie Salas via wrote: > I have an ancestor who fathered 10 children with the same > wife over 12 years, and I have now obtained the 10 birth > certificates. Each states that he was a butcher and lived > at the same place. Do people add 10 Occupation facts, each > with a different source and 10 Residence facts, each with a > different source to the one ancestor? I understand that > philosophically / methodologically this is what should be > done but doesn't such activity create a lot of clutter? > > > > This is posted here as I couldn't find anywhere else that > seemed more suitable. If there is, I am happy for > suggestions. > > > > Cheers > > Robert Salas > > (South Australia) > > > > > > =================================== > RM list Archives: http://archiver.rootsweb.com/th/index/ROOTSMAGIC-USERS/ > http://archiver.rootsweb.com/cgi-bin/search?path=ROOTSMAGIC-USERS > WISH LIST: http://www.rootsmagic.com/forums/ BLOG: http://blog.rootsmagic.com/ > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message