Hello, This is an automated reply. I will be out of the office Tuesday-Thursday of this week. When I return I will respond to your message. Thanks, Craig J. Handyside

Hello, This is an automated reply. I will be out of the office Tuesday-Thursday of this week. When I return I will respond to your message. Thanks, Craig J. Handyside

I overestimated what the "value" switch expression could be when I started, too. Unfortunately, it cannot do string comparisons on field value; it only tests if the field is not empty. So you might want to incorporate the verb in the [Desc] value, e.g., "was killed in action" "was shot for treason" "died a slow and painful death from paralysis of the bowel" "died of cancer" with the default verb "died" in the switch when [Desc is empty. Tom On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 9:35 PM, David Finnigan via < rootsmagic-users@rootsweb.com> wrote: > I'm trying to create a sentence for the death fact that reads one of three > ways: > > > > 1. John Smith died on date at place name - don't know how they died > but know when and where > > 2. John Smith died of Old Age on date at place name - know they died > of 'Old Age' (in Description) and know when and where > > 3. John Smith was Killed in Action on date at place name - know they > died at war ('Killed in Action' in Description) and know when and where > > > > I am using the following template at present - which is not working > correctly, it always shows "John smith was xxx on date at place name" > (where > xxx is whatever is in the Description) > > > > [person] <?<[Desc]="Killed in Action">|was [Desc]|died< of [Desc]>>< > [Date]>< [person:Age]>< [PlaceDetails]>< [Place]>. > > > > Thanks for any help. > > David > > > > =================================== > RM list Archives: http://archiver.rootsweb.com/th/index/ROOTSMAGIC-USERS/ > http://archiver.rootsweb.com/cgi-bin/search?path=ROOTSMAGIC-USERS > WISH LIST: http://www.rootsmagic.com/forums/ BLOG: > http://blog.rootsmagic.com/ > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > ROOTSMAGIC-USERS-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without > the quotes in the subject and the body of the message >

Some on the list may be of help. I can't. Jon *** On 6/27/16, David Finnigan via <rootsmagic-users@rootsweb.com> wrote: > I'm trying to create a sentence for the death fact that reads one of three > ways: > > > > 1. John Smith died on date at place name - don't know how they died > but know when and where > > 2. John Smith died of Old Age on date at place name - know they died > of 'Old Age' (in Description) and know when and where > > 3. John Smith was Killed in Action on date at place name - know they > died at war ('Killed in Action' in Description) and know when and where > > > > I am using the following template at present - which is not working > correctly, it always shows "John smith was xxx on date at place name" > (where > xxx is whatever is in the Description) > > > > [person] <?<[Desc]="Killed in Action">|was [Desc]|died< of [Desc]>>< > [Date]>< [person:Age]>< [PlaceDetails]>< [Place]>. > > > > Thanks for any help. > > David > > > > =================================== > RM list Archives: http://archiver.rootsweb.com/th/index/ROOTSMAGIC-USERS/ > http://archiver.rootsweb.com/cgi-bin/search?path=ROOTSMAGIC-USERS > WISH LIST: http://www.rootsmagic.com/forums/ BLOG: > http://blog.rootsmagic.com/ > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > ROOTSMAGIC-USERS-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without > the quotes in the subject and the body of the message > -- -- *Jon P Czarowitz*, NHC, GF, GGF, IGC Hempel Genealogist since 1986 Cunningham Genealogist since 1987 Retired International Genealogist RootsMagic 7 http://www.rootsmagic.com

Hello, This is an automated reply. I will be out of the office Tuesday-Thursday of this week. When I return I will respond to your message. Thanks, Craig J. Handyside

Hello, This is an automated reply. I will be out of the office Tuesday-Thursday of this week. When I return I will respond to your message. Thanks, Craig J. Handyside

Hello, This is an automated reply. I will be out of the office Tuesday-Thursday of this week. When I return I will respond to your message. Thanks, Craig J. Handyside

Hello, This is an automated reply. I will be out of the office Tuesday-Thursday of this week. When I return I will respond to your message. Thanks, Craig J. Handyside

Hello, This is an automated reply. I will be out of the office Tuesday-Thursday of this week. When I return I will respond to your message. Thanks, Craig J. Handyside

Hello, This is an automated reply. I will be out of the office Tuesday-Thursday of this week. When I return I will respond to your message. Thanks, Craig J. Handyside

Hello, This is an automated reply. I will be out of the office Tuesday-Thursday of this week. When I return I will respond to your message. Thanks, Craig J. Handyside

David I don't think there is in RM, but the Kinship List will give you a lot of options such as sorting by color coding Jon On 6/26/16, David Finnigan via <rootsmagic-users@rootsweb.com> wrote: > Is it possible to create a report in RM7 that lists all the relatives of a > person, based on a relationship type, ie all second cousins of a person? > > > > I have recently got results from DNA testing that suggest matches in the > range 2nd to 4th cousin. I have no obvious surname matches, so I'm trying > to > work out where the gaps in my research might be. > > > > I'm happy to use SQLLite, if that's the only way. > > Thanks for any help. > > > > Regards > > David > > Chilly Sydney Australia > > > > =================================== > RM list Archives: http://archiver.rootsweb.com/th/index/ROOTSMAGIC-USERS/ > http://archiver.rootsweb.com/cgi-bin/search?path=ROOTSMAGIC-USERS > WISH LIST: http://www.rootsmagic.com/forums/ BLOG: > http://blog.rootsmagic.com/ > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > ROOTSMAGIC-USERS-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without > the quotes in the subject and the body of the message > -- -- *Jon P Czarowitz*, NHC, GF, GGF, IGC Hempel Genealogist since 1986 Cunningham Genealogist since 1987 Retired International Genealogist RootsMagic 7 http://www.rootsmagic.com

Is it possible to create a report in RM7 that lists all the relatives of a person, based on a relationship type, ie all second cousins of a person? I have recently got results from DNA testing that suggest matches in the range 2nd to 4th cousin. I have no obvious surname matches, so I'm trying to work out where the gaps in my research might be. I'm happy to use SQLLite, if that's the only way. Thanks for any help. Regards David Chilly Sydney Australia

David, from personal experience, keep your mind open to the possibility of a "skeleton in your closet or in theirs"! It's a fascinating experience! Sue > On Jun 26, 2016, at 1:38 AM, David Finnigan via <rootsmagic-users@rootsweb.com> wrote: > > Is it possible to create a report in RM7 that lists all the relatives of a > person, based on a relationship type, ie all second cousins of a person? > > I have recently got results from DNA testing that suggest matches in the > range 2nd to 4th cousin. I have no obvious surname matches, so I'm trying to > work out where the gaps in my research might be. > > I'm happy to use SQLLite, if that's the only way. > > Thanks for any help. > > Regards > David > Chilly Sydney Australia >

Try the Kinship report with you as the reference person, save to text format, open in Excel and use its filter or sort on the relationship. With SQLite, see http://sqlitetoolsforrootsmagic.wikispaces.com/Relationships Tom On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 3:38 AM, David Finnigan via < rootsmagic-users@rootsweb.com> wrote: > Is it possible to create a report in RM7 that lists all the relatives of a > person, based on a relationship type, ie all second cousins of a person? > > > > I have recently got results from DNA testing that suggest matches in the > range 2nd to 4th cousin. I have no obvious surname matches, so I'm trying > to > work out where the gaps in my research might be. > > > > I'm happy to use SQLLite, if that's the only way. > > Thanks for any help. > > > > Regards > > David > > Chilly Sydney Australia > > > > =================================== > RM list Archives: http://archiver.rootsweb.com/th/index/ROOTSMAGIC-USERS/ > http://archiver.rootsweb.com/cgi-bin/search?path=ROOTSMAGIC-USERS > WISH LIST: http://www.rootsmagic.com/forums/ BLOG: > http://blog.rootsmagic.com/ > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > ROOTSMAGIC-USERS-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without > the quotes in the subject and the body of the message >

Hi, Just wanted to say hi and tell you how much I miss you, here are some interesting things for you <http://risebemy.keifferllc.com/lnrbvqvx> Warmest, dick.phillips@comcast.net

On 6/21/16, Jon P Czarowitz <czarowitz@gmail.com> wrote: > I agree Jerry if you want some of it for other purposes, but like the > the RM media gallery it was designed for RM. You probably would not > copy all media for other uses, just what you need. > Jon > > On 6/20/16, Jerry Bryan via <rootsmagic-users@rootsweb.com> wrote: >> RM's backup and restore of media has two significant problem. One is >> that it is extremely slow. The other is that it combines all your media >> into a single large directory. I think most users most of the time would >> be better served by copying their media to a new computer some other way >> than using RM's backup and restore of media. >> >> As far as your RM database itself, copying the database file to a new >> computer (the RMGC file) or doing a backup and and restore where it's >> the RMGB file that goes to a new computer, it's really six of one and >> half a dozen of the other. The RMGB file is smaller and the RMGC file >> process is slightly simpler, but there is very little practical >> difference between the processes. >> >> Jerry >> >> On 6/20/2016 10:41, Jon P Czarowitz via wrote: >>> Terry >>> The backup has a spot to copy the media as wedll as the database. Then >>> you can restore both. >>> Jon P Czarowsitz >>> >>> >> >> >> >> =================================== >> RM list Archives: http://archiver.rootsweb.com/th/index/ROOTSMAGIC-USERS/ >> http://archiver.rootsweb.com/cgi-bin/search?path=ROOTSMAGIC-USERS >> WISH LIST: http://www.rootsmagic.com/forums/ BLOG: >> http://blog.rootsmagic.com/ >> >> >> ------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to >> ROOTSMAGIC-USERS-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without >> the quotes in the subject and the body of the message >> > > > -- > -- > *Jon P Czarowitz*, NHC, GF, GGF, IGC > Hempel Genealogist since 1986 > Cunningham Genealogist since 1987 > Retired International Genealogist > RootsMagic 7 http://www.rootsmagic.com > -- -- *Jon P Czarowitz*, NHC, GF, GGF, IGC Hempel Genealogist since 1986 Cunningham Genealogist since 1987 Retired International Genealogist RootsMagic 7 http://www.rootsmagic.com

I agree Jerry if you want some of it for other purposes, but like the the RM media gallery it was designed for RM. You probably would not copy all media for other uses, just what you need. Jon On 6/20/16, Jerry Bryan via <rootsmagic-users@rootsweb.com> wrote: > RM's backup and restore of media has two significant problem. One is > that it is extremely slow. The other is that it combines all your media > into a single large directory. I think most users most of the time would > be better served by copying their media to a new computer some other way > than using RM's backup and restore of media. > > As far as your RM database itself, copying the database file to a new > computer (the RMGC file) or doing a backup and and restore where it's > the RMGB file that goes to a new computer, it's really six of one and > half a dozen of the other. The RMGB file is smaller and the RMGC file > process is slightly simpler, but there is very little practical > difference between the processes. > > Jerry > > On 6/20/2016 10:41, Jon P Czarowitz via wrote: >> Terry >> The backup has a spot to copy the media as wedll as the database. Then >> you can restore both. >> Jon P Czarowsitz >> >> > > > > =================================== > RM list Archives: http://archiver.rootsweb.com/th/index/ROOTSMAGIC-USERS/ > http://archiver.rootsweb.com/cgi-bin/search?path=ROOTSMAGIC-USERS > WISH LIST: http://www.rootsmagic.com/forums/ BLOG: > http://blog.rootsmagic.com/ > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > ROOTSMAGIC-USERS-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without > the quotes in the subject and the body of the message > -- -- *Jon P Czarowitz*, NHC, GF, GGF, IGC Hempel Genealogist since 1986 Cunningham Genealogist since 1987 Retired International Genealogist RootsMagic 7 http://www.rootsmagic.com

You somehow have them linked to persons in pedigree. go to the person's edit view and click media to see the media there Look at the tags that tag the docs. Use the EDIT TAG and uncheck the primary box. Note Reload your view you had trouble with. If docs still show up Go back and repeat the instructions for any person where the doc is showing up on the pedigree chart. You need to note any person with the docs while in pedigree view. Time consuming I know, but it should work. If it doesn't then they are linked as primary in another location, Which I don't know. Jon On 6/20/16, M. A. Beldin via <rootsmagic-users@rootsweb.com> wrote: > Hi All, > I followed Tom's suggestion and unchecked all the boxes for the media > files I had for my ancestors. > > I then replaced the file on my iPad and I still have the pictures of the > documents as photos next to each person's name in the pedigree view > > I don't want to have to delete all the media that I have collected and > attached to my ancestors but this is annoying. > > Are there any other suggestions? > > If not, I will call tech support to see if they can help. > > Thanks > Margie in Washington State > > *From:* Tom Holden <ve3meo@gmail.com> > *Subject:* Re: [RMagic] iPad app database displays incorrect media > *Date:* Thu, 16 Jun 2016 23:59:36 -0400 > > You might have to uncheck the "Include in Scrapbook" option for each tag. > > Tom > > On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 11:50 PM, M. A. Beldin via < > rootsmagic-users@rootsweb.com> wrote: > >> I just uploaded my database to my iPad. >> >> In the pedigree view, where the picture of an ancestor, if I had a > picture, >> could be viewed, I see a document that I have saved instead. >> >> These are ancestors from the 1700s, so I have no pictures but have added >> documents to their media files. >> >> I have unchecked Primary photo so that the media does not show in my PC >> database, but the same database uploaded to the iPad shows tons of my >> ancestors with a document in place of the blue or pink icon designating >> their gender. >> >> I have gone thru my media files for each person, checking the tags >> because that is one place I notice automatically checks the primary photo >> but on some, the Primary photo is already unchecked yet the document >> shows >> as their primary photo. >> >> How do I clean this up. It is most annoying >> >> Thanks >> Margie in Washington State > > > =================================== > RM list Archives: http://archiver.rootsweb.com/th/index/ROOTSMAGIC-USERS/ > http://archiver.rootsweb.com/cgi-bin/search?path=ROOTSMAGIC-USERS > WISH LIST: http://www.rootsmagic.com/forums/ BLOG: > http://blog.rootsmagic.com/ > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > ROOTSMAGIC-USERS-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without > the quotes in the subject and the body of the message > -- -- *Jon P Czarowitz*, NHC, GF, GGF, IGC Hempel Genealogist since 1986 Cunningham Genealogist since 1987 Retired International Genealogist RootsMagic 7 http://www.rootsmagic.com

I am using RM 7, when I print a family group sheet with say 2 children it prints just fine but leaves the rest of the page blank, I am sure that in a earlier ver, you could select print child even to fill page even if blank or some such wording, I need to look for extra children to a family and the extra spaces would be great, I can do it by adding a 1,2,3, ect to the family, but the old way was better am I missing something Cheers Jenny