I have created a number of GEDCOM files in the last couple of days and have noticed that I appear to have gained 'dbf' and 'fpt' files in the GEDCOM folder. Earliest date appears to be 11 July 2012 Just noticed I seem to also have some 'IMP' files? And 'List_of_PINs_with_bad_words_for_Pimble 20120711' Did I miss something or am I doing something incorrectly? Would appreciate your thoughts. Regards Gerald Guild of One-Name Studies 1788 researching PIMBLE & PYMBLE

Gerald, DBF and FPT files are FoxPro format files, which RM3 used to use. RM4 and RM5 don't use FoxPro format files anymore. That would be why Tom asked whether you were using RM3. If you aren't using RM3, then I can guarantee RM4/5 is not creating the DBF or FPT files. - Bruce http://www.rootsmagic.com On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 8:13 AM, Gerald A Cooke <gerald.cooke@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Tom, > > Thanks for the comments. I currently use RM5, have moved immediately each > new release has been made available, so suspect this is not RM3 related. > > Two things have changed in recent days. > > 1. A new version 5.0.4 of RM was released and this around the time these > files were created, not before. If no one else is experiencing the problem > then this takes me to the second change. > > 2. I have purchased Family Publisher from Progeny Software which creates > some unusual charts (360 degree fan charts etc, which I liked). It uses > GEDCOM files I have generated in RM5 to create the charts. > > I will do some experimenting and recording of times and events. Given that > RootsMagic is such a great piece of software and never gives me problems I > am leaning towards change 2 as being the source of the dbf etc files. Maybe > the clue I was looking for and missed was one of the files is a 'fpt' file! > doh! > > Thanks Gerald > > > -----Original Message----- > From: rootsmagic-users-bounces@rootsweb.com > [mailto:rootsmagic-users-bounces@rootsweb.com] On Behalf Of Tom Holden > Sent: Friday, July 13, 2012 1:07 PM > To: rootsmagic-users@rootsweb.com > Subject: Re: [RMagic] GEDCOM and dbf and fpt files > > The dbf and fpt files are probably your database files from RM3 or earlier. > Somehow they have been moved or copied to your GEDCOM folder or you have > imported into a new database which you created there. The imp file is likely > a text file produced by RM when an import does not go perfectly. > > Tom > > > > > =================================== > RM list Archives: http://archiver.rootsweb.com/th/index/ROOTSMAGIC-USERS/ > http://archiver.rootsweb.com/cgi-bin/search?path=ROOTSMAGIC-USERS > WISH LIST: http://www.rootsmagic.com/forums/ BLOG: http://blog.rootsmagic.com/ > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to ROOTSMAGIC-USERS-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

Gerald Are you using RM to make and read the Gedcom? Also use the latest version 5.0.4.1 Jon On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 4:55 AM, Gerald A Cooke <gerald.cooke@gmail.com>wrote: > I have created a number of GEDCOM files in the last couple of days and have > noticed that I appear to have gained 'dbf' and 'fpt' files in the GEDCOM > folder. Earliest date appears to be 11 July 2012 > > Just noticed I seem to also have some 'IMP' files? And > 'List_of_PINs_with_bad_words_for_Pimble 20120711' > > Did I miss something or am I doing something incorrectly? > > Would appreciate your thoughts. > > Regards Gerald > Guild of One-Name Studies 1788 researching PIMBLE & PYMBLE > > > > =================================== > RM list Archives: http://archiver.rootsweb.com/th/index/ROOTSMAGIC-USERS/ > http://archiver.rootsweb.com/cgi-bin/search?path=ROOTSMAGIC-USERS > WISH LIST: http://www.rootsmagic.com/forums/ BLOG: > http://blog.rootsmagic.com/ > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > ROOTSMAGIC-USERS-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without > the quotes in the subject and the body of the message > -- -- Jon P Czarowitz, NHC, GF, GGF, IGC Hempel Genealogist since 1986 International Genealogist for http://www.clancunninghamintl.org RootsMagic 4 http://www.rootsmagic.com CUNNINGHAMS TOGETHER - CUNNINGHAMS WORLDWIDE!

The dbf and fpt files are probably your database files from RM3 or earlier. Somehow they have been moved or copied to your GEDCOM folder or you have imported into a new database which you created there. The imp file is likely a text file produced by RM when an import does not go perfectly. Tom On 2012-07-13, at 5:55 AM, "Gerald A Cooke" <gerald.cooke@gmail.com> wrote: > I have created a number of GEDCOM files in the last couple of days and have > noticed that I appear to have gained 'dbf' and 'fpt' files in the GEDCOM > folder. Earliest date appears to be 11 July 2012 > > Just noticed I seem to also have some 'IMP' files? And > 'List_of_PINs_with_bad_words_for_Pimble 20120711' > > Did I miss something or am I doing something incorrectly? > > Would appreciate your thoughts. > > Regards Gerald > Guild of One-Name Studies 1788 researching PIMBLE & PYMBLE > > > > =================================== > RM list Archives: http://archiver.rootsweb.com/th/index/ROOTSMAGIC-USERS/ > http://archiver.rootsweb.com/cgi-bin/search?path=ROOTSMAGIC-USERS > WISH LIST: http://www.rootsmagic.com/forums/ BLOG: http://blog.rootsmagic.com/ > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to ROOTSMAGIC-USERS-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

Hi, Recently on the GOONS (Guild of One Name Studies) mailing list there was a discussion regarding who uses RM for their ONS (one-name study) to which I replied. Through further discussions, it was also asked about using RM for tracking DNA studies. The following was created in the ISOGG wiki to record information on RM, ONS and DNA - http://isogg.org/wiki/RootsMagic Thought others may be interested. Kind regards, Andrew <http://isogg.org/wiki/RootsMagic> <http://isogg.org/wiki/RootsMagic> -- <http://isogg.org/wiki/RootsMagic> *Kemp One-Name Genealogical Study* ***Guild Member 5729* ONS: <http://isogg.org/wiki/RootsMagic>http://www.kempfamilyhistory.com DNA: http://www.worldfamilies.net/surnames/camp/ Email: clan@kempfamilyhistory.com

It's listed here: http://forums.rootsmagic.com/index.php?/topic/10575-rootsmagic-5-update-history-5040/ On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 8:52 AM, Gary L. Roberts <glroberts@verizon.net> wrote: > I downloaded the newest version of RM (5.0.4.0) this morning but could not > figure out what has changed. I could not get to the page that showed what > changed. Can someone let me know what has changed?

I downloaded the newest version of RM (5.0.4.0) this morning but could not figure out what has changed. I could not get to the page that showed what changed. Can someone let me know what has changed? Thanks Gary

Windows 7 is great once you learn its tricks. FTM 12 is only good if you want a tree on Ancestry and want to synchronize the 2. RootsMagic has some great Webinars that teach you everything you need to know. RootsMagic has a free program called Essentials that is free if you want to see if you like it. Of course it doesn't have everything. I find that RM is reasonable, particularly if you are upgrading. Betty -----Original Message----- From: rootsmagic-users-bounces@rootsweb.com [mailto:rootsmagic-users-bounces@rootsweb.com] On Behalf Of Joy Perry Sent: Sunday, July 08, 2012 5:17 PM To: ROOTSMAGIC-USERS@rootsweb.com Subject: [RMagic] Moving from Family Tree Maker Reading a recent post from someone who had trouble opening a GEDCOM, I thought perhaps I could ask here for help I need in several areas.  I had bought (and installed) RootsMagic some years ago (Verson 1, I think), but did not keep up with newer versions because I had been using Family Tree Maker (2006) and I was used to its ease (to me) of entering data.  A long time ago I had Family Origins and I liked their Cascading Pedigree Charts, that (for a long time) FTM refused to add.  That's why I didn't bother to buy newer versions of FTM.  However, when F.O. ceased to exist, I learned that RootsMagic had taken its place, and I did order it and used it for the above mentioned Cascading Pedigree Charts.       Fast forward quite a few years.   I had been using WinXP but when I had to get Windows 7 because I got a new computer, I got the version that included WinXP as a Virtual Machine within it.  However, after a year of struggling with it (the XP) my computer man advised me to switch to Win7 and he has been moving my data to Win7 and I've been installing as many programs that would work in Win7.  FTM 2006 did not, so I had to buy v. 2012.  Yesterday I tried to import my data and finally (with the help of a techie from Ancestry/FTM) got it in.  I thought!   I discovered that although my kids and spouses and THEIR kids (my grandkids) are included, the grandkids spouses and THEIR kids (my gr-grandkids) are not!   Another call to Ancestry.  <sigh>   They told me to Merge, but it is asking me so many questions I don't know how to answer.  So I'll have to call them again.   I have to agree with those on this list who said they hate Windows 7!   So far the 'you'll get used to it and like it' doesn't seem to hold water with me!   Anyhow, I also do NOT like FTM V. 2012 and I'm finding I may want to use an upgraded version of RootsMagic instead.  So, the bottom line of my lengthy post is to ask how to best upgrade (I can't even find my original CD from RM V.1).  Should I contact the list administrator, or call RM, or what?  And once I get it, and install it, I'll need to know how to import the data into RM, so I guess I'll be back at the original subject of how to GEDCOM into RM.     Sorry to be so wordy, I'm just hoping someone can relate, and can advise.  Any help will be greatly appreciated!    =================================== RM list Archives: http://archiver.rootsweb.com/th/index/ROOTSMAGIC-USERS/ http://archiver.rootsweb.com/cgi-bin/search?path=ROOTSMAGIC-USERS WISH LIST: http://www.rootsmagic.com/forums/ BLOG: http://blog.rootsmagic.com/ ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to ROOTSMAGIC-USERS-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

You have the best set of coaches in the world in and on this list! Someone has an answer for most questions and there are some who will only ring in if they know a tweak that would help even more. FO was super, that is where FTM lost me! To me FO and now RM are so much more user friendly, plus we have this list for the bumps! Look at how quickly my little puzzle was sorted out! Call or email the RM folks, they probably have your name and password on file! Yes, even from that long ago! They are that good! ----Original Message----- From: Joy Perry Sent: Sunday, July 08, 2012 5:17 PM To: ROOTSMAGIC-USERS@rootsweb.com Subject: [RMagic] Moving from Family Tree Maker Reading a recent post from someone who had trouble opening a GEDCOM, I thought perhaps I could ask here for help I need in several areas. I had bought (and installed) RootsMagic some years ago (Verson 1, I think), but did not keep up with newer versions because I had been using Family Tree Maker (2006) and I was used to its ease (to me) of entering data. A long time ago I had Family Origins and I liked their Cascading Pedigree Charts, that (for a long time) FTM refused to add. That's why I didn't bother to buy newer versions of FTM. However, when F.O. ceased to exist, I learned that RootsMagic had taken its place, and I did order it and used it for the above mentioned Cascading Pedigree Charts. Fast forward quite a few years. I had been using WinXP but when I had to get Windows 7 because I got a new computer, I got the version that included WinXP as a Virtual Machine within it. However, after a year of struggling with it (the XP) my computer man advised me to switch to Win7 and he has been moving my data to Win7 and I've been installing as many programs that would work in Win7. FTM 2006 did not, so I had to buy v. 2012. Yesterday I tried to import my data and finally (with the help of a techie from Ancestry/FTM) got it in. I thought! I discovered that although my kids and spouses and THEIR kids (my grandkids) are included, the grandkids spouses and THEIR kids (my gr-grandkids) are not! Another call to Ancestry. <sigh> They told me to Merge, but it is asking me so many questions I don't know how to answer. So I'll have to call them again. I have to agree with those on this list who said they hate Windows 7! So far the 'you'll get used to it and like it' doesn't seem to hold water with me! Anyhow, I also do NOT like FTM V. 2012 and I'm finding I may want to use an upgraded version of RootsMagic instead. So, the bottom line of my lengthy post is to ask how to best upgrade (I can't even find my original CD from RM V.1). Should I contact the list administrator, or call RM, or what? And once I get it, and install it, I'll need to know how to import the data into RM, so I guess I'll be back at the original subject of how to GEDCOM into RM. Sorry to be so wordy, I'm just hoping someone can relate, and can advise. Any help will be greatly appreciated!

Reading a recent post from someone who had trouble opening a GEDCOM, I thought perhaps I could ask here for help I need in several areas.  I had bought (and installed) RootsMagic some years ago (Verson 1, I think), but did not keep up with newer versions because I had been using Family Tree Maker (2006) and I was used to its ease (to me) of entering data.  A long time ago I had Family Origins and I liked their Cascading Pedigree Charts, that (for a long time) FTM refused to add.  That's why I didn't bother to buy newer versions of FTM.  However, when F.O. ceased to exist, I learned that RootsMagic had taken its place, and I did order it and used it for the above mentioned Cascading Pedigree Charts.       Fast forward quite a few years.   I had been using WinXP but when I had to get Windows 7 because I got a new computer, I got the version that included WinXP as a Virtual Machine within it.  However, after a year of struggling with it (the XP) my computer man advised me to switch to Win7 and he has been moving my data to Win7 and I've been installing as many programs that would work in Win7.  FTM 2006 did not, so I had to buy v. 2012.  Yesterday I tried to import my data and finally (with the help of a techie from Ancestry/FTM) got it in.  I thought!   I discovered that although my kids and spouses and THEIR kids (my grandkids) are included, the grandkids spouses and THEIR kids (my gr-grandkids) are not!   Another call to Ancestry.  <sigh>   They told me to Merge, but it is asking me so many questions I don't know how to answer.  So I'll have to call them again.   I have to agree with those on this list who said they hate Windows 7!   So far the 'you'll get used to it and like it' doesn't seem to hold water with me!   Anyhow, I also do NOT like FTM V. 2012 and I'm finding I may want to use an upgraded version of RootsMagic instead.  So, the bottom line of my lengthy post is to ask how to best upgrade (I can't even find my original CD from RM V.1).  Should I contact the list administrator, or call RM, or what?  And once I get it, and install it, I'll need to know how to import the data into RM, so I guess I'll be back at the original subject of how to GEDCOM into RM.     Sorry to be so wordy, I'm just hoping someone can relate, and can advise.  Any help will be greatly appreciated!   

No message in this Only a strange web URL Should this be checked by webmaster ? Sent to several email addresses - not just RM I suggest not open email or web page

It has already been handled by RootsWeb list administrators (as the same posting was sent to a number of lists managed by RootsWeb). This is also a good time to remind everyone that if you have any questions or concerns about any posting to the RootsMagic-Users list, please send your question/concern directly to the RootsMagic-Users List Administrator, and *not* to the entire list. That email address is: ROOTSMAGIC-USERS-admin@rootsweb.com Thanks. P.S. I hope that everyone uses their common sense and never clicks on any links in email from people who they don't know, *especially* when the email has no subject line and has nothing in the body other than a link. Drew Smith RootsMagic-Users List Administrator ROOTSMAGIC-USERS-admin@rootsweb.com On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 5:25 PM, Web Croker <richterweb@hotmail.co.uk> wrote: > No message in this > Only a strange web URL > > Should this be checked by webmaster ? > Sent to several email addresses - not just RM > > I suggest not open email or web page

Thankyou Tom, the given/surnames I will keep in Danish, but the places and other wording I would like to translate to English, so I will add the Danish entry to the notes. If anyone has another idea I would be most grateful. Keeping 2 databases is too cumbersome for me so I don't think I will do that. Cheers Melissa -----Original Message----- From: rootsmagic-users-bounces@rootsweb.com [mailto:rootsmagic-users-bounces@rootsweb.com] On Behalf Of Tom Holden Sent: Thursday, 5 July 2012 10:05 PM To: rootsmagic-users@rootsweb.com Subject: Re: [RMagic] Adding my Danish relatives I have no experience with working in other than English but I know that RM5 supports the storage of characters from many alphabets. Without a Danish keyboard, you will find the entry of certain letters from the Danish alphabet to be very cumbersome. You could enter the primary name of a person in one language and the Alternate Name in the other. There is no such alternate name for Places, although I suppose you could use the standardized Place name in one language and the other fields in the other but screens and reports will typically display the other. If the tree has paragraphs of notes, and you want to have these in both languages, about the only way I can see of doing that is to put one language into the private notes markers {...} embedded in the other language note. But reports can only choose to include or exclude the private notes if notes are printed. Maybe the best approach is to maintain two databases, one in each language, if you want to keep developing the tree in Danish. Else, the easier way is to cut the cord and work in the language you and RM best work in! Tom ----- No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 2012.0.2195 / Virus Database: 2437/5112 - Release Date: 07/05/12

Hello I have recently been given a tree that is in Danish. How do I go about adding it to my tree, I would like to add it in Danish and also translate it into English (or vice versa) as I go so I can then understand it, but want to keep it in Danish too, so over time I will learn this part of my tree in Danish. Is this possible? Thankyou Melissa ----- No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 2012.0.2193 / Virus Database: 2437/5111 - Release Date: 07/04/12

I have no desire to restart the overly long and drawn out (and off topic?) discussion that mercifully ended here not long ago, but if anyone would like a copy of it I have just located something on the subject that some of you might like to have. It is a one-page *.pdf document that I saved some time ago that explains the double-dating system, what the different systems mean, and how we got to the mess in dates in the first place. Did you realize that it is not 2012 everywhere in the world today, and that other dates are used even today in the world? Just something interesting if you want a simple and easy to understand explanation of how we got into the confusing mess. If you would like a copy, please reply OFF LIST to the address below and I will be happy to send a copy of the *.pdf document to anyone who wants it. I can't post it to the list for a couple of reasons. David E. Cann decann@infionline.net or on Skype at "david.e.cann"

I have no experience with working in other than English but I know that RM5 supports the storage of characters from many alphabets. Without a Danish keyboard, you will find the entry of certain letters from the Danish alphabet to be very cumbersome. You could enter the primary name of a person in one language and the Alternate Name in the other. There is no such alternate name for Places, although I suppose you could use the standardized Place name in one language and the other fields in the other but screens and reports will typically display the other. If the tree has paragraphs of notes, and you want to have these in both languages, about the only way I can see of doing that is to put one language into the private notes markers {...} embedded in the other language note. But reports can only choose to include or exclude the private notes if notes are printed. Maybe the best approach is to maintain two databases, one in each language, if you want to keep developing the tree in Danish. Else, the easier way is to cut the cord and work in the language you and RM best work in! Tom On 2012-07-05, at 6:51 AM, Melissa2 <alterdcupboard@bigpond.com> wrote: > Hello > > I have recently been given a tree that is in Danish. How do I go about > adding it to my tree, I would like to add it in Danish and also translate it > into English (or vice versa) as I go so I can then understand it, but want > to keep it in Danish too, so over time I will learn this part of my tree in > Danish. Is this possible? > > Thankyou > Melissa > > ----- > No virus found in this message. > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com > Version: 2012.0.2193 / Virus Database: 2437/5111 - Release Date: 07/04/12 > > > > =================================== > RM list Archives: http://archiver.rootsweb.com/th/index/ROOTSMAGIC-USERS/ > http://archiver.rootsweb.com/cgi-bin/search?path=ROOTSMAGIC-USERS > WISH LIST: http://www.rootsmagic.com/forums/ BLOG: http://blog.rootsmagic.com/ > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to ROOTSMAGIC-USERS-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

Double Dating Definition: A system of double dating used in England and British North America from 1582-1752 for dates falling between January 1 and March 25. This was common practice because the new Gregorian calendar, which went into effect in 1582, but was not officially adopted by the British and the American colonies until 1752, recognized January 1 as the first day of the year, while the old Julian calendar recognized March 25 as the first day. Thus, dates between those two days prior to the calendar change in 1752 were often written with both year numbers (i.e. 5 January 1712/13).

It doesn't matter what "we agree on." Put this topic to bed. On 7/3/12 5:36 PM, Tom Holden wrote: > Is there not a user interface issue that perhaps we can agree on? That RM should accept double years in the format yyyy/yy for dates prior to 1583 just as it does for dates in the 21st century and automatically generate the sort date so that 28 Feb 1451/2 will sort after 31 Dec 1451 just as 28 Feb 2012/3 now sorts after 31 Dec 2012. > > Tom > > > > On 2012-07-03, at 3:37 PM, Lloyd Hite <lhite31.1@juno.com> wrote: > >> How about putting this double dating to rest. It has been going on long >> enough, or else you and Drew do your thing privately. >> >> Lloyd >> > > > =================================== > RM list Archives: http://archiver.rootsweb.com/th/index/ROOTSMAGIC-USERS/ > http://archiver.rootsweb.com/cgi-bin/search?path=ROOTSMAGIC-USERS > WISH LIST: http://www.rootsmagic.com/forums/ BLOG: http://blog.rootsmagic.com/ > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to ROOTSMAGIC-USERS-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message >

Is there not a user interface issue that perhaps we can agree on? That RM should accept double years in the format yyyy/yy for dates prior to 1583 just as it does for dates in the 21st century and automatically generate the sort date so that 28 Feb 1451/2 will sort after 31 Dec 1451 just as 28 Feb 2012/3 now sorts after 31 Dec 2012. Tom On 2012-07-03, at 3:37 PM, Lloyd Hite <lhite31.1@juno.com> wrote: > How about putting this double dating to rest. It has been going on long > enough, or else you and Drew do your thing privately. > > Lloyd >

Suggest that folks go to wikipedia and read about the Gregorian calendar. And no froth and discussion about the accuracy of wikipedia. Just a source for some interesting historical info. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gregorian_calendar Need to reread this. I always wonder about the 23 days that were lost, am I dealing with the middle of February or a March event.... Jinny Angelis > From: drewsmithtpa@gmail.com > Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2012 18:42:54 -0400 > To: rootsmagic-users@rootsweb.com > Subject: Re: [RMagic] Double Dating before 17th Century > > Jim, > > The point is, *no* country (neither Catholic nor Protestant) was using > the Gregorian Calendar prior to 1582, so no event that transpired > prior to that date would have been written under double dating. It > would have had only one possible, unambiguous date. > > Drew Smith > > On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 6:34 PM, Jim Bullock <j.b.bullock@comcast.net> wrote: > > It's irrelevant that the Pope adopted the Gregorian calendar when he did > > because the Protestant countries like England did not. They were still > > using the same calendar in 1750 that they did in 1550 or 1450, so double > > dating should be used in those earlier centuries for English ancestors. It > > would depend on the country that would determine which calendar was in use. > > (Some still use the Julian calendar.) > > > > Jim > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: rootsmagic-users-bounces@rootsweb.com > > [mailto:rootsmagic-users-bounces@rootsweb.com] On Behalf Of Drew Smith > > Sent: Monday, July 02, 2012 2:34 PM > > To: rootsmagic-users@rootsweb.com > > Subject: Re: [RMagic] Double Dating before 17th Century > > > > Jim, > > > > I wanted to see how the scholarly journal was handling it. The double > > dating in that example prior to 1583 doesn't really make sense. The > > Gregorian Calendar was not in use prior to 1583, so the 1567/1568 date > > would need to be listed correctly as 1567 (1568 didn't begin until 25 > > March), and the other date would have been 1558 (for the same reason). > > > > So the reason that RM wouldn't have those double dates recognized is > > that they would be incorrect. > > > > I would put in the correct dates (the earlier years) and then you > > could explain in a note that they were listed as "double dates" in the > > article. > > > > Drew Smith > > > =================================== > RM list Archives: http://archiver.rootsweb.com/th/index/ROOTSMAGIC-USERS/ > http://archiver.rootsweb.com/cgi-bin/search?path=ROOTSMAGIC-USERS > WISH LIST: http://www.rootsmagic.com/forums/ BLOG: http://blog.rootsmagic.com/ > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to ROOTSMAGIC-USERS-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message