Ok, entering all the data twice isn't something I would want to do. ;) But it would work. I don't have an iPad or iPhone etc. so I don't think I can use GEDview... Kim On 11/05/2012 03:53 PM, Tom Holden wrote: > Well, I don't but that is my interpretation of a workaround that Laura came up with. > > As to a shared-to-unshared conversion tool, I believe that the iPad app GEDview does that on its opening of a GEDCOM from RM. If it does it well, that might be a solution for some. > > Tom >

Cheri, You've given great instructions for minimizing the amount of work one has to do to avoid the issues caused by shared facts.  For those of us used to Legacy, however, where there is not just the equivalent of a Source Memorize button but a Fact Memorize button (copies an entire fact/event with its notes and its sources to the clipboard with one click), it seems like too many steps. I'm not complaining about RM, just hoping for the enhancement. On the Legacy list, they've been known to ask for a Shared Fact/Event, so I guess nobody can have it all;-) Connie 

Well, I don't but that is my interpretation of a workaround that Laura came up with. As to a shared-to-unshared conversion tool, I believe that the iPad app GEDview does that on its opening of a GEDCOM from RM. If it does it well, that might be a solution for some. Tom On 2012-11-05, at 3:00 PM, Kim <kim.mills@wightman.ca> wrote: > I'm trying to make sure I understand what you mean. With a census as an > example, do you mean you would create a census fact for the head of the > house, then share it with everyone listed adding their custom census notes. > Then you would also go to each person and make an individual census fact > with the same info? > > Kim > > On 11/05/2012 01:17 PM, Tom Holden wrote: >> Laura has another suggestion or practice to get around the limitations of GEDCOM while taking advantage of RM's shared fact virtues in its reports. The idea is to use a custom fact type as a shared fact while, at the same time, a standard unshared fact type carrying the same information for each sharee. The standard individual one is included for export but excluded from reports. The custom shared one is the opposite, excluded from GEDCOM but included in reports. >> >> It's more effort but maintains highest compatibility with third party programs while fully exploiting reports. Clever!

I'm trying to make sure I understand what you mean. With a census as an example, do you mean you would create a census fact for the head of the house, then share it with everyone listed adding their custom census notes. Then you would also go to each person and make an individual census fact with the same info? Kim On 11/05/2012 01:17 PM, Tom Holden wrote: > Laura has another suggestion or practice to get around the limitations of GEDCOM while taking advantage of RM's shared fact virtues in its reports. The idea is to use a custom fact type as a shared fact while, at the same time, a standard unshared fact type carrying the same information for each sharee. The standard individual one is included for export but excluded from reports. The custom shared one is the opposite, excluded from GEDCOM but included in reports. > > It's more effort but maintains highest compatibility with third party programs while fully exploiting reports. Clever! > > Tom >

I've been using shared facts for just about everything from census to baptism sponsors. I used them because it saves me so much time entering records over for each person. Especially with large family's and census data! I have to say I love this feature, but I didn't realize that they didn't show up in the research report. :-( I hope that will be fixed soon! I've also been hoping for some time that a conversion tool will be made that can convert the shared facts to individual facts when you export a gedcom. Kim On 11/05/2012 02:38 PM, Lisa Gorrell wrote: > Connie, > > I, too, wished there was some sort of "clipboard" in RM. I really miss > that in Legacy. I copy the source but must make a new event for each > person I want to attach that source. It is alot of work. But I also > switched to RM for the Research Notes report. > > Lisa Gorrell > >

On 04/11/12 20:13, Jinny Angelis wrote: > > I have not used shared facts except in the very beginning. I thought they might make the census info easier to input. BUT based on feedback, I stopped using it. What are people using it for that they think it works well for? > Based on feedback? Yours or someone else's? I've used it all the time, as soon as it as announced. I share : Fact (roles) christening (godparent, witness) Death (witness, informant on the death certificate) Marriage (witnesses) will (witnesses, inheritors, executors) Residence (inhabitants) Family Census (family members,boarders,visitors) burial (Person buried in same plot) MI (other names on the stone) The last is my own fact for a memorial inscription. I add it to the primary name, then share with others named on the stone. >> Is there any reason to avoid the use of shared facts? No! Some reports don't print all the shared fact info, but if in the future, they do, you're ready for them. If you don't share the fact, then you'll have to edit the witness, etc, and generate a miscellaneous fact, or a note, to say they were present at such and such an event. Why do all that, when shared facts are available? -- Regards Dave

Laura has another suggestion or practice to get around the limitations of GEDCOM while taking advantage of RM's shared fact virtues in its reports. The idea is to use a custom fact type as a shared fact while, at the same time, a standard unshared fact type carrying the same information for each sharee. The standard individual one is included for export but excluded from reports. The custom shared one is the opposite, excluded from GEDCOM but included in reports. It's more effort but maintains highest compatibility with third party programs while fully exploiting reports. Clever! Tom

Connie are you on the forum? Laura has put sentence templates in RM 5 forum in Tips and Hints showing how shared items can be used. If I want to share a fact, then I can make it a family fact and not a personal one. Can do that in the Menu/Lists/Fact list and create a new fact same like Residence (family) and is labeled family. Census(family) is only for spouse additions. That is how some of us use the shared fact. I do not set up the other style of Shared Event for the very reason that Tom mentioned. Annette -----Original Message----- From: rootsmagic-users-bounces@rootsweb.com [mailto:rootsmagic-users-bounces@rootsweb.com] On Behalf Of David Massie Sent: Monday, November 05, 2012 7:49 AM To: rootsmagic-users@rootsweb.com Subject: Re: [RMagic] Shared Facts On 04/11/12 20:13, Jinny Angelis wrote: > > I have not used shared facts except in the very beginning. I thought they might make the census info easier to input. BUT based on feedback, I stopped using it. What are people using it for that they think it works well for? > Based on feedback? Yours or someone else's? I've used it all the time, as soon as it as announced. I share : Fact (roles) christening (godparent, witness) Death (witness, informant on the death certificate) Marriage (witnesses) will (witnesses, inheritors, executors) Residence (inhabitants) Family Census (family members,boarders,visitors) burial (Person buried in same plot) MI (other names on the stone) The last is my own fact for a memorial inscription. I add it to the primary name, then share with others named on the stone. >> Is there any reason to avoid the use of shared facts? No! Some reports don't print all the shared fact info, but if in the future, they do, you're ready for them. If you don't share the fact, then you'll have to edit the witness, etc, and generate a miscellaneous fact, or a note, to say they were present at such and such an event. Why do all that, when shared facts are available? -- Regards Dave =================================== RM list Archives: http://archiver.rootsweb.com/th/index/ROOTSMAGIC-USERS/ http://archiver.rootsweb.com/cgi-bin/search?path=ROOTSMAGIC-USERS WISH LIST: http://www.rootsmagic.com/forums/ BLOG: http://blog.rootsmagic.com/ ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to ROOTSMAGIC-USERS-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

PhotoShop Elements ver 5 and 9 does have a group naming that could be used instead of the free one. I scan documents into a labeled scanned folder and then batched them over to my permanent folder with new names. I have used it many times. Do not have 11 yet, but maybe when I can afford it. Annette DeCourcy Towler Researching my family history... -----Original Message----- From: rootsmagic-users-bounces@rootsweb.com [mailto:rootsmagic-users-bounces@rootsweb.com] On Behalf Of Steven Niedermeyer Sent: Sunday, November 04, 2012 3:40 PM To: rootsmagic-users@rootsweb.com Subject: Re: [RMagic] Picture Naming Convention For organizing my family archives, here's what I do: Serialize - using a serialized number "P000001, P000002" - write this number on the back of the photo in archival marker or pencil depending on the material the photo is made of Scan both front and back - add a or b for front and back "P000001-a, P000001-b" Tif file format - save them in the TIF format (large, but lossless compression) Resolution -Scan front at either 600 or 1200 ppi and 600 for the back of photos. - Difference between 600 and 1200 is chosen based on quality, size, and importance of original Tag the individuals - keyword tag the file with the names and RM ref numbers of all the individuals that appear in the photo. By adding the RM ID, I can search my photo collection by that number and return all the results I have for that person. It also unique identifies all of those John Smith type names that might be confusing for future generations to figure out who you were talking about. - add additional metadata know about the picture including sequence individuals appear in the photo Protect the original - when enhancing/restoring a photo, I make a copy to perform the changes to keeping the original (P000001-a-enhanced.tif) - I always keep the original scan untouched (I turn all of the auto everything off when scanning) - I place the original photo in an acid free photo sleeve (about $.05 USD each). They have standard 4x6, 5x7, and then full 8.5x11 sheets I use. - Label the acid free photo sleeve with the serialized number in a consistent spot, making it easy to store the sleeves in photo boxes and flip through them to find the original you're looking for by number. Create service copies - the original files can be anywhere from 20-200MB each in TIF format. So creating a service copy at a lower resolution in JPG format allows you to share them and use them in programs more easily. The keyword tagging automatically is included in copies as long as you tag the TIF original first before making a service copy. "P000001-copy.tif or P000001-enhanced-copy.tif" Tools - Adobe PhotoShop Elements for scanning, cropping, batch saving - Bulk rename (to rename a group of files - best renaming utility I've seen and it's free) http://www.bulkrenameutility.co.uk/Main_Intro.php - Adobe Lightroom: you can use Windows to manage your photos, but the thumbnail caching it does and the limited access it gives you to applying keywords and other metadata isn't quite enough for my needs. Lightroom also makes quick work for standard enhancements to photos. You can also generate a collection of photos that include an individual very easily and even autoformat them into handsome photo books you can print via an online service for a reasonable price. - Adobe PhotoShop full version is really only needed if you're doing all out photo restoration or want o use the Adobe Bridge software to manage the metadata of each photo. Steven Bellingham, WA -----Original Message----- From: rootsmagic-users-bounces@rootsweb.com [mailto:rootsmagic-users-bounces@rootsweb.com] On Behalf Of Jinny Angelis Sent: Sunday, November 04, 2012 12:35 PM To: rootsmagic-users@rootsweb.com Subject: [RMagic] Picture Naming Convention As you can tell, I'm on the trail of scanning images of various sorts. I'm trying out the new Photoshop Elements 11 for their 30 day trial. PSE assigns a name based on some convention that it has. I've not varied it except to rename to the "main" file image name and add an O for the back side. Guess I should change those to "R" . Be that as it may, doing it this way there is no correlation in the file name to the person's name. I think this is going to be a problem. It is not a big deal to change them or at least I don't think so at this point. Scanning is slow as I am doing previews, resizing the image, and then adjusting the grey scale histogram, and then rescanning for final. Input please. Thanks so much. I know we are all in our little houses at these keyboards going through the same decisions. Group think really helps sometimes! Jinny Angelis =================================== RM list Archives: http://archiver.rootsweb.com/th/index/ROOTSMAGIC-USERS/ http://archiver.rootsweb.com/cgi-bin/search?path=ROOTSMAGIC-USERS WISH LIST: http://www.rootsmagic.com/forums/ BLOG: http://blog.rootsmagic.com/ ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to ROOTSMAGIC-USERS-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

Connie, I, too, wished there was some sort of "clipboard" in RM. I really miss that in Legacy. I copy the source but must make a new event for each person I want to attach that source. It is alot of work. But I also switched to RM for the Research Notes report. Lisa Gorrell On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 11:24 AM, Connie Sheets <clsheets1@yahoo.com> wrote: > Thank you, Lisa (and all others who've responded). > > Given that the Research Notes report is the primary reason I switched to > RM, and combined with the issues with GEDCOM, I will probably need to cease > using Shared Facts. I don't use family facts for things like census because > I don't like where they appear in reports. > > A Fact/Event clipboard (as found on the program from which I switched) > would make a nice addition to RootsMagic! > > Connie > > > Lisa Gorrell <snrylisa@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Connie, > > > > I found that the shared facts don't show up on the Research > > Notes report > > except on the person who is doing the sharing. For > > that reason I stopped > > using shared facts. > > > > Lisa Gorell > > > > On Sun, Nov 4, 2012 at 7:32 AM, Connie Sheets <clsheets1@yahoo.com> > > wrote: > > > > > Can someone clarify for me whether Shared Facts behave > > differently in > > > reports than individually entered facts? I know > > there is a difference > > > between individual facts and family facts, but can > > never remember what > > > differences, if any, there are for shared facts? > > > > > > Is there any reason to avoid the use of shared facts? > > > > > > Connie > > > > > > > =================================== > RM list Archives: http://archiver.rootsweb.com/th/index/ROOTSMAGIC-USERS/ > http://archiver.rootsweb.com/cgi-bin/search?path=ROOTSMAGIC-USERS > WISH LIST: http://www.rootsmagic.com/forums/ BLOG: > http://blog.rootsmagic.com/ > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > ROOTSMAGIC-USERS-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without > the quotes in the subject and the body of the message >

Thank you, Lisa (and all others who've responded). Given that the Research Notes report is the primary reason I switched to RM, and combined with the issues with GEDCOM, I will probably need to cease using Shared Facts. I don't use family facts for things like census because I don't like where they appear in reports. A Fact/Event clipboard (as found on the program from which I switched) would make a nice addition to RootsMagic! Connie Lisa Gorrell <snrylisa@gmail.com> wrote: > Connie, > > I found that the shared facts don't show up on the Research > Notes report > except on the person who is doing the sharing.  For > that reason I stopped > using shared facts. > > Lisa Gorell > > On Sun, Nov 4, 2012 at 7:32 AM, Connie Sheets <clsheets1@yahoo.com> > wrote: > > > Can someone clarify for me whether Shared Facts behave > differently in > > reports than individually entered facts?  I know > there is a difference > > between individual facts and family facts, but can > never remember what > > differences, if any, there are for shared facts? > > > > Is there any reason to avoid the use of shared facts? > > > > Connie

Hello Jinny When I was in the Christian book trade those little cards were commonly called 'pocket cards'. There are many manufacturers, some of whom name their product with fanciful names, so 'pocket cards' is the overall name that covers all brands andvarieties. And, yes, very popular and useful for any number of friendly purposes for children or adults. Judith Harper Nelson, NZ On 05/11/2012 09:15, Jinny Angelis wrote: > I have some small cards that are about 1 1/2" x 2 1/2". They have little pleasant sayings on them. No hearts, so I would not say valentines. Any thought on what they might have been called? Looks like they were exchanged between people, perhaps in Sunday School, perhaps for other places. > > Jinny Angelis > > >

Do you think it is worth using 600 dpi for the photos? Negatives, maybe, but there is a finite amount of info, and I settle on 300 dpi save to tiff files so there is no information loss. I have the Epson V750 and have been prescanning and then adjusting the histogram to the end points of the data for the most part. Some back I have changed so that they scan a little lighter and the writing is a little more legible. Good tip about numbering the images on the back. It would definitely facilitate retrieval of the original. I'll get my handy dandy archival pencil out and number these and go back and add the numbers to the metadata or rescan the backs. Jinny Angelis > From: sjniedermeyer@gmail.com > To: rootsmagic-users@rootsweb.com > Date: Sun, 4 Nov 2012 13:40:30 -0800 > Subject: Re: [RMagic] Picture Naming Convention > > For organizing my family archives, here's what I do: > > Serialize > - using a serialized number "P000001, P000002" > - write this number on the back of the photo in archival marker or pencil > depending on the material the photo is made of > > Scan both front and back > - add a or b for front and back "P000001-a, P000001-b" > > Tif file format > - save them in the TIF format (large, but lossless compression) > > Resolution > -Scan front at either 600 or 1200 ppi and 600 for the back of photos. > - Difference between 600 and 1200 is chosen based on quality, size, and > importance of original > > Tag the individuals > - keyword tag the file with the names and RM ref numbers of all the > individuals that appear in the photo. By adding the RM ID, I can search my > photo collection by that number and return all the results I have for that > person. It also unique identifies all of those John Smith type names that > might be confusing for future generations to figure out who you were talking > about. > - add additional metadata know about the picture including sequence > individuals appear in the photo > > Protect the original > - when enhancing/restoring a photo, I make a copy to perform the changes to > keeping the original (P000001-a-enhanced.tif) > - I always keep the original scan untouched (I turn all of the auto > everything off when scanning) > - I place the original photo in an acid free photo sleeve (about $.05 USD > each). They have standard 4x6, 5x7, and then full 8.5x11 sheets I use. > - Label the acid free photo sleeve with the serialized number in a > consistent spot, making it easy to store the sleeves in photo boxes and flip > through them to find the original you're looking for by number. > > Create service copies > - the original files can be anywhere from 20-200MB each in TIF format. So > creating a service copy at a lower resolution in JPG format allows you to > share them and use them in programs more easily. The keyword tagging > automatically is included in copies as long as you tag the TIF original > first before making a service copy. "P000001-copy.tif or > P000001-enhanced-copy.tif" > > Tools > - Adobe PhotoShop Elements for scanning, cropping, batch saving > - Bulk rename (to rename a group of files - best renaming utility I've seen > and it's free) http://www.bulkrenameutility.co.uk/Main_Intro.php > - Adobe Lightroom: you can use Windows to manage your photos, but the > thumbnail caching it does and the limited access it gives you to applying > keywords and other metadata isn't quite enough for my needs. Lightroom also > makes quick work for standard enhancements to photos. You can also generate > a collection of photos that include an individual very easily and even > autoformat them into handsome photo books you can print via an online > service for a reasonable price. > - Adobe PhotoShop full version is really only needed if you're doing all out > photo restoration or want o use the Adobe Bridge software to manage the > metadata of each photo. > > > Steven > Bellingham, WA > > -----Original Message----- > From: rootsmagic-users-bounces@rootsweb.com > [mailto:rootsmagic-users-bounces@rootsweb.com] On Behalf Of Jinny Angelis > Sent: Sunday, November 04, 2012 12:35 PM > To: rootsmagic-users@rootsweb.com > Subject: [RMagic] Picture Naming Convention > > > As you can tell, I'm on the trail of scanning images of various sorts. I'm > trying out the new Photoshop Elements 11 for their 30 day trial. PSE > assigns a name based on some convention that it has. I've not varied it > except to rename to the "main" file image name and add an O for the back > side. Guess I should change those to "R" . Be that as it may, doing it this > way there is no correlation in the file name to the person's name. I think > this is going to be a problem. It is not a big deal to change them or at > least I don't think so at this point. Scanning is slow as I am doing > previews, resizing the image, and then adjusting the grey scale histogram, > and then rescanning for final. > Input please. Thanks so much. I know we are all in our little houses at > these keyboards going through the same decisions. Group think really helps > sometimes! > > Jinny Angelis > > > > > =================================== > RM list Archives: http://archiver.rootsweb.com/th/index/ROOTSMAGIC-USERS/ > http://archiver.rootsweb.com/cgi-bin/search?path=ROOTSMAGIC-USERS > WISH LIST: http://www.rootsmagic.com/forums/ BLOG: http://blog.rootsmagic.com/ > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to ROOTSMAGIC-USERS-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

That's a start at least. These are all printed in fine blue ink. If there are any drawings, then very simple and usually not colored, although it looks like a couple had some red added to them, but not hearts. Some of the antique ones I saw online are relatively elaborate as you would expect. I'm sure that's why they were saved. Thanks, Jinny Angelis > Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2012 10:38:11 +1300 > From: quester@orcon.net.nz > To: rootsmagic-users@rootsweb.com > Subject: Re: [RMagic] little cards > > > > Hello Jinny > > When I was in the Christian book trade those little cards were commonly > called 'pocket cards'. There are many manufacturers, some of whom name > their product with fanciful names, so 'pocket cards' is the overall > name that covers all brands andvarieties. And, yes, very popular and > useful for any number of friendly purposes for children or adults. > > Judith Harper > Nelson, NZ > > On 05/11/2012 09:15, Jinny Angelis wrote: > > I have some small cards that are about 1 1/2" x 2 1/2". They have little pleasant sayings on them. No hearts, so I would not say valentines. Any thought on what they might have been called? Looks like they were exchanged between people, perhaps in Sunday School, perhaps for other places. > > > > Jinny Angelis > > > > > > > > > > =================================== > RM list Archives: http://archiver.rootsweb.com/th/index/ROOTSMAGIC-USERS/ > http://archiver.rootsweb.com/cgi-bin/search?path=ROOTSMAGIC-USERS > WISH LIST: http://www.rootsmagic.com/forums/ BLOG: http://blog.rootsmagic.com/ > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to ROOTSMAGIC-USERS-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

On Sun, Nov 4, 2012 at 3:15 PM, Jinny Angelis <jinnya@msn.com> wrote: > > I have some small cards that are about 1 1/2" x 2 1/2". They have little > pleasant sayings on them. No hearts, so I would not say valentines. Any > thought on what they might have been called? Looks like they were exchanged > between people, perhaps in Sunday School, perhaps for other places. > > Jinny Angelis > http://library.duke.edu/digitalcollections/eaa/guide/scrapbooks/ "Rewards of merit: These cards were awarded to students in schools and Sunday schools and often found their way into scrapbooks." http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.ancestry.com/~larsenbrown/Histories/lorenawashburn.txt "When I was a child of 7 or 8 and 9 years of age, we received small tickets or cards with a passage from the New Testament printed on them each Sabbath morning at Sunday School. And when we had collected about 50 of those small cards, we could exchange them at Sunday School for a New Testament. We could also get those cards for reciting in our class chapters from the New Testament or any good poetry. My brother Parley and I put our tickets together and each got a Testament. Our sister Louisa, who was married and lived in Washington, Dixie, was visiting at home during the winter of 1869 and 70, so we decided we would put our Sunday School tickets together and get her a Testament for a present. We worked hard. I recited all the poems I could think of and chapters in the Bible. One morning I recited the 16th chapter of Mark. I repeated the names of both the Ancient and Modern Twelve Apostles and was still lacking a few tickets to get the Testament. I told my troubles to my teacher and she said "Can't you think of just one more poem to recite; it would likely be enough." I told her I had one more, but maybe she wouldn't like me to recite it to the class. She said "Oh go right ahead and recite it." So I recited the following: Oh may that cursed Jeff Davis float In open sea, in open boat, To islands cold without a coat, Glory hallelujah Without a compass, sail or oar, A million miles away from shore. Where mighty waves like mountains roar, Glory hallelujah Without a paddle, wheel or stern Where sharks e'er wait at every turn, May the devil take the whole concern, Glory hallelujah. It was enough. The teacher, suppressing smiles while others giggled, handed me the needed tickets and, after the closing prayer, I walked home with the New Testament." -- -- -- --Ô¿Ô-- K e V i N

As you can tell, I'm on the trail of scanning images of various sorts. I'm trying out the new Photoshop Elements 11 for their 30 day trial. PSE assigns a name based on some convention that it has. I've not varied it except to rename to the "main" file image name and add an O for the back side. Guess I should change those to "R" . Be that as it may, doing it this way there is no correlation in the file name to the person's name. I think this is going to be a problem. It is not a big deal to change them or at least I don't think so at this point. Scanning is slow as I am doing previews, resizing the image, and then adjusting the grey scale histogram, and then rescanning for final. Input please. Thanks so much. I know we are all in our little houses at these keyboards going through the same decisions. Group think really helps sometimes! Jinny Angelis

I have some small cards that are about 1 1/2" x 2 1/2". They have little pleasant sayings on them. No hearts, so I would not say valentines. Any thought on what they might have been called? Looks like they were exchanged between people, perhaps in Sunday School, perhaps for other places. Jinny Angelis

I have not used shared facts except in the very beginning. I thought they might make the census info easier to input. BUT based on feedback, I stopped using it. What are people using it for that they think it works well for? Jinny Angelis > Date: Sun, 4 Nov 2012 07:32:51 -0800 > From: clsheets1@yahoo.com > To: rootsmagic-users@rootsweb.com > Subject: [RMagic] Shared Facts > > Can someone clarify for me whether Shared Facts behave differently in reports than individually entered facts? I know there is a difference between individual facts and family facts, but can never remember what differences, if any, there are for shared facts? > > Is there any reason to avoid the use of shared facts? > > Connie > > > =================================== > RM list Archives: http://archiver.rootsweb.com/th/index/ROOTSMAGIC-USERS/ > http://archiver.rootsweb.com/cgi-bin/search?path=ROOTSMAGIC-USERS > WISH LIST: http://www.rootsmagic.com/forums/ BLOG: http://blog.rootsmagic.com/ > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to ROOTSMAGIC-USERS-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

On 11/4/2012 12:41 PM, Jon Czarowitz wrote: > There were 3 place databases. 1 came with an older version of RootsMagic > called Place Finder; The 2nd was the newest one that you just downloaded > from the website and the 3rd is the one in your personal RM database file. > Jon The Place Finder was the one I previously had and is the one I would like to get again. Lloyd ____________________________________________________________ Woman is 57 But Looks 27 Mom publishes simple facelift trick that angered doctors... http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL3141/5096b76268c19375f6dbest01duc

On 11/4/2012 12:37 PM, Jon Czarowitz wrote: > Were you looking for the Place Finder database? > Jon Yes Lloyd ____________________________________________________________ Woman is 57 But Looks 27 Mom publishes simple facelift trick that angered doctors... http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL3141/5096b6ce6830a36cb3992st03duc