I have someone who is surnamed Walker and we have a firm paper trail back to Mordecai born 1805. He's had a 67 marker test. He does not match any of the Walker's currently tested. The family has been told that they match a group of Harrelson's. Now here's the question. With a 67 marker test does this mean anything? Am I dealing with a line of Walker's that just hasn't been delved into thus far or should I be looking at Harrelson's? Joyce Gaston Reece

something to consider - name change or out of wedlock or illegimate before mother's marriage to a stepfather...... David Samuelsen On 5/17/2012 6:56 AM, Joyce Gaston Reece wrote: > > I have someone who is surnamed Walker and we have a firm paper trail back to > Mordecai born 1805. He's had a 67 marker test. He does not match any of > the Walker's currently tested. The family has been told that they match a > group of Harrelson's. Now here's the question. With a 67 marker test does > this mean anything? Am I dealing with a line of Walker's that just hasn't > been delved into thus far or should I be looking at Harrelson's? > > > > Joyce Gaston Reece > > ===== > If you would prefer digest mode to mail mode, drop a note to roots-admin@rootsweb.com and ask for the digest... > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to ROOTS-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message >