This is a Message Board Post that is gatewayed to this mailing list. Author: RIP_09 Surnames: Rogers Classification: death Message Board URL: http://boards.rootsweb.com/surnames.rogers/10398/mb.ashx Message Board Post: On the Web: http://www.defenselink.mil/releases/release.aspx?releaseid=12459 IMMEDIATE RELEASE No. 052-09 January 23, 2009 Missing WWII Soldiers are Identified The Department of Defense POW/Missing Personnel Office (DPMO) announced today that the remains of two U.S. servicemen, missing from World War II, have been identified and will be returned to their families for burial with full military honors. They are Pfc. Julian H. Rogers, of Bloomington, Ind, and . . . Both men were U.S. Army. Rogers will be buried in the spring in Arlington National Cemetery near Washington, D.C., and . . .will be buried on May 30 in Kansas City, Mo. Representatives from the Army's Mortuary Office met with the next-of-kin of these men in their hometowns to explain the recovery and identification process and to coordinate interment with military honors on behalf of the Secretary of the Army. In November 1944, the 112th Infantry Regiment, 28th Infantry Division, was attacking east through the Hürtgen Forest in an attempt to capture the German towns of Vossenack and Schmidt. On Nov. 4, the Germans counterattacked in what would become one of the longest running battles in U.S. history. Rogers and . . . , both members of G Company, 112th Infantry Regiment, were reported killed in action near Vossenack on Nov. 4. Their bodies were not recovered. In 2007, a German citizen searching for wartime relics in the Hürtgen Forest uncovered human remains and military identification tags for Rogers and Marquez. He notified U.S. officials and a Joint POW/MIA Accounting Command (JPAC) team excavated the site later that year. The team recovered human remains and non-biological material. (see link for complete release) Important Note: The author of this message may not be subscribed to this list. If you would like to reply to them, please click on the Message Board URL link above and respond on the board.

This is a Message Board Post that is gatewayed to this mailing list. Author: TinaCordia Surnames: Rogers Classification: queries Message Board URL: http://boards.rootsweb.com/surnames.rogers/3539.3696/mb.ashx Message Board Post: Hi Kevin-I have some info on your Jesse Rogers. She was my great-great-grandfathers sister. She was born in Pacific MO and died in New Mexico and was married to Robert L Jones. We are looking for information on her younger brother Thomas Jefferson Rogers. Their parents moved from Virginia to Franklin county Missouri-where most of the kids were born. I have a picture of the two of them in New Mexico when they were pretty old. I am pretty sure that we are talking about the same family. Important Note: The author of this message may not be subscribed to this list. If you would like to reply to them, please click on the Message Board URL link above and respond on the board.

This is a Message Board Post that is gatewayed to this mailing list. Author: blpurdy1 Surnames: Classification: queries Message Board URL: http://boards.rootsweb.com/surnames.rogers/4785.1.1.2.1.1.1.3.1.1.1/mb.ashx Message Board Post: This is a picture of my maternal grandmother Nancy Elizabeth Graves Windle (her husband and two of her three daughters). The smallest of the girls is my mother. My grandmother was the granddaughter of Elizabeth "Betty" Rogers, Isabella's sister. I hope this picture comes through. Important Note: The author of this message may not be subscribed to this list. If you would like to reply to them, please click on the Message Board URL link above and respond on the board.

This is a Message Board Post that is gatewayed to this mailing list. Author: lilfishjean1 Surnames: Rogers/Rodgers/Roggers, Daniels Classification: queries Message Board URL: http://boards.rootsweb.com/surnames.rogers/4785.1.1.2.1.1.1.3.1.1/mb.ashx Message Board Post: She has very similar features to my paternal grandmother whose mother was a "Rogers" and also said to have Cherokee blood. Important Note: The author of this message may not be subscribed to this list. If you would like to reply to them, please click on the Message Board URL link above and respond on the board.

This is a Message Board Post that is gatewayed to this mailing list. Author: ltjc1 Surnames: Classification: queries Message Board URL: http://boards.rootsweb.com/surnames.rogers/10397/mb.ashx Message Board Post: If you are a Rogers who has had your genealogical DNA tested by Ancestry.com or any one else, www.rogersdna.com is a free site dedicated to finding common Rogers (Rodgers) ancestors. Important Note: The author of this message may not be subscribed to this list. If you would like to reply to them, please click on the Message Board URL link above and respond on the board.

This is a Message Board Post that is gatewayed to this mailing list. Author: jrrobinson59 Surnames: Rogers, Deming Classification: queries Message Board URL: http://boards.rootsweb.com/surnames.rogers/10396/mb.ashx Message Board Post: I am looking for information for Frank A Rogers family. The following is what I have. Any corections or additions are greatly appreciated. Thank you. Frank A Rogers, b: 20 Apr 1865 in Marlow, Cheshire, New Hampshire. In 1895 he married Thirza Abbie Deming, b: 23 Jun 1870 in Cornish City, New Hampshire. They had four children. Hazel G Rogers, b: May 1893 in New Hampshire. Bernice E Rogers, b: Dec 1896 in New Hampshire. William Frank Rogers, b: 12 Sep 1898 in New Hampshire. Hester Delight Rogers, b: 12 Aug 1907 in Newport, New Hampshire, d: 3 Dec 1975 in Spring Valley, Rockland, New York. Important Note: The author of this message may not be subscribed to this list. If you would like to reply to them, please click on the Message Board URL link above and respond on the board.

I am interested in corresponding with person(s) researching John H. and Hetty Rogers or with anyone having connections to this [email protected] Edith.....Descendants of Jesse James Jr. Rogers 1 Jesse James Jr. Rogers 1790 - 1855 .. +Mary Celia Cagle 1800 - 1870 ......... 2 Nelson R. Rogers - 1882 ......... 2 Elizabeth Rogers 1821 - 1894 ............. +Eli Garner 1814 - 1900 .................... 3 Sampson Garner Garner 1837 - 1864 ........................ +Martha J. Davis .................... 3 Amos Garner 1840 - 1912 ........................ +Vinca J. Davis .................... 3 Matthew Bogle Garner 1841 - 1924 ........................ +Mary Rebecca Keeble .................... 3 Nancy Garner 1843 - 1930 ........................ +James M. Garner .................... 3 Elizabeth Garner 1845 - 1919 ........................ +Allen Jones .................... 3 Jane Garner 1847 - 1939 ........................ +Sam Keeble .................... 3 Eli Jr. Garner 1848 - 1907 ........................ +Mary C. Spurling .................... *2nd Wife of Eli Jr. Garner: ........................ +Nancy Reagan .................... 3 Francis Garner 1850 - 1927 ........................ +Sara C. DeLozier .................... *2nd Wife of Francis Garner: ........................ +Sarah Caroline Davis .................... 3 Ransome Garner 1852 - 1906 ........................ +Melvina Jane Garner .................... *2nd Wife of Ransome Garner: ........................ +Martha Rebecca Rogers .................... 3 Mansel Garner 1854 - 1886 ........................ +[1] Elizabeth Jane "Eliza" Cagle .................... 3 Alexander Garner 1858 - ........................ +[1] Elizabeth Jane "Eliza" Cagle .................... 3 Levi Garner 1858 - 1928 ........................ +Lydia E. Barbra .................... 3 Eveline Garner 1859 - 1929 ........................ +Josiah "Si" Reagan .................... 3 Hugh Garner 1861 - 1930 ........................ +Minerva Clementine Davis 1839 - 1921 .................... 3 Nelson Garner 1863 - 1925 ........................ +Winnie Benson .................... *2nd Wife of Nelson Garner: ........................ +Mary Elizabeth Davis .................... 3 Emily Garner 1865 - ........................ +James R. Reagan ......... 2 Asa Rogers 1823 - ......... 2 Esther "Hetty" Rogers 1825 - 1889 ............. +John H. Rogers 1820 - 1871 .................... 3 Elizabeth "Betty" Rogers ........................ +William Anderson "Ance" Graves ............................... 4 George Taylor Graves ................................... +Mary Elizabeth Johnson ........................................... 5 Nancy Elizabeth "Bettie" Graves ............................................... +John R. Windle ......... 2 Telitha Rogers 1827 - ............. +Adam Garner

This is a Message Board Post that is gatewayed to this mailing list. Author: tracer4236 Surnames: Rogers Classification: queries Message Board URL: http://boards.rootsweb.com/surnames.rogers/10395/mb.ashx Message Board Post: GGrandmother Willie B. Ripley in Dyer Co., TN. In addition to marrying Thomas S. King in 1877, she married Robert Rogers in 1886, and John M. Rogers in 1893. Want to share and compare info on this line. TTYL~Diane Important Note: The author of this message may not be subscribed to this list. If you would like to reply to them, please click on the Message Board URL link above and respond on the board.

This is a Message Board Post that is gatewayed to this mailing list. Author: t42Moore Surnames: ROGERS Classification: cemetery Message Board URL: http://boards.rootsweb.com/surnames.rogers/10394/mb.ashx Message Board Post: ROGERS Melba S and Glenn C I photographed this gravestone in the Moore Cemetery, Arlington,Tarrant Co., Texas. Feel free to use this picture for your personal records. This is one of the 200,300 cemetery photos free at http://teafor2.com . If you know more about this person please reply here,instead of contacting me because this is most likely not my family. Important Note: The author of this message may not be subscribed to this list. If you would like to reply to them, please click on the Message Board URL link above and respond on the board.

This is a Message Board Post that is gatewayed to this mailing list. Author: t42Moore Surnames: ROGERS Classification: cemetery Message Board URL: http://boards.rootsweb.com/surnames.rogers/10393/mb.ashx Message Board Post: ROGERS Carroll W-and Madie V I photographed this gravestone in the Moore Cemetery, Arlington,Tarrant Co., Texas. Feel free to use this picture for your personal records. This is one of the 200,294 cemetery photos free at http://teafor2.com . If you know more about this person please reply here,instead of contacting me because this is most likely not my family. Important Note: The author of this message may not be subscribed to this list. If you would like to reply to them, please click on the Message Board URL link above and respond on the board.

This is a Message Board Post that is gatewayed to this mailing list. Author: blpurdy1 Surnames: Shadrach Rogers b. 1804 NC Classification: queries Message Board URL: http://boards.rootsweb.com/surnames.rogers/4785.1.1.2.1.1.1.3.1/mb.ashx Message Board Post: This is the first picture I've seen of any of the Rogers' in any line. I've always thought there were Cherokee connections in this line of our family because of the coal black hair and high cheekbones. Even my mother has those features, as did her Mom (black hair and blue eyes). I'm still digging on this avenue as well. Thanks for the picture. Important Note: The author of this message may not be subscribed to this list. If you would like to reply to them, please click on the Message Board URL link above and respond on the board.

This is a Message Board Post that is gatewayed to this mailing list. Author: wmfultz Surnames: Rogers Classification: queries Message Board URL: http://boards.rootsweb.com/surnames.rogers/4785.1.1.2.1.1.1.3/mb.ashx Message Board Post: I am also researching John H and Hetty Rogers. The 1850 Blount Co census shows they had a daughter Isabel(la) who later had a daughter Eliza Jane, who is my wife's great grandmother. Pictures (see attached)of Eliza show strong Native American features. I am trying to determine if the Rogers were in fact Cherokee. As you probably know, many of the Cherokee were forced to migrate to Oklohoma (Trail of Tears) but many others chose to stay in TN and were thus absorbed into the prevalent white society. Any help you can give would be most appreciated. Important Note: The author of this message may not be subscribed to this list. If you would like to reply to them, please click on the Message Board URL link above and respond on the board.

This is a Message Board Post that is gatewayed to this mailing list. Author: ArleyMeadows1 Surnames: Classification: queries Message Board URL: http://boards.rootsweb.com/surnames.rogers/10379.1.2.1.2.1/mb.ashx Message Board Post: Not a complaint necessarily but just an observation. None of the replies to my original query have anything whatsoever to do with my original query (it concerned DNA testing of male descendants of Allen Meadows and Sarah Rogers). I appreciate that brick walls can sometimes be broken by "mining" online message boards but I also think that it is important to read the origianl query and keep to the subject. I have been getting emails that a reply has been posted to my query but when I check it out I find that the "reply" actually has no connection to my query. I think it is great that people are breaking down some brick walls but I also think that this can be done better, for all concerned, by posting queries based on the subject you want to research. As I said, not a complaint - I love it when people gain new information. Just an observation to hopefully help us all in our research. Arley Important Note: The author of this message may not be subscribed to this list. If you would like to reply to them, please click on the Message Board URL link above and respond on the board.

Why not join the MEADOWS Rootsweb list and post a query there for DNA purposes.. You would probably get more replies.. Just an idea if you haven't done this.. Ellie S. In a message dated 01/19/09 01:14:07 Mountain Standard Time, [email protected] writes: Please reply only if you have information pertaining to my question. I have done no research on the Rogers family and know nothing about them.

This is a Message Board Post that is gatewayed to this mailing list. Author: lilfishjean1 Surnames: Rog(g)ers, Daniels, Conaway, Fisher Classification: queries Message Board URL: http://boards.rootsweb.com/surnames.rogers/10379.1.2.1.2/mb.ashx Message Board Post: Thank-you, Janet for your post on my behalf... A couple of things: 1) I did cite information from the 1860 Montague and 1880 Palo Pinto Census in my post, so, I was well aware of the info contained in them; therefore, am also aware that Lawson (called "Lawrence" on the Palo Pinto census) was a different person than Peter; however, Peter's middle name WAS "Lawson" as was his grandson's, my father, Roy Lawson Fisher. (I also have the 1900 Erath census which mentions my paternal grandmother, "Carrie L[eona] Daniels".) 3) I am curious as to why you think that the Martha E. Rogers you cited appearing on the Polk Cty. census is "my" Martha E. since her birthdate of 1860 is fully 2 years AFTER than of "my" Martha Rogers (1858). I have found no less than 7 "Martha Rog(d)gers" on various TX counties' census -- some of whom have a much closer birthyear than that of the one on the Polk Cty. census. 4) I am also curious as to why you believe the James Daniel(s) you cited (Dawes Rolls?) as being 3/8 Cherokee is the same James Daniels you cited as having died in Palo Pinto of pneumonia in 1880 and why you believe that either of them is the same James Daniel(s) who is the father of my Peter Lawson Daniel(s) since most Daniel(s) researchers maintain that James was killed by Indians in TX. 5) I would very much like to know the source of your information that Mary Conaway was Eliza (aka "Arminta") Daniel(s)' mother since the maiden name of Eliza ("Arminta") was "Hagler/Haglar". I have a fundamental problem with the 1880 Palo Pinto vs. the 1900 Erath census and that is IF the "John" and the "James" Daniels listed in Peter's household on the 1880 census are Peter's sons AND the "Catherine" Daniels listed as Peter's wife is really "my" Martha Daniels (nee Rogers), then why does the 1900 Erath census list her as only having five children? Including "John" and "James", that would make seven, not five AND, if Peter and Martha had actually been married for 25 years as the 1900 Erath census suggests, it would have been "Martha" and not anyone named "Catherine" who would have been the mother of James & John since that would make Peter and Martha's marriage year about 1875 (which does jive with a separate "Erath County Marriages" source I have). These are the kinds of problems I have been having with this family for YEARS now... jean in CA Important Note: The author of this message may not be subscribed to this list. If you would like to reply to them, please click on the Message Board URL link above and respond on the board.

Thank you Jim for your kind words. I know that I have heard that some people to just want to get information out of other people and then disappear, I guess they are gathering infor to write a book or something. I guess I trust too much, but oh well, I would rather be like that than the other way around. I have been around the websites of MyFamily, Rootsweb, and others for about 13 yrs. now. I did research the old fashioned way before I got the computer, now I use it a lot, but still you can't get all the information on it. They do keep adding all the time though, so sooner or later, it should all be on here. That 1890 census that got burned sure is a huge loss in genealogy, don't you think. Thank you again Jim and I will be careful. I appreciate your writing to me. Janet ----- Original Message ----- From: [email protected] To: [email protected] Sent: Sunday, January 18, 2009 3:41 PM Subject: Re: [ROGERS] Sarah Rogers; Allen Meadows (1842-1906) This is a Message Board Post that is gatewayed to this mailing list. Author: jamerm Surnames: Rogers, Meadows Classification: queries Message Board URL: http://boards.rootsweb.com/surnames.rogers/10379.1.2.1.1/mb.ashx Message Board Post: Greetings Janet: Thank you for taking the time to help Jean add several more names to her Rogers/Meadows family history research. You are very kind and special to do that! I wish all of us could have that warm desire to help another fellow researcher break down some of their brick walls. I believe the vast majority of the family history researchers who post messages on reputable sites like Ancestry.com are very willing to share their data with others, like you did. However occasionally we see a person who asks for help and promises to share everything they have. When they get the information they want, they abruptly disappear into the cosmos and change their email address, so no one can find them. I have been on a MyFamily.com website that was known for doing this and for pirating information they received from others. Some of the things they posted were nothing but disgraceful lies about others. If you are interested in finding out more about this site, you can email me directly. Please forgive my complaining, but even though I know this outrageous conduct happens infrequently in family history research, you can tell it is still one of my pet peeves! I believe these sites should be banned by MyFamily.com, but it never happens, even when you contact them about what is being posted. Your friend, Jim Have a great day with your best friend -- our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ! Happy Sabbath Important Note: The author of this message may not be subscribed to this list. If you would like to reply to them, please click on the Message Board URL link above and respond on the board. ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

Answers are below in your post. ----- Original Message ----- From: [email protected] To: [email protected] Sent: Sunday, January 18, 2009 9:27 PM Subject: Re: [ROGERS] Sarah Rogers; Allen Meadows (1842-1906) This is a Message Board Post that is gatewayed to this mailing list. Author: lilfishjean1 Surnames: Rog(g)ers, Daniels, Conaway, Fisher Classification: queries Message Board URL: http://boards.rootsweb.com/surnames.rogers/10379.1.2.1.2/mb.ashx Message Board Post: Thank-you, Janet for your post on my behalf... A couple of things: 1) I did cite information from the 1860 Montague and 1880 Palo Pinto Census in my post, so, I was well aware of the info contained in them; therefore, am also aware that Lawson (called "Lawrence" on the Palo Pinto census) was a different person than Peter; however, Peter's middle name WAS "Lawson" as was his grandson's, my father, Roy Lawson Fisher. (I also have the 1900 Erath census which mentions my paternal grandmother, "Carrie L[eona] Daniels".) Yes, I knew you were aware of what was in the censuses that you mentioned in your post, I was only putting them in to let you know that I had also seen them. I wasn't sure if you knew that the census showed the two brother, one being Lawson, it said, but I figure it was wrong and it should have been Lawrence, since if your Peter had the middle name of Lawson, they certainly wouldn't name his brother that too. I don't think anyway. 3) I am curious as to why you think that the Martha E. Rogers you cited appearing on the Polk Cty. census is "my" Martha E. since her birthdate of 1860 is fully 2 years AFTER than of "my" Martha Rogers (1858). I have found no less than 7 "Martha Rog(d)gers" on various TX counties' census -- some of whom have a much closer birthyear than that of the one on the Polk Cty. census. I just think it is her, and the censuses are often off by two years, some aren't. Depends on the accent the people have and who the person is that is taking the census. Sometimes I think the census people made up a lot, not really, just didn't listen very well, or something. Mostly I think that it is "your" Martha because of where the parents were born, because it is where she said they were born. 4) I am also curious as to why you believe the James Daniel(s) you cited (Dawes Rolls?) as being 3/8 Cherokee is the same James Daniels you cited as having died in Palo Pinto of pneumonia in 1880 and why you believe that either of them is the same James Daniel(s) who is the father of my Peter Lawson Daniel(s) since most Daniel(s) researchers maintain that James was killed by Indians in TX. Oh, I don't know if they are the same James Daniels or not, I just thought you would like to know that, if you hadn't seen it. I don't know if the James who died of pneumonia in 1880 is the same as yours or not, just a tidbit of info to think about for the Indian connection. 5) I would very much like to know the source of your information that Mary Conaway was Eliza (aka "Arminta") Daniel(s)' mother since the maiden name of Eliza ("Arminta") was "Hagler/Haglar". When in the 1880 Palo Pinto, TX census, Mary Conaway is listed as 70 yrs old and as Peter's grandmother born in Ga., and Eliza said her mother was born in Ga., that is why I figured that, not that is correct, just my opinion. I have a fundamental problem with the 1880 Palo Pinto vs. the 1900 Erath census and that is IF the "John" and the "James" Daniels listed in Peter's household on the 1880 census are Peter's sons AND the "Catherine" Daniels listed as Peter's wife is really "my" Martha Daniels (nee Rogers), then why does the 1900 Erath census list her as only having five children? Including "John" and "James", that would make seven, not five AND, if Peter and Martha had actually been married for 25 years as the 1900 Erath census suggests, it would have been "Martha" and not anyone named "Catherine" who would have been the mother of James & John since that would make Peter and Martha's marriage year about 1875 (which does jive with a separate "Erath County Marriages" source I have). I am thinking that maybe the Daniels in Palo Pinto, Tx aren't the right Daniels. From what you know, it doesn't seem like they are, don't you agree? These are the kinds of problems I have been having with this family for YEARS now... I was only trying to help you with your problems, but maybe I have only made it worse, If I find anything, more concrete, I will send it to you. I love genealogy and try to help other people, if I can. I am also a Rodgers, but in WV, VA, not out in the west, on my branches anyway. Janet jean in CA Important Note: The author of this message may not be subscribed to this list. If you would like to reply to them, please click on the Message Board URL link above and respond on the board. ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

This is a Message Board Post that is gatewayed to this mailing list. Author: ncjbryant Surnames: Rogers/Rodgers Classification: queries Message Board URL: http://boards.rootsweb.com/surnames.rogers/10379.1.2.2/mb.ashx Message Board Post: Thank you for answering my post. Since we don't know anything about our ancesters such as siblings, parents etc. There is always a possibility that a connection might be found somewhere down the road. This is a list of my great-great-grandfather, Allen P. Rogers family listed in 1860 Census of Franklin Co., Ala. Allen 56, born NC; Elizabeth 41 or so, born NC; All the Children were born in Ala. Margaret 17, Melonta 15; William D. 12; Lucinda 10, John C. 8; Cleopatra 6; Sarah J. 4; Modenina 2; Manda B. 1. It is possibly that there are older children that had already married and left home. But this as far back as I can go with the family except. Allen own land in Franklin Co., Ala. I believe the land deed was dated in the late 1840's. I don't know anything about any family back from 1860. I have traced some of his children in North Mississippi including my grandmother, Cleopatra. The best I can figure out is that they came to North Mississippi after the Civil War. I have kept the information found here in my folder in case I ran across anything that might answer some questions we have. Nancy Important Note: The author of this message may not be subscribed to this list. If you would like to reply to them, please click on the Message Board URL link above and respond on the board.

This is a Message Board Post that is gatewayed to this mailing list. Author: jamerm Surnames: Rogers, Meadows Classification: queries Message Board URL: http://boards.rootsweb.com/surnames.rogers/10379.1.2.1.1/mb.ashx Message Board Post: Greetings Janet: Thank you for taking the time to help Jean add several more names to her Rogers/Meadows family history research. You are very kind and special to do that! I wish all of us could have that warm desire to help another fellow researcher break down some of their brick walls. I believe the vast majority of the family history researchers who post messages on reputable sites like Ancestry.com are very willing to share their data with others, like you did. However occasionally we see a person who asks for help and promises to share everything they have. When they get the information they want, they abruptly disappear into the cosmos and change their email address, so no one can find them. I have been on a MyFamily.com website that was known for doing this and for pirating information they received from others. Some of the things they posted were nothing but disgraceful lies about others. If you are interested in finding out more about this site, you can email me directly. Please forgive my complaining, but even though I know this outrageous conduct happens infrequently in family history research, you can tell it is still one of my pet peeves! I believe these sites should be banned by MyFamily.com, but it never happens, even when you contact them about what is being posted. Your friend, Jim Have a great day with your best friend -- our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ! Happy Sabbath Important Note: The author of this message may not be subscribed to this list. If you would like to reply to them, please click on the Message Board URL link above and respond on the board.

This is a Message Board Post that is gatewayed to this mailing list. Author: ArleyMeadows1 Surnames: Classification: queries Message Board URL: http://boards.rootsweb.com/surnames.rogers/10391/mb.ashx Message Board Post: Would like to find a male descendant of this couple who would be interested in joining an ongoing DNA project. Allen Meadows was a son of Thomas Meadows who in turn was a son of Francis Meadows (c.1754-1836). There is an ongoing DNA project which is attempting to link all of the sons of this Francis Meadows by means of a Y-DNA test. This requires the testing of a descendant through the male line. We know of at least one son of Allen Meadows and Sarah Rogers - a Joseph T. Meadows. Testing would have to be done on a son or grandson or great-grandson (etc.) of this Joseph, with descent strictly through the male line. Francis Meadows, according to his Revolutionary War records, had twelve sons but they were not named in the records. So far six sons have been proven by paper documentation: Francis, Fielding, Anthony, Thomas, Nathan, and St. Clair. Another, Abraham, has been connected through the comparison of Y-DNA tests done on two of his male descendants and a test conducted on a male descendant (me) of Nathan's. The aim of the project is to test male descendants of all of the six proven sons and male descendants of the other suspected, but not proven, sons in hopes of tying them together genetically. Please reply only if you have information pertaining to my question. I have done no research on the Rogers family and know nothing about them. Thank you. Arley Meadows Important Note: The author of this message may not be subscribed to this list. If you would like to reply to them, please click on the Message Board URL link above and respond on the board.