Personally, I think it is a GOOD idea. Many lists have more than one type for SURNAMES. This one will enable interested folks to discuss only the CD names etc. I find on the "regular" ROGERS list that I find most postings are not in my line, and with this list, I can choose what line to inquire or post about. I haven't wanted to unsubscribe from the ROGERS-L for fear I might miss something, but it takes up a lot of time reading EMails that I can't use. Lola HAYES, INMAN, LIPPENCOTT, MARSH, ROGERS, SANFORD, SMITH All of Medina Co., Ohio from VT, CT, MA, NJ, via NY 1800s ----- Original Message ----- From: Dan <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2000 11:13 AM Subject: Re: [ROGERS] message > To be Frank and quite honest I DO not see any reason to start another ROGERs > type list, or undermine one that is already going fine, I protest this New > list and have filed a complaint to RW for duplicating ROGERS-L > As for a CD project I also have a CD Writer , should have our own list > project ? > I see no reason to have any more Rogers lists to have to deal with . > > Any one else have any views on this ? > > Dan > ==== ROGERS Mailing List ==== Archives? http://www.rootsweb.com/rootsweb/members/archives.html RootsWeb Mailing Lists -- Interactive Search http://searches.rootsweb.com/cgi-bin/listsearch.pl ============================== Personalized Mailing Lists: never miss a connection again. http://pml.rootsweb.com/ Brought to you by RootsWeb.com.