>From: Cindy Walcott <[email protected]> >Subject: RE: Uriah Hoyt/Pamela Robblee >Date: Sun, 24 May 1998 16:42:45 -0400 >... >I do not think Pamela Rublee m. Uriah Hoyt is the child of William and >Katurah. She is not mentioned in any of the Lanesborough records, nor in >William's will. I do not know how she is connected. Uriah and Seth Hoyt >(married Keturah "Catherine", d. of William Robblee) were brothers. My >hypothesis would be that Catherine and Pamela were cousins, not sisters. > Her death record does not shed any light on this. > >Many people from Lanesborough MA settled in New Haven, VT -- then >significant numbers went on to Franklin Co., VT mostly to Berkshire. It >IS funny that of the Robblee/Rublees, the women's families all stayed on >and the men went north. Except -- circumstantial information indicates >that one daughter's family went on to Berkshire -- Rebecca (Rublee) >Jeffords. > >I have not been able to trace Stephen Haight, second husband of Keturah >(Baker) Robblee. However, the source for much of my information on Hoyt >is a genealogy on the Haight, Hoyt and Hight families. I agree that >Stephen Haight may be related to the Hoyts of Lanesborough and New Haven. > >Cindy > >