Thanks Karen . ----- Original Message ----- From: <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 1:25 PM Subject: [RIPROVID] Re: Glendinning > Hello, > I checked on my Vital Records of RI CD, and while there wasn't anything on > those specific names, I submit to you those names I found under Glendinning. > Perhaps they could be of help at some point. > > Deaths > Earl B Glendinning Feb 15, 1920 5mos > kin: Louise R and Regina > Mary E Glendinning May 31, 1918 39yrs > Kin: husband William, kin Regina Glen(this is the way it appeared on the > Cd) > > Marriages > Anna E Glendinning to Walter T Smith April 24, 1901 > > Births > Henry E. Glendinning Oct 5, 1904 > Parents: Henry D & Maud M . > > No recordes on Clendinning > no recordes on marriage of William Walker & Catherine Collins > > Good luck > karen > RI > > > ============================== > To join Ancestry.com and access our 1.2 billion online genealogy records, go to: > http://www.ancestry.com/rd/redir.asp?targetid=571&sourceid=1237 >

Hi, I am trying to do a reverse look-up in history that pertains to a Providence RI. I think I was looking for the wrong address (mistaking a 2 for a 3). To figure out what an official wrote on a 1905 ship manifest I decided I should look at how the author of that manifest wrote the numbers 2 and 3 elsewhere on the manifest, to see if that would help decipher what I was looking at. Looking at the complete manifest, lines 8 and 10, you can see the ages of some the immigrants. The first is 23 and the second 24 years of age. Both having examples of the numbers 2 and 3. http://www.sentex.net/~tolenio/napolitan.gif The 2's are very distinct from the 3's. So now I wonder if the address I should be looking for is; 334 Pocasset Ave; http://www.sentex.net/~tolenio/POCASSET.gif Never thought I would need to learn handwriting analysis, but something that rookies like me should think about when picking up only small bits of information off old manifests. Opinions anyone? Is it 334 or 234 or something else? Later, Tom -- Thomas Olenio Ontario, Canada Hardiness Zone 6a

Hi Tom, I think that you are definately on target with 334. Elaina ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tom Olenio" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 12:28 PM Subject: [RIPROVID] Pocasset Avenue > Hi, > > I am trying to do a reverse look-up in history that pertains to a Providence RI. I > think I was looking for the wrong address (mistaking a 2 for a 3). > > To figure out what an official wrote on a 1905 ship manifest I decided I should look > at how the author of that manifest wrote the numbers 2 and 3 elsewhere on the > manifest, to see if that would help decipher what I was looking at. > > Looking at the complete manifest, lines 8 and 10, you can see the ages of some the > immigrants. The first is 23 and the second 24 years of age. Both having examples > of the numbers 2 and 3. > > http://www.sentex.net/~tolenio/napolitan.gif > > The 2's are very distinct from the 3's. > > So now I wonder if the address I should be looking for is; 334 Pocasset Ave; > > http://www.sentex.net/~tolenio/POCASSET.gif > > Never thought I would need to learn handwriting analysis, but something that rookies > like me should think > about when picking up only small bits of information off old manifests. > > Opinions anyone? Is it 334 or 234 or something else? > > Later, > Tom > > -- > Thomas Olenio > Ontario, Canada > Hardiness Zone 6a > > > > ============================== > To join Ancestry.com and access our 1.2 billion online genealogy records, go to: > http://www.ancestry.com/rd/redir.asp?targetid=571&sourceid=1237 > > >