Hi Sue, The Samuel of 1796 does not appear in Wallace and that is because Wallace followed a direct descendant line so therefore the information of the siblings and their children and not detailed. For instance, for Edward III and his 11 children, Wallace picks up only Samuel (1681) and his descendants but does not follow Samuel's brothers or sisters. I have not reached the point yet where I have filled in any of these blanks either. Hopefully, the information will come together. If I get anything about your Samuel I will pass it on. Carolyn sent me a copy of her book also but somehow our systems don't make the transfer well. Could you send on the electronic file so I can see if maybe that might work? Thanks, Sarah