Loree - I'm sure Ann will straighten us out. When I didn't find the marriage in the online Ancestry database, I looked at the LDS site. When I found the marriage there, it said the data was from their film for Warwick, Kent, RI computer printout - marriages, but I didn't see where it referenced the OS 9 and OS 17, so I was thinking the marriage was on the RI CD, but not on the corresponding online database. Your message reminded me that I have a civil war CD that doesn't work very well. I have to see what the problem is. I set it aside because it was annoying me, then I forgot all about it. Thanks, I think..... Lisa ----- Original Message ----- From: "Loree" <Loree@dc.rr.com> To: <RIGENWEB-L@rootsweb.com> Sent: Monday, April 17, 2006 7:29 PM Subject: Re: [RIGENWEB] RI Vital Records CD > Lisa... I have the Ancestry CD, and use both the Ancestry online version and use to use the CD, which I now cannot get to work on my computer. GGrrrrr. Ann will have to answer that questions about whether the Conly-Keely marriage is on her CD. I read the originial note a couple of times, and finally concluded (perhaps wrongly) that the marriage she found was only on the LDS I.G.I. and not on the CD.... For sure, Vol. 9 and 17 don't relate to the year 1855. > > Loree > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Lisa Lepore > To: RIGENWEB-L@rootsweb.com > Sent: Monday, April 17, 2006 4:16 PM > Subject: Re: [RIGENWEB] RI Vital Records CD > > > Is this CD the same as the database on line at ancestry.com? > Rhode Island Marriages, 1636-1930? > > The reason I ask is that this Keeley/Conly marriage is not included > in the on line version. > > Lisa > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Loree" <Loree@dc.rr.com> > To: <RIGENWEB-L@rootsweb.com> > Sent: Monday, April 17, 2006 12:35 PM > Subject: Re: [RIGENWEB] RI Vital Records CD > > > > Ann - those are Providence records. The CD contains -just- > Providence records. Occasionally you find an event that happened in > "North Providence" or Cranston.... and very, very occasionally, > Warwick. Not sure how that happened.... except, maybe, the priest > just happened to be in the vicinity of the Providence recording place > rather than the local recording office... The few from Cranston I've > found, have been either in the Olneyville/Cranston area or the South > Providence/Elmwood area. The town border lines are right there. > ...Can't explain Warwick..... > > > > The Original Source number you quote are Providence Vol. 17, pg. 29 > and Providence Vol. 9, page 147. > > > > LDS has filmed the vital records from Kent Co.; also Cranston, East > Providence.... > > > > Hope that helps. > > Loree > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: AHarney > > To: RIGENWEB-L@rootsweb.com > > Sent: Monday, April 17, 2006 9:24 AM > > Subject: [RIGENWEB] RI Vital Records CD > > > > > > Does anyone know if the reference numbers in the above records > relate to a > > specific city record? > > I.E.: > > OSPage: 17:29 > > OSPage: 9:147 > > > > I know this CD does not contain Pawtucket and area. Wonder if it > covers > > Warwick / West Warwick? > > > > If found this on the familysearch.org page from the IGI and can > find no > > further reference: > > > > PATRICK CONLY > > Marriages: > > Spouse: MARY KEELEY > > Marriage: 22 JUL 1855 Warwick, Kent, Rhode Island > > > > TIA, > > Ann > > > >