RootsWeb.com Mailing Lists
Previous Page      Next Page
Total: 8020/10000
    1. returned email - looking for Nancy Mauro
    2. Deborah A. Sweeney-Faiola
    3. I'm concerned about Nancy, all my emails to her are coming back. Has anyone spoken to her recently? Thank you, Debbie

    02/16/2006 08:28:28
    1. Re: [RIGENWEB] Laurence - Begin families
    2. Possibly this one? Sophia Catherine Lawrence born 27 August 1835 to a Phineas and Catherine in Hopkinton, married a Mr. Reed. She died October 13, 1904 in North Providence? Nancy-Jo Nunez A Genealogy Enthusiast ...Member of Rhode Island Genealogy Society, Connecticut Genealogy Society, New England Genealogical & Historical Society, Killingly Historical Society, Rhode Island Historical Society, Santa Clara California Genealogical Society, Northern California Genealogical Society. Searching...searching...searching... "History is a great teacher. Read it, understand it, ponder upon the first and last chapters as well as the middle. It makes the present so much more understandable and less perplexing."

    02/16/2006 12:17:09
    1. Laurence - Begin families
    2. LOOKING FOR INFO REGARDING THE FAMILY SOPHIE LAURENCE. IN 1870 LIVED IN WARWICK WITH FOLLOWING: CELEINA[DAU-AGE 17]/FRANCOIS -AGE 14/ALBINA [DAU-AGE 12]/ JOSEPHINE [DAU-AGE 8]/ VICTOR -[SON - AGE 4] I THINK SOPHIE WAS WIDOW. HER DAUGHTER ALBINA LAURENCE MARRIED ACHILLE BEGIN IN AUGUST 1880. ANY INFORMATION ABOUT SOPHIE AND THE REST OF HER CHILDREN MUCH APPRECIATED. THANKS - MARIE MCSHANE

    02/15/2006 10:38:19
    1. Re: RIGENWEB-DFamily search.org
    2. I have been having trouble with this site for some time. I found by going to google.com and typing in Latter Day Saints site, I can get there. Judy Brooks Truchon

    02/15/2006 08:01:23
    1. family search.org
    2. HI LISTERS again... I just got back in from being out. And low and behold the familyserach .org was up and woroking once again... Musy have been something online... that was causing a programm.... Marie McShnae

    02/14/2006 09:41:51
    1. Re: [RIGENWEB] family search
    2. I tried a .org website earlier this morning and it Could Not Be Found. Maybe ALL the .ORG Sites were down for some technical reason? e

    02/14/2006 06:39:34
    1. Re: [RIGENWEB] family search
    2. WARREN A BARBER
    3. I just tried FamilySearch.org and found no problem. Suggest you try again. Warren ----- Original Message ----- From: mimitwo2@cox.net<mailto:mimitwo2@cox.net> To: RIGENWEB-L@rootsweb.com<mailto:RIGENWEB-L@rootsweb.com> Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2006 12:30 PM Subject: [RIGENWEB] family search HI LISTERS - HAS ANYONE HAD ANY PROBLEMS WITH TRYING TO GET THE FAMILYSEARCH.ORG PAGE TO OPEN ? I HAVE TRIED SEVERAL TIMES TODAY AND I GET A MESSAGE THAT THE PAGE CAN NOT BE DISPLAYED. JUST WONDERING.... MARIE MCSHANE ==== RIGENWEB Mailing List ==== Visit and/or join our Rhode Island off topic Mail list http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Rhode_Island/?yguid=86367525<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Rhode_Island/?yguid=86367525> Subscribe: Rhode_Island-subscribe@yahoogroups.com<mailto:Rhode_Island-subscribe@yahoogroups.com>

    02/14/2006 05:39:53
    1. Re: [RIGENWEB] family search
    2. M.E.Sorensen
    3. Glad to hear I'm not the only one. I couldn't get it yesterday or today. M.E. ----- Original Message ----- From: <mimitwo2@cox.net> To: <RIGENWEB-L@rootsweb.com> Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2006 12:30 PM Subject: [RIGENWEB] family search > HI LISTERS - HAS ANYONE HAD ANY PROBLEMS WITH TRYING TO GET THE > FAMILYSEARCH.ORG PAGE TO OPEN ? I HAVE TRIED SEVERAL TIMES TODAY AND I GET > A MESSAGE THAT THE PAGE CAN NOT BE DISPLAYED. JUST WONDERING.... > MARIE MCSHANE > > > ==== RIGENWEB Mailing List ==== > Visit and/or join our Rhode Island off topic Mail list > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Rhode_Island/?yguid=86367525 > Subscribe: Rhode_Island-subscribe@yahoogroups.com >

    02/14/2006 05:36:53
    1. family search
    2. HI LISTERS - HAS ANYONE HAD ANY PROBLEMS WITH TRYING TO GET THE FAMILYSEARCH.ORG PAGE TO OPEN ? I HAVE TRIED SEVERAL TIMES TODAY AND I GET A MESSAGE THAT THE PAGE CAN NOT BE DISPLAYED. JUST WONDERING.... MARIE MCSHANE

    02/14/2006 05:30:10
    1. Re: [RIGENWEB] AshleighDaigle
    2. Glad I didn't open it. Must have been a scam. Claire

    02/14/2006 05:15:25
    1. Re: [RIGENWEB] family search
    2. A. S. Balch
    3. Yes, I could not open it, this morning. Adrian ----- Original Message ----- From: <mimitwo2@cox.net> To: <RIGENWEB-L@rootsweb.com> Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2006 11:30 AM Subject: [RIGENWEB] family search : HI LISTERS - HAS ANYONE HAD ANY PROBLEMS WITH TRYING TO GET THE FAMILYSEARCH.ORG PAGE TO OPEN ? I HAVE TRIED SEVERAL TIMES TODAY AND I GET A MESSAGE THAT THE PAGE CAN NOT BE DISPLAYED. JUST WONDERING.... : MARIE MCSHANE : : : ==== RIGENWEB Mailing List ==== : Visit and/or join our Rhode Island off topic Mail list : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Rhode_Island/?yguid=86367525 : Subscribe: Rhode_Island-subscribe@yahoogroups.com : :

    02/14/2006 04:39:53
    1. Re: [RIGENWEB] family search
    2. Arlene Haddock
    3. It did not open for me either; however, I have found that usually they are working on the site. It opened tonight for me. I wish there was a way for them to say so instead of putting up the message that the page cannot be displayed. Arlene --- mimitwo2@cox.net wrote: > HI LISTERS - HAS ANYONE HAD ANY PROBLEMS WITH > TRYING TO GET THE FAMILYSEARCH.ORG PAGE TO OPEN ? I > HAVE TRIED SEVERAL TIMES TODAY AND I GET A MESSAGE > THAT THE PAGE CAN NOT BE DISPLAYED. JUST > WONDERING.... > MARIE MCSHANE > > > ==== RIGENWEB Mailing List ==== > Visit and/or join our Rhode Island off topic Mail > list > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Rhode_Island/?yguid=86367525 > Subscribe: Rhode_Island-subscribe@yahoogroups.com > > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com

    02/14/2006 04:27:14
    1. The Blackstone Canal (part 5 of 5)
    2. Beth Hurd
    3. continued from part 4. "The final trouble that the canal involved came in constant quarrels between the boatmen and the various mill owners over the water itself. The latter were drawing just enough water for their manufacturing to ruin the boatmen's business, and there was many a near riot over the matter. Mill owners even went so far as to tip loads of rocks into the locks so that the barges could not pass through and the boatmen threatened to set fire to the mills. All this trouble might have been avoided had enough money been raised in the first place so that the canal company could have controlled all the water rights. But matters went from bad to worse, and in 1848 the last toll was collected on barges. Before that time portions of the canal had been closed to passage. Providence auctioned off the boathouse terminal, and the following year the locks and land as far as Woonsocket were sold. Taking the place of the canal was the new railroad, connecting the same two towns and giving rise to the remark that of 'the two unions between Worcester and Providence, the first was weak as water -- the last strong as iron.' One can still trace the route of the old canal as it follows along the Canal Street, by the American Screw Company's works, and under Randall Street. Farther out in the country it becomes distinct for various intervals, disappearing entirely where it has been filled in. It was a noble experiment, one which could easily have been more fruitful in its results, and we might have seen the picturesque barges moving slowly along today through the Lower Blackstone River Valley." for more info: http://www.woonsocket.org/canal.html http://www.worcesterhistory.org/ex_blackstone.html http://www.blackstonedaily.com/RG-chuck.htm

    02/13/2006 06:18:31
    1. Re: [RIGENWEB] AshleighDaigle
    2. Sorry, but I don't know what you are talking about as I haven't sent any messages.

    02/13/2006 05:16:41
    1. AshleighDaigle
    2. Please state the subject of your inquiry. I do not know you so I delete your message unless a specific subject is mentioned. Claire

    02/13/2006 05:11:31
    1. The Blackstone Canal (part 3 of 5 )
    2. Beth Hurd
    3. continued from part 2. "John Brown, with characteristic enterprise, began in 1796 to make the first plans for a canal from Providence to Worcester. He had the enthusiastic support of many influential citizens in both Rhode Island and Massachusetts, but, due to some legislative difficulties with the latter state, his plans never matured. Twenty-six years passed before the subject was brought up again -- this time with success. Citizens in both Worcester and Providence held meetings, discussed the need for a canal, and ended by forming commissions and engaging engineers to investigate every detail which such an enterprise would involve. Benjamin Wright, the chief engineer of the middle section of the Erie Canal, headed the party of surveyors and assayers who laid out the proposed route. The results of the survey were very encouraging. The soil was found easy to excavate. There were large ponds all along the route from which a supply of water could be obtained. The difference in elevation between tide water in Providence and Thomas Street in Worcester was found to be 451 1/2 feet, not a great difference considering that the canal was to be 45 miles in length. After the favorable report of the engineers, promoters of the enterprise went to work to stimulate the enthusiasm of the people with a view to raising the necessary money for the project. The estimated expense was $323,319, and the sum set to be raised was $400,000. Here a first great mistake was made. So successfully did the promoters present the canal proposition that they could have raised $1,000,000 as easily as the $400,000 they asked for. Later on, when the actual cost of the canal proved to be $750,000 and they needed more money, the public had lost its faith in the enterprise and was unresponsive. It was a marked contrast to the mad scrambling for stock when the Blackstone Canal Company was first formed. Then, people in Providence bought all that was offered and hurried to Worcester to buy up any more shares that might have been left over." continued in part 4.

    02/12/2006 01:27:45
    1. Re: Mosher
    2. Carol H
    3. The parents of my were Henry and Ann/Anna Maria, not Mary. Alice was born in 1848 in North Dartmouth, Ma. Thank you for your assistance. Carol Sherman Houghton Searching: Sherman, Briggs, Gibbs, Hall, Smith in New England Houghton, Moore, Palmer, Franklin in West Va., Virginia, Penn. & New York --------------------------------- Brings words and photos together (easily) with PhotoMail - it's free and works with Yahoo! Mail.

    02/12/2006 12:47:04
    1. Re: [RIGENWEB] re connection between Cornell MFEMFEMFEMF and William Littlefield
    2. Donna's Place
    3. Have you checked the GENWEB ARCHIVES for the LITTLEFIELD's ? Someone might have already sent information that would be helpful to you .

    02/11/2006 05:44:07
    1. Re: [RIGENWEB] Re: Mosher Book
    2. Stefanie
    3. Carol, I find no Henry with a wife Mary Anne and daughter Alice. What I do find on page 457 is MOSHER, Charles H. 7 (Nicholas B.6, Gideon5, Nicholas4, Thomas3, Nicholas2, Hugh1) born Warrensbury, Warren Co. NY 5 Oct. 1831; d there 26 April 1868, buried Warrensburg Village cemetery. He m. MaryAnn________, b. ca. 1834. They were living in Warrensbury 1855 Child Alice8 b. 1854 References Census Warrensbury, Warren Co. NY 1855. Warrensbury NY Village cemetery inscrip. Stefanie -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 267.15.6/257 - Release Date: 2/10/2006

    02/11/2006 03:27:58
    1. Re: [RIGENWEB] Mosher
    2. I would like to know the names and info of the Mosher children. I believe one is my ancestor. You may put on my e0mail if more convenient.-bethsergill@aol.com

    02/11/2006 02:44:46