Hello Barbara, I believe you are thinking of the Burgess Reeves b. 1746. I believe he married Frances Mauldin did he not and then they named a son John Mauldin. I don't have much research on that family. I have just noted John Mauldin Reeves as a witness here and there. I am mentioning the Burgess Reeves b. ca. 1794 also probably in Pendleton Dist, He may be a nephew to the earlier one but I have never found any indication that he was his son.. We have discussed Asa and I have kept him in mind but I do not know the answer for you right now. I hope he is connected up before too long. Good luck to you. I will continue to keep him in mind. Tommie

Thanks and happy hunting. Barb ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tommie Smith" <tommiess@sbcglobal.net> To: <reeves@rootsweb.com> Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2007 4:36 PM Subject: [REEVES] Burgess Reeves > Hello Barbara, > > I believe you are thinking of the Burgess Reeves b. 1746. I believe he > married Frances Mauldin did he not and then they named a son John Mauldin. > I don't have much research on that family. I have just noted John Mauldin > Reeves as a witness here and there. > > I am mentioning the Burgess Reeves b. ca. 1794 also probably in Pendleton > Dist, He may be a nephew to the earlier one but I have never found any > indication that he was his son.. > > We have discussed Asa and I have kept him in mind but I do not know the > answer for you right now. I hope he is connected up before too long. > Good luck to you. I will continue to keep him in mind. > > Tommie > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > REEVES-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes > in the subject and the body of the message >