In a message dated 8/4/2007 8:21:08 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time, ERollins10241@aol.com writes: In looking at the 1830 census in Ohio Meigs. There is a Hugh Irwin age 40 to 50 with 2 females age 5 to 10 In 1830 Sarah would have been 5 years of age. Also on the page were many Reeves families. My bet would be on this Hugh Irwin.. In 1850 it says members of these families were born in Pa. So was Ruben Reeves. Maybe they traveled to Ohio together. Sharon Sharon, I tend to agree with you, except that the 1781 Hugh M. IRWIN is my line and all the information I have seen on him does not support him having a daughter named Sarah, that is UNTIL you brought up the 1830 census. The last child I have of Hugh & Jane is Susannah b. 1823. Since Jane was only 40 years old in 1830, she could very well have had another daughter in 1825. So now I ask, "why the mystery" ? Does anyone have an obituary on any of Hugh's children that might mention a sister named Sarah (IRWIN) REEVES ? Dave - _Famsource@aol.com_ (mailto:Famsource@aol.com) ************************************** Get a sneak peek of the all-new AOL at http://discover.aol.com/memed/aolcom30tour