RootsWeb.com Mailing Lists
Total: 2/2
    1. Re: [QUEEN] James S. Queen kit 38694
    2. GlendaP
    3. Gene - Thanks for checking for other surnames matches on this kit. Hope I didn't offend anyone by asking. It will be interesting to see what the lab does on their second try! Oh by the way - Rolla I LIKE the changes on the web site - with the link for the 'wider' version. Thanks again. It'll be interesting to see what the next results are. Can't wait! Glenda

    01/02/2007 12:11:18
    1. Re: [QUEEN] James S. Queen kit 38694
    2. O. Eugene Queen
    3. I certainly wasn't offended at any question. I do, however, have a burr in my britches regarding the results reported by the lab for this sample. (I've just been able to snort privately until now.) If these results at markers 50-60 hold, then at least we are due a major explanation from the lab. How could a nearly perfect match (off 1) at 37 markers blow apart into hyperspace on markers 50-60? Another bit of "matching" info. When there are no (or a few) matches of non-Queens at 37; it is not possible to generate matches by upping to 67. This old sucker still works: match at 12, then upgrade to 25; still match at 25, then upgrade to 37; match at 37, then there had darn well better be some fairly solid matches when upgrade to 67. If inadequate matches at 12; then the boat has been blown out of the water for matches at 25>37>67. Rolla...........c'mon in. Argue? Gene ----- Original Message ----- From: "GlendaP" <gprieba@cox.net> To: "QResearchers" <QUEEN@rootsweb.com> Sent: Tuesday, January 02, 2007 7:11 PM Subject: Re: [QUEEN] James S. Queen kit 38694 > Gene - Thanks for checking for other surnames matches on this kit. Hope I > didn't offend anyone by asking. It will be interesting to see what the > lab does on their second try! Oh by the way - Rolla I LIKE the changes > on the web site - with the link for the 'wider' version. Thanks again. > > It'll be interesting to see what the next results are. Can't wait! > > Glenda > > > > > When replying to a digest post, quote only the specific text to which you > are replying, removing the rest of the digest from your reply. Also, > remember to change the subject of your reply so that it coincides with the > message subject to which you are replying. > > > TO VIEW PREVIOUS EMAILS BY SUBJECT, GO TO THE THREADED ARCHIVES AT > http://archiver.rootsweb.com/th/index/listowners > > TO VIEW PREVIOUS EMAILS BY DATES AND SUBJECT GO TO THE SEARCHABLE ARCHIVES > AT http://archiver.rootsweb.com/th/index/listowners > >> http://webpages.charter.net/rlqueen/DNA/queenmarker.htm >> >> http://www.familytreedna.com/public/queenDNA/ > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > QUEEN-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes > in the subject and the body of the message

    01/02/2007 12:54:53