No argument. I agree with your analysis (for the most part!) Rolla -----Original Message----- From: queen-bounces@rootsweb.com [mailto:queen-bounces@rootsweb.com] On Behalf Of O. Eugene Queen Sent: Tuesday, January 02, 2007 4:55 PM To: GlendaP; QResearchers Subject: Re: [QUEEN] James S. Queen kit 38694 I certainly wasn't offended at any question. I do, however, have a burr in my britches regarding the results reported by the lab for this sample. (I've just been able to snort privately until now.) If these results at markers 50-60 hold, then at least we are due a major explanation from the lab. How could a nearly perfect match (off 1) at 37 markers blow apart into hyperspace on markers 50-60? Another bit of "matching" info. When there are no (or a few) matches of non-Queens at 37; it is not possible to generate matches by upping to 67. This old sucker still works: match at 12, then upgrade to 25; still match at 25, then upgrade to 37; match at 37, then there had darn well better be some fairly solid matches when upgrade to 67. If inadequate matches at 12; then the boat has been blown out of the water for matches at 25>37>67. Rolla...........c'mon in. Argue? Gene