RootsWeb.com Mailing Lists
Total: 2/2
    1. [QUEEN] New results coming in
    2. Rolla Queen
    3. The New Year greets us with at least 3 upgrade results that should prove interesting, another brick or three out of the wall. I will post those results as soon as I get some additional information from the participants for those 3 results. In the meantime, the 67 marker results of KIT 38694, going back to James S. Queen, 1819, are becoming more interesting. The participant has speculated a connection back through William Lewis Queen, but at the 37 marker level, the results are so dramatically different that it begs the question of considering some scenarios. How firm or speculative is the connection from James to William Lewis, and how is it being documented. Is there cause in these results to propose that this test may actually represent a break from the Old William line prior to Old William. There is a clear relationship established in the results, the question is how far back we go till we find the last common ancestor, before or after Old William. Or does this represent a DNA anomaly, some event of fast mutating alleles? Rolla

    01/02/2007 01:02:04
    1. Re: [QUEEN] New results coming in
    2. Rolla Queen
    3. Correction - statement should state "at the 67 marker level, the results are so dramatically different"

    01/02/2007 01:07:58